Offers for readers

The comment stream

Recent comments

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Corporate Recovery Senior – Australia, Audit experience welcomed
Successful applicants will have the opportunity to work with this leading Australian Advis...more
Australia
Transaction Services Assistant Manager/ Manager – Melbourne
Think Global Recruitment is working with this exceptionally respected Australian Boutique ...more
Australia
Audit Senior - Australia
Sought after opportunity to move to one of the most beautiful westernised countries in the...more
Australia
Research & Master Trust Relationship Manager
Strategic and Senior Appointment...more
Australia
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Who do you think should be appointed Reserve Bank Governor to replace Alan Bollard when he retires in September?

Choices

Opinion: Why Q4-09 growth won't surprise on the high side

Posted in News

By Roger J Kerr

Despite the conciliatory tone of recent official statements from the central banks in both the US and New Zealand assisting the “lower for longer” interest rate market mantra, I do not expect our term wholesale swap interest rates to move any lower from current levels.

There is also no reason for them to increase for a good few months either, at least until there is more hard evidence of stronger economic growth in New Zealand.

It still appears to me that only a material depreciation of the NZD against the USD to the mid/low 0.6000’s will lift annual GDP growth to above 3.00% later in the year, as stronger export industry performance drives the economy higher.

In the short-term, the moneymarkets are keenly focused on this Thursday’s GDP figures for the December 2009 quarter.

It does not give you much confidence in the economic forecasting fraternity (i.e. bank economists) when the range of forecasts for this number start from +0.5% and go up to +1.8% for a period that started six months ago and ended three months ago! It is all history, yet the forecasters have no idea where it might print.

From an interest rate management perspective any outcome above +0.8% will tend to push rates up as the market will conclude that the economy was recovering earlier and stronger than what the RBNZ are forecasting.

The economic data we have had to date for the December quarter paints a very mixed picture with some manufacturing stronger, but big primary industry production off a tad. Retail was flat in the December quarter and construction was not much better. Hours worked from the employment data decreased by 0.4%, so it is not that easy to see the number surprising on the strong side.

Bank economists persistently cite “stock rebuilding” as a major positive driver of economic growth in the late 2009/early 2010 period. They are applying the historical economic theory that states inventory levels are always rapidly rebuilt up to pre-recession levels as we come out of an economic recession.

Historical economic theory is out of the window in this recovery in my view, as businesses throughout New Zealand take the opportunity to permanently reduce inventory levels and apply just-in-time ordering regimes from their suppliers. Do not expect strong GDP numbers as a result of stock re-building this year.

The strength of the economic recovery this year and next can only come from the export industries who are now enjoying record high product prices and will expand/invest even more when the Kiwi dollar comes off some more.

In conclusion, one has to say the economic forecasting gurus in New Zealand may still have more credibility than the bank economists in Australia who have resorted to following the RBA picks of journalist Terry McCrann (wasn’t he Arthur Daly’s sidekick?) as their central source of intelligence.

For the record, our forecast for the GDP is +0.6%, thus helping the “lower for longer” lobby group.

—————-

* Roger J Kerr runs Asia Pacific Risk Management. He specialises in fixed interest securities and is a commentator on economics and markets. More commentary and useful information on fixed interest investing can be found at rogeradvice.com

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

5 Comments

Roger, I agree with you.

Roger,

I agree with you. And any way you look at it, growth is going to be less than the amount of government stimulus over the quarter.

"They must answer for a

"They must answer for a depression. "

Ambrose being his usual happy self....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/749471...

We might pray for +0.6% near year's end....its looking like a trade war and after China I wonder how long before Fonterra gets bounced by the US diary lobbyists....once a trade war starts I wonder how it would be stopped....not til all the ammo is gone I suspect....

You just have to look at the farmers etc and think I wouldnt want to be in their shoes at this moment in time....its tough now, if the US can effect our export market(s) then thats going to look vile IMHO.....and we wont be able to do a thing....

2010 looks more interesting every day...

regards

@PeterR: and Govn is talking

@PeterR: and Govn is talking about bringing spending forward to stimulate....so a few years from now there will be a hole to fill....

regards

steven <blockquote> if the US

steven

if the US can effect our export market(s) then thats going to look vile IMHO

They are not "our" export markets unless we can provide product that is price competitive. That requires NZ cuttiing our costs of agricultural production at least as fast as our competitors. Something we are delusionally failing to accept while hoping for economic recovery or free trade miracles.

I am not so sure

I am not so sure the ussa will still be around in 50 years. There is a high chance the union will fall apart. Alaskan's will be the first to pull the plug. Mandarin is the new game in town. Maori have a head start...they are but a few thousand years from a direct line out of China if you skip the Pacific thing.