In this section
Offers for readers
Follow the news from interest
The comment stream
Recent comments
- 1 of 20832
- ››
Editors choice
- 1 of 295
- ››
Finance sector jobs
Lead from the front utilising your strategic, technical and leadership qualities within th...more
New Zealand
Lead from the front utilising your technical expertise in this highly attractive senior li...more
New Zealand
Customer focus, high performance, exceeding client expectations and achieving profitable g...more
New Zealand
Key leadership position in the bank. Be a part of one of the fastest growing banks in New ...more
New Zealand

The news stream
Latest news
Most commented
- Govt eyes NZ$1.4b revenue grab 63
- English defends current account blowout 61
- 90 seconds at 9 am 51
- Budget 2012 reactions 48
- Friday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 43
- Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint 38
- 'Next 5-10 years make or break for NZ' 33
- What covered bonds mean for ma and pa 32
- Westpac and ASB change rates down 26
- 90 seconds at 9 am 22
Most viewed
NZ labour productivity woeful in last year despite recession
New Zealand private sector labour productivity fell 1.5% in the year to March 2009 despite the recession as employers hoarded workers, Statistics NZ figures show.
Productivity often increases during a recession as businesses cut spending and employment more than output, but that has yet to be seen in the current recession. New Zealand's weak productivity growth in recent years is a factor in weak GDP growth and inflation pressures. Unless New Zealand can significantly boost labour productivity, it is unlikely to boost real wages by much or have any chance of catching Australia.
See more detail below from Statistics NZ:
Labour productivity fell 1.5 percent in the year to March 2009, Statistics New Zealand said today. The decline in labour productivity was driven by the fall in output – that is, real GDP – of 2.2 percent, while workforce hours fell 0.7 percent. The recent decline has not significantly affected the long-term trend, with labour productivity growing by 1.9 percent annually since 1978.
"Productivity declined in the March 2009 year as the New Zealand economy went into recession. There
was a large drop in output, with labour taking longer to respond to the fall in demand. This led to a significant fall in labour productivity," economic statistics development manager Jude Hughes said. The output decline in the March 2009 year was driven by falls in the manufacturing and construction sectors. The labour market weakened during this time as the unemployment rate increased to 5.0 percent by the March 2009 quarter and firms reported that finding staff was easier than it had been for more than 30 years.The long-term trend of more capital being available to each worker continued in 2009. Capital investment increased steadily, up 3.3 percent, while workforce hours declined. Looking at labour productivity from a
different angle, additional capital helps workers boost their productivity. However, in 2009 this was more
than offset by factors such as process or knowledge improvements – known as multifactor productivity – which fell by 3.1 percent. Overall, labour productivity declined.The productivity measures cover the part of the economy referred to as the ‘measured sector’. Industries
excluded are government administration and defence, health, education, and commercial and residential
property services.
17 Comments
So to put it another
So to put it another way, those parts of our economy that aren't productive are ,"... government administration and defence, health, education, and commercial and residential property services." !
In contrast http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/2035-Its
In contrast
http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/2035-Its-Called-DEFLATION-Fo...
The Labor Department reported Thursday that productivity jumped at an annual rate of 6.9 percent in the fourth quarter, even better than an initial estimate of a 6.2 percent growth rate. Unit labor costs fell at a rate of 5.9 percent, a bigger drop than the 4.4 percent decline initially estimated.
In the real world this means:
*
Work harder and get more done.
*
Get paid less.
*
Suck it up, don't complain, or you're fired.
In a nutshell, unemployment is
In a nutshell, unemployment is likely to rise more swiftly and higher than maybe expected, and rather sooner than later...
I beleive that productivity is
I beleive that productivity is key to our future as a country. At the moment though we seem to be working more hours and getting less done.
Andrew J, that is very
Andrew J, that is very telling. The USA's productivity is increasing exactly as it should in a recession; ours is not. Incomes falling, are also an inherent part of a recession, which is a painful adjustment to past wrong patterns of investment and production and income.
