sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Aussie media turns on Aussie property; Mrs Assad wears the pants; Portugal the new Greece; Why the oil spike could derail global recovery; Coup talk brews in China; Fracking in NZ; Dairying and reckless nitrogen use

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Aussie media turns on Aussie property; Mrs Assad wears the pants; Portugal the new Greece; Why the oil spike could derail global recovery; Coup talk brews in China; Fracking in NZ; Dairying and reckless nitrogen use

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 1 pm in association with NZ Mint.

I welcome your additions in the comments below or via email tobernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop the extras into the comment stream. See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #9 from Jon Morgan, who has slammed dairy's performance on our waterways.

1. Infighting in China? - Gordon Chang writes at Forbes that there may be more than meets the eye to the latest drama in China's political leadership.

The sacking of Bo Xilai as Mayor of Chongqing last week was sensational.

Now Chang reckons the battle is far from over.

And he suggests the military may be called on to adjudicate on any factional splits.

He even uses the coup word.

Plenty to see here. Don't move along now.

We were told that the upcoming transfer of power, from the so-called Fourth Generation leaders to the Fifth, would be “smooth” and uneventful. They were wrong.  For one thing, Bo is still holding on to his seats on the Central Committee and the Politburo, giving him the opportunity to fight back.  And at the height of the crisis in Chengdu, he ran to the 14th Group Army in Kunming, in Yunnan province. Bo’s move is widely seen as an attempt to get the military involved on his side in this ever-widening struggle.

In this environment, it is not surprising that in the last few months there have been rumors of coups, all of them fascinating, none of them confirmable.  But we have to remember that people do not talk of military takeovers when a regime is stable.  And people are gossiping now because they know how powerful the military has become.

That’s undoubtedly why Hu Jintao issued a warning of his own on Monday.  In Beijing, he reminded military officers that the People’s Army was subordinate to the Party.  As a retired senior colonel said to the South China Morning Post, recent comments from flag officers have “undermined the absolute leadership of the Communist Party.”

Here's more from Chang in January on coup talk.

2. The media turns on Australian property - Leith van Onselen from Macrobusiness highlights the way the Australian media has turned from being property bulls to property bears over the last year or so.

He points to this piece on A Current Affair (A bit like Close Up or Campbell Live) about Australian property.

3. Frack off - Peter Griffin writes at Sciblogs there's a need for an independent investigation into fracking in New Zealand.

The time would seem to be ripe for a robust and independent investigation into fracking.There is a hodgepodge of anecdotal accounts, randomly referenced studies, claims and counterclaims about fracking, doing the rounds in the media. There will be much more in the coming months. We need an independent view on this to cut through the confusion.

That’s also the view of New Plymouth mayor Harry Duynhoven. Despite the wealth oil and gas companies generate for his region, he told 60 Minutes that it was time for an independent inquiry. It is the only thing that is really going to give those communities in areas where fracking is used or is planned for, some certainty one way or other about the safety of it.

4. She wears the pants - The Telegraph's Alex Spillius reports that the First Lady of Syria thinks she really runs the country. Fair enough.

Mrs Assad’s “dictator” comment was made partly in jest during an exchange with a friend about how much attention spouses typically pay to each other.

“As for listening – I am the REAL dictator, he has no choice ...” she wrote on Dec 14. Her use of the word in reference to her husband suggests she understands how others regard him.

5. The new threat - The Telegraph's Ambrose Evans-Pritchard reports the IMF's Christine Lagarde is warning the recent spike in the oil price could derail any global economic recovery.

“Optimism must not lull us into a false sense of security. The global economy may be on a path to recovery, but there is not a great deal of room for manoeuvre and no room for policy mistakes.” The warning came after Brent crude reached $126 a barrel last week, hitting all-time highs in euros and sterling. The US and Britain have agreed in principle to release supplies from their strategic reserves if necessary, but so far no decision has been taken on this.

The bilateral accord did little to soothe jittery markets. Traders saw it as a signal that Washington is moving closer to a military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Bank of America said the latest oil spike is nearing the pain barrier. It has pushed energy costs to almost 9pc of global GDP, a trigger for world recessions over the past 40 years. “For 2012, we believe the global economy cannot afford oil prices above $130,” the bank said.

