sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Economics agreement; US drought; auto industry recovers; reviewing Geithner's term; the world in 2030; the new mercantalist challenge; Dilbert, and more

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Economics agreement; US drought; auto industry recovers; reviewing Geithner's term; the world in 2030; the new mercantalist challenge; Dilbert, and more

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10:00 am today in association with NZ Mint.

Bernard is on his summer break and will be back on January 22, 2013, from Wellington.

As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to david.chaston@interest.co.nz.

See all previous Top 10s here.

 

1. Finding common ground 
Chrystia Freeland reports on an effort to counter the undermining of expert economic knowledge.

She says that the economics profession is actually much more united in its analysis than most people would realise.

This is a tough time for experts. Empowered by the Internet and embittered by the sour economy, many people doubt the wisdom of expert elites.

Journalism sometimes casts further doubt by seeking polarised positions that can draw an attention-grabbing debate, or by taking refuge in he-said-she-said accounts to avoid the harder job of figuring out who’s right.

Now one tribe of specialists – economists – is striking back. Concerned that the great unwashed have come to see all economic proposals as being equally valid, the University of Chicago Booth School of Business has led an effort to figure out what economists agree on, where they diverge and how certain they are about their views.

To do that, the Booth school called on reputable economists to join its panel of experts. Each week, the panelists are asked whether they agree or disagree with a particular economic idea.

"Among practicing economists, it is understood that the media and the political process paints economists as more divided than they are," explained Anil K. Kashyap, a professor of economics and finance at the University of Chicago and a leader of the project. "It is more sensational and maybe makes for better reading to have point-counterpoint. It seemed reasonable to provide some context. There’s a lot more settled issues than most people have a sense of."

2. A drought's far-reaching grasp
The middle grain-producing areas of the US are in the grip of a long drought. In fact, the mighty Mississippi River is getting so low, some are forecasting it may soon cease to be navigable. And when the water is low, people start fighting over it. Could get serious:

"If this goes on, we're going to be forced to sell our cows this next spring," says Phillip Smith. He and his wife, Doris, have been farming and ranching the land in Amarillo - growing wheat, grain sorghum and hay for cattle - for more than 50 years.

The Smiths tell Lyden that they have already sold off a lot of the herd, and this year might be the last for the "Sunshine Ranch," as they've dubbed their farmstead. As the drought began, Phillip Smith says, submoisture allowed them to produce a "less than average" crop for two years, but this year they might not be able to grow anything.

"There is nothing growing on [the fields], it's pretty much bare ground," Doris Smith says. "Even the crops that we did plant in the late summer and early fall, because of the lack of moisture, those crops have died." Their farm is just one example of what is happening across the US., she says, and when agriculture suffers, we all suffer. "If you eat you are involved in agriculture [and] this really affects everybody," she says.

3. More half full/half empty debate
The warming planet will produce winners and losers. It is easy to focus on the losers. But there could well be a third impact - people will change what they do, adapting to the world as it changes. Or so says an optimist:

Consider the newest global-warming exaggeration: an article from Newsweek shrilly claiming that rising temperatures are heralding “The End of Pasta.” All of the major grains – rice, corn, and wheat – are already suffering from global warming, the article explains, but wheat is the most vulnerable to high temperatures. So, as warming increases, we will see “shockingly high prices” for pasta and bread. Its central message is straightforward: “If humans want to keep eating pasta, we will have to take much more aggressive action against global warming.”

The argument is almost entirely wrong.

Yields of all major crops have been rising dramatically in recent decades, owing to higher-yielding crop varieties and farmers’ greater use of fertilizer, pesticides, and irrigation. Moreover, CO2 acts as a fertilizer, and its increase has probably raised global yields more than 3% over the past 30 years.

But increasing temperatures will harm some crops while benefiting others. Because most crops are already grown where they do best, it is not surprising that climate models show that temperature increases will reduce yields if farmers change little or nothing. In fact, farmers will adapt, especially over the course of a century. They will plant earlier, grow more heat-loving varieties, or change their crop entirely. And, as growing wheat and grains becomes possible higher north in Canada and Russia, even more opportunities will open up.​​

4. Today's raw market data ...
A quick holiday update:

as at 11:10am Today
9:00 am
Monday Four
weeks ago
One
year ago
         
NZ$1 = US$ 0.8402 0.8385 0.8447 0.7935
NZ$1 = AU$ 0.7958 0.7951 0.8000 0.7697
TWI 75.31 75.17 75.26 71.14
         
Gold, US$/oz 1,658 1,675 1,696 1,641
Dow 13,495 13,486 13,149 12,467
Copper, US$/tonne 8,071 8,117 8,001 7,966
Volatility Index 13.56 13.36 16.34 22.20

5. A Detroit resurgence
The American auto industry is gearing up to sell more than 17 million vehicles, the same number as in the previous peak in 2007. In fact in 2015/16 they expect "serious pent-up demand" to come to market. It is a "remarkable turn-around".

