The comment stream

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

Opinion: The gathering storm of "arrant, dangerous nonsense"

Posted in Opinion

Olly NewlandBy Olly Newland

In this column, I would like to cover a variety of topics, as the last few weeks have been crammed with 'news' and opinions about the property market - and much of it arrant, dangerous nonsense.

Some folk in the news media and posters on various websites have had a field day predicting the imminent collapse of the property market. They continue to be spectacularly wrong, it should be noted.

These deluded commentators seem to believe that if property prices fell by 20% to 30% (as some have predicted) then they, and their children would be able to buy a house more cheaply in the future and that would be a wonderful thing. They think a massive drop in the market would make housing 'more affordable'.

What they cannot understand is if that really happened hundreds of thousands of Kiwis would be out of work, much of our economy and industry would come to a virtual halt, the banks would collapse and New Zealand would be reduced to a nation of ragged beggars left to shuffle through the two dollar shops and rifle garbage bins.

Jobless and with an economy in ruins it wouldn't matter if houses were a third of their present price. They would still be unaffordable.

It will cause some consternation to these nay-sayers to learn this week, that house prices are still well up on this time last year despite the usual upside down view some in the media always make of these things.

I always derive much amusement in the way the media portray good news through the wrong end of the telescope. The headline in this example says: "House prices fall further in June".

It's not until you read down further that in fact house prices are still 5.2% higher than at this time last year and the slippage (if you can call it that) is a statistically insignificant  0.4%. Put another way, it is effectively a yearly increase on the current average price of $404,715 by a respectable $21,045 (or about twice the rate of inflation.)

I have no doubt a certain widely-respected Mr B. Hickey and some of his schadenfreude-ridden followers will look through the glass darkly and predict the end of the civilisation as we know it.

The Reserve Bank

It is my unshakeable opinion that the Governor of the Reserve Bank Dr Bollard blundered in raising the official cash rate by 0.25%.

It is not the amount it was raised by. It is the message it conveyed.

It is no coincidence that the property market almost came to a halt in the last month - with the lowest property sales volume in years and the lowest mortgage approvals that go hand-in-hand with this phenomenon.

So it was ironic that cuts in lending rates by the banks were announced  shortly after in direct opposition to the official cash rate being raised.  

Why did this occur? Because people are hesitant to borrow and the banks are choking on money that people are hoarding instead of spending whether it be on houses or whatever.

If the banks cannot on-lend they go broke. It is as simple as that.

If the public believe that higher interest rates are coming they will not buy. If they do not buy, then the chain reaction goes right down through the whole economy and that is precisely what is starting to happen.

The recovery of the NZ economy is still so fragile, it will only take the slightest puff of wind to knock it over. Increasing interest rates may just be the puff of wind that does the job.

It must be hard for people like Bollard who enjoy a guaranteed income, status and a pension for life, to understand what it feels like to have limited income, precarious employment and no means to influence events as they occur.

Of course we know why he did it. He has been threatening interest rates hikes for months and if he didn't follow through he would have lost all standing with the public and especially his masters, the politicians (of whom I will have more to say later).

Dr Bollard risks going down in history of being the man who ruined the country unless he is very very careful in the time to come. He's already on record as failing to pull the trigger in 2005 in the lead up to the General Election and leaving the credit-fuelled bubble to swell unrestrained. History can be very unforgiving and he should mark that well.

The Budget

The impact of tax measures announced in the May budget have fallen unevenly. Specifically, the move to scrap property and plant depreciation allowances will affect industry more than redidential investors. Commercial landlords' cash flows may drop somewhat - and in many cases significantly.

Several large public property investment companies have forecast lower returns for the shareholders - which is a strange way of rewarding those who invest in the share market as an alternative investment.   

What sort of message does that send?
How does punishing business slow down inflation in house prices?

What sort of Mickey Mouse targeting is that? Already we find that Treasury and the IRD are fighting over the impact of the measures that have been announced and it wouldn't surprise me if we see subtle amendments being made in the months ahead - watering down the unintended consequences of this ill thought out legislation.

What is also particularly galling is the suggestion that a form of land tax or capital gains tax could be introduced by stealth.

It has been suggested that a levy be placed on property of 1% or 2% if the tax take from that property was less that. (As I read the suggestion, a house worth $400,000 would have to pay a minimum $4,000 to $8,000 in tax irrespective of whether it was profitable or not.)

It seems the pointy heads have yet to realise that the property boom is well and truly over and there is now a desperate need for time-out and a break for gentle healing during  injury time.

In the past year or two  billions of dollars were (and still are being) lost out of shonky finance companies as the horror stories continue to  mount, hundreds of Kiwis are still losing their homes as they try to balance the stretched family budget already at breaking point, receivers and debt collectors are having a field day, bankruptcies are at record levels and the courts are choked with crooks waiting to get their just desserts. (We hope.)

Now these clowns want to make it worse with onerous charges attacking the walking wounded and those just surviving.

Give me a break.

If ever there was a time to 'have a cup of tea' as the late lamented David Lange once said, now is that time.

GST & the Carbon Emission tax

Another budget measure is the imminent increase of GST to 15% (from next October) and the introduction of the Carbon Emission Tax .

The result has been an immediate rise in prices right across the board with much more to come. Ask any housewife about the impact being felt as they try to balance the already stretched family budget to breaking point.

When you do the numbers, the reduction on company and personal tax rates has been completely lost with the flow-on effect from the increase of the new taxes.

I doubt if any single person will be really better off when all the pluses and minuses have been calculated.

The politicians are of course doing all this for a reason - and that reason is not that obvious to the masses. There is a hidden agenda in all these increases and that is to deliberately create a measure of inflation. Bill English admitted as much after he presented the budget in May.

But, gentle reader, the elephant in the room is not inflation or even stagflation. It is deflation.

If you ever want to see a politician wet himself just mention the word 'deflation'.

This evil arises out of reckless political pressure, over taxation, and a fragile economy resulting in falling prices - not only for food and other basics but for all the "hard" investments of every kind.

If people think that prices will be cheaper tomorrow they will not buy today. We live in a consumer economy whether we like it or not. If we all stop consuming then business will dry up and the downward spiral begins.

And that's where I have a problem. On all sides we are bombarded with messages that we as a nation should save more and spend less.

But how can this work? We cannot save and spend at the same time.

Taken to an extreme, if we all saved our pennies the banks would have even more money on deposit. And to whom would they then lend if there are no borrowers?

Maybe some egg-head economist can explain how this can be done in words of two syllables so we can all understand.

And here's another problem to think over when to comes to GST at 15% shortly: How do the politicians expect more houses to be built when the single biggest intangible component in a house is the GST?

Take a new house for sale a $400,000. The GST alone will be $60,000 . In other words the cost of the actual house, including the builders profit. is actually $340,000.

It gets worse.

Next door or down the road there will 'second hand' house which can be identical to the new one but GST free and consequently much cheaper. How are builders expected to compete in a market distorted like this?

If the politicians were really that interested in the "new home" buyer (and keeping the building industry on its feet) you would think there would be a GST exemption or the like for new home buyers up to a certain limit - but no.

That idea is just too hard for our beloved masters as they swipe their parliamentary credit cards just one more time.

Australia has a scheme like that – and hasn't it done well?

The Banks

One of the tragedies of the past few years has been the demise of the finance company sector. Even worse: they will never be back.

We need finance companies as they provide funds for projects that banks would not touch (and never will touch).

Of course I'm not saying we need the crooked finance companies that rorted the public left right and centre. They got what they deserved. But the regular finance companies that backed sensible projects and made sensible loans.

Look about you. Where are the cranes? Where are the inspired developments? The new housing estates? Nowhere to be seen.

What lenders are we left with?

The same old tired lot that will say 'No' every time you ask for a loan unless, of course, you can prove you don't need it. I exaggerate a little I know, but the culture of the tight-fisted risk-averse bank is still alive and well at a trading bank near you.

Let me give you an example:

A very good friend of mine has an account with one of the big banks. His main "00" account has anywhere between $10,000 to $50,000 in at any one time and there is no overdraft facility.

Some time ago he opened an "01" account to run parallel with the "00" account but it was not used in the end.

However the bank charged a fee so the 01 account went 50 cents in overdraft. He has just received threatening letter from Head office (Head Office note) advising him that the 01 account was now overdrawn by 86 cents including costs and that they had transferred one dollar from his 00 account to remedy the situation followed by a stern warning not to let the situation occur again.

This type of petty-fogging attitude will hold back the recovery. Until that attitude changes I hold serious doubts if the much-anticipated, - hoped for - touted recovery will actually eventuate.

Rents - Residential

In my last column I predicted an increase in rents caused by the budget changes to depreciation, and the slow down of the house building industry. My view was echoed by Westpac  in their predictions for the coming months.

Naturally their predictions are tempered as they cannot be seen to be too extreme but our common agreement is that rents will rise is clear. It won't happen over night but it will happen.

Almost one third of Kiwis rent their home, so there are a lot of tenants and a lot of landlords. As rents rise we will see tensions rise as well. This happened in the 1980's and gave direct rise to the Residential Tenancy Act and the Tenancy Tribunal and the lumpy, often biased legislation that goes with it.

As our population grows, and the number of houses being built remains in the doldrums, indirect costs and direct costs rise, we may see investors either quitting (or not entering) the housing market.

Either way this will result in a shortage of rental accommodation and pressure on rents.

The shoe box apartment market

Little has changed in this market. Prices remain at rock bottom after having been grossly over priced to start with. My advice still remains. The shoe box apartment market can be a bargain hunters dream - so long as you follow simple rules and only buy the right ones. A lot of rubbish was built during the boom but among them were some better ones and these are the ones you should be targeting.  

I am currently advising a number of my mentoring client on these types of investments as real estate agents (bless then) cannot be totally independent no  matter how hard they try.

Those interested in shoe boxes could well look to Wellington for better deals.

Rents - Commercial

Commercial rents were far less affected by the excesses of the past few years because of leases effectively fixing rents for some time in advance.

The outlook for commercial is mixed. Existing tenants are still paying solid rents (but grizzling like mad as is their wont, especially in a weak economy) but it is the vacant properties that are causing the problem.

As the recession grinds on - despite some bright spots here and there - business failures and downsizing have left large numbers of buildings empty or partially empty which is a huge drain on the landlords who have to create all sorts of inducements to find tenants (or keep them).

But who wants to own, let alone buy, an empty building when new tenants are as scarce as hens teeth?

Many of my clients are in this sort of pickle and it is only by intensive marketing and innovative leasing arrangement that tenants can be found. Using these methods my staff and I have helped owners lease off spaces that have been empty for up to two years and more. It ain't easy to be sure, but it can be done.

Buying and selling commercial

As the commercial market stumbles, bargains emerge that were undreamed of a few years ago. Several 'vulture funds' have been set up already to buy distressed commercial property. I predict that if managed right they will make a fortune for the promoters.