6. Portugal is the new Greece - Ambrose also points to comments from PIMCO's Mohamed El Irian that Portugal will be the next of the PIIGS to need a bailout.

“Unfortunately, that is how it will be. It will make the financial markets nervous because they are worried about a participation of the private sector,” he told Der Spiegel over the weekend.

German finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble insists that Greece is a “completely unique case” and that there will be no further haircuts for banks, insurers and pension funds holding eurozone sovereign bonds.

However, the EU authorities broke their pledges so many times during the Greek saga that market faith has been shattered. Even Norway’s sovereign wealth fund has expressed disgust, signalling that it will give Club Med debt a wide birth from now on. It has already sold half its Spanish bonds.

7. America's not very credible stress tests - Jonathan Weil has written a tough piece at Bloomberg arguing the US Federal Reserve's stress tests on its banks weren't very convincing.

The results of the Fed’s “comprehensive capital analysis” are more about public relations and manufacturing confidence than they are about disseminating reliable information on banks’ health. Citigroup Inc. (C) was deemed well capitalized under the government’s methodology when it got bailed out in 2008. So was CIT Group Inc. when it filed for bankruptcy in 2009.

How stressful were the Fed’s tests? One anecdote stands apart: Regions Financial Corp. (RF), which still hasn’t paid back its bailout money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, passed.

The footnotes to the company’s latest financial statements tell the story. There, the Birmingham, Alabama-based lender disclosed that the loans on its books were worth $8.1 billion less than what its balance sheet said, as of Dec. 31. By comparison, the company’s tangible common equity, a bare-bones measure of net worth, was $7.6 billion.

So if it weren’t for the inflated loan values, Regions’ tangible common equity would have been less than zero, with liabilities exceeding hard assets. In short, the test was a joke, although it had its intended effect. Shares of Regions and other large banks soared, and Regions raised $900 million selling common shares on Wednesday. The company, which hasn’t reported an annual profit since 2007, plans to use the money to help repay the $3.5 billion it got from the Treasury Department in 2008.

8. Rout in US Treasuries market - Keep an eye on this. Long term interest rates have risen sharply since the middle of last week. Here's Bloomberg's analysis of the jump.

“For a very long time, the market dynamics in interest rates have been overwhelmed by Fed monetary policy,” said Jeffrey Rosenberg, chief investment strategist for fixed-income at New York-based BlackRock Inc., the world’s biggest money manager which oversees $3.5 trillion. “Has the big inflection point been reached?”

“Global bond markets have enjoyed a three decade long bull rally,” UBS AG currency strategists led by Mansoor Mohi-Uddin in Singapore said in a report to clients on March 16. “But this era is now set to end.”

9. 'Reckless use of nitrogen' - Dominion Post Farming Editor Jon Morgan has some tough things to say about dairying and nitrogen use.

Some disturbing facts have come to light following my call last week for fewer cows on sensitive dairying land. They show an industry which is doing little to curb the reckless use of nitrogen.

I don't think the industry is doing enough. Fonterra has made fencing of all farm waterways a condition of supply from the end of this season. That's good, but, at the least, riparian strips are also needed. Better still would be the reduction of cow numbers on sensitive, porous soils. If the industry won't do this, then regulations are needed.

10. Totally Jon Stewart on Bashar Al Assad's hacked emails.And Larry King's moobs...

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

51 Comments

So, when will the world come right? With justice and prosperity for all?   What was the basis for the prosperity of the UK, USA, NZ, Australia etc over the last 200 years?

Up
0

"right"?  oh dear, never........

"Basis", Cheap and plentiful fossil fuels....ie production was increased anytime ppl wanted more of it.

Oops we cant do that any more....in fact its now a decline for 30 odds years, so,

a) The world wont come "right", at least to how it was say 5 years ago.

b) "Justice and prosperity" for all was an illusion in fact we never had it and what we had we have wasted it....

     i) Expect the world's population to collapse to 1 to 2billion in the next 50 years and not grow to 9.

     ii) Life expectancy will obviously drop to 50, maybe less.

     iii) Super bugs will have a field day....

c) Globalisation is finished......

       i) No consumerism,

       ii) tourism, bye bye.

      iii)  few imports.

      iv) few exports, we will eat what we have...

