The comment stream

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Senior Liability Underwriting Manager
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Senior Liability Product Underwriter - Product Management
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
High Performing Senior Liability UnderwriterHigh Performing Senior Liability Underwriter
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Head of Retail Credit -Wellington, NZ
Key leadership position in the bank. Be a part of one of the fastest growing banks in New ...more
New Zealand
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

ASB makes changes to NZ$1 billion 'Jobs Creation' fund after 2.7% uptake of low interest loans

Posted in News

ASB has lent only NZ$27 million from a NZ$1 billion 'Jobs Creation' fund it set up in February, with a lack of applications leading it to announce changes to the scheme in an attempt to make it more attractive to businesses. The changes are in part to make the fund look more attractive to exporters, ASB said, as they play a lead role in the recovery of the New Zealand economy.

The fund was set up ahead of the government's jobs summit in February as a vehicle to lend to businesses which could demonstrate a loan from the fund would create jobs, or prevent existing jobs from being lost. However, with such a low level of uptake over the previous six months, ASB has expanded the loan options, intoducing the option of a 4.75% floating interest rate for loans.

The fixed rate option for loans is now at 5.75%, after initially starting at 5%. Loan rates will apply for two year terms, and the floating rate will remain at 1% below ASB's variable housing rate for that time.

These rates are well below regular business lending rates. Reserve Bank of New Zealand figures show banks' weighted aggregate business base lending rate was 9.86% in August.

ASB Chief Executive of Relationship Banking, James Mitchell, said that so far ASB had lent just over NZ$27 million from the fund, which is just 2.7% of the available funds. This was "very low" from what had been expected, hence the changes made today. So far, ASB had made 70 loans to companies which had created or saved just over 540 jobs, Mitchell said.

Applications to the fund had also remained low, with a lack of enquiries that went through to actual applications. Mitchell said that if every company that applied had met the scheme's requirements, ASB would have lent "perhaps another NZ$20 million" from the fund.

ASB said it had now specifically reserved NZ$250 million of the fund to lend to exporters, with options available for foreign currency funding. Of the 70 firms ASB had lent to, these were "not largely exporting companies," Mitchell said, "so we're doing this to broaden the appeal."

"Exporters play a lead role in the recovery of our economy, and these low interest loans can offer some relief against a high New Zealand dollar," he said. "Setting aside NZ$250 million of the loan fund for exporters is one way we can support their businesses during these difficult times."

The application cap of NZ$10 million per loan remains in place to stop the fund being consumed by large businesses, such as Fonterra, with large balance sheets, Mitchell said. The minimum loan amount is NZ$100,000.

"We want to lend the money," Mitchell said. "We copped a bit of criticism in the media when we launched it, with our competitors saying it was a gimmick to gain headlines, but it is a genuine inititative to help the economy."

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

Oh goody a blank thread,

Oh goody a blank thread, love a blank thread. Recently we have been reading comments from pro bubble posters pointing out how houses today are much bigger than a while ago and therefore cannot be said to be greatly more expensive, that the figures on cost of homes were misleading.....while it seems to me that the sections are a good deal smaller and a bloody sight more expensive....so maybe it all balances out, so that we can accurately say properties today are a dam sight more expensive than they ought to be. Not that the govt gives a stuff, in fact I am of the opinion that Key and English are very happy to see families sinking in debt and destined to a life of misery feeding the Effing banks. That's Ruddspeak readers.

Oz are lucky to have

Oz are lucky to have the ruddy man . We're rudderless , no key to our future .