It is not necessary to have a vulture fund of your own to take advantage of the commercial market malaise. In simplistic terms you have to find sound buildings that have nothing wrong with them except they are empty or partially empty and the vendor (often as not the mortgagee) is desperate.

I recently purchased one such property for half its registered valuation and on terms that were dictated by me and not by the seller.

The attitude I took towards the seller was to say "Look, you have a huge problem on your side of the table and I have no such problem. There is no way I am taking your problem off your hands and making it mine unless you accept all my terms without question."

You may make scores of offers along these lines before you succeed - but as I have often said to my students and consulting clients over the years: We're not running a race.

Summary

Despite some bright spots (for example, the rise of available jobs and some better news on the export and manufacturing front) we are still being held back by recessionary pressures. What is disappointing to me is that those 'at the helm' seem hell-bent in making matters worse, not better.

We can count our lucky stars that we haven't had the crisis that some countries experienced but I cannot help feeling that there is a slow rise in discontent among the people and if not carefully checked may gather into storm clouds.

Rising prices, not matched by rising incomes, and constant frustration can lead to social unrest. New Zealand may have 40 million sheep (and that includes much of the population) but even sheep will fight back if provoked enough.

Olly Newland
July 2010
www.ollynewland.co.nz
© 2010 Olly Newland. Used with permission. 

 

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

235 Comments

Newland sounds distinctly

Newland sounds distinctly worried - as he should be.

REINZ June data should be out

REINZ June data should be out today.

Don't hold your breath as it

Don't hold your breath as it it put together and put out by spindoctors who can even put a gloss on a turd.

 Look and read more like a

 Look and read more like a meltdown to me.

Which is funny considering he

Which is funny considering he wrote the book "the day the bubble bursts". Now he contradicts everything he says in said book in this articlwe. Hmmmm backhander perhaps
 

Yeah but that was back when

Yeah but that was back when he was hoping to drive prices down so he could "snaffle a few bargains", but now he is severely over-extended on property and hemorrhaging cash from every pore, and so consequently desperately attempting to talk the market back up in order to sell his junk property without being murdered.
 
When OllyN wants to buy property at a cut-rate, he says: "Property is going to crash!!!!"
 
When OllyN wants to sell property without too much loss, he says "Property is going great guns!!!!"
 
There are interstellar vacuums that are less transparent than Olly Newman.
 
 

Don't worry. New Zealand is

Don't worry. New Zealand is different. Our financial sector is better managed than the Europeans and Americans. Even in the depths of the 2008 crisis, prices did not crash. It reduced only slightly.

"Don't worry. New Zealand is

"Don't worry. New Zealand is different."
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA
 
Brilliant! Better than Rowan Atkinson at his finest!
 
"Our financial sector is better managed than the Europeans and Americans."
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
 
You're on a roll!
 
"Even in the depths of the 2008 crisis, prices did not crash. It reduced only slightly."
 
'It didn't happen then so it ain't gonna!'
 
That's the spirit!

Olly can ramble on as much as

Olly can ramble on as much as he likes how values are still higher than a low point last year but he cannot escape the fact that the trend is down, the trend is accelerating and the trend is going to be the trend for the forseeable future. Greed had put houses out of the reach of many but now those people can look forward to being able to buy their first home. That must be good for society in general in NZ.

Hi Olly, this is on the nail.

Hi Olly, this is on the nail. Basically it covers full circle where other commentators have only ranted on about a segment. Every action has a reaction and the knack is to get the balance. This collection of Bureaucrats (including councils and the reserve bank) all seem to be making dodgy decisions on their own agendas without thinking "bigger picture"  It is a worry. As a landlord I am actively selling up simply to reduce financial impacts to me personally through things I have no control over. I will put my money under the mattress. What good is that to the economy. Sigh!

 Yes. I bailed out in timed

 Yes. I bailed out in timed and now am happy with my decision. I guess we have to wait for a couple of years till the prices bottom out and then get back to property investment. Right now my money is in the bank which is not really being productive but atleast my capital is not getting eroded.

The point is under the

The point is under the mattress is probably better for the economy than investing in property...which I suspect is detrimental at this level.

Financial speculation / gambling on asset appreciation is not the real productive economy....

regards

Why buy at home when German

Why buy at home when German listed property shares at 60% of NAV yield over 13%?
OK the Euro is a risk but Germany would benefit from dropping out with the other strong countries.
 

That's interesting - an

That's interesting - an article which highlights the reality but protests the fact that those pointing out the reality should be loathe to do so - but it certainly didn't stop him pointing out that reality to the poor sod of a commercial property owner that he bought a building from at a 50% below valuation recently.
 
But on whole I agree - every arm of government has done stupid things in their attempt to address New Zealand's response to this global crisis.  Asset price deflation is headed our way whether we like it or not, and Olly is right - the government's actions are just a kick in the teeth for every New Zealander (aside from the forest owners).
 
My advice in the short term - buy trees.

Deflation may actually be

Deflation may actually be good for those of us with no debt and plenty of cash.
 
Not everybody is a clueless, gullible PI buried in hock up to the eyeballs.

The article does highlight

The article does highlight some realities, but without any great understanding of them. The tirade represents "arrant, dangerous nonsense".

Very clear well done Olly!!

Very clear well done Olly!! but the Schadenfreude infected commenter’s, some of whom have already arrived above, still won't get it. Why can't people see that any economy is built on consumer spending end of story. we don’t manufacture/produce/grow things to sit on a shelf were is the fun in  that?.

and therein lies the problem.

and therein lies the problem.

You still believe it's all

You still believe it's all about spruiking and nothing else? That the fundamentals have nothing to do with it?
 
No wonder the economy is in such sad shape when utterly clueless losers such as yourself are allowed to partake in it.
 

what an appropriate name you

what an appropriate name you have

He talks dribble, i cant

He talks dribble, i cant stand this guy and didnt he once manage a fail property development company.

And he lost a lot of other

And he lost a lot of other people's money in the 80's. Did you pay it back to them Olly?

Very insightful comment

Very insightful comment Curtis. NOT! Saying he talks dribble in your opinion, and then follwoing up with you "don't "LIKE" him"...very mature...did you have someone at school called Olly bully you once? Comments like this are why many including me are being turned off this site.

My thoughts also

My thoughts also

Richmastery investors by any

Richmastery investors by any chance ?

Sally you obviously had no

Sally you obviously had no money tied up in Landmark in the 1980s. It was a property country run by Olly. Guess what it imploded and everyone lost their money. So did Olly and he says he has some again and he is going to reimburse those poor people who believed in him all those years ago aren't you Olly.

A lot of points worth reading

A lot of points worth reading but the reality is that people have already spent on credit to the limit. Boats, holidays and other trinkets also got their share and also have been knocked back. That credit binge like overseas helped pushed up house prices to unrealistic levels - a bubble. Now is debt payback time for those people and for the government which has also overspent. All the factors point to prices dropping regardless of Olly's wishes that the economy needs a boost, not a kick in the pants. The fact is the economy is in bad shape and it will take time to re-build. People are still been made redundant. House prices will correct to much lower levels as they have done in most other countries. The difference is that they don't have self interested REINZ and government owned QV spin doctors misleading the public. We will never know the extent of the correction because the pricing results are deliberately inaccurate. Have a look at the Stats Dept commentary on pricing methods.

Olly is upset that the system

Olly is upset that the system is unwinding...the gravy train is off the tracks...no more bubble economics...well Olly, it was fun on the way up and plenty of people made fortunes thanks to the stupid RBNZ and brainless Labour govt....now the shoe is on the other foot as they say and it would be wrong to expect brilliant govt and superb reserve bank policies...far wiser to expect poor govt and poor RBNZ policies on the way down.
 

How can you respect someone

How can you respect someone who got out there in the 80's, floated an idea,took a lot of money off people who trusted him, lost their money and now has the gall to come on and criticise others. I would repsect him if he sold his assets and paid all those poor shareholders back plus interest. Many people have not forgotten what he did to hem. He should put up or shut up. He is no better than a lot of others being currently criticised for taking moeny off people to make money for themselves and then losing it.

“Why did this occur?

“Why did this occur? Because people are hesitant to borrow and the banks are choking on money that people are hoarding instead of spending whether it be on houses or whatever.
If the banks cannot on-lend they go broke. It is as simple as that.”
 
Wow, are you really this stupid or just being wilfully ignorant to try and dupe people into believing the garbage you spout? As a country we borrow (mostly via the Aussie banks) a huge amount of money from overseas to prop up the current housing bubble. The interest payments are simply being getting sucked out of the NZ economy, just to keep an asset bubble alive.
Wait until the core funding ratio starts ramping up to 75% and we will see how much cash “banks are choking on”. Stick to areas where you have at least some expertise please Olly.

Go ask your Bank manager what

Go ask your Bank manager what would happen if their Bank ceased all lending tomorrow. Let me know when you have the answer.

Its simple , Banks could stop

Its simple , Banks could stop lending and still make a profit form interest income due on currnet loans, their book would shrink however, and this would lead to more agrressive lending later to catch up . Get a copy of the ANZ Annual report and see how banks earn their money.... from interest income and fees on transactions and arrnagements . The idea to stop new lending for a while may be a good one , as I beleive the banks have got too big and cumbersome and have to keep rolling to stay in business Some downsizing by Banks would be a good thing all round .

Very in depth article. I

Very in depth article. I learnt a lot of good things from it.
 
I'm just wondering how it got posted on this website because you blatantly rip into B. Hickey on several occasions and he is the forefront of this websites articles...

 Good onya BH for publishing

 Good onya BH for publishing alternative points of view.

You say it ALL with this

You say it ALL with this comment - an "ALTERNATIVE point of view" to that of this media site. Guys really read what you are saying... do you really want everyone to agree with you...how sad.

 Read into my comment all you

 Read into my comment all you like.  I have no property bias one way or the other.  I don't come to interest.co.nz for property related content, although it is apparent that most do.
I'm all for opening up the debate though - because I'd hate to see interest.co.nz turn into a schadenfreude echo chamber.
 

KanucK Many thanks. You make

KanucK
Many thanks. You make a good point about avoiding an echo chamber.
I have a point of view, but we welcome in many points of view. Interest.co.nz aims to be the focal point for debate about housing, the economy, interest rates, monetary policy, exchange rate policy and tax policy.
We hope to fuel the debate with lots of stats and reportage and opinion.
To give you and others an idea of the breadth of stats and reporting we do, here is our link to all our real estate data charts.
http://www.interest.co.nz/charts/real%20estate
 
Here is a link to our monthly home loan affordability series.
 
http://www.interest.co.nz/property/home-loan-affordability
 
And here is a link to all our property articles.
http://www.interest.co.nz/property
 
cheers
Bernard

"... if that really happened

"... if that really happened hundreds of thousands of Kiwis would be out of work, much of our economy and industry would come to a virtual halt, the banks would collapse and New Zealand would be reduced to a nation of ragged beggars left to shuffle through the two dollar shops and rifle garbage bins."
It would have been good to have some reasoned justification for this statement in the article. As it is, the whole thing is just another pile of gobshite from Olly.

