sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Should Tiwai Pt become a bitcoin mining data centre?; Why China's slowdown matters; Pollution bonds rather than taxes?; Dilbert

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Should Tiwai Pt become a bitcoin mining data centre?; Why China's slowdown matters; Pollution bonds rather than taxes?; Dilbert
<a href="http://bit.ly/107VHl0">Five key reasons people buy gold and silver</a>

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at midday today in association with NZ Mint.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #6 on how Germans are actually worth less than Cypriots. Really. 

1. The Chinese slowdown - I said last year the change of Chinese leadership would be the biggest thing to matter for New Zealand for years to come.

I said it would be more important than Obama's re-election or even Julia Gillard's ejection.

And so it has come to pass. 

The slowdown in Chinese growth is being engineered by China's new leaders Xi Jingping and Li Keqiang. They are wary of the wrong kind growth driven by debt-fueled infrastructure investment that simply inflates property prices and leads to debt bubbles later on. See # 9 for more on that. 

They want to see more consumption and a better kind of growth that isn't so damaging to the environment.

They also want to crack down on corruption.

Here's Bloomberg on how the corruption crackdown is actually starting to slow growth in the real economy.

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s campaign to rein in lavish spending by officials and state-owned companies is proving so effective that it risks helping end the nation’s economic rebound after one quarter.

Xi’s efforts are restraining consumer spending and making it tougher for the new government to boost domestic demand asfactory output slows. Large-restaurant and catering sales fell for the first time in more than three decades in the first two months of the year, while demand and prices for luxury items such as Moutai liquor and Longjing tea have slumped.

“The anti-corruption action by Xi is creating unprecedented phenomena, including an absolute fall in high-end restaurant sales,” said Shen Jianguang, chief Asia economist at Mizuho Securities Asia Ltd. in Hong Kong, who previously worked for the European Central Bank. “It’s certainly a big factor dragging down short-term growth.”

2. Not so virtual - The beauty of bitcoin seemed that it was so virtual and not connected to physical resources in any way. Except it is. Bitcoin 'miners' use large amounts of computational power (and electricity). An awful lot, Bloomberg reports.

Maybe we should turn Tiwai Pt into a data centre for mining bitcoins. Just kidding. Sort of. HT Jens via email.

Mining is a process in which powerful computers create Bitcoins by solving processor-intensive equations. The idea is to keep the supply of Bitcoins from multiplying too quickly. Bitcoin mining, like mining of precious metals, is supposed to be arduous. By design, the more miners there are, the more processing power is required to mint new coins. Most people aren’t used to thinking in terms of the energy it takes to solve math problems; a few minutes of Excel may not take much energy. But make the problems complicated enough, and things change.

“Mining” Bitcoins takes so much processor power that it’s often done with specialized computers optimized for rapid repetitive calculations. So how much power can that take? Blockchain.info, a site that tracks data on Bitcoin mining, estimates that in just the last 24 hours, miners used about $147,000 of electricity just to run their hardware, assuming an average price of 15 cents per kilowatt hour (a little higher than the U.S. average, lower than some high cost areas like California).

That, of course, is in addition to the money devoted to buying and building the mining rigs. The site estimates the profits from the day of mining at about $681,000, based on the current value of Bitcoins. So mining, at least for the moment, is a lucrative business.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Keep it safe. Keep it in a New Zealand Mint safety deposit box. Details here »
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Just outsource it - The debate within New Zealand's building industry over materials cost inflation is brewing, and so is the appetite to buy overseas as the New Zealand dollar continues to soar. 

Maybe the manufacturing 'revival' linked to the earthquake rebuild won't last as long as some people say...

Anne Gibson at the NZHerald reports on the debate here, citing Ngai Tahu's property boss Tony Sewell.

Sewell said said his organisation was spending up to $100 million on new buildings yet he was extremely unhappy with procurement pricing.

He is concerned builders only source products such as cement in New Zealand.

"They're not spending the time it takes to really get into good procurement and scouring the world. They must be asking questions about why houses here cost $1600sq m to build when the same house and the same quality is half that price overseas. So why aren't they researching that? The answer is they don't have to buy locally," Sewell said.

"This is my interpretation: some people will pick up my challenge and go around the world and there could be a three-year repositioning and New Zealand players will get a pummelling, some of the middle men will be taken out of the scene and the market will reposition," he said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New Zealand Mint. Experts in gold & silver bullion, commemorative coins and jewellery. Details here »
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. The Beveridge curve - The Atlantic reports on the relationship between long term unemployment and job openings. The moral/learning from the story. Don't become unemployed for a long time because the job openings start closing the longer you are unemployed.

It also raises the question: how fair on a particular age cohort is an intense and long period of unemployment in the economy. Just bad luck?

