In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 20739
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 294
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand
Reporting to the Head of Finance - Retail and Business Bank the key focus of this role is ...more
New Zealand
This role in consultation with the Financial Controller provides financial, strategic and ...more
New Zealand
If you are motivated by the prospect of seeing the big picture, developing your team and m...more
New Zealand

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 'Don't sell SOE shares; Borrow from Kiwis' 105
- Record exodus to Australia in last year 75
- 'Councils should look at asset sales' 34
- Fonterra cuts payout forecast 23
- English wants more house builds 21
- 90 seconds at 9 am: No G8 deal 20
- NZ to borrow more if crisis worsens-Key 19
- Beware of the creeping taxman 19
- Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 18
- Thousands get lower rates; what now? 17
Most viewed
Serious Fraud Office lays 21 charges against 5 people 'involved with South Canterbury Finance's affairs' over alleged NZ$1.7 bln fraud
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has laid 21 charges against five so far un-named people involved in failed lender South Canterbury Finance's affairs in what it alleges is a NZ$1.7 billion fraud, exceeding anything in the history of New Zealand white-collar crime.
Meanwhile, the Financial Markets Authority (FMA), which after its own South Canterbury Finance (SCF) probe, will supply information supporting some of the charges filed by the SFO at the Timaru District Court today, is eyeing action to try and recover some of the NZ$1.58 billion worth of taxpayer money paid out to SCF investors under the Crown retail deposit guarantee scheme after the company's collapse last year.
SFO chief executive Adam Feeley said, after a fourteen-month investigation into a variety of transactions involving SCF, the SFO had laid the charges.
“However, until such time as the charges are first heard before the Court, and any issues regarding suppression have been fully dealt with, it would not be appropriate to make any comment on which individuals have been charged," Feeley said.
He said the charges allege a variety of offences, including theft by a person in a special relationship; obtaining by deception; false statements by the promoter of a company; and false accounting. The offences carry maximum penalties of between seven and ten years imprisonment.
"The total estimated value of allegedly fraudulent transactions is approximately $1.7 billion, which includes an estimated $1.58 billion from entering the Crown Retail Deposit Guarantee Scheme," Feeley said.
“The collapse of SCF was one the most significant of all the failed finance companies. The value of the fraud alleged to have been committed exceeds anything in the history of white-collar crime in New Zealand, and the time we have taken to complete this matter is a reflection of that scale," Feeley added.
The SFO revealed in October last year it was investigating five SCF related party loans made between 2005 and 2009 for potential false statements or other fraudulent conduct. See more here in this Double Shot interview with Feeley.
Related Topics
FMA eyes action to recover taxpayer money paid out to SCF investors
Meanwhile, FMA chief executive Sean Hughes also said the FMA was examining possible ways to take civil proceedings in order to recover some of the money paid out to SCF investors under the Crown Retail Deposit Guarantee Scheme.
The FMA said its support of the SFO case comes after it completed its own criminal investigation of SCF. Hughes said the FMA will supply particulars of false statements in two SCF prospectuses to support some of the SFO charges.
"The untrue statements relate to the level of loan impairments and the availability of banking facilities," Hughes said.
“As with other investigations into failed finance companies, FMA has worked closely with the SFO on this case. A single prosecution is more efficient and is consistent with FMA’s Enforcement Policy, which allows for joint prosecutions where appropriate," Hughes added.
“We have also taken into account the fact that the Crimes Act charges laid by the SFO carry heavier maximum sentences than Securities Act charges targeting the same behaviour. Convictions on Securities Act charges would be unlikely to add to the penalties resulting from the SFO charges.”
SCF collapsed into receivership on August 31 last year triggering a NZ$1.58 billion taxpayer funded payout to 35,000 of the company’s investors under the Crown retail deposit guarantee scheme. Receiver McGrathNicol has so far recovered NZ$395 million and the government expects it to recoup about another NZ$285 million for taxpayers. The government also provided the receiver with a NZ$175 million loan to repay SCF's prior charge holders, including Pyne Gould Corporation's Torchlight, which was repaid by McGrathNicol in February.
(Update adds detail, SFO comments).
23 Comments
Does this mean that some of
Does this mean that some of the money that the smarties made from knowing that the government guarantee was going to be amended will be clawed back?
Moreover, does this mean
Moreover, does this mean the taxpayers crack a bottle of someone else's bubbly - or is Hubbard's cupboard bare?
"charges allege a variety of
"charges allege a variety of offences, including theft by a person in a special relationship; obtaining by deception; false statements by the promoter of a company; and false accounting. The offences carry maximum penalties of between seven and ten years imprisonment."
Jeez all 5 must be so thankful for their white collars....Time to spruce up the mansion and prepare for home detention..now which lawyer will get sick first I wonder.