The Detroit Three auto makers, which downsized dramatically by closing dozens of factories during the 1990s and 2000s, are almost reaching the point where they need to open new vehicle assembly plants. While they report healthy profits because of deep cost cuts made during the downsizing and what is now a solid recovery in North American sales, Chrysler, Ford. and General Motors, are staring at analysts’ forecasts for an even more robust market later in the decade.

6. The 'new' mercantilist challenge
The history of economics is largely a struggle between two opposing schools of thought, 'liberalism' and 'mercantilism.' Economic liberalism, with its emphasis on private entrepreneurship and free markets, is today’s dominant doctrine. But its intellectual victory has blinded us to the great appeal – and frequent success – of mercantilist practices. Dani Rodrik reviews who's on first:

The mercantilist model can be derided as state capitalism or cronyism. But when it works, as it has so often in Asia, the model’s “government-business collaboration” or “pro-business state” quickly garners heavy praise. Lagging economies have not failed to notice that mercantilism can be their friend. Even in Britain, classical liberalism arrived only in the mid-nineteenth century – that is, after the country had become the world’s dominant industrial power.

A second difference between the two models lies in whether consumer or producer interests are privileged. For liberals, consumers are king. The ultimate objective of economic policy is to increase households’ consumption potential, which requires giving them unhindered access to the cheapest-possible goods and services.

Mercantilists, by contrast, emphasize the productive side of the economy. For them, a sound economy requires a sound production structure. And consumption needs to be underpinned by high employment at adequate wages.

These different models have predictable implications for international economic policies. The logic of the liberal approach is that the economic benefits of trade arise from imports: the cheaper the imports, the better, even if the result is a trade deficit. Mercantilists, however, view trade as a means of supporting domestic production and employment, and prefer to spur exports rather than imports. Liberals should be happy to have their consumption subsidized by mercantilists.

Indeed, that, in a nutshell, is the story of the last six decades: a succession of Asian countries managed to grow by leaps and bounds by applying different variants of mercantilism. Governments in rich countries for the most part looked the other way while Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and China protected their home markets, appropriated “intellectual property,” subsidized their producers, and managed their currencies.

We have now reached the end of this happy coexistence. The liberal model has become severely tarnished, owing to the rise in inequality and the plight of the middle class in the West, together with the financial crisis that deregulation spawned. Medium-term growth prospects for the American and European economies range from moderate to bleak. Unemployment will remain a major headache and preoccupation for policymakers. So mercantilist pressures will likely intensify in the advanced countries.

7. 'Little known escape clause'
If things improve faster in the US than the Fed has counted on (or economists expect), then Bernanke has room to react quicker than previously signaled.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is giving himself an escape clause from his latest stimulus steps in case the economy finally gains momentum. He’s made his third round of quantitative easing open-ended - meaning the program doesn’t have a set time frame - and signaled he may adjust its pace if needed. In December, the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee added outright Treasury purchases to its mortgage-bond buying, saying it would acquire US. government debt “initially” at a pace of $45 billion a month on top of $40 billion in home-loan debt. Policy makers at their last December meeting saw the economy continuing to expand at a “moderate pace” as concerns about the so-called fiscal cliff restrained growth.

The strategy gives officials maneuvering room to slow purchases if gross domestic product expands at a more robust pace than forecast, said Dean Maki, chief US. economist at Barclays Plc. Fed officials in December projected growth in a range of 2 percent to 3.2 percent in 2013, already more optimistic than Wall Street’s median estimate of 2.2 percent, based on 57 analysts in a Bloomberg survey conducted Jan. 4 to Jan. 9. The Fed “doesn’t want to box itself in,” Maki, a former Fed board economist, said in a telephone interview from his New York office. “You could have a situation where financial markets improve and that leads to better growth. They want to not be committed to keep policy on hold, even if that stronger cycle were to get going.”

 

8. The Geithner era
It has been a tough four years for Tim Geithner, and he wants out. He is stepping down from a role where few expected him to shine. But many close observers think he did shine, and shine brighter than many of the stars around him at the Obama cabinet table.