When you look at say the Russian communist collapse we see GDP falling off a cliff, same with Cuba as they had no Russian oil imports to rely on......drops of 25% per annum quite possible.

regards

 

 

Up
0

Mortgage Belt, I don't usually shout, but:

 

THE BASIS OF GROWTH, IN EVERYTHING, OVER THE LAST 200 YEARS, WAS AN EVER-INCREASING, EVER-CHEAPENING, SUPPLY OF FOSSIL FUEL.

 

There. Lagarde is sounding the warning - she is well aware. Obama tried, obliquely, to sound the warning. Birol - belatedly, very - sounded the warning. How many does it take?

 

Take a look at a combine harvester being pulled by a 4x4 Deutz, and then me Malthus wasn't merely staved-off by the application of fossil fuels to agriculture.

 

In overshoot now, thanks to that wee burst, we have about 5 billion too many on the planet. Justice/ Prosperity?  You're kidding, right?

Up
0

Overshoot, can't wait to see the snap-back from that.  Well at least peak oil will reduce carbon emmissions.  Though technology has greatly increased the ability to grow food without the use of fossil fuels.  Peasants can now grow tomatoes in the Himalyas using some pretty baisic tools to build passive solar greenhouses. 

 

Free birth control would go a long to stopping population growth.

Up
0

Don't you think we will just substitute fossil fuels for electricity when the price gets too high? Probably 80% of all car trips could be done in a purely electric car - imagine how much oil that would save.

Electricity can be produced in a variety of renewable ways, and if that isn't enough there is always nuclear.

Up
0

Jimbo Jones - you comment is just a tad sadder than GBH''s nonsense below.

 

Yes, we do electricity here, and renewbly. We currently use it all, though, and your demand will be 'on top' of that. Do we displace the energy required i our daily transport? No.

 

Do we have the time to effect the morph? No. It had to be done while there was spare capacity in the fossil fuel department, and that's been left too late.

 

Materials ditto. They need the energy to be extracted, even as we attempt to grow from the biggest BAU the planet has ever seen. Can't do both, so say goodbye to 'growth' if we address the issue realtime.

t

Nuclear - current technology - peaks in about 40 years, if asked to take over. Both nuclear and renewables need to be built with oil, remember.

 

Still, compared to the geologically-ignorant comment below, you're more on the pace. Efficiencies wll be the key hereabouts - will free up more of our existing.

Up
0

MB : I think we can all agree that the world has come right ...... it's just that  the green shoots have been lost amid the incessant gloomsterising of the media ...

 

..... but , of course , we've never had absolute  " justice and prosperity " for all ....... not for all .......

 

And a new gamechanger that has slipped under the radar , the boom in energy supplies from shale oil & gas . Ignoring the hystrionics of some folk , the fact is , the earth's crust is chock full of fossil fuels . And the substitution of dirtier coal burning by cleaner natural gas is the next big thing to enrich those country's lucky enough to sit atop shale gas deposits........ horizontal drilling is the way to go ......

 

The good times are already here , my friend , enjoy !

Up
0

EROEI

Up
0

"So, when will the world come right? With justice and prosperity for all?"

Well it is generally accepted by many (particularly Americans) that the USA leads the world.  So what happens there will find its way here; rich getting richer, poor getting poorer until they cannot pay their mortgages at which point there is a property crash.  Mass protesting, police state. etc. etc. etc.

 

 "What was the basis for the prosperity of the UK, USA, NZ, Australia etc over the last 200 years?"

As PDK says, oil.  Cheap oil.  Of course there are other contributing reasons, but this is one of the fundamentals.