It turns out long-term unemployment is much scarier than you could possibly imagine. 
 
The results are equal parts unsurprising and terrifying. Employers prefer applicants who haven't been out of work for very long, applicants who have industry experience, and applicants who haven't moved between jobs that much. But how long you've been out of work trumps those other factors. As you can see in the chart below from Ghayad's paper, people with relevant experience (red) who had been out of work for six months or longer got called back less than people without relevant experience (blue) who'd been out of work shorter. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Available now. Our brand new 1 oz Taku gold bullion coin. Details here »
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. The Germans are the poorest and the Cypriots are the weakest - So says Wolfgang Munchau in this fascinating FT.com column about median net wealth across the Euro zone. He points out that a lot of Germans don't own houses, while the Spanish and Cypriots do. Munchau suggests it means someone's gotta leave the euro to reflect the real disparities in wealth, given wage and price inflation or migration won't do the trick. HT Tyler Cowen, who also has a nice discussion on the piece.

Measured in terms of the median, German households occupy the last place among all eurozone countries, with net wealth of a mere €51,000, while the median Cypriot household has net wealth of €267,000. The explanation for this gap is the low property ownership rate in Germany – well under 50 per cent. This means that the median German does not own a house, while the median Cypriot or Spaniard does.

In a monetary union, adjustment can only occur through real movements in wages and prices. Since Germany is not inflating, and is not likely to inflate in the future, I see no chance of that happening, even in the long run. My conclusion is that, in the long run, this adjustment will eventually happen through a nominal change in the exchange rates – which means that somebody has to quit the eurozone or resort to a parallel currency.

6. The Cypriot euro - Munchau concludes in his piece that there are now in effect different types of euro in the euro zone, which explains the capital flight to the north. The implication too is the German euro is massively under-valued. The implication for us is if the euro were to break up then all those cheap German cars we're now buying may not be so cheap any more.

Here's Munchau:

Looking back to 1999, my own experience was that restaurants and taxis in Berlin were cheaper than restaurants or taxis in Brussels or Paris, but the differences have now become extreme. Curiously, the price gap also affects tradeable goods: European cross-border retail markets are not working efficiently.

This leaves me to conclude that the unit of account is not really the same across the eurozone – that Spain and Germany have a different euro. This is also the reason why I believe southern Europeans have a rational reason to shift their savings to bank accounts in the north – because this would present the only way to preserve the value of their euros in the long run.

Of course, I would not expect the ECB or any other European institution to conclude that the euro is not the same in Germany as in Spain. It is their job to deny this. But the imposition of capital controls in Cyprus has set a precedent. It now has a new currency. I call it the Cypriot euro. According to the ECB’s study, Germany also has its own currency – the German euro – and it is massively undervalued.

7. Pollution bonds rather than pollution taxes - Here's a nifty idea to make sure polluters accurately pay the 'externalities' of their pollution over time. It's an alternative to a pollution tax. 

8. Land taxes on the Spanish - The Germans really, really don't want to bail out Southern Europe. Here's the latest ideas leaking out of the German think tanks to avoid Germans bailing out the Spanish, courtesy of Ambrose Evans Pritchard.

Senior advisers to Chancellor Angela Merkel are pushing for better-off households to pay towards the cost of any future bail-outs for the weaker members of the single currency.

The proposals, from members of Germany’s council of economic experts, raise the prospect of taxes being imposed on property in a country like Spain if its government was forced to seek a bail-out.

As well as inflaming tensions between Germany and its smaller southern partners, the suggestion could also mean that Britons with holiday homes are dragged deeper into the eurozone crisis.

9. How big is the Chinese debt ? - Reuters reports it may be much, much bigger than even the most pessimistic Fitch estimate used in its recent downgrade of China.

The agency, which downgraded the country's sovereign credit rating this week, puts China's overall sovereign debt at 74 percent of GDP by the end of 2012, of which 49 percent is central government and 25 percent is local.

Dealing with the systemic risk posed by local government debt is seen as one of the key priorities for the administration of China's new president, Xi Jinping. Fears about local debt first arose in the aftermath of Beijing's 4 trillion yuan stimulus package unleashed at the height of the global crisis in 2008.

Recent data indicates that, after stabilizing in 2011, local debt surged again last year as policymakers launched a new wave of infrastructure spending to stabilize the world's No.2economy amid its slowest growth in 13 years.

Fitch's debt-to-GDP tally is far greater than Standard Chartered's estimate of 50 percent for combined central and local debt. Beijing-based macroeconomic consultancy GaveKal-Dragonomics puts the combined figure at 49 percent, while Barclays says 62 percent. In fact, even Fitch's relatively pessimistic estimate may be too rosy.