It’s a result few would have forecast after his first few months in Washington. Called in from the presidency of the New York Federal Reserve Bank for his expertise in financial crisis management, Geithner was initially the lowest-profile member of the economic team. He lacked the sterling academic reputations of CEA chair Christina Romer and National Economic Council director Larry Summers, or the D.C. profiles of Summers or OMB director Gene Sperling. Nor was he a longtime confidante of the president. They’d never met during Obama’s stint in the Senate, and he played no role in the presidential campaign or the broader universe of aughts-era Democratic Party politics.

And in the early months it showed. Geithner was unsteady in his public appearances, and his team was an awkward blend of N.Y. Fed people who didn’t know Washington, and D.C. operatives who didn’t know him. But what looked initially like an error by a rookie president turned into a triumph. Geithner outlasted Summers and Romer, along with three chiefs of staff and two defense secretaries. And unlike Hillary Clinton, he became not just the head of a major government agency but a real adviser to the president - part of the inner circle of decision-makers.

9. Looking forward
If you have a long term investment decision to make, you may well want to have some idea about what the world will look like in 2030. The US National Intelligence Council has taken a crack at answering that. US centric, of course, but a useful basis to test some ideas. What do you think? You can read it here »

The NIC foresees a transformed world, in which "no country – whether the US, China, or any other large country – will be a hegemonic power."

This reflects four 'megatrends': individual empowerment and the growth of a global middle class; diffusion of power from states to informal networks and coalitions; demographic changes, owing to urbanization, migration, and aging; and increased demand for food, water, and energy.

Each trend is changing the world and "largely reversing the historic rise of the West since 1750, restoring Asia’s weight in the global economy, and ushering in a new era of ‘democratization’ at the international and domestic level."

The US will remain “first among equals” in hard and soft power, but "the ‘unipolar moment’ is over."

10. Today's quote
"It is an unfortunate human failing that a full pocketbook often groans more loudly than an empty stomach." Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Median price - REINZ

Select chart tabs

NZ total
Source: REINZ
Northland
Source: REINZ
Auckland
Source: REINZ
Waikato
Source: REINZ
Bay of Plenty
Source: REINZ
Gisborne
Source: REINZ
Hawke's Bay
Source: REINZ
Manawatu
Source: REINZ
Taranaki
Source: REINZ
Wellington
Source: REINZ
Tasman
Source: REINZ
Nelson
Source: REINZ
Marlborough
Source: REINZ
West Coast
Source: REINZ
Canterbury
Source: REINZ
Otago
Source: REINZ
Southland
Source: REINZ

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

13 Comments

"MasterCard reported last week that US gasoline consumption has slipped to the lowest level since tracking began in 2004. US oil imports have fallen to the lowest level in 25 years."

ho hum.

regards

 

Up
0

#2 and #3

Last week the US Department of Agriculture issued a report saying that the US corn inventory will be at its lowest point in 17 years by the end of August and the current inventories are 17 percent lower than last year at this time. Obviously it is too early to say anything about the 2013 crops, but another year of bad weather could lead to much higher food prices. For now there is not yet a critical mass of political leaders that is willing to link fossil fuels to climate change. Given the pace at which the situation is changing, however, this may not be the case much longer.

Whats strikes me on #3 is the clutching at straws....yes in highly controlled conditions higher co2 means better growth, yes a bit warmer means better growth, but this isnt an averages thing.  The problem is averages hides the extremes. Its tehse ever more occuring extremes thrown in that cause the huge problems. A few more inches of rain per year or less isnt so bad, trouble is it all seems to come or not at once, plants dont like that, they die.  So sure in a good year the crop will be higher, but bad years it could drop a lot, then we have less inventories asnd we ration by price.

regards

Up
0

Have to agree, how do you adapt to extremes of weather, not many crops flourish in hurricanes, drought and flood

Up
0

And, as growing wheat and grains becomes possible higher north in Canada and Russia, even more opportunities will open up.​​

Funniest justification I ever read.

So, heaps of opportunities arise in growing cacti in the rest of the world?

Up
0

Steven - what are you talking about in regards to "highly controlled conditions higher CO2 means better growth"?  Please do your study on carbon farming and go back to the basics of photosynthesis. 

Carbon farming is not a highly controlled system at all in fact it has fewer inputs and uses less water when managed correctly and crops and animals are far healthier requiring less animal health products.  Extremes of weather are part of the process, for example heavy snow lifts nitrogen levels, wind and rain and floods all bring mineral benefits.  Even burning off which is less practiced has enormous benefits. 

