In this section
Offers for readers
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 19105
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 276
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
Think Global Recruitment is working with this exceptionally respected Australian Boutique ...more
Australia
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 116
- Wednesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 78
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 28
- Amanda's Take Five for Wednesday 19
- The problems with NZ's energy use 18
- More bank mortgage rate cuts 16
- Govt lifts minimum wage 50 cts to $13.50 an hour 16
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 15
- 90 seconds at 9 am with BNZ 14
- Full time jobs fall 13,000 in Dec qtr 14
Most viewed
Interest on Twitter
Opinion: OCR to trough at 2% for some time from mid 2009
By BNZ Markets Head of Research Stephen Toplis
The RBNZ has slashed the Overnight Cash Rate a further 150 basis points. That's a massive 400 basis points in just three meetings. We were a little surprised by the magnitude of today's move. We'd thought that a more conservative 100 points might do the trick.
Having said this, we have no difficulty with the rationale that the RBNZ has provided to support its move. In short, it's terrified by what it sees happening offshore and the likely implications of that on the New Zealand economy, so it's taken a no-holds barred approach.
With this in mind, we have sharply revised lower our future track for the New Zealand cash rate. The RBNZ seems, for good reason, fixated on international developments. In our opinion, these will continue to surprise on the downside. This being so, from a consistency perspective, the Bank will have no option but to push rates much lower yet.
Consequently, we now believe the Bank will lower rates a further 75 basis points at its next meeting. This is a big move but smaller than the 100 the market is currently pricing and still consistent with the RBNZ's stated view that "any further reductions will be significantly smaller than those seen recently." The "significantly" was dropped in by Dr Bollard at his press conference and is not in the published statement.
It would then be very unlikely in our mind that a central bank would stop immediately after a series of cuts of this magnitude without slowly deflating the easing process. Moreover, it will be difficult to stop easing as a swathe of very poor economic data is produced locally. Headlining this will be a sharp rise in unemployment. So we have then built in further cuts of 50 basis points and 25 points at the following two meetings respectively.
Put all this together and the cash rate troughs at 2.0%, where it should stay for some time.
We see this very much as a central forecast with risks on both sides. It is plausible that further deterioration in economic activity sees an even more dramatic fall. In contrast, the RBNZ will be reluctant to push rates so low that conventional monetary policy no longer remains an option in the way that the United States is currently afflicted.
Related Topics
Generally, we are very concerned that too much weight is currently being put on the power of interest rates to "fix" things. In normal times lower interest rates provide householders with more spare cash to go out and spend and, in turn, stimulate the broader economy. At the same time investment activity is promoted. However, in the current climate one can't help but think that any cash relief is more likely to be saved by householders and businesses alike. This means that the impact of falling interest rates will be substantially dampened. As a result, just pushing rates forever lower may be an inappropriate course of action.
In fact, it may prove counter productive as folk dependant on income from investment for their livelihood have their earnings slashed. These are the very same folk who have seen their capital bases also blasted by the collapse in global asset prices. As the clamour for the banking sector to cut rates in line with the cash rate grows louder, spare some time for those for whom falling interest rates is an
unmitigated disaster.
Alas, from here on in the outlook for the New Zealand economy is very poor indeed. We have weathered reasonably well stage one of the recession but stage two, the wash from the global rout, is only just hitting us. We have recently lowered our already miserable growth forecasts for calendar 2010 to -0.9%. The risks to this remain to the downside. This is much worse than the +0.3% we expect for 2008.
As recently as last month Governor Bollard declared that the recession was over; it seems he has now
reached a somewhat different conclusion, as have we all. While this remains so, the only direction for interest rates, and probably the NZD, is down. It's not when, it's how much.
* All of the research produced by the BNZ Markets team of economists is available here.
14 Comments
Will this mean that 5.5%
Will this mean that 5.5% fixed for 5 years predicted by Tony Alexander in his Weekly Review on 22 January will now be revised to 4.99% for 5 years fixed?
If so then a $300,000 mortgage will only cost $287 per week compared with $519 per week 9 months ago!
Lara do you have a
Lara do you have a link to this review? I read an indirect quote in the herald that he said that but I am very surprised.
Ah found it! Incredible 2-7
Ah found it! Incredible 2-7 year fixed rates at 5.5% by March!!! Thats a big call - the average property investor with 10 or more properties will have an additional $60 000 a year in cashflow not to mention rents are expected to rise over that period.