Property values collapse,

Property values collapse, banks call in loans as there is now insufficient security, business closes, bank suffers loss, staff laid off,  unemployed staff cant service their mortgage, bank sells house, bank suffers loss, bank becomes more risk averse etc etc etc.
If you are broke it doesnt matter whether the median house price is $ 300k or $10k you still cant afford it. Not that hard to figure out really.
 

Why would the banks call in

Why would the banks call in loans if house prices collapsed? That would only make things worse for them, by triggering the kind of downward spiral you descirbe.
What the banks did in the UK in the early 90s - sharp reduction in property prices, millions of homeowners in negative equity? They sat tight, because it was the only thing they could do.  All that mattered at the time was whether borrowers could service their loans.  The market came right in the end, but it took 10 years.
We have had just over three years of broadly unchanged house prices.  With luck, we will get another seven years of this, by which time real house prices will have fallen by 30% or so, hundreds of thousands of NZers will have been able to accumulate nice little kiwisaver nest eggs, and then we will have another round of real estate madness.

Come on OLLY, I had to deal

Come on OLLY,
I had to deal with your deceit and manipultaions when you were Chairman of Fund of NZ and oversaw its collapse. I can't believe you are a "born again" good guy now and wonder what your real motive is?
At leas you hold strong views and are willing (if not very brave) to express them.
One hopes this shibboleth will not be your undoing!
 

May 31st and we got

May 31st and we got this:
"Olly Newland explains why he thinks there's never been a better time to buy property"
Today we get this:
"The gathering storm of "arrant, dangerous nonsense"
Figure it out for yourself!
 

Interesting article, 200

Interesting article, 200 comments by tonight, BINGO by 10am
I wouldn't recommend buying appartments ;)

 By tonight atleast 10 first

 By tonight atleast 10 first home buyers like me will be a lot smarter. 

Olly, don’t know your

Olly, don’t know your history but you look less trustworthy than a Las Vegas timeshare salesman.
 
People might take your article more seriously if you removed the desperation, it’s not an odor – it’s a stench!
 
Oh and please, for heavens sake don’t blame Bollard. He is a professional doing his job, unlike the many bottom feeding property sharks that frequent this site.

These deluded commentators

These deluded commentators seem to believe that if property prices fell by 20% to 30% (as some have predicted) then they, and their children would be able to buy a house more cheaply in the future and that would be a wonderful thing. They think a massive drop in the market would make housing 'more affordable'.
What they cannot understand is if that really happened hundreds of thousands of Kiwis would be out of work, much of our economy and industry would come to a virtual halt, the banks would collapse and New Zealand would be reduced to a nation of ragged beggars left to shuffle through the two dollar shops and rifle garbage bins.
Very emotive but can you provide some logic behind this statement, for example why would a housing price fall put 200,000 plus NZ workers out of work, and why would it cause Australian banks to fail?
 

  A lot of my mates are real

 

A lot of my mates are real estate agents, mortgage brokers etc. Most of them are turning gloomy about the housing market here. Some of them have started looking at alternative careers. 
 

Load of vague, contradictory,

Load of vague, contradictory, incoherent, unsupported nonsense, full of faulty logic and unsupported assertions. 

Well, yeah, but he does have

Well, yeah, but he does have a point about the government mismanagement.  Tinkering with depreciation and LAQC rules was a ballsup, pure and simple.  Ring fencing losses on residential property business/investments was the sensible approach.... but I suspect vested interests of the politico class and their landlord supporters got in the way. 

One tiny point doesn't even

One tiny point doesn't even come close to redeeming that steaming pile.

:-)   And of course, he would

:-)
 
And of course, he would never actually admit that all they needed to do was ring fence losses - as taking advantage of those losses might likely have been his bread and butter.

Apartment? There are close to

Apartment? There are close to 3,000 vacant apartments in auckland central at last count. Shoeboxes are probably close to their minimum price and I see little change of them gaining in value anytime soon, barring a massive turnaround in migration/internation student numbers (which have been stagnant for the last 4 years).

Mind you, if the price of oil

Mind you, if the price of oil goes through the roof - the shoebox in central Auckland will be a logical option for alot of present folks living in the burbs and working in the city. 

As would extending broadband

As would extending broadband coverage and access so more people can work from home and don't have to all try to travel to the same place at the same time.

But then the manufacturing

But then the manufacturing and service sectors of retail, hospitality, medicine etc... can't work from home - and many accountants, lawyers and other such consultant/professionals already do.
 
I haven't ever seen any sound cost/benefit analysis that supports the argument that the billion+ taxpayer rollout of fibre will enable a substantive drop off in commuter traffic.

It doesn't have to take

It doesn't have to take everybody off the road - just some.  Would also be good for working hours to be more flexible, so that starting and finishing times are staggered throughout the day and night. 

But Kakapo, this extended

But Kakapo, this extended broadband rollout is a taxpayer funded one - AND the government is also spending (or should I say borrowing) to build more roads!
 
They haven't got a clue, frankly.  Broadband access in all kinds of technological forms is available on commercial terms through commercial providers.  If the government isn't happy with those terms (i.e. the price isn't right) then they need to sort out the competition issues - not build the infrastructure at the taxpayers expense for no tangible economic benefit.    

Kate You are onto it This

Kate You are onto it
This government does not understand the meaning of cost-benefit-analysis. Hasn't been done for the Super City either. They are flying blindly on all fronts.
 

I so agree on the Super City

I so agree on the Super City - haven't yet seen even an estimate of what the HR/recruitment and redundancy cost estimates are.  And then just watch.... as all the bureaucrats who happily take the pink slip get re-hired back into the bureaucracy, either as consultants and/or contractors.

Which would then leave a big

Which would then leave a big pile of houses in the suburb sitting vacant, alongside all the others now empty and quietly rotting as idiotic sellers try to convince themselves it's still 2006 and their festering heap of Hardiplank is worth "top dollar, mate, top dollar!" 

Can you provide a link to

Can you provide a link to verify your 3,000 vacant apartment claim please. There are only 1,926 listings to rent on TradeMe for all property types in Auckland City.  889 are apartments but many are listed more than once. 
Overall on TradeMe rental listings are down 18% on the same time last year and enquiries to those listings are up 22%. Advertised rents are up 4%.

Link for TradeMe

Look everyone!   It's another

Look everyone!
 
It's another undercover RE parasite who hasn't yet abandoned all hope but is still willing to give spruiking one last desperate chance!
 
Good for you! 

I am not now, nor ever have

I am not now, nor ever have been, nor ever will be a RE agent. I merely posted a link to some relevant facts regarding rental figures on NZ's biggest site. Your outburst is a bit strange.
 
 

Borrow Borrow Borrow Buy Buy

Borrow Borrow Borrow Buy Buy Buy!.......

Seems to me Olly has only

Seems to me Olly has only managed to cement in place the fear that needed some leadership. Now the word is screaming through the market that the great Olly is seriously worried....jeez with things THAT BAD the last thing to do is borrow and splurge on property....the collapse MUST be an absolute certainty....why else would Olly be so desperate !!!

Hello Wally...what about

Hello Wally...what about your gold, which The Economist magazine says has peaked and will weaken...are you desperate?
Haw Haw.

Poor Olly.   You thought that

Poor Olly.
 
You thought that your wee article would have morons rushing back to the RE offices in droves.
 
But all those desperately sweaty words did was make even more people realise just how munted the NZ  property sector is now.
 
Good work, mate!

I thought they stretched your

I thought they stretched your neck Haw Haw!...try this site for quality and depth of economic analysis..:http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/
 

I think you'll find gold has

I think you'll find gold has gotten ahead of itself (based on technical analysis) in the short term - medium to longterm it's still probably going to keep doing what it's been doing for the last decade, helped by the fact that central bankers are doing what they've been doing i.e stoking the boiler with debt based fiat currency.
But hey if a magazine named "Economist" says it's peaked then you might as well short the s**t out of it.......No? ok

 If people like Olly are

 If people like Olly are scared then I guess small time investors like me are in deep trouble . We are caught between the fire and the frying pan.
If we sell now we may have to incur some losses because of the fall in prices. If we continue to hold a lot on to our property  investments we may continue to lose  till the market stabilizes.
When I started investing I was told that long term investment would be about 10 years but looks like one may have to hold longer with the changed scenario.
 I am sitting on the fence now. If the downturn trend continues for another month I will have no choice but to clear out from this industry. 

With few exceptions the

With few exceptions the media historically has placed a positive spin on the real estate market. The advertising revenues dictate this. It is rare for any media agency in New Zealand to give  an honest view of a failing real estate market,and now that we appear to have reached a turning point Olly is (and quite possibly many others are upset) that their view point is not being trumpeted as loudly. House sales for June out in two minutes . Maybe Olly has reason to be confident?

Median Residential Property

Median Residential Property Price A June Record - REINZ latest data released

Prices firmed last month to the highest June median ever despite relatively low turnover compared with the past 10 years, according to figures released today by the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand (REINZ). After easing back to $350,000 in May the national median residential property price rose to $352,500 in June which is 3.67 percent higher than last year’s June median of $340,000 and also an increase on the previous highest June median of $347,500 recorded in 2007

It's good to see that at

It's good to see that at least some of the undercover RE agents on this site haven't given up spruiking! 

The low turnover means that

The low turnover means that it's even less valid than usual to call a trend based on short term data.  The smaller the sample the lower the certainty.  Look up statistical significance.

 What a load of rubbish!

 What a load of rubbish!  Couldn't be bothered reading the whole article!  Waste of time posting it on Interest.co.nz

Hey, I read it three

Hey, I read it three times!
 
One can never laugh enough in the morning! 

A few good points by Olly but

A few good points by Olly but also some rubbish.
Apartments generally are appalling investments. The better (and more expensive) ones typically offer crap yields (5% if you are lucky), the crap shoebox apartments can potentially offer better yields (maybe 7%) but capital gains will be non existent and capital losse are likely. 

two things, people in nz that

two things, people in nz that save will just mean the banks will need to lend less from overseas sources, and rises in interest rates may hurt those that are in debt, but for all those that it hurts there are those that benefit, in this current environment those of us that rely on income from our savings and hard work are hurting and have had to cut down on our spending. Debtors have had an easy ride, lets get real.

Wally and others  "Now the

Wally and others  "Now the word is screaming through the market that the great Olly is seriously worried....jeez with things THAT BAD the last thing to do is borrow and splurge on property....the collapse MUST be an absolute certainty....why else would Olly be so desperate !!!"
On the contrary I have never been happier and less desperate.  I am snaffling up bargains and making deals for myself and for many others that would have been the stuff of fairy tales a few years ago. But I can see the wider picture and it does irritate to see unfairness perpetrated against the less fortunate in the community. 

In other words you are buying

In other words you are buying while prices are down and still falling. Some bargain! I'm bloody glad you're not my investment advisor.
 