 

Food prices will always have fluctuations its the nature of the beast. It doesn't mean the world cannot produce enough food for the populace. In fact most people world-wide eat too much not too little and do you know how much food is thrown out annually? Read up on it. 

If your worried about the weather extremes stop watching the TV. The media loves devastation because put simply it increases ratings. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Up
0

Steven - what are you talking about in regards to "highly controlled conditions higher CO2 means better growth"?  Please do your study on carbon farming and go back to the basics of photosynthesis. 

Carbon farming is not a highly controlled system at all in fact it has fewer inputs and uses less water when managed correctly and crops and animals are far healthier requiring less animal health products.  Extremes of weather are part of the process, for example heavy snow lifts nitrogen levels, wind and rain and floods all bring mineral benefits.  Even burning off which is less practiced has enormous benefits. 

 

Food prices will always have fluctuations its the nature of the beast. It doesn't mean the world cannot produce enough food for the populace. In fact most people world-wide eat too much not too little and do you know how much food is thrown out annually? Read up on it. 

If your worried about the weather extremes stop watching the TV. The media loves devastation because put simply it increases ratings. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Up
0

Notane - another year, another failure to understand.

 

Food-production nowadays, is entirely fossil-fuelled. Nothing to do with 'the nature of the beast'. That's a linear comment. This is an exponential problem.

 

Sure, claims are made that 'up to 30% of produced food is wasted'. Folk I know would do something about it - like dumpster-diving - but are stymied by those who profit from the wastage. That's not the problem though, the problem is the fossil-fuel underwrite. It is 100% guaranteed to be a very temporary state of affairs.

 

Carbon sequestration is not meaningfully happening. How could it? Already 40% or so of the land-based photosynthesis is human controlled/used. As you see here, all want more 'land supply' (read, less photosynthesis).

 

You need to believe because?

Up
0

#9 Looking Forward

The eighteen hundreds was the age of mechanical engineers and machines that changed peoples lives and they way things were done forever.

 

The ninteen hundreds started out by making housewives redundant with washing mashines, dishwashers, and so on. But ended up being the age of electrical engineers and the transistor, or silicon chip as it is know. The "chip" changed space exploration, telecommunications, offices with word processors and so on. It changes the war machine and many other areas of our lives.

 

So this centuary will be another one of great change. This will be the age of science, nanotechnology and many other sciences will change our world forever. There will be new materials and new ways of making things. There will be many things we can't even imagine. DNA and life its self will change dramatically.

 

One thing that wont change is "War" it has been with us since time began and we dont seem interested in finding answers as to why. So i believe, just like we had the "cold war" with Russia, we will have the "cyber war" with China. As America and China challenge each other for top spot they will wage cyber war on each other. Tensions will be very high at times.

 

The financial system wont collapse. If people will buy bottles of water when fresh, clean, water is plentifull then people will buy anything. When people buy anything you have a market. If the market can get people to stay up all night to be the first to get an iphone, the market can get people to do anything.

 

So there's my quick take for now.

 

 

 

 

Up
0

MikeB - those bottles are made of oil, and delivered by same.

 

Those folk aren't buying water, they're buying a bit of fossil energy/resource, which took millions of years to accumulate.

 

My take is that we will indeed have wars, but real ones - over the remaining resources. There may be a majority who can't see the connection (hard to see how they can't: if they just stood on the side of a main arterial for one day, and thought a bit!) but the US military and the Chinese leadership aren't among them.

 

Much of our technology will be lost in the triage - food/water/shelter tend to be more important that Ipads and aged-care medicine, when the chips are really down.

 

 

Up
0

Love the cartoon...hang on to your wallet when the pollies come calling...

Up
0

Regarding Geithner Item 8 amazing to read something positive about the guy.

Slate , have not looked on that site in ages. The article kind of felt like a PR piece trying to appear balanced.

Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone sure has a different take on Geithner so do a lot of comentators.

I wonder if Geitner will 'Ascend to Heaven' and if so where?

 

 

 

 

Up
0

Seeing Obama sing his praises and then watching Taibibi describe the reality of Geithners career really leaves me with little respect for the American president.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OsqAhYb9Fc&feature=player_embedded

I note also that the nobel peace prize winner has launched another military adventure in Africa

Up
0

Maybe this story is going to get bigger and bigger

http://www.disinfo.com/2013/01/aaron-swartz-americas-mohamed-bouazizi-w…

 

 

Up
0