The head of China's National Audit Office (NAO), which published a detailed survey of local debt in 2011, recently estimated current local debt outstanding at 15 to 18 trillion yuan -- equal to 29 to 35 percent of GDP -- by the end of 2012. That's well ahead of Fitch's estimate of 12.85 trillion yuan and an increase from the NAO's previous estimate of 10.7 trillion yuan in local debt outstanding by end-2010. A former finance minister, Xiang Huaicheng, said at a forum last week that local debt may total as much 20 trillion yuan.

10. Totally Jon Stewart on the 'Empire of the Gun'. Here's the first part.

 

And Part II

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

22 Comments

$1600 a sqm to build in chch...fat chance of holding costs that low...gst and council theft are the killers.

Giving councils the authority to be the building inspection tool...and handing BRANZ a free hand to pump the red tape..these were dumb moves.

Councils are about keeping council power...and that means bodies moving paper...inventing charges on top of fees with gst on top....

And the fatheads in the Beehive still cannot work out why building a box of Rhubarb in NZ costs so much more than it ought to....even after boosting the cost for every house by the best part of $3000 having been conned by the bureaucrats into thinking scaffolding would save ACC payouts....doh

But the banks just love it.

Up
0

Near Chch:  After 4+ years in government, in finally creating a marine reserve in Akaroa harbour they have instituted the first and only thing that has not negatively affected my personal life, my economic well being, the common good, New Zealand's federal or local democracy, or the environment !!! 

 
 

Up
0

#1. They want to see more consumption and a better kind of growth that isn't so damaging to the environment - An oxymoron if ever I saw one.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot - Let's stop hiding behind recycling and be honest about consumption.

As so many in her position do, she was using population as a means of disavowing her own impacts. The issue allowed her to transfer responsibility to others: people at the opposite end of the economic spectrum. It allowed her to pretend that her shopping and flying and endless refurbishments of multiple homes are not a problem. Recycling and population: these are the amulets people clasp in order not to see the clash between protecting the environment and rising consumption.

 

In a similar way, we have managed, with the help of a misleading global accounting system, to overlook one of the gravest impacts of our consumption. This too has allowed us to blame foreigners – particularly poorer foreigners – for the problem

 

We use China just as we use the population issue: as a means of deflecting responsibility. What's the point of cutting our own consumption, a thousand voices ask, when China is building a new power station every 10 seconds (or whatever the current rate happens to be)?

 

Unsurprisingly, hardly anyone wants to talk about this, as the only meaningful response is a reduction in the volume of stuff we consume. And this is where even the most progressive governments' climate policies collide with everything else they represent. As Mustapha Mond points out in Brave New World, "industrial civilisation is only possible when there's no self-denial. Self-indulgence up to the very limits imposed by hygiene and economics. Otherwise the wheels stop turning".

 

The wheels of the current economic system – which depends on perpetual growth for its survival – certainly. The impossibility of sustaining this system of endless, pointless consumption without the continued erosion of the living planet and the future prospects of humankind, is the conversation we will not have

 

 

Up
0

Methinks the "wise men" of Germany have rather let the cat out of the bag. Germany has an export surplus because they underpay the general population using clever sleight of hand. Just like the Chinese aristocracy/bureaucracy do.

 

We have the other problem, we overpay ourselves by borrowing.

Up
0

More on the illegal foreclosures in the U.S.- the details on the investigations are considered "trade secrets" so will not be given to the victims.

http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/fed_messed_with_the_wrong_senator/

Up
0

#3 I love you for letting me say I told you so. Rail against councils all you want - God knows they deserve it even if it's for crimes other than the ones you imagine. But they are not the reason why the median house now costs $400k (not the only one anyway).

 

NZ is a tiny market comprised almost entirely of monoploies, duopolies and oligopolies. Decades ago these businesses worked out that you don't have to operate an explicit cartel to make out like bandits. They all know to keep their mouths shut, don't compete on price, copy the other guy's prices and everyone will make plenty of profit.

Up
0

Everyone please vote Kumbels excellent comment up. Not only makes a very pertinent point with style, but uses oligopolies in perfect context.

If the same laws that bind business in the USA applied here we would have seen management of our building supplies cartel led from their ivory towers in handcuffs to spend the next few years providing cell cleaning services and carnal gratification to big brown fellas with lots of tattoos.

Up
0

Wake up John...here's a thought for you..why not give away shares in Soiled Energy...think of the votes...

The best way to get people to care about our economy is to give them a stake in it
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/9998344/The-best-way-to-get-people-to-care-about-our-economy-is-to-give-them-a-stake-in-it.html

Up
0

Now let me get this right wooly...Proposal

To give NZ's a share in something they (figuratively speaking) already had shares in , all that time enjoying the benifit of cheap power amid a cartel style enterprise.

