Offers for readers

The comment stream

Reader poll

Who do you think should be appointed Reserve Bank Governor to replace Alan Bollard when he retires in September?

Choices

Rent or buy?

Posted in Property

The Rent or Buy report - New Zealand

31 January 2012

A monthly assessment of renting a property verses taking out a mortgage.

To buy or to rent, that is the question...

The purpose of this Report is to help you decide when to move from renting to owning. The indicators in here show whether you should continue to rent-and-save-for-a-deposit, or when the time is right to buy.

For many, the goal of owning your own home remains a powerful objective - one we support. But affordability issues can be serious barrier to achieving this, and renting is often seen as a ‘second best’ outcome – what you are left doing if you can’t afford to buy.

However, this Report is aimed at renters who want to buy, and suggests when conditions are appropriate to make the move from renting to owning.

Firstly, the assumptions

We assume you are a first home buyer household, renting a 3 bedroom house and paying a median rent. Your household income consists of one male median income and one female median income from the 25-29 age group.

We assume you want to buy a similar house, but as you are starting out, it will be one priced in the first quartile. You have saved a deposit based on 20% of your household income for the past four years to a maximum of 20% of the house price. The resulting mortgage is for 25 years as a traditional table mortgage. In this report, the two-year fixed mortgage interest rate is used until August 2010. From September 2010 onward, this research has adopted a variable or floating interest rate as the market is shifted to a lower and cheaper rate on a floating basis.

The rent or buy results for December 2011:

In December 2011, it takes 24.9% of household take-home pay to service the mortgage and related household costs on a lower quartile priced house.

But it also takes 23.0% of household take-home pay to make the median rent on a 3 bedroom house.

That means in December  2011, it takes 1.8% more of your household income to afford the mortgage than to rent. Of course, this assumes you have saved the deposit to afford a mortgage, and that may well be another big barrier for many.

It takes a household 3.3 years (with a saving rate of 20%) to save a 20% deposit, as now required by most banks.

 

Key drivers in December 2011:

Rent affordability

The median weekly after tax income for a first-home buyer household in New Zealand was $1,431.82 in December, up from $1,429.51 last month and up from $1,394.81 in December 2010.

Median rent for a 3 bedroom house in New Zealand was $330 per week, unchanged from last month’s $330 and up from last year’s $320 per week.

In December, it takes 23.0% of your after tax income as a first home buyer household to pay the median rent of a 3 bedroom house. This is down from last month’s 22.1% and unchanged from last year’s 22.9%

Home loan affordability (HLA)

HLA measures of the percentage of after tax income needed to service the mortgage of a lower quartile house bought in November.

Factors that determine this figure includes house price, interest rate, income, rates, insurance and maintenance.

In December, a floating mortgage rate of 5.74% and a lower-quartile house price of $255,000 will require a weekly mortgage payment of $308.38 This is down from last month’s $315.28 and down from the $308.68 that was required the same month last year.

In addition to the mortgage payment, this analysis also includes the household costs of rates, insurance and maintenance, amounting to $47.94 per week.

This is equivalent of 24.9% of the after tax income of a first buyer household income. This is down from last year’s 25.4%.

 

 

Full regional reports are available below: 

- New Zealand (159kb .pdf)
- Northland (159kb .pdf)
    - Whangarei (159kb .pdf)
- Auckland (159kb .pdf)
    - Auckland Central(159kb .pdf)
    - Auckland North Shore(159kb .pdf)
    - Auckland South(159kb .pdf)
    - Auckland West(159kb .pdf)
- Waikato and Bay of Plenty (159kb .pdf)
    - Hamilton (159kb .pdf)
    - Tauranga (159kb .pdf)
    - Rotorua (159kb .pdf)
- Hawkes Bay and Gisborne (167kb .pdf)
    - Napier (159kb .pdf)
    - Hastings (159kb .pdf)
    - Gisborne (159kb .pdf)
- Manawatu and Wanganui (159kb .pdf)
    - Palmerston North (159kb .pdf)
    - Wanganui (159kb .pdf)
- Taranaki (159kb .pdf)
    - New Plymouth (159kb .pdf)
- Wellington region(159kb .pdf)
    - Wellington City(159kb .pdf)
    - Wellington Hutt Valley(159kb .pdf)
    - Porirua (159kb .pdf)
    - Kapiti Coast (159kb .pdf)
- Nelson and Marlborough (159kb .pdf)
    - Nelson (159kb .pdf)
- Canterbury (159kb .pdf)
    - Christchurch (159kb .pdf)
    - Timaru (159kb .pdf)
- Central Otago Lakes (159kb .pdf)
    - Queenstown (159kb .pdf)
- Otago (159kb .pdf)
    - Dunedin (159kb .pdf)
- Southland (159kb .pdf)
    - Invercargill (159kb .pdf)

Here is a cool tool that helps you assess a range of factors.