"I am snaffling up bargains and making deals for myself and for many others that would have been the stuff of fairy tales a few years ago."

If in fact this is Olly and

If in fact this is Olly and not somebody using the name, and if in fact you are confidently hoovering up the 'bargains', this does nothing to support the swill of contradictory and illogical assertions above.  Confidence based on no data or faulty data or cherry-picking of data, or biased interpretation of data is nothing but subjectivity and delusion and has no bearing on external reality.  So:  to take just one point from above, you assert that average rents will rise.  What do you have to justify this assertion?  And how do you reconcile this assertion with the huge oversupply of rental apartments available?

But you're happy to screw

But you're happy to screw down those "less fortunate"?
 
Olly, you're full of contradiction.  If you want the market to stablise - pay the over-inflated prices - and advise you're clients to do so as well.

Oh yeah we believe you

Oh yeah we believe you Olly..."unfairness perpetrated against the less fortunate"...sure you are.

Olly - what is your opinion

Olly - what is your opinion on these kinds of ideas:
 

Asset class focused capital adequacy rules:
 
http://www.interest.co.nz/news/rbnz-delays-introducing-tougher-capital-rules-rural-lending-until-end-2010

 
and LVRs:
 
http://www.telegraph..co.uk/finance/personalfinance/borrowing/mortgages/7831323/Bank-of-England-to-cap-mortgages.html
 
Maybe having increased LVR's for non-owner occupied residential property? (Investment property.)
 
That'd still leave you serious PIs with yield, indeed better yield IMO.
 
Cheers, Les.
www.mea.org.nz

Aucklands not sounding too

Aucklands not sounding too good accorind to Reinz
 
Auckland
After falling in April to $470,000 and $455,000 in May the Auckland district median house price has eased further in June to $445,000 which is just 2.3 per cent up on the median price of $435,000 a year ago. At 1,645, total sales were down on the 1,887 sales in May and fewer than the 2,032 sold in June 2009.
The median sale price for a North Shore City home decreased from $550,000 in May to $539,000 in June, but while it is up on the median of $523,250 in June 2009 it is the same as the median price in June three years ago. Sales totalled 315, a decrease on the 353 houses sold in May and down on the 396 sold in June 2009.
Sales volume was down in Waitakere City at 204 sold in June compared with 238 in May and is also a decrease on the sales of 279 in June 2009. The median price reduced to $379,500 from $400,500 in May (June 2009: $355,000).
After rising to $550,000 in March the median price for an Auckland City house has fallen back to $495,000 in June from $520,000 in May (June 2009: $477,500). And 559 houses were sold in June, a decrease on the 675 sales in May and down on the 655 in June 2009.
In Manukau City the median price eased back to $419,000 from $438,000 in May and $432,000 in April, and is still significantly down on the $441,000 median a year ago. The number of sales decreased from 363 in May to 346 last month (June 2009: 415).
The 56 sales in Papakura in June were two up on the number sold in May (June 2009: 61). After rising to $337,500 in April the median price is back up to $321,250 from $306,500 in May. But is still down on the June 2009 median of $329,000.
The median price for a Metropolitan Auckland house has continued to fall from $475,000 in April to $465,000 in May to $448,000 in June. Though this is an increase on the median price of $440,750 in the same month a year ago it is less than the June 2007 median of $450,000. Sales of 1,480 were a decrease on the 1,683 houses sold in May and 1,806 in June 2009.

Very good reading, finally

Very good reading, finally someone with subject knowledge, backing up words with facts, and real name.

OllyN Agree with you re

OllyN
Agree with you re removal of depreciation on buildings and plant. A few companies I follow on the NZX have said their profits will be reduced, even after accounting for the lower corporate tax rate. Cant see how this is a good thing, most certainly an unintended consequence!!!

Hello Olly. Some well made

Hello Olly.
Some well made points. I think you are a bit too concerned about politicians and their actions, as the property market goes on regardless and if government makes it more and more difficult for property owners ultimately the tenants pay the price through market rents.
I agree with you re rising rents.

Pussy is correct Olly, you

Pussy is correct Olly, you can only talk a market up so far and for so long before it comes crashing back down again of its own accord.
 
You had a great run with the banks forcing property prices to ridiculous heights, but now the bubble has burst and the party is over.
 
You've survived bankruptcy before, so you'll probably survive it again this time 'round.
 
Or not. 

Can't agree with you Pussy.

Can't agree with you Pussy. We all should be very concerned about politicians and ALL their actions.
Both National and Labour Governments have made monumental hashes in the management of our country. It is time to rein in the politicians and allow New Zealanders themselves to have an effective say in our country's directions. http://www.100days.co.nz/ alerts us to the question of "How Competent are our politicians?"

This will

Olly. I don't know why you

Olly. I don't know why you would comment on here as you know you would get a hard time.
Speak sense and they knock you because of success.
The reality of this site is that many can now not afford to buy property and think if they continue to talk property down by heaps then they can afford it.
Wrong. They don't realise that if property did drop heaps (which it won't) Banks would then feel vulnerable and would only lend to people that had say 40% deposits like they used to many years ago.
That being that they would need to have $160,000 of their own money to purchase a $400,000 home in Auckland.
As we all know they will never save that in their lifetime, hence they will never own, and continue to rent.

You assume that house prices

You assume that house prices would stay where they are, fool. 
A 40% drop in a $400K would drop the price to $240K, or about where it should be, adjusted for inflation and affordability.  A 40% down payment would be $80K.  Today, a 20% down payment would be $80K on a $400K house.  That's about the market for lending right now, and why there are fewer buyers- they don't have the cash required because banks have tightened up lending.  A boom requires access to easy money.  Those days are GONE.    There are plenty of people who would like to have 100% financing, but aren't getting it.  It's no longer available.  That puts those potential buyers out of the market, leaving only those with cash and a job....and a motivation to buy now and not later.  That's not many people.  Banks want people to have some skin in the game.  20%.  20% of $400K or 40% of $260K is the same amount.  If somebody doesn't have the down payment to buy a house, then they shouldn't be buying.  It's not a crash, it's a return to fundamentals. 
For those of you with a brain I suggest a googling of "the Minsky Cycle," or "Minsky Meltdown."  Explains everything you need to know on this subject. 
My plan is to buy homes from deceased estates with owner financing...in a few years, of course.
 

You assume that house prices

You assume that house prices would stay where they are, fool. 
A 40% drop in a $400K house would drop the price to $240K, or about where it should be, adjusted for inflation and affordability.  A 40% down payment would be $80K.  Today, a 20% down payment would be $80K on a $400K house.  That's about the market for lending right now, and why there are fewer buyers- they don't have the cash required because banks have tightened up lending.  A boom requires access to easy money.  Those days are GONE.    There are plenty of people who would like to have 100% financing, but aren't getting it.  It's no longer available.  That puts those potential buyers out of the market, leaving only those with cash and a job....and a motivation to buy now and not later.  That's not many people.  Banks want people to have some skin in the game.  20%.  20% of $400K or 40% of $260K is the same amount.  If somebody doesn't have the down payment to buy a house, then they shouldn't be buying.  It's not a crash, it's a return to fundamentals. 
For those of you with a brain I suggest a googling of "the Minsky Cycle," or "Minsky Meltdown."  Explains everything you need to know on this subject. 
My plan is to buy homes from deceased estates with owner financing...in a few years, of course.
 

Maybe those of you who bash

Maybe those of you who bash property would instead rather invest in gilt edged bank deposits:
Investors lose 13 per cent in closed ASB trusts
By Tamsyn Parker

An Auckland couple whose investment with the ASB has shrunk by 13 per cent say they are angry the bank is closing down 10 trusts withoutgiving them a chance to recoup their loses.

link: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10658620

Nope.  My money's on

Nope.  My money's on trees!   
 
:-)

Olly N @ 10.52am About as

Olly N @ 10.52am

About as silly as saying don't buy houses because people lost cash in Blue chip

            should be a

 
 
 
 
 
 
should be a "hurt" in my last comment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Olly's "article" typifies

Olly's "article" typifies most commentators' perspectives - his view on things is consistently tinted by the lenses in his glasses. He will see things he wants to see and ignore data counter to his perspective. And he seems completely unaware of his biases, which only goes to make me even more distrusting of his conclusions. But, on this he is not alone. Too many people making too many dogmatic judgements, thinking that everyone else is an idiot and presuming on their own "independent" and "objective" perceptions.
However, I'll give Olly this - i do enjoy his raves. They are certainly entertaining.
However, I hope he doesn't make his property investment decisions using the same amount of excessive emotionalism he displays in his writing.
 

Do any of you guys own a

Do any of you guys own a home?
If so why so much glee?
What I see is if you have to sell it aint great.
Good housing stock is selling ok, the poorer end of the market moves slower and you may get a so called bargin, but you have to put considerable cash to bring it upto scratch. so it aint a bargin
Generaly prices are not falling because if you dont have to sell you want. Supply and demand is keeping prices up.

"Do any of you guys own a

"Do any of you guys own a home?" - Few here don't.
 
 "If so why so much glee?" - PIs and spruikers think any facts which indicate a poorly performing property market is "negative" and those discussing them to be doing so "gleefully". That's because you've spent the better part of the last decade in la-la-land, talking-up everything in sight.
 
"What I see is if you have to sell it aint great." - It's called "business". You buy, you sell. Some get bargains, some lose their shirts. It works both ways. The last few years buyers have been happily letting themselves be shafted by buyers, but now it's turned about-face, although sellers shafted themselves when they paid such high prices in a market that was so-obviously doomed. Live and learn.
 
"Good housing stock is selling ok..." - Is it? A lot is not selling, and the houses which are selling are going for "bargain" prices...compared to what they cost the seller, anyway.
 
"Generaly prices are not falling..." - Really? How odd, because according to every other fact and figure they are falling, and at a ever-increasing pace.
 
"...because if you dont have to sell you want." - Uh, what? The people who borrowed far too much to pay far too much for a grossly over-priced property probably do have to sell. That's a lot of people, probably the majority of those who bought property since around 2005. But even those that don't have to sell are watching the value of their property fall, and they'll be able to see it do that for years to come.
 
"Supply and demand is keeping prices up." - You didn't do so well in accounting at school, right? There is a marked over-supply at the moment, a genuine glut, and that's going to increase come spring time. And there is a clear shortage of demand: people have woken up to the fact that property is not a great investment, and they are far better off paying-down their substantial debt. So they are.
 
Lots of sellers, few buyers - prices fall, and it was inevitable considering that prices got much too high and the bank lending which allowed that to happen is nowhere to be found these days.