 

Up
0

Oh yeah, and perhaps the end of democracy.  I have wondered this for a while, but hasn't democracy only existed in times of excess?  For example times of cheap energy of the 20th century allowed democracy to exist in many countries (voters voting in more and more for themselves).  When times were hard, countries had a ruler (you get told how things are and that's that).  For those who say that ancient Greece used to be a democracy, well perhaps, but they had excess in the form of Slaves rowing ships around the Mediterranean - http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2011/s3361876.htm

 

Up
0

Ahh someone is starting to do some thinking I see. Very good.

Up
0

Maybe that's Gerry's vision for the wee ditch...have the unemployed rowing the ferries...I can see Gerry with whip in paw and his sporty new jacket.

Up
0

5) Yeah - that bloody oil is the real criminal – preventing the world from recovery. Shame on you oil !

 

No, no Walter it isn’t my fault - look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPO9rsnBZRY

Up
0

Gee, maybe governments could remove the mountain of taxes they put on oil?

Interesting graph from OPEC of oil prices in different countries that shows the tax affects:

http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/333.htm

Up
0

and what would that achieve? a temp price reduction, until again the scarcity bites. Now if that saving was put into alternatives and energy efficiency, OK, but it wont be......so better to add tax so businesses and ppl have an incentive to minimalise use.

regards

Up
0

If Christine Lagarde is in any way correct then it could avert the derailing of an economic recovery.

Some how every solution to every problem ends up being yet another tax.

Up
0

No because we are short of increasing oil output.....all you do is put in a delay....so the trend is the problem......

lets say you drop tax, you buy maybe 1 or 2 years and ppl stop thinking of energy efficiecny...

Somehow the solution to a problem over the last 30 years has been to reduce taxes for the rich...it hasnt worked.  Or Pillage the planet yet more, get rids of regs.....thats just can kicking....at best.

An educational film for you....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvoFJsqF1wQ&feature=player_embedded

regards

 

 

Up
0

Dear Mr Belt, try reading this book by Niall Ferguson, the noted historical economist.

http://www.amazon.com/Civilization-The-West-Rest-ebook/dp/B004Q9T4E4/re…

Clear and concise, easy to read and explores some of those exact wider issues and their implications for where we are today.  Although, as he shows, the prosperity gap started more than 200 years ago and his journey starts in 1411, when China was clearly the leader and the west a ramshackle of small kingdoms.

Up
0

Yes and he's biased....so bear in mind its a book and not a pear reviewed pice of work..... something to read with a pinch of salt.

regards

 

Up
0

You can scoff at being widely read if you like but it only makes you narrow minded in the end.

Up
0

Ralph - remember to separate what can be done, energy-wise, from the 'price'. At some point, the driver can't be measured by the driven.

Up
0

No Ive read some of his work and Ive also read the critiques of that and what he says....narrowed minded is you when you blindly follow the dogma you believe in. 

I do my utmost to avoid that trap....others such as yourself seem to wallow being in it....

he fails to take account of energy, he fails to getoutside of his political / economic view point...what he rights is through that lens.

That doesnt make him totally wrong, he has insights....whats interesting is listening to him he almost smes to get it then the lights go out and he;'s just swicthes away......This is a Novel and not a literal, accurate piece of work.

regards

 

Up
0

So you claim to be widely read but discourage others from the same practice.

I'm afraid that's close to text book hypocrisy.

Up
0

No I dont claim to have read widely, I have read what I can in the time I have, and I dont discourage ppl reading him.  I merely point out that they shouldnt take his work at face value but look at other viewpoints, ie read widely as what he writes should be read with care.

So I merely point out that his work may not be fact or close to it but opinion.........

regards

Up
0

My apologies I must have been reading inaccurately.

Up
0

This starts as a good piece by him where he disects the problems quite well, 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtLcalkHgyA

Where he goes "off the rails" is the solutions he thinks its a tax issue and not an energy issue....its deck chair shuffling on his part.....of course he gets some of these ideas from Paul Ryan, a loony republican who's voodoo economics is mind blowing in its errors and downright lies...

Like I said.....read with care....

regards

Up
0

Pear reviewed? As opposed to Apple reviewed.

Uhm, as someone immersed in research, conferences, journals etc I have discovered there is nothing particularly special about a lot of "peer-reviewed" navel gazing and micro-analysing articles leading to .... nowhere ...