Note to Editors

This work must be referred to as the interest.co.nz rent-or-buy Report. It has been produced by www.interest.co.nz. Please direct queries via email to info@interest.co.nz, or see our contact information below.

 

Sources / Definitions / Methodology

Targeted renter or buyer: An individual in the 25-29 year old age group that buys the lower-quartile priced house with a deposit as calculated below.

Interpreting this Index

These affordability indexes measure the proportion a weekly median rent for a 3 bedroom house and a weekly mortgage payment is of weekly take-home pay. A separate measure is generated for each region, plus a national one, and for other various mortgage interest rate terms.

Household Weekly Income

The source on which we base our estimates of weekly income, is now the LEEDS (Linked employer-employee data survey) data from Statistics New Zealand.

A household of one male and one female, both on full median incomes, is used.

Income tax rates from IRD are used to calculate a take-home pay (which is the LEEDS-based data net of the specific income tax rate).

Deposit - First home buyer index: 

As house prices vary by region to a larger extent than wages, we refrained from using a simple 10% deposit-90% mortgage rule to emulate a first home buyer. Instead, to capture the disparity between incomes and house prices we estimate the deposit as a function of savings – that is 20% of weekly income saved for 4 years, plus interest earned at a 90 day deposit interest rate.

Home Loan: (Lower quartile house price less the deposit)

Mortgage repayments are based on the value of the home loan, paid weekly for 25 years, using the 2 year bank average interest rate. The home loan is assumed to be a standard table mortgage, where both interest and principal is repaid in a fixed weekly payment made in arrears. The repayment is calculated using the tools on our Calculators section.

Mortgage Rates

Average mortgage interest rates are sourced from www.interest.co.nz. These averages are for banks only as banks have 90%+ of the mortgage market. Affordability calculations are done for mortgages at the floating rate and one year through to the five fixed-rate terms. In this report, the two-year fixed mortgage interest rate is used. This is, and has been the most popular term. However, the market is shifting to longer term rates, and the index reviews allow for keeping track of affordability issues as this shift happens.

House price data

Median house prices are as reported by the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand. Although the REINZ series is more volatile than the QV equivalent, there is a highly positive correlation between the two series. The REINZ series is more current and offers an earlier indication of market trends.

Saving Rates

Average savings interest rates are sourced from www.interest.co.nz. These averages are for banks only, and use the 90 day term deposit rate. Saving calculations take into account the individuals marginal tax rates as defined by IRD.

Rents

This study uses data sourced from the Department of Building & Housing tenancy bond service, focusing on median rents for a 3 bedroom house.

Rates, Insurance and Maintenance

These are costs paid by a landlord and included in rent. To ensure this Rent-or-Buy analysis is fair, we have assumed the following costs will be incurred by homeowners:-

Rates and insurance – The average rates and insurance costs are sourced from the Household Economic Survey published by Statistics New Zealand.

Maintenance – Based the average weekly property maintenance related expenses as sourced from Statistics New Zealand.

Disclaimer

IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ

No reader should rely on the contents of this report for making a specific investment or purchase decision. The information in this report is supplied strictly on the basis that only overall market trends are being reported on, and that all data, conclusions and opinions expressed are provisional and subject to revision.

If you are making a specific investment or purchase decision, you are strongly advised to seek independent advice from a qualified professional you trust.

The conditions and disclaimers set out in our Terms and Conditions are applicable to this report as well.

This report is made available on these terms only, and JDJL Limited or www.interest.co.nz is not responsible for any actions taken on the basis of information in this report, or for any error in or omission from this report.