It is great to see
It is great to see Stephen and associates have awoken .....it took a fire alarm to waken them....rather than the tweeting of birds.
Yes, the RBNZ are now awake too and as Stephen suggests...terrified. Yes, the RBNZ no longer purporting optimism that the recession is over.
The BNZ eco$peak is finding new language...magnitude,terrified,swarth,collapse in global asset prices, rout,dramatic fall, miserable growth forecasts, unmitigated disaster.
Yes, those words say it all !!!!! The banks are finally realising the party is over.
How could they sleep in for so long when the warning bells have been apparent for so many months....
http://www.bnz.co.nz/binaries/w220109.pdf on page 7 Tony
http://www.bnz.co.nz/binaries/w220109.pdf on page 7 Tony Alexander said:
"I might have had a look at buying a property 12 or 24 months ago but found that the numbers simply did not stack up because the debt servicing cost was too high. But I would run the numbers again assuming a 5.5% five-year fixed interest rate and see what affordability of my preferred property would look like. The chances are that a very large number of people are going to find property extremely affordable this year and this is likely to add to demand and therefore limit the downside for prices."
Paul, How can you believe
Paul,
How can you believe rents will rise when all around people are leaking cash?
Tonz,
Keep adding to the lexicon!
What I find difficult to
What I find difficult to reconcile is - we have a credit crisis, yet those of us with money get very little interest for it. My US dollars receiving nill return and my NZ bank deposits paying low returns. The reverse should be happening the demand for cash should mean borrowers paying 18-22% interest. Something does not add up. Perhaps this will be the next credit shock and interest rates will go sky high.
Raf, the genre(hate that word)
Raf, the genre(hate that word) of the lexicon is `generative metaphor`(schon) It forms the basis to analyse and predict the changing perceptions and shifts (not Peter Schifs!!!)
Valentina, Over the last few
Valentina,
Over the last few months you could have been buying senior bank bonds and good quality corporate bonds with 3-5 year maturities at between 7 and 8%.
Valentina we don't have a
Valentina we don't have a credit crunch we have a capital crisis.
The Banks assets have decreased in value, why because they lent out the money on bad investments and now they are losing money, this is forcing them to mark there assets down which means the bank has less capital reserves, a bank is required to maintain a certain capital reserve.
This is why the Tarp program in the US didn't free up lending by US banks, the US banks still have lots of assets that need to still be marked down their by decreasing their capital reserves more so they must hold onto all that cash.
Their is not enough cash(savers) in the world to inject into the banks thanks to the amount of leverage the banks were able to apply thanks to fractional reserve lending. So the federal reserve has been injecting cash into the banking system.
The other thing with these
The other thing with these bank assets is the banks for years were allowed to value them to what ever value they liked. They could mark them to myth using fancy excel spreadsheets. This changed and they were forced to mark to market.
When I first came out of univ in NZ I went to work for one of the worlds largest treasury software companies and I got lots of experience developing treasury software for doing the revaluation calculations. Of course our clients always complained that our numbers were never correct. In the end we just allowed the client to import their own market myth value from their spreadsheet model, our software then handled the accounting P&L entries but the market value was a myth number made up by the client.
The whole derivatives market is BS, the numbers were all made and the accounting which was signed off by the auditors was all BS, which is why we now have all this crap hiting the fan, the banks and corps have been massaging their books for years, hell they are probably still doing it. Note all this is legal but its not logical, of course who ever said accounting was logical.
Banks have been lending irresponsibly
Banks have been lending irresponsibly for the past several years. The central bank is nowtrying save the banks and not the public for sure. It was not hard for the central bank to curb the excessive lending by banks by insisting on a higher debt-equity ratio when the country's debts increase year after year. The structural risks spoil the saving mentality by poor returns to savers, and encourage irrational speculation by public.
sam.p, The primary responsibility of
sam.p,
The primary responsibility of the RBNZ is not as widely assumed maintaining inflation within policy targets, but ensuring a sound financial system. It could be argued that the RBNZ has already failed in its primary duty, and is trying to cover the fact i.e. ... perhaps I shouldn't say that?
I Love the Loriders… I
I Love the Loriders"¦ I have a LowRod.Love The vid and song!