Up
0

+1

Up
0

Ralph,

Another book of interest http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Book-of-Books-ebook/dp/B004UFTQP6 outlines (in a non-religious way) the influence of the Bible (on it's 400th anniversary - KJ version) on the advancement of democracy & economic progress, scientific endeavour etc ..

Up
0

Niall Ferguson is not religious as far as I am aware.  Certainly doesn't come across in his book - not there is anything wrong with religion.

He does include the impact of historical religious behaviour in various sections and some interesting views the Chinese leadership have specifically in Christianity (being the western philosophical foundation).

Up
0

He's religious, or dogmatic in his economic and political viewpoint......

regards

Up
0

Please stop these ridiculous sound bites of gossip;

'he's biased'

'he's religious'

'he thinks this (or that)'

'he got his ideas from the fish mongers wife'

etc

Up
0

Not gossip, I can listen to what he says...its not gossip when you can see him opening his mouth and saying he's taken solutions to the USA's economic woes from a Republican whos "economics" is the equiv of the dark ages healthcare.

"he's Religious", no I didnt say that....I see no inclination he's religious in temrs of religion....but then I dont bother looking at religious stuff at all....so its possible.

regards

Up
0

If you drive south after arriving at Auckland airport via Hape drive just over the bridge you are often faced with cows standing in the margin of the estuary defecating directly into the waterway. It is the most visible and viewed example of agricultural pollution so easily mitigated, in full view of one time visitors and kiwis alike. Terrible first impression and an indicator of conditions on a grand scale in rural NZ. I'm a part time farmer myself, understand the financial pressures and prevailing attitudes of the industry. I am sorry to admit that nothing will change in any meaningful way without legislation. 

 

We have got a lot smarter in our application of synthetic inputs but not out of any altruistic sentiment, only  bottom line protection due to the high cost of what amounts to wasted inputs. Nitrogen capture by riparian planting is effective, aesthetically pleasing and beneficial to the ecology of terrestrial and aquatic systems. We know this as fact. Clearly this is not incentive enough. i have yet to meet a contemporary without gorse in his/her pockets! 

 

I think we missed a trick when agriculture was left out of the carbon emissions trading scheme. Offset methane emission with a cost and carbon and nitrogen capture. Now thats incentive. Nitrogen capture could be calculated as equivalent to carbon capture, No?

 

A holistic approach to production and ecology is the only fair estimate of the aggregate impact on our environment as a whole of one industry versus another. Focusing on one variable, namely emissions creates distortion and unfair advantage between industries and seperate operations while failing the regulations intended purpose of long term sustainable practice. A lose lose.

Up
0

Good luck getting an "independant" report on fracking.  Who doesn't have a vested interest?

Up
0

Should be enough real world evidence for that..........

regards

Up
0

Evidence supplied by "vested interests."

Up
0

"Fools never see themselves for the fools they are."

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.co.nz/

Up
0

It's not just dairy that's contributing to nitrogen in the rivers. Pig farmers, with very strong support from the Pork board, are allowed to spread effluent on land adjoining Canterbury's major river. Whilst not actually tipping the pigshit into the river, they are doing the next best thing.

 

But the agriculture lobby is immensely strong; after all, they kept themselves out of the carbon credits. They will continue to pollute unhindered.

Up
0

Im not sure that organic fertilizer is a problem.....though the scale of it could be, the scale however would be significantly  different? 

regards

 

Up
0

This is untreated pigshit from a 1000+ sow piggery that easily makes its way through the porous soil.

Up
0

Good heck and be jeezes there's money in that there pigshit...you grab all you can carry RobinT.

Up
0

I thought you were talking about a farm for a moment there, not parliament.