Oh yea of little faith- read

Oh yea of little faith- read and tremble:
 
14 Jul 2010
 
Residential property prices firmed last month to the highest June median ever despite relatively low turnover compared with the past 10 years, according to figures released today by the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand (REINZ).
After easing back to $350,000 in May the national median residential property price rose to $352,500 in June which is 3.67 percent higher than last year’s June median of $340,000 and also an increase on the previous highest June median of $347,500 recorded in 2007.
‘The predicted post-Budget blues have not come to fruition and we are not seeing the forecast fall in prices,’ says REINZ President Peter McDonald. ‘What we have is a genuine rather than a speculative market, with people seeking and buying homes to meet their own needs.’ 
But Mr McDonald says the REINZ statistics should not be taken as an indicator individual house values are still rising. They are purely the median of all sales during the month and can be impacted by the number of properties sold at either end of the price bracket.    
‘The average gap between listing and selling prices last month was relatively small at only four to five per cent which indicates successful vendors are being realistic in assessing the market value of their home,’ he said.  
Reflecting the traditional winter slow down of the real estate market, residential property transactions of 4575 last month were down on the May total of 5206, and sales of 6040 in June last year. But the total is more than the 4305 sales transactions recorded in June 2008.
‘The national median number of days to sell increased from 43 in May to 45 in June but was over 60 days in Waikato/BOP, Hawkes Bay, Manawatu/Wanganui and Taranaki, and 86 days in Central Otago Lakes which suggests significant regional differences in the state of the property market,’ Mr McDonald says.
The total value of residential sales, including sections, in New Zealand in June was $1.96 billion, a decrease on the May total of $2.27 billion. The breakdown of the values of the properties was 156 for $1 million plus, 539 for $600,000 - $999,999, 1,162 for $400,000 - $599,999 and 2,718 under $400,000. Movements in the median price varied widely from district to district across the country with falls as high as 11 per cent in 4 regions, and increases of up to 10 per cent in the other 8 when compared with the same month last year. The largest rise in the median price was in Canterbury/Westland which is up nearly 10.2 per cent on the previous year and the largest falls were in Northland down 9.6 per cent and Southland down 11.1 per cent.

 What has "faith" got to do

 What has "faith" got to do with it?
 
That's why you're such a shoddy businessman Olly, and bankrupt or on the run from creditors half the time: because you don't understand that business and markets are governed by fundamentals, not wishful thinking.

Olly, I'm a little surprised

Olly, I'm a little surprised at your clueless attitude to the merits of saving.
You wrote :-   "And that's where I have a problem. On all sides we are bombarded with messages that we as a nation should save more and spend less. But how can this work? We cannot save and spend at the same time.Taken to an extreme, if we all saved our pennies the banks would have even more money on deposit. And to whom would they then lend if there are no borrowers?"
Saving more, does not mean we will spend less. It may mean our spending will be defered until we can afford it. So that when we do spend, we are spending our own hard earned money, not debt borrowed from overseas banks, that has to be paid back with interest. Effectively, we are paying over the odds prices for everything we buy with debt.
NZ does have a debt problem, with net external debt approaching 100% of gdp. If people learnt to save for the things they want, rather than just slapping it on the plastic, then maybe we can start decreasing that debt ratio, and be better off as a nation.

Using Kiwis never ending

Using Kiwis never ending “Real Estate Mentality” today again. Bloggers talking about properties like crazy- clever Bernhard- keeps your blog busy. 
If such subjects contribute to help and improve our unbalanced economy - I doubt.
As I understand, listening and reading your articles you self condemn an over heated property market.

But then I think Kiwis in general like “The Spinning in a Circle.”
 
WK

Ollie is a nutter. Anyone who

Ollie is a nutter. Anyone who actually thinks that the property market has bottomed out , needs to think again. Any market that has run away with itself ,  moves back to its average , and this is what is likely to happen  to  property . Its happened on the NZX , the ASX and most other stock markets . The interest rate cycle is now also moving back up towards its avaerage. Its an unwritten law that property will revert back to kilter , every market in the world does this and its part of the free market system. Frankly with regards to supply and demand, property is probably in kilter right now , and the cost of borrrowing ( interest) is the only thing likely to influence the demand/supply equation .......and its not looking good ......... so watch this space Ollie.

Ollie you have contradicted

Ollie you have contradicted yourself .Your opening paragrapph suggests predictions of a collpase in property is not imminent , is dangerous talk , etc etc . Then you tell of buying a property for HALF its registered value. That's a collpase in anyone's language . If you asked the seller of that property  for his view , I am sure he would say the market HAS collapsed. Its all relative the truth is that all property is in trouble right now. I can see we are on the cusp of a meltdown, we are struggling to sell an investment property in West Auckland . Costs of borroing are going up , finance is neigh impossible to find, buildings are empty, and the recession is far from over. Middle income Kiwi's are broke and cant afford rentals and are moving in with the folks. Frankly , I dont share your optimism, but I wish I did have such a rose tinted view.    

Simple question: If "property

Simple question: If "property price is going to crash and burn" then why banks still continue to lend money?  The big four bank (incl. some smaller ones) have done very well even in the recession - I don't think they are dumb!
Just my thought but I am sure the cynics will comment shortly!

You must have missed the part

You must have missed the part where banks aren't loaning the way they used to. No more 105% plus car and holiday mortgages. People now must have a deposit and a reliably solid income. Also look at spruikers like Tony Alexander. He's so desperate you can hear the cold sweat dripping on to his desk. People have too much debt and don't want any more. The housing bubble popped and people are on a different fad now --- saving.

Kevin: the property I bought

Kevin: the property I bought for half price has problems that can be fixed- but fixing problems is not every ones cup of tea . Hence the discount. When the property is  fixed it will be worth it's full value once more- which will result in several millions "profit" 

Several million?  Do you mean

Several million?  Do you mean "millions" in capital gains - or "millions" on a rent returns basis?

Either way, he's counting a

Either way, he's counting a lot of eggs and calling them chickens.

You were able to buy it for

You were able to buy it for half price because the market is failing.
 
You cannot talk this bubble back to life Olly.
 
The days of talking-up the market are gone and everyone now recognises that fact.
 
It's all over.
 
Take your losses like a man.
 
Or run away and hide behind bankruptcy.
 

Sound like that one the fool

Sound like that one the fool bought that didn't have  driveway access! Landlocked battle-axe block. But that's 'fixable' too, at a price, I guess?

Olly, You're a hero. A

Olly,
You're a hero. A century of comments up before lunch.
Hoping you can bat on through tea to the close of play and bring up a double ton.
cheers
Bernard

But not a lot of good to you

But not a lot of good to you without the clickthrough revenue... ;)
 
Still, seeing Olly's utter desperation and terror first hand was worth every moment of my time!

It will be interesting to

It will be interesting to watch the market crush Olly's opinion in the next 2 years.  If I'm wrong, then I will pay 10% more for property than I should if I were to buy today.  No big deal.  Better that than buy and have prices drop another 20%.  That's the problem with calling market bottoms.  It's never a bottom until the trend reverses and starts going the other way.  Right now you are seeing on a chart that prices are touching where they were 2-3 years ago.  That's called a "double top" in technical analysis.  From here the price either has to absolutely EXPLODE to the upside (extremely rare), or begin a crash is a selling panic (more likely).  Olly would do very well to read the works of Jesse Livermore, probably and arguably the most successful of all stock market speculators in history.  He loved to sell things short, and the sad thing is, so few people even know what that means.  If you sell short, you make money when a stock crashes.  If I could sell short the real estate market, I would.  Right now. 

You can short the NZ property

You can short the NZ property market, just short an Aussie bank.
Fairly safe bet I reckon, I might look in to it to.

Like the sharemarket, FX,

Like the sharemarket, FX, hedge funds etc.  . Noone knows when housing market will hit the bottom, we can only look back at the data knowing that it has bottomed out.  In the mean time, everyone can have a go at guessing it (some will be educated guesses).  
So if you want to take the risks (Like Olly) then have a go, you only got yourself to blame and your banks if they want to go for a ride!  If Olly made a bundle, good on him...!

If the collapse of properties

If the collapse of properties will cause economic damage (not disagreeing here), surely the fact that our house prices are well above the long term average, and well out of kilter with the afordability ratios should be causing economic damage as well.  Its just a matter of working out which side of the equation is the biggest. 

Thank you Bernard for your

Thank you Bernard for your kind words.  One of the few comments that makes 100% sense and good reading besides my own.  

I am one of the investors in

I am one of the investors in Landmark who lost money as a result of your lack of ability Olly. When am I going to get back what I lost from you. You go on about how wealthy you are but do not seem to be willing to put things right.

 "investing" is gambling, you

 "investing" is gambling, you don't ask the casino back when you lose money do you?

It's only gambling if you

It's only gambling if you don't know what you're doing. 

So no plans to address the

So no plans to address the many contradictions, unsupported assertions, and plain old self-serving nonsense that have been pointed out?
It's an interesting habit you have of declaring that prices aren't dropping, EXCEPT for the properties you buy, which seems very inconsistent, selective and dishonest.  Unless Planet Olly somehow operates independently from the universe the rest of us are living in?

The cost of borrowing is

The cost of borrowing is going up, but imterest rates are still low, and will be for some time...
House prices are not climbing out of control - neither are they in freefall.
Probably no worse time to buy or sell a house?
 

Uh chicken or egg

Uh chicken or egg scenario?
"They think a massive drop in the market would make housing 'more affordable'. What they cannot understand is if that really happened hundreds of thousands of Kiwis would be out of work".
What you are saying (I think) is if a housing collapse happened we wouldnt be able to afford to buy...where it may actually be the case that because we enter the Second Great Depression we cant afford to buy so then house prices collapse.
Not sure which is which looking to see what happened in the 1st GD may show us which happens first. 
and in fact it might well be that we get a negative spiral effect, chicken, egg, chicken, egg.....etc....all the way down...to a 40~50% loss, maybe even more. I recall reading that the drops were 89% for some things during the 1st GD.
Saving v spending.....our economy has mis-directed itself...ie we now cannot survive if we stop spending and the only way we can keep spending is taking on more debt.....I hate to use the word "common sense" but common sense should tell us at some point we cant take on any more debt....indeed at that point with no spare cash we cant pay off the existing debt so in effect the economy stagnates, it just happens later....we are then very vunerable to an un-expected cost we cant meet or an increase in interest rates...just a small thing could tip us as individuals into failure to pay.  Govn's are probably more resilient in theory...but if many of the above tax payers are indebted and the Govn then effectively raises taxes to pay for its debt, we tax payers default on something....
I think the Govn is right to try and get us off the property band wagon and right to do it gently as possible....in terms of wealth, property is too much of a financial / speculative gain and not a worked for gain....that has to change if we are to become a robust and solid economy.
 
 
 
 
 
 

The debt and real estate

The debt and real estate bubble is so huge that the inevitable decline and deleveraging will probably be pretty hellish across the board in the short term, but if it means that in the long term New Zealanders can live without running up huge debts in order to over-pay for accommodation throughout their lifetimes, then that will be a very positive thing.  Less money poured into the black hole of mortgage and consumer debt means more money to be invested and spent in ways that will actually benefit the wider economy.  Given less mortgage stress the average family will be far more able to go for an occasional dinner out, hire a cleaner, go on holiday, and all the other millions of things that would be more productive than sending most of their income straight out of the country in the form of interest payments.