 

Contact

For more information, contact

Bernard Hickey 
Managing editor,
www.interest.co.nz

JDJL Limited
206 Jervois Road, Herne Bay
PO Box 47-756, Ponsonby
Auckland, New Zealand

Phone:  (09) 360-9618
Mobile:  021 866-051 
Fax:       (09) 360-9319

Email:   bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz

7 Comments

All this discussion about the

All this discussion about the price of everything ( and the value of nothing ) leaves me cold.  I just spent my lifes earnings on a beautiful block of land where I will happily while away my time and play at being self sufficient as much as possible. I will happily be buried there under a tree, and if its worth a whole lot less when that time comes, I care not a fig. If it cost me 0.0024% more per acre  to buy it in March 2011 than It would have if I had invested the deposit and waited till 3rd quarter 2015 or something of the like, would I have been better off? Or should I have bought it in Waikikamukau where land is 3.72% cheaper than it was last year. Its not about how much you make over time, its about what you make of the time you have got.  

Murray I agree absolutely. 

Murray I agree absolutely.  And here is an item which discusses the consumption value of owning your own home.

http://baselinescenario.com/2011/05/13/renting-and-buying-compared/

 

The salient part:

  • Now for the usual caveat: Everything above discusses buying a house as an investment. Most people get more consumption value from owning a house than from renting an equivalent house because most people get utility from living in a place that they own. They like the security, the ability to make modifications to the house (even though most of those modifications are probably money-losers), and so on. Also, in many markets you just don’t have a choice. I live in a small college town, and the rental market here is primarily geared toward students, so it’s hard to find a nice house for rent (especially one that will let you have a dog, which we did when we moved here). So there are plenty of good reasons to buy a house other than the idea that it’s a good investment. Those are valid reasons why you might buy a house even while thinking that it’s a bad investment. Except for scale, it’s no different from, say, eating at a nice restaurant now and then. Buying an expensive dinner is a lousy investment, but it gives me consumption value.

(Emphasis added)

 

Kwak continues:

  • As Rappaport says,

“Homeownership, at least until recently, was often described as a great investment that also includes a place to live. More accurately, homeownership should have been described as a place to live that also includes an expected investment benefit.”

  • There is an expected benefit there, but remember that it’s not that big and it comes with greater financial risk.

In addition note Kwak says  

  • " as your expected holding period decreases, owning becomes less attractive because you have less time over which to amortize the transaction costs."

I would comment that the converse applies " as your holding period increases, owning becomes more attractive because you have more time to amortize the transaction costs." so if we moved less often we aould gain more.

 

I have been in flats and it

I have been in flats and it sucks. You can't beat owning your own home. its all yours, no crappy landlords mucking you around. No flatmates moving out in the dead of night, or having to chase up for bills money.

You own your home, and there's no people crap to put up with, and after 15 or 20 years its all paid off and then there's no more mortgage to be payed, and your pay is all yours to do with, what ever you want to do with it.

You can't beat it.  Thats only my point of view of course.

 

I know this report is updated

I know this report is updated regularly.

However I still await reference to the "opportunity cost" of the saved deposit funds.

As I see it when you buy your house you not only have to pay out interest on a mortgage together with the other ongoing expenses. You have also given away income on the 20% deposit.

For example $80000 saved and earning 5% is $4000 annually before the tax so possibly $3000 net on average is also  given up.

There must be a new monthly

There must be a new monthly report about now.

Please Bernard, can we address the "opportunity cost" on the deposit and come up with "real" figures?

Another 6 weeks gone by so I

Another 6 weeks gone by so I guess any answer on the opportunity cost of a deposit is either not relevant or "too hard"???

Hey guys, I'm not sure that

Hey guys, I'm not sure that the LEEDS dataset should be used for this survey...it doesn't include students, pensioners, beneficiaries etc...

After looking at the Statistics website, the NZIS would be a better dataset because it includes a wide range of sources. LEEDS just uses people in paid work, and in NZ we have about 300,000 people of working age on welfare - and they should really be included.

Below is a quote from the Statistics website:

"The NZIS includes “income for everyone over the age of 15 years and over, including those not in paid employment” (Statistics NZ, 2008a, p2).

This means that, unlike the Quarterly Employment Survey (QES), the Labour Cost Index (LCI) and the Linked Employer-Employee Dataset (LEED) job-level datasets, the NZIS includes people who are not engaged in paid employment (for example beneficiaries, superannuitants, stay at home parents and students) as well as those receiving both wages and salaries and other forms of income such as government transfers. As a consequence, the NZIS includes income from a greater number of sources, such as income from government transfers (for example benefits and tax credits) and investments as well as from wages and salaries and from self employment. (Statistics NZ, 2008a, p6)"