Up
0

“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” AE
 
 
"This spiral of government sponsored debt financed debacles has shockingly accelerated as we have supposedly been experiencing an economic recovery for the last two years. The 2008 financial meltdown was the result of too much debt peddled to too many people who never had the means or intentions to repay the debt. The Wall Street peddlers of debt didn’t care if it got repaid because they had already packaged it, bribed Moodys and S&P to rate the toxic garbage as AAA, and sold it to their “clients”. Then they made derivatives bets that it wouldn’t be repaid and raked in billions more as their Ponzi scheme unwound. There was just one problem with their master plan. The Wall Street titans made their derivate weapons of mass destruction so complicated and confusing that their own evil organizations of Harvard MBAs didn’t understand them. Enough hubristic CEOs existed at enough financial firms (AIG, Lehman, Bear Stearns, Citicorp) to bring the entire system crashing down as the toxic derivatives intertwined every major institution in the worldwide banking cabal.
 
What has happened since those dark days of 2008 is mind blowing in its epic proportions and epic stupidity. To quote Doug Casey, “Not only haven’t we done the right thing, we’ve done the exact opposite of the right thing.” It is absurd and ultimately suicidal to cure a debt disease by administering massive doses of more debt. But that is exactly what those in power have done. The National Debt has risen from a $9.7 trillion to $15.6 trillion, a 61% increase in three and a half years, while our real GDP has grown by $244 billion, a 1.9% increase. Not exactly a fabulous return on investment. But at least there are 7 million less people employed today than there were at the peak in 2008. Plus, senior citizens and middle class savers have seen $450 billion of annual interest income they were earning in 2008 pilfered from their savings accounts and handed to the Wall Street banking elite through Ben Bernanke’s ZIRP"

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article33668.html

Up
0

Marmigeddon!  The "other black gold" has run out.  Immenent appocalyptic collapse.

Up
0

Why does every post now trend to Malthusian catastrophe?

Up
0

You are the one calling it a catastrophe.

 

Some of us just point out the facts. Do, perchance, think that if we were all optimistic, things would be different outcomewise? It's a hundred years since a few folk gathered optimistically onthe upper deck. You'd think people would realise that emotions don't change actuality.

 

As for the timing, well, it had to start going pear-shaped at some point, and that point is about now. Did you not do your homework?

 

http://dieoff.org/page25.htm

(2nd graph down, I've posted it here often enough. They ran it with 'double resources - ie another planet to chew into - and it made diddly-squat diffo to the timing. As did the 3.6 bbl actual production, have no effect on Hubberts 3 bbl/year call. I take it you know about that?

 

It's simply time to have the limits to growth discussion, as we're upon them now.

 

All the best

Up
0

Did you catch this one from the weekend PDK? The five horsemen he calls them: Chromium, Cobalt, Nickle, Mangenese and Platinum. Less than a generation left at current demand.

 

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article33647.html

 

What is interesting is that it is coming from an investment angle. Chromium in there, which I pointed out last year, those figures appear to be the same I was looking at on USGS.

Up
0

Went to the Nicole Foss (Automatic Earth blog) talk at Otago uni tonight. Some interesting tidbits and discussion. She's speaking around the country. She condensed her thesis to 30 minutes. Very dense/quickfire, it really assumed a degree of familiarity with the material.

Bio http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/nicole-m-foss

Other dates http://sustainable-business.ning.com/events/a-century-of-challenges-nicole-foss-the-nz-lifeboat-tour

A few takeaways -

1. Isolated countries (NZ) suffer more in the event the deflationary depression/debt crisis/peak oil crushes global trade.

2. On the upside we have a lot of resources, and the population is lower than the carrying capacity.

3. Longer term, we'll have a functioning power grid for some time because of hydro.

 

Up
0

"Portugal is now in the batter's box and Spain is on deck. Both will fail, just as Greece did. The only thing that remains to be seen is how much money the ECB throws at those problems before both blow up in the ECB's face"

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.co.nz/2012/03/imf-and-ecb-bailouts-screwed-greek.html

We are rapidly approaching the point where all sov bonds will be avoided by the market...not by idiots...the cost of credit to refi NZs debt is set to rise. The same can be said for bank debt.

Up
0

Hahaaa...if you live in Baker Nevada and drive a couple miles to Garrison Utah, your petrol per gallon will be 81.5 cents cheaper at $3.665.......a ten gallon tank saves you $8.15us....do that twenty times a year....$163

Up
0