sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

NZIER’s quarterly survey of business opinion shows RBNZ winning inflation battle and causing recession

Bonds / news
NZIER’s quarterly survey of business opinion shows RBNZ winning inflation battle and causing recession
Flooded construction site
Photo by Casey Horner on Unsplash

NZIER’s quarterly survey of business opinion is welcome news for the Reserve Bank of NZ’s fight against inflation, economists say. 

BNZ head of research, Stephen Toplis said it was “probably an overstatement” to say RBNZ would be “overjoyed” with the results of Tuesday’s Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion (QSBO).

“But there is no doubt it will be mighty relieved that the labour market and inflationary pressures are clearly moving in the ‘right’ direction in terms of its objectives”. 

The key message from the survey was that labour market concerns had begun to diminish as more workers were entering the country and demand for products had eased. 

For the first time since June 2021, businesses have reported demand as being the primary limit to output and not labour shortages. 

The story for much of the past two years has been that businesses have been unable to hire enough staff to meet high consumer demand. This has been a key driver of inflation. 

Now firms are reporting less difficulty in finding both skilled and unskilled labour, despite record high turnover and strong hiring intentions.

Toplis said the central bank would look closely at these measures as it assesses whether the economy was moving towards maximum sustainable employment. 

“We think the Reserve Bank will, generally, be cautiously optimistic about the message the suite of labour market indicators is delivering and it should also be heartened that the net number of businesses intending to raise prices has fallen from 71 to 61.” 

That reading would be consistent with annual inflation falling to roughly 6%, as BNZ has forecast for the 12-month ending in September, and lower over the following year. 

The data wasn’t soft enough for the central bank to back away from a rate hike tomorrow, but it does support the view that the official cash rate doesn’t need to go all the way to 5.5%. 

NZIER’s survey showed a net 61% of firms expect to increase prices in the next three months, that number would need to fall to around 25% to be consistent with the Reserve Bank’s definition of price stability.

“None of this stuff says the RBNZ has won the battle, yet. But it definitely suggests it is not losing,” Toplis said in a note.

“Today’s data almost certainly will leave it feeling less threatened that inflation might remain at its current elevated levels.”

Pick’n’mix 

Kiwibank economists, Jarrod Kerr and Mary Jo Vergara said the survey results were “a bit of mixed bag” with good and bad data points to point to. 

“Demand is falling, investment intentions are weak, and inflation remains a problem. Fewer firms reported higher costs in the March quarter, that’s good news. But more firms raised their prices in Q1, not so good”. 

“Business confidence improved, but not hugely. Cost pressures have eased, but consumer prices are still rising. Labour shortages may be normalising, but sales are now the top concern”.

The economists said they still believed the RBNZ might tighten monetary policy more than necessary but this survey was unlikely to change its trajectory. 

Mark Smith, a senior economist at ASB Bank, said pricing and cost metrics had moved lower but remained too high to be consistent with inflation under 3%. 

“At long last, there are signs that the weak demand backdrop is starting to make headway into easing capacity pressures, although there is still a long way to go”.

RBNZ would continue raising rates until it was “supremely confident inflation will settle” and reduced pressure in the labour market was just one promising sign. 

Meanwhile, New Zealand has likely entered a recession during the past three months and the survey suggests there may be more difficult months ahead for businesses and workers.  

“The signal, nonetheless, is consistent with recessionary conditions, although confidence gauges have not always provided a useful economic signal of late,” he said.  

Christina Leung, NZIER’s principal economist, agreed that gross domestic product had declined slightly in the first three months of the year. 

“We believe that with the destruction from the extreme weather events, that would result in a negative quarter,” she said. 

This would put the New Zealand economy in a technical recession, which is defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth. 

Trouble on site

BNZ’s research team called attention to the rapid deterioration of conditions in the building sector, in the survey. It was the most downbeat sector with a net 76% of firms expecting a worsening in conditions over the coming months. 

“This is particularly important because the wider economy tends to be highly leveraged to this sector. It is thus with some trepidation that we note that new orders expected by builders are at a low not seen since the almighty recession of 1991.”

Another notable data point was that 64% of builders saying that a lack of demand is the key reason constraining output. Previous surveys had shown a lack of materials as the top issue, but it has “faded into insignificance”.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

23 Comments

BNZ head of research, Stephen Toplis said it was “probably an overstatement” to say RBNZ would be “overjoyed” with the results of Tuesday’s Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion (QSBO).

“But there is no doubt it will be mighty relieved that the labour market and inflationary pressures are clearly moving in the ‘right’ direction in terms of its objectives”. 

IMO, a naive comment by Toplis. If the bank economists and RBNZ boffins think that a 'bit of pain' will steady the ship and then everything goes 'back to normal'. I can understand how such a narrative can be palatable for the ruling elite and the hoi polloi. 

But what if they don't go 'back to normal'? What if it things go into some kind of drawn-out deflationary spiral that drags on and on and on and on? Might sound a bit DGM, but it's always good to balance things out with different scenarios.    

Up
2

I'd love to know what date, or quarter, or year was 'normal'. Just for reference/context.

