sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Algae turns greedy for phosphorous from effluent

Rural News
Algae turns greedy for phosphorous from effluent

Agriculture must use all it's creative science expertise to solve many of the issues that confront it's industry,as it strives to increase  production in a ever hungry world.

Effluent disposal from intensive agriculture is a negative spin off to producing more food, and must be sorted if we want to exploit our clean green brand used by our marketers.

Recycling waste to sustain the elements in a healthy soil by this novel algae approach looks like an exciting idea, and farmers will be supportive of research funds being directed this way.

We are constanly reminded of the low investment in Research and Development by agriculture, so in these times of strong commodity prices should all product sectors be increasing the levys to fund these projects?

Your views?

Professor Andy Shilton, School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, and his team have the grant from the Marsden Fund managed by the Royal Society reports Rural News. The fund is designed to allow researchers to do 'blue sky', innovative, long term science in particular areas. Phosphorus is of critical strategic importance to New Zealand agriculture and to farming systems around the world, Shilton says. "It's a fundamental element and there is no substitute as there is for, say, fossil fuels.

Conversely, says Shilton, a lot of money is spent trying work out how to get phosphorous out of our effluent discharges to waterways."A common way of removing it is to use chemicals and 'lock' the phosphate up. But chemicals are increasingly expensive and the phosphate captured is hard to recycle. Alternatively, billions of dollars are being invested into building processes that use bacteria to suck up phosphate." But Shilton and his team, Dr Nicola Powell from Massey and Dr April Gu, based in the US, believe there is another way.

"We have found that algae in the simple waste treatment ponds used extensively throughout rural New Zealand can also suck up large quantities of phosphorus from waste water and store it. One of the great things here is that the phosphorus stored inside the algal cells is quite stable which makes it easier to recycle than the bacterial alternative." Internationally, achieving phosphorus removal and recycling from effluent is a huge challenge with many universities worldwide competing to refine the bacterial based technology. Much work remains to be done before a new process can be rolled out in full scale application.

"For this novel algal-based alternative we have the international lead and this Marsden grant gives us the chance to lay the engineering foundation of a new environmental biotechnology developed in New Zealand. "Don't worry about oil: there are substitutes; that's the least of our concerns. The big issue is how much food is available. To make that food our farms need phosphate, and for phosphate there is no substitute once we have let it all be flushed out to sea."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

2 Comments

A viewer comunicated by email criticising my comment " the low investment in Research and Development by agriculture" and cited $1000's of dollars spent on his DairyNZ levy, and the view that agriculture spends little in this area. Stats NZ data indicates NZ's spend in this area is under half what OECD countries invest and of that total the primary sector only contributes 16%.

With the DairyNZ levy being 3.6c/kg MS, on this years Fonterra payout in percentage terms for all the responsibilties they encompass, it does not seem a large amount.

Whether dairy farmers get good value and good governance out of that investment I will leave for that viewer and other dairy farmers to decide.

Up
0

Tony, you are comparing apples with oranges as the OECD investment average refers to 2008 and the NZ investment average refers to 2010.  Stats NZ says in their report that the 2010 OECD average figures are unavailable.

In 2010, the business sector was responsible for 41 percent of all R&D expenditure in New Zealand. The government sector contributed 26 percent and the higher education sector made up the remaining 33 percent.

http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/businesses/research_and_devel…

New Zealand levels of investment may be lower than OECD but that is only part of the equation the other side is - what incentives are there for R&D in other OECD countries.

 

Up
0