sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

GDP grew 0.7% in March quarter compared with consensus forecasts of 0.6%

GDP grew 0.7% in March quarter compared with consensus forecasts of 0.6%

By David Hargreaves

Gross domestic product (GDP) increased 0.7% in the March 2016 quarter, following an increase of 0.9% in the December 2015 quarter, Statistics New Zealand said today.

The result for the quarter is a touch better than the 0.6% consensus of economists' forecasts. The Reserve Bank had also picked 0.6%. The Kiwi dollar, already strong after the US Federal Reserve left American interest rates unchanged, jumped nearly half an American cent on the news and was worth US70.8c a short time ago.

Economists saw the latest GDP outcome as possibly reducing the chances of the Reserve Bank cutting interest rates again at its next review in August, but upcoming inflation figures are seen as likely having a bigger impact on the RBNZ's decision.

The latest growth was driven by the construction and health industries, but partly offset by decreases in the primary industries and manufacturing.  

“The main driver behind the GDP growth was construction, which rose 4.9%. This was the strongest quarterly growth for the industry since March 2014,” national accounts senior manager Gary Dunnet said.

The increase in construction also reflected higher construction-related investment. Investment in other construction (infrastructure such as roading and telecommunications) was up 12% – the highest quarterly growth since June 2014. Investment in residential building rose 4.2%, driven by strong increases in Auckland and Waikato, but eased in Canterbury.

Rising demand saw service industries grow 0.8% this quarter. The health and retail trade industries led the overall increase.

“We saw a larger population reflected in the rise in health care and consumer spending. When the rising population is taken into account, our GDP per capita rose 0.1% on the previous quarter,” Mr Dunnet said.

Strong tourist arrivals also supported the growth in service industries, reflecting a 4.9% rise in tourist spending.

Annual GDP growth for the year ended March 2016 edged down to 2.4% from 2.5% in December, while the size of the economy in current prices was $249 billion.

Real growth in national disposable income per capital, which takes into account population growth and changes in the purchasing power of income,  was up 1.6% in the March 2016 quarter, following a revised 0.2% decrease in the December 2015 quarter and a 0.2% decrease in the September quarter.

Stats NZ said over the March 2016 year, RGNDI per capita increased 0.3% compared with the December 2015 year. This shows that New Zealand’s real purchasing power increased more than New Zealand’s population.

This is what ANZ senior economist Philip Borkin thought:

A LITTLE SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE

KEY POINTS

·         The economy expanded by 0.7% over the first three months of the year, which was a little stronger than consensus expectations (0.5% q/q). Annual growth accelerated to 2.8% y/y.

·         Despite the upside surprise, the data confirms a modest softening in momentum relative to the strong pace of growth seen over the second half of last year, where growth averaged close to a 0.9% quarterly pace. It is also a reasonably soft result in per capita terms, with the economy barely treading water over the quarter (+0.1% q/q).

·         Twelve of 16 production-based industries recorded growth over the quarter, with the construction sector leading the way (as expected), rising 4.9% q/q. Primary sector activity dipped 0.4% q/q, while services sector activity rose 0.8% q/q – with a similar pace of growth now seen for three consecutive quarters. The latter was led by health care and social assistance, and is a function of strong population growth. Retail trade and accommodation rose 1.3% q/q, in part due to strong tourist spending.

·         Expenditure GDP rose by a modestly softer 0.5%, led by fixed asset investment (again construction-related). Household consumption was on the softer side, rising just 0.4% q/q. Net exports were a modest drag on growth (-0.4%pts), as were inventories. Stronger terms of trade resulted in a decent bounce in real gross national disposable income (+2.2% q/q).

·         In many ways, there is something for everyone in this data. In the first instance, there was of course an upside surprise in headline growth, which is nice. Income growth rebounded. But per capita growth was soft and household consumption somewhat lukewarm. Plant & machinery investment (0.6% q/q) was also a little disappointing in the context of a fall in Q4. There were also some modest downward historical revisions.

·         When all is said and done, we view the figures as a respectable result following a strong pace of growth over the second half of 2015. There are risks to the outlook (global scene, dairy cash flow, elevated NZD etc), but when we consider the following, our base case is that reasonable rates of growth will continue (volatility aside) over the next year or so:

−     Indicators for Q2 are generally providing a decent signal. Primary activity should bounce and business and consumer confidence remain at decent levels.