 By George your right......give them what's theirs to begin with and tell them your doing them a favour.....now that's the stuff of genius and truly worthy of being labelled a Thatcherism

Up
0

Maybe it would help you to feel better about the whole exercise Christov, if I were to tell you that I have no wish to own shares in a power company or for the Government to own shares in a power company in my name, so what you'd be buying is not something you already own - it's something that I already own, and don't want. 

Up
0

Cheers for that Ms de M....felling better already, your generosity is exceeded only by your satirical wit albiet ....slightly taunting.

I was indulging wooly's good humour....for what it's worth.

Up
0

I shall expect a knighthood and no less...

Up
0

And so you should Wooly....services rendered indeed.

Up
0

Has anyone got any views on the mining for oil off NZ ?  As far as I can see the volumes of oil off our coast line is peanuts on the scale of things.  Seems like a waste of time and money.  There maybe more natural gas but oil forget it is just peanuts.

Up
0

Seems to be an emotive issue that one. Opinion ranges from the breathless "We could be the next Norway" to the sad "We should leave it in the ground for future generations". Personally I'm for all for a bit of oil, but perhaps it is lots or nothing at all.

Up
0

RW - i see you are one of those who make it emotive. (sad)

 

Actually, that question must be asked - sooner or later - about all finite resources. If you're ramping into them at increasing rates, it's sooner. Perhaps you may decide ' they can die off", or "they can go without".

 

The denial crap - the fudged comparison of stones with energy being a classic - is just that; denial.

 

So we're back to the oil, hereabouts. Firstly, the fact that we are down to fracking, deep-sea drilling at the whip-end of the planet, ferogen and bituminous sands, tells us that - despite the recent hype - we are scraping the bottom of the barrel. Forget the 'environmentalists vs the developers' sideshow - this is about a descending EROEI, globally.

 

Plot that graph, and the investment isn't returned - indeed most aren't.

 

Also, sequestration is a physical thing. I would have no problem whatever, if the pollution those future generations are being visited with (un-agreed-to-debt, which has to be close to fraud) is mitigated 100%. You don't do that with money, you do that in real time. It takes some of the real energy to do so, and it seems to me the global fiscal system hasn't the leeway to accomodate that. Not surprising, from a physics point of view.

 

In terms of 'lots', it's an irrelevant argument. By the time it came on line - in whatever quantity - the world is a depleted, angry place. All bets, including political stability, are off.

Up
0

"All bets"

Indeed.

regards

Up
0

No, opinions also range to there is nothing there, or what little there is offers no economic return, which are the last 2 by far the most likely.

Consider,

1) the majors have been here, if there was something the size of brazil or bigger they would at the very least lock it in as a reserve they can develop later. They have all exited.

2) Smaller players are showing little interest....

The "next Norway" is farcical. Norway is shallow waters and easy to get to. So the next Brazil or Horizon (remember hat one?) maybe (NB and it wasnt economic). In fact I seem to recall some halfwit saying there could be 1 trillion barrels out there in NZ waters. Mathematically/geologically there are only about 2.3Trillion barrels, virtually all known so another 1trillion is the comment of an imbecile IMHO.

3) "We should leave it in the ground for future generations" is if I recall properly the comment that a Saudi King made, though add on "they will need it"  I think.

Im curious why leaving it in the ground for future generatuons is "sad" how about its a moral thing when in fact the last 2 generations have used 1/2 of what there is (and most of the easy and cheap stuff) in 100 years?

regards

 

 

Up
0

Which is the view of the Industry by the look of it.

Consider,

1) we are an english speaking nation,

2) with a good rule of law,

3) easy to do business in,

4) a keen to do deal Govn,

5) 1st world status,

6) good engineering capability and air routes

7) good ports....

Alternatively Shell has left and is in the likes of Nigeria, or they invaded Iraq and are now trying to hold it down...

Do you really think if there was 200billion or more oil off NZ every man and his dog wouldnt be here?

regards

Up
0

In the seventies I worried about the imminent global ice age and running out of oil next month. I was duped by exciteable types with plausible theories. Having said that I think we were lucky to escape a nuclear war which could oh so easily have happened.

Up
0

In the seventies global population was a bit over half what it is now.

 

In the seventies we had a lot more of every finite resource, and were extracting same at a lesser rate.

 

If you thought it was 'next month', you didn't do your homework. In '75, I had read enough to expect Peak around 2000. It looks like it was 2005 on, although it's academic. Not far off - where did you get the 'information' from? Sure, the US was now vulnerable to the Arabs turning off the taps, whereas before 1970, it wasn't. Did that cloud the vision?

 

Still too much emotion in there, though. Exciteable, plausible, lucky........

 

:)

Up
0

Oi , BH, what's with using the same Dilbert two days in a row? Are things that tight?

Up
0