I think you're likely right,
I think you're likely right, Wolly. Given the independent judiciary’s construction of justice and punishment in this country I fully expect that any of those found guilty of New Zealand's largest ever billion dollar crime to expect to feel the full weight of the law. Two weeks home detention and a thoroughly good telling off. We won’t have any of that 154 years for Bernie Madoff’s billion dollar crimes nonsense in this country, thank you very much.
By the way, can you tell me, in the judicial sense of course, what is the difference between being fully independent and aristocratically arrogant?
Heck DB...that's a MOOT point
Heck DB...that's a MOOT point mate....it would keep the lawyers busy for...oh ten years at least....or until the money ran out! The judges however have longer time frames cos their money never runs out.
Two weeks HD is a tad light and rather cynical of you....they face at least 6 months home detention and can expect to have their legal fees paid for by you....gosh if any of them are members of the National Party...they are likely to be black balled...for at least three meetings or until they get new wigs and learn how to look humble.
Haha, that is enough to pay
Haha, that is enough to pay off a few judges.
How is it that you are smart enough to steal 1.7 billion, but too stupid that you get caught?
Worse case scenario a couple of months prison in the paratai drive mansion.
I wasn't aware that there
I wasn't aware that there were any Paratai Drive mansions in Timaru, scarfie?
In a small town, smart
In a small town, smart ,wealthy lawyers and accountants can get away with murder. These guys got too big for their boots . They totally abused their positions and thought they could do what they bloody well liked. They all need to experience serious jail time ,bankrupted and barred from business for the rest of their pathetic lives.BUT,we all know after a bit of home D,They will be back terrorising little old ladies.
And the tax payer pays
And the tax payer pays for their defence.......
1.7 Billiion is no small amount.....
I was right .....
I was right ..... ;)
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
July 6th, 2009 at 11:28 pm
We new this was going on 2.5 years ago eh Bernard.
SOUTH CANTERBURY FINANCE
SOUTH CANTERBURY FINANCE DEBACLE
It would appear the taxpayers are going to be unnecessarily in the hole for about $1 billion for this debacle. The "recovery" is a disgrace.
One does tire of the hillbilly political / commercial culture in this country. And the gullible economic retards out there.
In 1920 New Zealand had the highest GDP per capita in the world, according to the Angus Maddison Historical GDP Tables (refer bottom left column my website). Today - according to the IMF we are ranked 33 - a whisker below Slovenia.
Hugh Pavletich
www.PerformanceUrbanPlanning.org
I know this is a bit touchy
I know this is a bit touchy feely......That is just to get your.....ATTENTION.
And a wee bit premature...before the actual court case is heard, but it seems based on past performance, it is never the verdict, but the justice system that is at fault in treating all these fiascos as a white collar crime, with no real victims, so leniency prevails.
Perhaps if the victims took a razor to the crims, it might gain some real...ATTENTION.
Not that I advocat that BURNHARD....the Devils Advocate.....it would be a crime.
That ATTENTION is needed as the Commerce Ommission and Governance and idle GOVERNMENT as a rule....to date have never done its job as far as I can remember.
(Except when acting under urgency to get a pay rise, then ATTENTION is paid....and so are they).
Seems that there is no real justice left, no matter what the crime, the size, the severity, nor what assets are seized in the name of the CROWN...it is never ever, enuff.
Thre birds have flown, the money has flown, but the victims REMAIN....though sometimes...not.
The victims still seem to lose out in a big way. How can they trust a failing system.
Even the repatriations have been inflated away into thin air.
The Banks seem never to leave any trail of the proceeds, it all seems to have vanished into thin air.
TRUST funded computer crime is rife it seems, not thin on the ground..
When you cannot trust a computer to even transfer money immediately, without clipping the ticket...because it has been swapped and derived to death, who can one trust....even when the funds are yours...they are not.
Which brings me to the point I was really going to make.
As usual my rambles have a point...and this is a big POINT.
It seems that the number of suicides of elderly investors who have had it all stolen as a rule.....has increased....SO PAY...ATTENTION.
Now assisted suicides are illegal, but I think the very same culprits are the same ones who seem to get off with Home Detention....as a rule... of thumb.
And that home has been inflated as well during their detention, so they seem to win on both counts, but are not accountable for the...............VICTIMS....who lost everything...including their lives and livelyhoods in the Ponzi Scemes we promote...today..
Just hoods thumbing their noses at us all....it seems......and usually on Legal Aid..to boot. ...as are the lawyers.
(I call it working for the TAXMAN...but then...as a rule....they can hide the truth....but not from ME....but I digress....)
Or a paltry 35K fine and a fine house in Aussie....and off and running...again as they export the crims and crimes back to the homeland...of the hood....since time immoral.
(Silly me I thought all the descendants of criminals were in OZ...but we seem to have superceded that .....but nothing else).
It seems that this form of state funded largesse is largely to blame, so I blame the people who make the rules, but cannot ABIDE...by em themselves.
