sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

BNZ grows December quarter business lending at more than double pace of housing lending; Deposit growth outstrips both combined

BNZ grows December quarter business lending at more than double pace of housing lending; Deposit growth outstrips both combined

By Gareth Vaughan

The Bank of New Zealand's December quarter profit surged 93%, boosted by gains on financial instruments and tumbling loan impairments. The BNZ also lent more than twice as much money to businesses as to residential mortgage customers, although deposit growth outstripped the bank's new lending.

BNZ's General Disclosure Statement (GDS) for the three months to December 31, 2011 - the first issued by a major bank that covers this period - shows it grew "other term lending", largely lending to businesses including farmers, by NZ$571 million in the quarter to NZ$26.704 billion.

The business lending growth is likely to be the strongest, or near strongest, among the major banks for the quarter. According to Reserve Bank credit sector data, business debt rose NZ$1.675 billion in the December quarter to NZ$73.718 billion and agriculture debt fell NZ$311 million to NZ$47.332 billion. In the September quarter BNZ grew lending to businesses by NZ$496 million, more than any other bank, which BNZ attributed to new lending across the agriculture, commercial and institutional sectors.

In the three months to December, BNZ grew its housing loans by NZ$244 million to NZ$27.626 billion with residential mortgages with loan-to-valuation ratios (LVRs) of 60-69%, 70-70%, 80-89% and over 90% all rising and only loans with LVRs of 0-59% falling. This continues a recent trend across the big banks of loans with LVRs above 80% rising.

Gross loans and advances overall grew by NZ$802 million to NZ$57.901 billion, with the increase well shy of the NZ$1.813 billion increase in deposits from customers to NZ$33.167 billion. This included an NZ$819 million rise in term deposits to NZ$19.805 billion.

Profit jumps to NZ$289 mln from NZ$150 mln

Meanwhile, BNZ's net profit after tax surged NZ$139 million, or 93%, to NZ$289 million in the December quarter from NZ$150 million in the same period of the previous year. This came as gains less losses on financial instruments - such as hedging, foreign exchange and fair value of financial assets and liabilities - at fair value jumped NZ$124 million to NZ$139 million and impairment losses on loans fell NZ$36 million to just NZ$3 million.

Net interest income rose NZ$24 million, or 7%, to NZ$358 million and operating expenses were unchanged at NZ$196 million. 

Total impaired assets fell NZ$45 million to NZ$614 million and 90 day past due assets fell NZ$11 million to NZ$191 million. BNZ's total assets fell NZ$2.598 billion to NZ$71.487 billion and total liabilities fell NZ$2.921 billion to NZ$66.815 billion with total shareholders' equity up NZ$323 million to NZ$4.672 billion.

The bank's tier one capital ratio fell to 8.76% at December 30 from 8.99% at September 30 and its total capital ratio rose to 12.17% from 11.84%. The Reserve Bank mandated minimums are 4% and 8% respectively, although BNZ, because it still has debt covered by the Crown Wholesale Funding Guarantee Scheme, must retain a tier one capital ratio of at least 6%. See more here from the Reserve Bank on bank capital adequacy ratios.

This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers this morning. See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

1 Comments

I think it will be a rock and a hardplace for banks....and drops in rates hard to predict...maybe that will happen for 6 months....then....The problem is a mortage is a 25 year commitment....and you just dont know...

When we finally get deflation (and at that stage I think many ppl will be able to see its a 5 or 6 year -10% per annum slope) then I wonder with the banks leverage and the asset value of the houses on their books deflating just how long it will be before they are technically bankrupt. On the other hand will the banks get anyone willing to lend to them? if not then mortgage rates could go high.....and at that point say on 10% mortgages on a house losing 10% per year thats a huge loss for a household....so no one will be taking out mortgages....and at that point house prices look to collapse a long long way....hence I think 50% minimum loss, 75% doesnt look that crazy...

Some hard Qs to be asked in the future...its crystal ball time....I think Stoneleigh has the best insight so far....no one will be lending, but no matter no one will be borrowing....price collapse is scary, she thinks 90%....ouch...

So many unknowns, so much iteration.....so many variables on even the knowns.

regards

Up
0