−     Despite the elevated NZD, financial conditions remain supportive. The effective mortgage rate continues to fall. Tailwinds from migration and the construction sector pipeline persist.

−     Credit growth remains strong, supporting spending, although this does admittedly raise some medium-term sustainability questions.

·         Today’s result was a little above the RBNZ’s June MPS pick (0.6% q/q) and so at the margin should reduce the odds of an August rate cut. However, the upcoming CPI and labour market data should carry far more weight in that regard. The odds still favour an August cut (on currency strength and global wobbles alone), but it is not a conviction view.

And this was the reaction of ASB's chief economist Nick Tuffley:

Implications

GDP was stronger than ourselves and the market expected, and slightly stronger than the RBNZ forecast at the March MPS.  However, from the RBNZs perspective, this small upward surprise will be offset by minor downward revisions over 2015.  Overall, annual average growth is close to the RBNZs expectation and we continue to expect the RBNZ to cut the OCR to 2% at the August meeting.  While we continue to expect a further cut to 1.75% later this year, there is more uncertainty around a second cut given the RBNZs concerns around financial stability.  The GDP outcome doesn’t add to the case for cutting below 2%.

Comment

As expected, growth was led by a broad-based increase in construction activity in Q1.  Strong international visitor arrivals was also an area of support, with tourist spending increasing 4.9% in Q1.

There was stronger-than-expected growth in retail, transport, telecommunications, financial services and health care.  These lifts all likely reflect increased demand for goods and services resulting from high tourist numbers and strong population growth.

Meanwhile, manufacturing and wholesale trade activity held up better than indicators suggested.

From an expenditure basis, investment increased strongly (led by construction-related investment) while consumption increased more modestly.  Exports of goods contracted due to lower dairy, meat and oil exports.  However, exports of services lifted strongly due to growth in tourist spending.

Downward revisions: Production GDP was revised down by 0.2 percentage points over 2015 (0.1ppt in each of Q1 and Q3). Expenditure GDP was revised down by 0.5 percentage points.  These revisions help somewhat to close the gap that has been growing between Expenditure and Production estimates of GDP growth.  However there remains a large divergence between the two measures, with expenditure annual average growth at 3.1% vs 2.4% on a production basis.

Overall, the NZ economy is recording respectable growth due to strong population growth and tourism.  These factors are helping offset the dampening impact of weak dairy incomes.  However, from a per-capita basis, growth remains reasonably low.  We expect to see a pick-up in momentum over the coming year with additional support from low interest rates.

No chart with that title exists.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

21 Comments

Expenditure GDP rose by a modestly softer 0.5%, led by fixed asset investment (again construction-related). Household consumption was on the softer side, rising just 0.4% q/q.

For the year ending Mar 16 nominal GDPE rose 3.8131% compared to a downwardly revised 3.2258% annual increase for the previous year ending Dec 15 data release.

Up
0

One has to point out that the population is currently growing at a rate of 1.6% per year due to immigration plus 0.6% from natural growth; ie 2.2% per year. (note how ridiculous our immigration is compared to our natural growth rate) Accordingly the GDP growth rate per capita has only grown about 0.2% for the year to March. One also has to consider that the influx of immigrants produces a lot of one off large demands of the economy which can be viewed as an economic "sugar rush" This will not last and at some point down the track the increased population needs to be supported by sustainable economic activity. In the long term it is more likely that on a per capita basis, we are going backward significantly.

Up
0

We are definitely going rapidly backwards because almost none of the economic activity in NZ economy is sustainable, and the tiny portion that is sustainable is being increasingly overwhelmed by growth in the unsustainable sectors.

Never forget that the greater portion of economic activity in NZ is, one way or another, predicated on conversion of oil (most of which is imported) into airborne pollutants, and anyone who thinks that is sustainable is completely insane.

.

Up
0

Ironic while 40,000-50,000 Kiwis moved to Australia annually over the last 15 years. Australia grew by the total population of NZ in just the last 13 years.

