sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

The World Gold Council's asset allocation strategist says rushing back to cash is probably not a good idea as yields rise, and investors should remember the longer-term historical record of equities, bonds and gold

Personal Finance / opinion
The World Gold Council's asset allocation strategist says rushing back to cash is probably not a good idea as yields rise, and investors should remember the longer-term historical record of equities, bonds and gold
gold and yield

The following is a re-post from the World Gold Council. The original is here.


A lot has been made of the convergence of yields for cash, bonds and equities (on an earnings yield basis), with the higher yield on offer in the cash space leading many investors to reassess their portfolio exposures (Chart 1). 

Chart 1: Yield comparisons

<p class="small-text">*Data from 31 December 2012 to 30 June 2023.&nbsp;</p>

Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council. Global equities is MSCI World Index, UK corporate is Bloomberg Sterling Aggregate Corporate Index, and cash is UK Bank of England (BoE) Official Bank rate.

*Data from 31 December 2012 to 30 June 2023. 

In fact, with cash yields offering compelling reward with little risk and with the balance of economic forces still appearing to be tilted against global capital markets, investors have been rushing into cash over recent months. And after years of unattractive yields, it is of course a welcome change to get some interest on defensive positions. That, however, is different to saying that holding cash today – on a long-term basis – is a no-brainer. Why? Cash yields still aren’t positive in real terms (Chart 2). In the late ’80s, ’90s and pre-Global Financial Crisis, high cash rates were associated with growing spending power. Today it’s not the case.

Chart 2: UK’s real interest rate

<p class="small-text">*Data from 31 December 1988 to 30 June 2023.</p>

Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council

*Data from 31 December 1988 to 30 June 2023.

Considering the above, rushing back to cash today – other than for tactical reasons – is not the obviously good idea it might at first appear to be. There is no certainty its purchasing power will actually hold up. So the key question of where to make long-term investments that can deliver positive real returns remains as relevant as ever, given the inflation outlook.  

From an asset allocation perspective, investors should remember the longer-term historical record of equities, bonds and gold. Moreover, looking for historical guidance on which assets to hold shows the advantages of stretching your time horizon to increase certainty of achieving real returns (Chart 3). 

Chart 3: Maximum and minimum real annualised returns over various investment horizons

Best and worst performance based on annualised real returns over a rolling 1-year, 5-year, 10-year and 20-year basis* 

<p class="small-text">*Data from 1972 to 2022. Computations based on y-o-y returns for each rolling window. Cash: Bank of England official bank rate. Hypothetical balanced portfolio: 60% equities (FTSE 100 Total Return index), 40% bonds (ICE BofA UK gilts Index). Hypothetical balanced portfolio with gold: 60% equities (FTSE 100 Total Return index), 35% bonds (ICE BofA UK gilts Index), and 5% gold (LBMA gold price).</p>

Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council  

*Data from 1972 to 2022. Computations based on y-o-y returns for each rolling window. Cash: Bank of England official bank rate. Hypothetical balanced portfolio: 60% equities (FTSE 100 Total Return index), 40% bonds (ICE BofA UK gilts Index). Hypothetical balanced portfolio with gold: 60% equities (FTSE 100 Total Return index), 35% bonds (ICE BofA UK gilts Index), and 5% gold (LBMA gold price).

Retrospectively, as one moves up the investment horizon, the range of outcomes narrows – even for a balanced portfolio, which is traditionally categorised as riskier than cash. In fact, our analysis shows that the risk-reward profile of a balanced portfolio with gold starts to look attractive relative to cash (as well as a balanced portfolio without gold) after five years. And over any single rolling 10-year period between 1972 and 2022, the worst real return for a balanced portfolio with gold is better compared to both cash and a balanced portfolio without gold. This demonstrates the advantages of focusing on long-term investments and gold’s diversification and return attributes. 

If one stretches the investment horizon further, both balanced portfolios (with and without gold) have the added benefit of always delivering positive real returns over any single 20-year period over the past five decades. By contrast, cash does not, highlighting that long-term overweight cash allocations may come with opportunity costs.  

In summary, our analysis shows that good investment outcomes over a medium- to long-term horizon come from good strategic decisions. Chart 3 underscores why we believe gold has a key role as a strategic long-term investment and as a mainstay allocation in a well-diversified portfolio, alongside equities and bonds.


*Jeremy De Pessemier is an asset allocation strategist at the World Gold Council.


Our free weekly precious metals email brings you weekly news of interest to precious metals investors, plus a comprehensive list of gold and silver buy and sell prices.

To subscribe to our weekly precious metals email, enter your email address here. It's free.

Email:   

Comparative pricing

You can find our independent comparative pricing for bullion, coins, and used 'scrap' in both US dollars and New Zealand dollars which are updated on a daily basis here »

Precious metals

Select chart tabs

closing prices
Source: Kitco
closing prices
Source: Kitco
closing prices
Source: Kitco
closing prices
Source: Kitco

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

3 Comments

Shock horror, the 40th article in a row where the world gold council thinks you should invest in gold.

Up
1

Also, it's blatantly misleading that they've chosen a 5, 10, 15 and 20 year horizon, knowing that 30 and 40 year horizons paint a very different picture. Despicable.

Up
1

I just can't understand why these blatant advertorials are allowed here. Does interest.co get paid to feature this stuff?

Up
1