Up
3

It appears to me that a 'back to normal' is the first opportunity where central banks can begin slashing interest rates to provide much-needed relief to banks and the wealthy at the expense of the rest of the economy and working people.

Up
8

It appears to me that a 'back to normal' is the first opportunity where central banks can begin slashing interest rates to provide much-needed relief to banks and the wealthy at the expense of the rest of the economy and working people.

Something like that. My feeling of 'back to normal' is when you have a steady stream of punters willing to sign on the dotted line for new debt. Ideally those punters will come from across the spectrum from low to high income. Money for jam. 

Up
2

"to provide much-needed relief to banks and the wealthy at the expense of the rest of the economy and working people"

Ah the good old pitting the rich vs the poor, sorry, I mean the bad rich vs the good poor people, sure to yield a lot of upvotes!

Up
4

Commodities have been moving up again over the last couple of weeks, things are gradually moving in the right direction but we are very far from showing we have inflation back in the bag.

Up
2

As I've said on another thread, the problem in the coming months might be when businesses realise that those who have stopped spending aren't coming back (mortgage stress won't disappear overnight) and the best way to maintain earnings is by raising prices for their remaining customers, most of whom can absorb it because their wages / super have increased. Arguably the data presented above already shows signs of this happening, with businesses increasing prices even as costs and demand are easing.

 

Up
8

I got another price shock today when my favourite city lunch spot had upped its dish price from $16 to $19. I go there every week so it must have happened this week.

This will become a monthly visit rather than a weekly one. 
Just can’t justify it, even if I can afford it…

Up
2

I also had a price shock when paying bills at various establishments in <insert popular Indonesian destination> recently, so much so, I felt compelled to leave generous tips. Outstanding quality and service.

Dairy and packaged products are comparable, if not more expensive. Whole foods and some fish products fit for any demographic.

Bit of an Apples and Oranges comparison.

Up
1

Great post HGWR !

Up
1

Exactly. This is what is happening in the States - they have given it the abbreviation 'POV' - Price Over Volume. Basically firms are realising that if they increase prices, they might lose a bit of volume, but they can also shed some cost and increase their margin overall. Economic theory would suggest that they will then lose market share. But, what is actually happening is that competitors are putting their prices up too! Kerching all round!

Apparently this started with Pepsi pulling out of Russia and trying to maintain profitability by nudging up prices everywhere else. It worked famously - so well that Coca-Cola did the same. Everyone's a winner. Well, apart from consumers, but hey who worries about the wage slaves.  

Up
2

Raising your price seems like an easy fix. This is New Zealand. The loyal customer comes back next time. They see the new price. They smile, pay the bill and leave. You think everything is fine. 

Up
0

Lots of very wishful thinking 

Up
0

RBNZ would continue raising rates until it was “supremely confident inflation will settle”

Unlikely, if the RB raised until it was supremely confident inflation settles between 1 - 3%, we would end up with interest rates at 10% and the NZ economy in absolute taters.

Up
0

This isn't really the RBNZ's problem. They have a mandate to control consumer prices. Chippy needs to change the rules if he doesn't want interest rates going any higher. I doubt this is likely to happen. His understanding of monetary policy is probably on par with his understanding of what defines a woman.

Up
2

Great post. 100% right.

All the central banks seem very confused. Given their  core inflation mandate and their (flawed) belief in the power of interest rates to quell inflation, they *should* keep hiking (again I am not saying that is the *right* thing to do)

Why back off now? Although there are some concerning economic signs, those signs aren’t dismal, and unemployment is still very low. 
According to their own logic, mandate and  rhetoric, they should be continuing to hike the OCR as ‘the path of least regret’…probably to at least 6%

Up
1

So how long does it take for OCR changes to flow through into the economy? At least 12 months? At the start of April 2022 the OCR was 1%. It is about to be raised to 5%.

Up
0

18 months lag between rate rises and CPI falls according to the data - although correlation does not always mean causation! 

Up
0

18 months from the moment the rises started? Or from say the mid point in the hiking sequence?

 

Up
0

The OCR was hiked quite aggressively between ‘03-‘07 yet throughout that whole period the CPI oscillated up and down between 2-4%, appearing to not be strongly influenced in a causative sense by the upward direction of the OCR.

The more I think about it, and look at the data, the more I subscribe to the notion that the OCR is a bit of a useless tool.

Up
2

It would be good if we were able to see an alternative universe where they hadn't adjusted OCR at that time to see the effects. Would the CPI have run hotter during that period? 

Up
0

It's not so much that things have got back to normal.

It's that industry has adjusted its way of operating to allow for how janky everything is now.

Including their prices.

Up
0

rbnz should hold today (but will go .25)

 

Taking heat out of the economy is fine but when it gets to irreversible losses where instead of businesses shedding a few employees they end up gone forever - that's too far - and the 18 month lag from the very first OCR hike has barely passed yet - what damage the RBNZ may have already caused and is yet to see is unknown. 

A leaf needs to be taken from the RBA. Time to pause.

Up
1