(YET.... cannot see the woods for the trees and the expenses and the pay rises and the photo ops and the trips..overseas......and the weddings and the TV and the GANG SHOWS...and game shows and stage shows and radio shows and the side shows involving tea...but not JUSTICE).
(See yesterdays rant about rules as a rule, shows they are not paying...ATTENTION)
Maybe the IRD needs to have the TRUST FUNDS under its mantle, Mr Key and Mr English and Mr Joyce....MR BANKS is ex police....so not without mention.
Otherwise the voters may be all deceased TAXPAYERS, before any true justice RULES.... prevail.
A razored approch is entertainment today. ...a reasoned approach is not.
But have we learnt nothing about the ineptness of the rule of law, since the crims were shipped overseas from the UK to oz...and uz..
The GANGS may have changed...but the LAWS have not kept up with the DEMAND.
So I DEMAND attention from all you VOTERS.
SENSIBLE SENTENCING ......FOR INSENSLESS...CRIMES....or else.
Maybe we need a minister of that.....without haste.... and with no real teeth...NATURALLY.
Just smile and wave...if ye acknowledge.
3 years will do....do not hurry.....most of these crims are getting long in the tooth....but some of their victims......ARE NOT.
Suicide is a measure of ones true FAILURE....please pay...ATTENTION.
GET TOUGH..or GET....OUT.
Has anyone seen Bill or
Has anyone seen Bill or Connor around lately?
Whitebaiting out of
Whitebaiting out of season....such is the privildge for our illustrious duo....
Justice!!!!!! $1.3b now
Justice!!!!!! $1.3b now $1.7b! Greedies having a lovely time - we're forever blowing bubbles * * * * !
Where does FORSYTHE BARR AND
Where does FORSYTHE BARR AND SANY MAIER fit into all this.Surely they along with lachie new all this was happening.
In an interview after the SFO
In an interview after the SFO probe was announced last year Adam Feeley said Sandy Maier was not under investigation.
How are they going to get any
How are they going to get any money back. Even if these guys are found guilty and sent to prison, You can bet your life everything they have will will be sown up tight in trusts, that our politicans designed for them to do just that.
Labour are a bit rich running down the current lot, when all these finance companies hit trouble under their watch and did nothing.
No worries Ivan...the banks
No worries Ivan...the banks will be lining up to lend them the dosh to pay the fines...expect it to run into oh maybe ten grand each!
The Greens, like Labour, want
The Greens, like Labour, want an inquiry:
Government must answer questions over SCF bailout
The Green Party is supporting calls for an investigation into the Government’s management of the Crown deposit guarantee scheme, following the Serious Fraud Office laying charges over South Canterbury Finance (SCF) transactions worth $1.7 billion.
“It appears fraud may have occurred while South Canterbury Finance was covered by the Government’s retail deposit guarantee scheme. That indicates a complete lack of Government oversight,” said Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman.
“While there were good reasons to introduce the guarantee scheme, it was critical the scheme was managed in a way that minimised tax payer liability. The Government’s management of the liability relating to SCF is now highly questionable.
“The public needs to know what Treasury and the Government were doing to stop alleged fraud happening while the taxpayer was underwriting SCF. It seems whatever they were doing wasn’t enough.”
The Auditor General’s report on Treasury’s management of the Crown Retail Deposit Guarantee Scheme criticised the Treasury and the Government for not managing the size of the Crown’s potential liability. Deposits with SCF grew by 25% after the guarantee was put in place and Treasury did not attempt to moderate this behavior, ‘even when it could see the Crown’s potential liability increasing’.
“The Government and Treasury need to take responsibility for their actions. There is mounting evidence they made poor quality decisions that benefited those who invested in SCF over the taxpayer,” said Dr Norman.
“When such large companies entered the retail deposit guarantee, it was important to minimise any cost to the public. On the face of it, this wasn’t the case with SCF, so an inquiry is needed to clear things up.
“We support the Labour Party’s call for a thorough inquiry. It should happen immediately. Any inquiry should also cover the use of consultants by Treasury and their role, if any, in this affair.
“We need to determine if tax payer’s money has been wasted on SCF through poor decision making, a lack of on-going oversight, and inaction on alleged fraud,” said Dr Norman.
Yes and why we are at it, can
Yes and why we are at it, can we have an inquiry into why the Securities Commission under Plane Jane did nothing while all these finance companies were going under, again all while Labour were in Govt.
Anyway going now, lunch time.
Enjoy your coffee & Sky TV
Enjoy your coffee & Sky TV with Jane!
The fact that the SFO is
The fact that the SFO is laying charges does not mean much. They often get it wrong, and in the case of the Winebox could not get it right even with the help of the judiciary. I remember my tax law lecturer telling us what serious problems they have in doing their duty, and then I saw it it for myself in court one day.