Leave Olly to it. The

Leave Olly to it. The Government, that he so roundly critisizes, has determined what will happen to the property market in New Zealand. He can ignore their advice at his peril.

Wow! Emotions are high.   So

Wow! Emotions are high.
 
So here is my true story just to add something to the pot.
 
When I was in my 20s I bought a house. That was when I finished my apprenticeship and was well into my first job and where I still am today! But anyhow I worked long hours and paid off most of it because it was much cheaper than houses are now of course.
 
A few years ago both my parents died within some months of each other. My only other family is my sister who married an American when she was 18 and they have lived in the USA and Canada ever since that time. She has come home three times the last for my dad's funeral and she said then that it was the last time, because the trip is too long and not worth it. Sometimes I visit them.
 
But I got the old family home and it was bigger than mine. The house I bought was smaller but in an area that got very valuable which was a surprise I wasn't expecting at all. Lots of yuppie types thought it was trendy even though it definitely wasn't when I bought it all those years ago!
 
So anyway it was actually worth much more than my parents old house so I sold my home for a mint in September 2006 and moved into the old family place which was nearer to my work so it was a good move. All the house money went into term deposit accounts and some investments which have done well, and nothing was put into finance companies thanks God!
 
My sister doesn't want the family house, they are filthy stinking rich like Kiwis cannot believe. The money in America is just amazing. So the old house is all mine and I live mortgage free and rent free so life is cheap and good I'm happy to say and my banked money is doing well too.
 
But I have had arguments with guys at work who say I was crazy to sell my first house because it would get worth more and more in their opinion and I should have hung on to it and rented out the family home and bought more property. But the thing is I'm not getting any younger! When I retire which isn't all that far away I don't want to be mucking about with house sales at my age. What I want is to just relax with enough money to keep me comfortable until I catch up with mum and dad again!
 
The boys at work all have so much debt! They say it's fine because it's on property and will make them money but I think of the days when you paid off the house within only a few short years and then could save for a good and comfortable future and have a bit of fun, and buy nice cars or fund hobbies. People today seem to only have one hobby which is houses!
 
But who on Earth wants to pay huge prices for a house which takes them forever to pay off and even when they sell a chuck will go to clear the mortgage. Think of the money they could have been saving for themselves and their family if houses hadn't become so bloody expensive? No, it all goes to pay mortgages on their house and their rental property and suchlike while working like slaves to pay for it all during the best part of their lives.
 
And that's what they are really when you stop and think about it -- They are house slaves. They throw away their best years to pay for a house or houses then have to sell it when they're getting old to help pay their bills before they die. I'm certain some of them will die prematurely from the stress, they always seem to do nothing but talk about houses and mortgage interest rates and so on and so forth, arguing, arguing all the time among themselves, sometimes quite viciously.
 
I know I am lucky the way things turned out for me and our young ones don't have it so easy with the price of houses being so high, but there are much better things to do with your money and you life especially than worry about houses. A house is just a box really isn't it. So I hope the prices fall rather a lot and it seems likely they will, because it will be nice to think the kids of today and tomorrow can have the things we had and not be stuck with only our debt.
 
Sorry for such a long and dull rambler folks!
 
Anton.

Two dollar shop provide value

Two dollar shop provide value for money.People from all works of life shop there.People think wisely these days and save.People don't bother much about brand name.

Too true saathi and the

Too true saathi and the Sallys have such bargains. Gotta be the best place for the family mum to save a bob or two and ....and pick up the odd cracking good buy.

Good ramble, Anton. But 'it's

Good ramble, Anton. But 'it's the leverage' is the counter to your piece. Buy at 80% LVR, lots of them, and reap the rewards on someone elses money. Sounds great, in the good times. But it will mean financial and lifestyle anihilation for many, in the years to come.

"They continue to be

"They continue to be spectacularly wrong, it should be noted.", Olly starts with. Actually, it's Olly and his pals that are the ones doing the wrong kind of speculation! And it's not only going to be publicly very embarassing when the market heads off down again, but very expensive!

"Spectacularly wrong" he

"Spectacularly wrong" he says, only based on  a 'median house price' report which we all know is bunk stats based entirely on worped stats! I can't wait to rubbed Olly's nose in the next catastrophic 2 years

Bernard, I hope you pay Olly

Bernard, I hope you pay Olly well for all the extra traffic he gets on your site.
That said, I don't expect any great collapse in property prices just sideways movement for a number of years as inflation eats into their real value.
If prices are down 5 % in 2 years then the real figure is more like 15% in real terms.
If property prices end up 10% down over 4 years than in real terms they will be down 25% given our rampant domestic inflation.
10 years of sideways movement would be a real 40% drop. We are never going to get back to the early 70s (and earlier) when affordability was only 2 times income, but it sure would be a start.

Olly, you have basically said

Olly, you have basically said that NZs ecomony is currently a big bubble fueled over the last 8 years by the property price hike. Therefore if it burst and property prices fell, it would mean terrible things for the economy. Well yes you are probably right, and is exactly what has happened in Ireland. It is not a case of whether it will happen, but when it will happen. Hopefully it won't get as bad as ireland. The houses in NZ on average are rubbish quality wise, unless you get an architecturally designed well detailed high spec building, whcich there are few of.
Prices may be higher than they were, however in real terms when you take into account inflation, and what you could have got if you had that same money in the bank, houses have lost ground over the last 2-3 years.
 

Amen.  And the leaky house

Amen.  And the leaky house problem has not even been addressed.  No way.

 a predictable set of

 a predictable set of response to that old dinosaur,bullfighter(or should that be bullsh-tter) Olly's appearance here on the rack!
if olly's getting scared,as is apparent in his rave, then we really are on the skid slope downhill,...but i sold up in 06 and am renting and waiting to buy so it's all  a plus from where i sit?
 
BTW OLLY..IT'S NOT ARRANT, AS YOU HAVE IN YOUR HEADLINE..IT'S ERRANT !!

Rob  please note:   Both

Rob  please note:   Both spelliings are correct . Go back to school.

"spelliings Olly. You should

"spelliings Olly. You should not be so arrogant. You need to go back to school also.

So you'll nitpick spelling,

So you'll nitpick spelling, but weasel out of addressing rebuttals people have made to the substance of your article.  Really enhances credibility.

Posted this result before..

Posted this result before.. Just a reminder we are nowhere near as bad, and in the US only -5.3 !!!  One would have thought minus 20 or something!
Global house prices
Year to March 2010 (country, percentage change)
1. Hong Kong +27.1
2. Singapore +23.9
3. Taiwan +18.5
4. Australia +16.6
5. Israel +12
6. Finland +11
7. Sweden +9.6
8. China +8.2
9. Norway +7.6
10. Britain +5.4
16. New Zealand +1.5
27. United States -5.3
Source: www.globalpropertyguide.com.

USA is a biiiiggg

USA is a biiiiggg country.  Lots of areas have had massive falls, but many have not really been impacted.  This is why you hear horror stories of 30% drops, but the average doesn't look so bad.

-20% was 2008.  Get a clue.

-20% was 2008.  Get a clue.

The way Olly cocked up

The way Olly cocked up Landmark in the 1980s and lost a lot of people a lot of money you would wonder whether he ever went to school at all. People who generally get into property in a big way do not have any other way of making some decent coin I find.

 Meanwhile over on the

 Meanwhile over on the official OLLY Channel we find out why Olly is talking up a storm..to sell more rubbish to the uncertain, the financially iltterate and the tea-leaf readers.
read on:"

Post-Budget Special Briefing - Audio CD set available NOW

When the rules change, the ’right’ strategy might change too. ANY change to the property market presents new challenges, risks and opportunities. 
This is not a time for panic or reflex action. It’s time to get advice from those you can trust.

This Audio CD set gives you the chance to listen in on a straight-talking, feet-on-the-ground session with three genuinely experienced property investors and experts. They each share their views of the changes and their implications, and the way forward -- paying attention to their own areas of expertise. 

After their briefing (about an hour) listen to them answer and discuss questions raised by members of the more than 100 strong audience of local investors.

This special LIVE recording evening is an opportunity for anyone interested in today’s property market (owners, investors and those intending to be) to get the benefit of their broad experience and long view ... read a review of the evening (and contents of the Audio CDs) here.
Get your copy of this Audio CD set ($69 + P&H) at our website here ... or call 09 535 2415.
^Top

Olly Newland's July column: "The Gathering Storm"

In this column, I would like to cover a variety of topics, as the last few weeks have been crammed with 'news' and opinions about the property market — and much of it arrant, dangerous nonsense.
Some folk in the news media and posters on various websites have had a field day predicting the imminent collapse of the property market. They continue to be spectacularly wrong, it should be noted.
These deluded commentators seem to believe that if property prices fell by 20% to 30% (as some have predicted) then they, and their children would be able to buy a house more cheaply in the future and that would be a wonderful thing. They think a massive drop in the market would make housing 'more affordable'.
What they cannot understand is if that really happened hundreds of thousands of Kiwis would be out of work, much of our economy and industry would come to a virtual halt, the banks would collapse and New Zealand would be reduced to a nation of ragged beggars left to shuffle through the two dollar shops and rifle garbage bins.
Jobless and with an economy in ruins it wouldn't matter if houses were a third of their present price. They would still be unaffordable.
 
 
mercifully abridged blah blah

"tea-leaf readers"....oh sod

"tea-leaf readers"....oh sod it Rob...I've just finished my ncea level 5 in chicken guts reading. Now what?

Perhaps a little

Perhaps a little overly emotive by Olly, RotN, but probably the spirit of the thing is about right. Oh. And the bit he so badly fails to mention: Those with cash will be in the box seat. Sell while ye can!!
"...thousands of Kiwis would be out of work, much of our economy and industry would come to a virtual halt, the banks would collapse and New Zealand would be reduced to a nation of ragged beggars left to shuffle through the two dollar shops and rifle garbage bins.
Jobless and with an economy in ruins it wouldn't matter if houses were a third of their present price. They would still be unaffordable.
"

The clown who wrote this

The clown who wrote this article is the worst kind of self-centered fool I have ever read. What an idiot,

 shucks wally...fade out the

 shucks wally...fade out the chicken guts and try the residue at the bottom of a good glass or merlot..works for me...crazy ole world,huh?

In two or three years time we

In two or three years time we will all look back and say "Olly was right!"

Let's hope so. Because the

Let's hope so. Because the alternative scenario he gives us is pretty grim.

HaHaHaHaHaHa

HaHaHaHaHaHa

Either that or he'll be bust

Either that or he'll be bust

Bugger....time to get into

Bugger....time to get into sly grogging...I hear there is a vacancy!