I read the entire Karl Denninger post you linked to. He says exactly what I was already thinking. The non-measured sector, especially public employees, is inherently parasitical on the rest of the economy. Of course productivity in the private, measured sector will be dropping, as public employees salaries and perks and superannuation grow way out of proportion with the real world. The private sector has to pick up the tab for this, and compete with it for skills and knowledge as well.
There is the explanation to our problem, now what are we going to do about it?
PhilBest From The States <blockquote>
PhilBest
From The States
Actually, I can tell you
Actually, I can tell you how it ends, and productivity is the least of the red herrings.
try this:
http://www.chrismartenson.com/martensonreport/end-money
AndrewJ is absolutely right - the public bailout of the private sector, globally, has been massive, has to happen again but bigger next time, and is unrepayable. In essence, (sorry Steven, I do harp on) we ran up against the exponential 'doubling' which we couldn't underwrite. The powers that be appear to be cranially bankrupt, and even if they were smart (and I think Merkel is a physics grad, so there's one there somewhere) there are no answers.
Productivity is a deckchair, and it's sliding with exponential rapidity, along with all the rest of them. Just remember, it's not 'too big to fail', but 'too big to survive in a finite arena'.
Given that they will keep printing money frantically, and that there is a finite amount of matter to purchase, money has to keep getting worth less. Their problem is that they have to pump exponentially more money in each round, even at near-zero rates.
Productivity? Anyone who reduces the amount of physical impact they induce, is doing us all a much bigger favour than any eager beaver.
But it's such a minor part of what is happening macro-ly, as to be pretty much irrelevant.
Right, less time reading and
Right, less time reading and posting here. No more trademe and for those who indulge, no more twitter/facebook etc etc.
…and considering our fast increasing
…and considering our fast increasing unemployment rate (7.3%), plus the fact that we import most everything, I’m mystified, why the government doesn’t take steps to support the Private Sector in order to expand and/ or develop new industries.
http://www.henderson.com/sites/henderson/sri/approach/topdowntheme/overv...
Another idea, which would save the country millions.
Walter
AndrewJ, Powerdownkiwi said this already,
AndrewJ, Powerdownkiwi said this already, but all that free money from the government to the household sector, is merely a long-term theft of the VALUE of all the money everyone already has. It is fairy dust money. In terms of the real value of money, the parasitical nature of public incomes still holds true.
If you think being pro free market means being pro bailouts, you haven't met a true free market supporter. Parasite "capitalists" and big government politics are an alliance made in hell.
Powerdownkiwi, if your monetary ideas originate from Von Mises, good on you.
"....The powers that be appear to be cranially bankrupt....."
Hear, hear.
30% of Real Estate agents
30% of Real Estate agents and other bureaucrats should be urgently moved and retrained to work in the Agriculture - and Health sector. Another 20% should be involved in quality manufacturing to cut imports.
Walter
..and why not, another 10%-
..and why not, another 10%- 15% should become involved and solve our NZ infrastructure problems - on the ground - such as Public Transport & Telecommunication.
Shrink bureaucrats and politicians now !
Walter
W.Kunz, exactly, there is a
W.Kunz, exactly, there is a whole industry of people doing a job that pretty much does itself, who actually buys a house based on what a real estate agent tells you? how hard is putting pictures of a house on the net and in flyers?
Why do we need whole armies of people doing this job?
Too many service sectors aimed at creaming off others in NZ.
..and it would sav(f)e New
..and it would sav(f)e New Zealand BILLIONS !
..and it would make New Zealand productive !
..and people would get wealthier and healthier !
..and the nation would prospers !
..and it would be KIWILAND again !
Walter
..and why do not more
..and why do not more bloggers comment on that ? Are you all Real Estate agents or sitting on a chair all day long- wow incredible!
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objecti
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10632790
..and when oil hits US$ 95.85 - TradeMe is full of auctions on horses, bicycles, shoes and Chinese taxi carts !
..except the horses - all
..except the horses - all imported of course.