Up
0

DP

Up
0

And I read recently that Australian economists are now saying that the costs to the economy that all that immigration caused was not worth any benefits that they bought. Looking back the whole thing wasn't worth it and certainly their economy is hardly healthy.

Up
0

Economists can always talk about money but never have to make any.....Unknown.

Up
0

Or maybe you listen to the wrong economists, or maybe not economists at all,

http://www.therichest.com/celebnetworth/celeb/authors/paul-krugman-net-…

Up
0

Now watch the Kiwi$ strengthen on the back of us being virtually the only country in the OECD with this sort of growth rate

Up
0

In other words, we managed to grow debt slightly ... keeping the ponzi going for a bit longer. Ask an economist when any economy will EVER be able to raise interest rates again and you will get a better indication of where things are heading.

Up
0

What, you mean if we can keep borrowing more money off of them furriners to buy our houses off of each other then she''ll be sweet? Something like, if only we had some more ham, we could have more ham and eggs, if only we had more eggs?

Up
0

Exactly what I'm talking about

Up
0

One of the best tools on this website ,( other than the obvious posters) is the secondary production data for cement production and linking that to consents and vehicle movements. The construction data may stabilise for another quarter but will fall sharply by Q3/Q4 . Canterbury certainly appears to have peaked , jobs , real estate , construction, everything is heading south. Migration at some point will no longer be positive, and the service sector supporting Aucklands housing market only needs an exuberant RBNZ or an external shock to turn those increasing household debts into a beguiling mix as the country wakes up to the fact its income we need ( JK and his 40 percent exports/GDP is not getting closer)

Up
0

"Canterbury certainly appears to have peaked"

I don't like that word peaked. I prefer the term "run out of cash flow or incentives"? The reason I say that is you go down there ( I was a few months ago) and much of the city is still a gigantic car park. So the work hasn't peaked but the money to keep that work going has that's for sure.

Up
0

How many bits of land in the CBD have been converted into Wilson's carparks is astounding - as is how many bits of land have nothing on them. While the centre of town has new buildings being built - many are on there own with a few empty sections between them. I think the CBD will be smaller and more compact - with none of the more interest shops returning (some on the lower end of Manchester Street were time expired buildings with businesses that will not pay the new rent that landlords will require for the new buildings - which is sad as many of those businesses added a bit of life to town - such as S/H bookstores).

On the bright side JB Hifi is coming to Christchurch :-)

Up
0

Easy to expand when you pay little tax due to your 'very high' costs
http://www.smh.com.au/business/wilson-parkings-tax-numbers-appear-to-de…
And then lock-in profits in foreign trusts offshore
http://www.smh.com.au/business/world-business/wilson-security-implicate…
.
"2012, the brothers were charged in one of the biggest bribery cases in Hong Kong's history just as Wilson Security was preparing to bid for Australian government contracts worth billions of dollars.
The brothers resigned as directors from Wilson's holding company based in the British Virgin Islands, but two new entities then appeared as directors.
The leaked documents showed these new directors, Harmony Core and Winsome Sky, were run by the Kwoks, revealing Mossack Fonseca had helped the brothers hide their directorships of the company controlling Wilson Security, Four Corners reported."

Up
0

Four Corners Investigation

Here is the broadcast investigation
Well worth watching
Compare what AU is doing and what NZ isn't doing
See no evil

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2016/04/04/4434529.htm

Up
0
Up
0

People forget BadRobot that when cities like CHCH were in creation there was a real enthusiasm for REAL productivity with real productive jobs. Not a huge debt and bureaucracy ridden environment to the degree we have now.

They got on and did things, they took great risks, innovated, created and exported.

Now, we are trying to create a new city within the framework of a post global monetary and banking fraudulent system, dodgy insurance industry, a mountain of bureaucracy, and an economy propped up mainly by a massive debt fueled property ponzi scheme.

It may be just too much.

Up
0

I'm currently in CHCH and not sure about the CDB being a waste land or construction peaking just yet. From this office I count 27 crane booms on various building sites. Maybe if you use forward consents as the measure but in physical construction terms there is still a lot more life in this rebuild.

Up
0

Wow, NZ is doing great, especially if compared to most other countries. (I can also confirm this from personal experience as I am now in Europe after having been in Asia and the US) despite what all the whingers say

Up
0