Olly , thanks for your

Olly , thanks for your response to my comment . I get the gist of your article , dont get me wrong , and I like to see someone with something positive to say about property . I  want to be as positive as you are. My gut feeling however is not optimistic and I am paying down all my debt as fast as I can and selling marginal investments . My concerns are around interest rates and secure jobs (incomes) . Our property  investments are cash negative at a mortgage rate of 7,75 % and we are getting closer . I have fixed some of them . My wife and I dont have the income we had three years ago to service a big shortfall , and tenants are struggling to pay rents on time. Some have lost their jobs and some are on short -time . Wealthy Asian immigrants from HK, South Korea  and Singapore no longer arriving , the poorer ones are coming in now from Phillipines and Indonesia, with no money to buy or pay a decent rent . The world economy is a shambles and it could wash up here especially if Aussie Banks have to raise expensive cash offshore , and Kiwi's are caught in the crossfire . I also dont see a property crash however , because everyone has to be housed, but things could get much tougher for us before they get any easier  

"Residential property prices

"Residential property prices firmed last month to the highest June median ever..."
"...the national median residential property price rose to $352,500 in June which is 3.67 percent higher than last year’s June median of $340,000 and also an increase on the previous highest June median of $347,500 recorded in 2007".
‘The predicted post-Budget blues have not come to fruition and we are not seeing the forecast fall in prices’

WHERE IS THE PROMISED CRASH?! I HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR MORE THAN 2 YEARS NOW! UNDO THE PRICE RISES IMMEDIATELY!!! I DEMAND THE PROMISED CRASH!!
 
 

"Property prices still 6.1%

"Property prices still 6.1% down on January 2008 high point". There's the start for you. Hang in a bit longer. All things come to those that wait.

I agree with you The Man.

I agree with you The Man.

Olly,   Weren't you talking

Olly,
 
Weren't you talking DOWN property prices during the best years of the boom?  Now, when its pretty obvious the next leg is down, you seem to be bullish on property?
 
No wonder Bob Jones called you Omelette Olly in one of his books, egg on face coming up soon I'd say!

500sq section 120k     

500sq section 120k      (dictated by land supply and council fees)
170sq house 190k       (determined by tradesmen and compliance costs)
landscap, driveway, fence 20k    (tradesmen again)
Finance 9months 15k     (banks and int rates)
House price $345k
RV $355k
For house prices to drop 20 to 30 % given that we have net immigration who is going to take the hit? 

Obviously (A) ! Land....

Obviously (A) ! Land....

120k of land is pretty much

120k of land is pretty much all council/subdivision fees and reserves contributions, so if the answer is (A) that means the land will be worth less than negative $70k. This seems unlikely.

I agree with Olly that rents

I agree with Olly that rents WILL rise a bit in the next couple of years - but nowhere near enough to return property to being a good investment overall.
I DO think the talk of increasing rents is exaggerated,. As Olly rightly states, the benefits of the tax cuts will be more than wiped out by the increased costs of living. People simply won't have enough money to afford very significant rental increases. Instead, they will tend to stay at home my mum and dad longer, or crowd into flats a bit more than they otherwise would have. Remember many university graduates over the last year or two are struggling to even get jobs - this will be reducing demand for rental properties

In addition, as migration turns around there will be less demand for rental properties

I think Landlords dreaming of significant rental increases are dreaming

How about the obvious, the

How about the obvious, the land price !
NZ uses about 2% of it's land for housing. So not much of a problem to release land for the public to buy.
n.b. Stopping companies land banking, and-or charge companies for their present land banking, thus releasing cheap land onto the market.
Also during deflation, salaries and costs fall, so there'd be room for more cuts.
Easy in principle, nothing magical needed, just deflation and-or sensible Government freeing up of land to build.

Okay. It's not Auckland, but

Okay. It's not Auckland, but in Christchurch you can drive in any direction and say to yourself " Lotta land, here!" 2011 sees the review of the  Council Plan, not to mention The Flight Path Review, so who knows? All those 10 acre block to be chopped up.....

 Omlette Olly!  Shriek!!! By

 Omlette Olly!  Shriek!!!
By the expression above definitely a cheese-y omlette.

From Andy: "I don't expect

From Andy: "I don't expect any great collapse in property prices just sideways movement for a number of years"
 
Andy, no offense, but name ONE TIME that this has EVER happened in history?  The only time that prices go sideways for any amount of time is when they are bouncing on the bottom of the graph in a Depression.  Prices go UP or they go DOWN, rarely sideways.  Especially at high prices.  True of any asset

From Andy: "I don't expect

From Andy: "I don't expect any great collapse in property prices just sideways movement for a number of years"
 
Andy, no offense, but name ONE TIME that this has EVER happened in history?  The only time that prices go sideways for any amount of time is when they are bouncing on the bottom of the graph in a Depression.  Prices go UP or they go DOWN, rarely sideways.  Especially at high prices.  True of any asset

Who would’ve thought in the

Who would’ve thought in the 40’s, 50’s, & 60s that affordability would have ever gone beyond 2X income affordability.
House prices are highly related to money supply. Do you see this going anywhere over the next few years?
If house price fall by 10% then rise by 10%. That is side ways movement because the starting price is the same as the ending price.
House prices have moved sideways for three years, is it unrealistic given the de-leveraging happening worldwide for this to occur for another 5+ years. I don’t think so.

I am one of those who have

I am one of those who have been saying for a long time that Hugh Pavletich is right, we have unprecedented Ponzi type behaviour in housing "investment" because the supply side of the market has been turned into a racket by the councils and their urban growth boundaries. The land bankers take it from there.
Olly is partly right about the fact that we are stuffed once our property bubble blows. Knowing you're going to be stuffed if it happens, doesn't make it not happen.
Governments are very responsible for the catalogue of mismanagement that has got their economies into this mess.  Years of property price inflation, home owners using rising equity as an ATM for consumer spending, GDP up, tax receipts up, finance ministers basking in the warm fuzzies and dreaming up lavish new ways to spend the money. Meanwhile, in NZ anyway, the part of the economy that really matters, where all income growth comes from, shrunk 12%.
I suspect Ollie Newland doesn't truly believe that continuing the property Ponzi scheme is the "solution" to all this - I suspect he is spreading obfuscation in the hope that some "bigger suckers" will come along and take some of HIS investments off his hands before the crash comes. Smart operators will be using any rally to "sell".
The fact that we're stuffed anyway once it happens, ain't gonna stop it happening. You can't inflate the non-productive, speculative asset part of the economy and shrink the "tradables" sector forever. The follies that led to this mess have been followed by such confusion in the economics profession, that I feel more than ever that my pessimism is well founded.  The biggest confusion of all is the non-ability to see the origin of all this, in the land supply side.
 

Obfuscation's the word, all

Obfuscation's the word, all right.  Just did a Youtube search on 'Olly Newland'.  Was quite instructive.  Hard not to get the impression that over the past 2 or 3 years he's been coming out with all kinds of vague and/or wildly contradictory scattershot bullsh1t, possibly in the hopes that some of it will turn out to be correct, and that we'll all forget about the oceans of wrong.

Look up and see what he did

Look up and see what he did to Landmark. He absolutely stuffed it and lost no end of shareholders funds because he thought he knew what he was doing. Nothing has changed. He told someone earlier today on this site to go back to school. What a cheek as he never went. Don't worry he will leave his estate to all the poor shareholders who lost their money in the Landmark debacle. Good old Olly. He wont't let them down like Hotchin, Petrovic and Watson.

Oh, I did. Unfortunately I

Oh, I did.
Unfortunately I didn't take screenshots, but I think the website where he's hawking books has been lightly edited over the past couple of weeks.  I'm sure that last time I checked in the blurb for 'Lost Property' included some idiotic statement about how 'nobody' could have foreseen the 1987 crash.  Now it's gone.

Olly - you didn't comment on

Olly - you didn't comment on this question that I asked you earlier. Am keen to know what is your opinion on these kinds of ideas:
 
Asset class focused capital adequacy rules:
 
http://www.interest.co.nz/news/rbnz-delays-introducing-tougher-capital-rules-rural-lending-until-end-2010
 
and LVRs:
 
http://www.telegraph..co.uk/finance/personalfinance/borrowing/mortgages/7831323/Bank-of-England-to-cap-mortgages.html
 
Maybe have increased LVR's for non-owner occupied residential property? (Investment property.)
 
That'd still leave you serious PIs with yield, indeed better yield IMO.
 
Cheers, Les.
www.mea.org.nz

Attn Auckland Property

Attn Auckland Property Experts: Can you please advise approx. people have been paying for an investment property in an average suburb in Auckland and the rent they were likely to achieve. i.e. rental yield! Not a difficult question if you know the market as many think you do.

west auckland usually around

west auckland usually around 250-<300K for 3 beddy with car port, average rent west Auckland $335 pwk, I got a 3 beddy recently for $255K and after lick of paint rented it out within a week for $350 per week with great tenants

28 yr old. Well done. Seems

28 yr old. Well done. Seems like good investing to me. So there are opportunities up in Auckland. Seems like too many aren't prepared to work and want to be given everything.
Keep up the good work!!

The Man...good to see you

The Man...good to see you back on site.

Regards.

RPIT. Hard to keep the good

RPIT. Hard to keep the good investors down. Isolated by Bernard for a few days but saw so many garbage comments had to reply. They also thought we are one and the same, amazing really. Also had some using "the Man" name giving abuse so had to reappear.

You are the smartest

You are the smartest commenter here so keep it up.
BH is just a moron who thinks he knows everything about finance but really knows nothing and does not know that we experienced pros are all laughing at him.

RPIT. Thanks I appreciate you

RPIT. Thanks I appreciate you saying that and you are pretty sharp and on the ball always.
Bernard is just a little girl on the subject of finance dancing for all the negative losers living in their caravans and eating dog food.

The Man at 11.38p.m. I did

The Man at 11.38p.m. I did not say this comment Bernard.Imposter.

Previous post not written by

Previous post not written by RPIT...now I know why people use anonymous...gee there are some bitter people around when it comes to money...phew!

People are still paying too

People are still paying too much for them as the rental return is rubbish.That is why a lot of them are on the market and their prices are coming down every month.

This is all that I get on

This is all that I get on here is that people are paying too much and the prices are coming down.
What do people pay in Auckland and the return please!!!

What do people pay in

What do people pay in Christchurch and what is the average rent.

Depends on the level of

Depends on the level of expertise. Can pay as little as $220K and get a return in the vacinity of $330 p.w. if you look around and prepared to work!

These cannot be very nice

These cannot be very nice houses. Do they need a lot of work on them. In Taranaki where I live $220k gets you a house that needs considerable work done on it and you would be lucky to get $220 to $250pw depending on the location. Even less.

anon at 7.50 p.m. Not much

anon at 7.50 p.m. Not much work at all if you know what you are doing.

Anon at 7.50 p.m. Not a

Anon at 7.50 p.m. Not a typical example but you can find good buys around still if you are an investor.

Les: Your first link concerns

Les: Your first link concerns farming loans and although I am considered an expert on all manner of pure property investment, farming is a mixture of life style, home and business so best answered by a farming expert.

Your second link does not work for some reason. I think what you are saying is that LVR's should be different for different classes of property. Higher for homes, less for second homes, different again for business premises as against pure investment. If I read you right the banks are doing that now in any event.

Typically a bank will go up to 80% and more sometimes for home owners while investors may be limited to 70-75%. Again different classes of apartments get different levels for loans and whether its unit title, cross lease, strata, bare land or stand alone can also make a difference.

Olly - thanks. I just checked

Olly - thanks. I just checked that 2nd link and I could not get it to work either. Ho hum. Anyway, like the first link about specific capital adequacy ratios for some asset classes, in that case dairy farms, the general idea was about Central Banks (our RBNZ) specifying (and possibly varying, not in articles) minimum LVRs to help avoid the pro-cyclical nature of lending practices that tend to contribute to 'bubbles'. Sure, banks might well be looking harder now, in essence pro-cyclical given where we are on the curve, and not unreasonably so. However, I guess the nub of the question is, given banks would tend to relax LVRs during upswings, should we have our RB specifiying minimum LVRs to counter the pro-cyclical nature of such lending (during upswings in particular) so as to minimise the bubble effect and smooth volatility in the property market? 
What do you think?
Cheers, Les. 

You call yourself an expert

You call yourself an expert in property investment after what you did to the shareholders in Landmark. What a joke and how arrogant.

The sad fact is this.. The

The sad fact is this..
The government will always be on the property side, business borrowing is linked so strongly to property and banks dont lend against business but are happy to lend against property.
If property crashs, businesses will go down, jobs will be gone, banks go down, savings disappear, the whole country will be draged down, so they have to keep the property market going.
Thing is if you put the hard earned money towards property, you will at least have 1/2 chance. If you are a saver or renter then you'll get no chance.
At the end of the day, renters provide a market for property investment.
Its very sad, and we've all been in this game for so long, and theres no way we can change that, because we humans always want cheaper, better and more. Thats called greed.

yes and no.  The government

yes and no.  The government will go after whoever they can TAX the most. THAT is now the 'multi home buyers' club who are fast being found via IRD

Olly Steals property off

Olly Steals property off desperate vendors buying at 30% to 50% below value then holds or tries to resell later at valuation quiet simple really......................!

"What they cannot understand

"What they cannot understand is if that really happened hundreds of thousands of Kiwis would be out of work, much of our economy and industry would come to a virtual halt, the banks would collapse and New Zealand would be reduced to a nation of ragged beggars left to shuffle through the two dollar shops and rifle garbage bins."
 
Yeah what ever (w)Olly, That's why we in the 'know' call it a "false economy".

(w)Olly basically ADMITTED

(w)Olly basically ADMITTED that the housing market is a "ponzi scheme" which he seems to think WE are all beholdened too! Well, not when your debt FREE olly. Property is going down down down, it's going down down down,

Like a lot of other spruikers

Like a lot of other spruikers make a lot of cashflow from running seminars for the uneducated, one such seminar is coming up soon where the promotors will gross $125k for two days work, the spruikers all work in conjuction to suck in as many suckers as they can for a day of total BS. Spruikers subsidise there properties or cover their cashflow deficits by running seminars, seminars are a huge cashflow for spruikers in times like these where there may be huge deficits on the 100's of properties they may or may not have bought during the boom years.
Yes the seminars are a huge help to the spruikers cashflow....Buyer beware......Yes it;s cheap but pack in 300 suckers and what do you get a huge cash transfer to the spruiker and not much else.

Things must be getting bad

Things must be getting bad for the likes of (w)olly, he sounds scared!

Wow a thread talking about

Wow a thread talking about property prices, how novel.

A sad reflection of what NZ

A sad reflection of what NZ has become I'm afraid. We could of been the 'Switzerland' of the South Pacific, but alas no, we sold our souls, our land, our good businesses and good state assets, and we are about to sell our principals to the highest bidders in Asia via No:1 traitor John Key

Seems to be one of the things

Seems to be one of the things NZ is best at, selling our futures down the road.
But don't you realise, that apparently all this money that comes in from overseas will be used really wisely, and this time won't be wasted on rubbish, like it just so happened to be every other time.
Yeah right.

Olly is spot on: Bollard is

Olly is spot on:

Bollard is pathetic
This government hasn't got a clue
The pessimists outweigh the optimists
The gloomers outnumber the boomers
The bankers are bastards
The hard worker is hard to find

This counry is going to the dogs!

Justice: I am not scared at

Justice: I am not scared at all. Indeed I am thrilled at the way the market is working in my favour. Investment in anything is all about timing. I have used the ups and down of the market over the years to profit and there is no need to be squeamish about it. Some times you win and some times you lose. No body ever said the business has to be nice.

Good old Olly timed it so

Good old Olly timed it so well in the 80's he lost a lot of money for a lot of New Zealanders. It was one big down. His greed which he obviously has not lost clouded his judgment and the little people who foolishly believed and trusted in him lost out. Some probably never to recover. His arrogance is disgusting. Why is he on this site. There has to be someone out there with better credibility than him.

Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExp

Normal
0

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}

It is so interesting to read everyone's comments. Some of them it is really worth to read them, some of them could be for entertainment.
 
I think whatever you do, it all has risk. Everyone has their own choices for investment. I still think the properties are the best long term investments amount others. I will keep invest in properties if I have money or bank allow me to borrow more.

Can I be the 100th comment?

Can I be the 100th comment?

I mean 200th... dang...

I mean 200th... dang...

If you can mathematically

If you can mathematically demonstrate how house prices can continue to increase 5.2% in perpetuity while wages grow at 1.5% without NZers becoming further debt burdened I will take my hat off to you.

V, you're asking the wrong

V, you're asking the wrong question. The question should be how do we keep supplying houses to people who can't afford them? We know what is affordable i.e. what wage is required to support a specific purchase price, so if the purchase price increases 5.2% ad infinitum, and wage growth only 1.5%, then obviously less and less people can afford houses. There in lies your answer.

Yeah sorry, it was mean't to

Yeah sorry, it was mean't to be more of a rhetorical statement to the opinion writer than a question. :-)

Too many people in this

Too many people in this country rely on others too much. We all have the same opportunities to prosper by getting off our butts and doing extra to improve our lot. The reality is that the people who continue to bemoan the property investors would really love to be in the same position but haven't bothered to try. While the doers are out making the most of their time the others are doing nothing constructive. I see it thru most of my tenants .

Usual response from The Fool

Usual response from The Fool who is going to learn his recent purchase using all or some borrowed money from the bank was not great timing but what would you expect from someone with blinkers on who has to put all his eggs in one basket because anything is really just too hard.

ex agent, the man has a plan.

ex agent, the man has a plan. He has stuck to it, obviously over many years. It has worked for him. He is now successful and can continue buying property even in quiet market times.

Shows the benefit of sticking to something for a long time.

What have you ever stuck to?

The idea is to be flexible

The idea is to be flexible The Fool as no market goes in a straight line as evidenced by the current housing market which is trending down and accelerating down. Soldn the houses in 2007/2008, bought some good shares last year when it bottomed and have most of them still and some cash for when the housing market bottoms. That will be sitting in the bank for some time believe me.

The idea is to be consistent

The idea is to be consistent ex agent. "The secret of sucess is constancy of purpose". Seems the man and others are like that...consistent.

Can't see you being successful if all you can do is put money in a bank. What man ever got rich (I mean real rich) sticking money in the bank.\? Very productive.

Yes, it's vitally important

Yes, it's vitally important to keep on doing the same thing no matter how circumstances may change.

Absolutely. Well said Kakapo

Absolutely. Well said Kakapo old mate. In the long time view, sticking to your knitting and what you know best will be successful. This is true in all of life.

Adaptation and flexibility

Adaptation and flexibility are for suckers.

And there is such a thing as sarcasm.

I agree Kakapo, stick to what

I agree Kakapo, stick to what you always do.

Those other guys are the sarcastic ones eh'. They will get nowhere.

The Fool you missed out on

The Fool you missed out on taking profits in 2007/2008 then missed out on the share market recovery last year because you are consistant. Flexibilty and pragmatism is the key in investing. And you never have all your money in one market let alone in all the markets as there will always be an opportunity to buy a bargain and it is handy to have cash available for that.
Warren Buffett always has cash in the bank so he can use it if an opportunity arises.

Have you sold your apple

Have you sold your apple shares ex agent? Big re-call coming up!

Haw Haw

Not yet. They will go to at

Not yet. They will go to at least $300us. Remember they have no debt The Fool.

I reckon putting all your

I reckon putting all your eggs in one basket is a fool's choice, you can't put all your money in one industry and expect to last, but hold on, the value of property always goes up! Its this one assumption that is going to bring down a lot of people I reckon, greed is blind.

I think what a lot of people need to realise is that being richer than someone else doesn't make you a bigger man.

alas alack,poor olly..i knew

alas alack,poor olly..i knew him well...whew,it's hot up on samui island in the land of smiles..
naughty olly..bad karma..not too late to start telling the truth..no shame in early dementia and forgetting things,you know?

So what if the residential

So what if the residential property market colapses? I have still got to live in my house with my wife and three kids. I have equity in the house and I will not sell into a collpased market if I dont have to, and I am sure most Kiwi's are in the same position. I dont see what the issue is here

Hi KB. Not sure if it's

Hi KB.

Not sure if it's actually an issue. People are just discussing current events.

The property market went sky high as a result of a combination of things, but mostly just because banks were lending to anyone like there was no tomorrow.

The downside was that prices went so high that it became very risky to buy when the world economy was in such a dodgy state (think of the mortgage!) and the people that did buy on the assumption that property values would continue to rise are now discovering that they lost the bet.

In short there are many property owners who are barely hanging on right now and with the way things are going many of them *will* be forced to sell. With the market heading down for the long term they will sell at quite a loss and still be left with a lot of mortgage debt to repay somehow.

The only real upside is that those who didn't take a punt and who still have jobs will be in a good position to buy an affordable home fairly soon, although since prices are likely to keep falling for a long time the buyers are probably better to wait until they're certain things have levelled out a bit.

KB a large part of the

KB a large part of the population are not in your position. PI"s have a lot of debt on their rentals,many have borrowed the lot for negative gearing or they just did not have the cash for a deposit. Also there are a considerable number of people who borrowed heaps to buy a home to live in instead of going up in steps. They like some of the PI"s have credit card,hp and car debt. Something has to give especially as values drop.

Olly not an imminent collapse

Olly not an imminent collapse just a long slow decline over the next decade or so but that's only if there are no severe economic shocks from overseas which would give it a good shake or two.

Anyone who says values have

Anyone who says values have increased in the last 12 months is truly ignorant. Talk to anybody actually buying and selling property and the facts are the market here nationwide is shocking.

Enormous discounts from desperate vendors are available daily and any experienced agent will tell you the market has just about stopped completely for everything except the very bottom end.
For Olly to be talking a market this bad up is truly sad.
Mind you he helps people sell property so this is a good way for him to uncover desperate vendors I guess.