The comment stream

Recent comments

Join the Interest community to be a registered commenter so you can:
- Edit your comments
- Avoid the CAPTCHA
- Vote on comments
Register Here

Already registered? log back in here ..

Forgotten your password? No problem! Click here

Finance sector jobs

Manager Operational Effectiveness and Assurance IT
Reporting to the Senior Manager Operational Risk Effectiveness and Assurance, the key focu...more
New Zealand
Financial Controller
Reporting to the Head of Finance - Retail and Business Bank the key focus of this role is ...more
New Zealand
Manager Finance Corporate Core - 12 Month Contract role
This role in consultation with the Financial Controller provides financial, strategic and ...more
New Zealand
IT Audit Manager - Internal Audit - Auckland
If you are motivated by the prospect of seeing the big picture, developing your team and m...more
New Zealand
efinancialcareers.com

Reader poll

Should you fix your mortgage now or stay floating?

Choices

Strategic returns likely to mirror those of other failed property financiers

Posted in News

Strategic Finance debenture holders look like getting back no more money than investors in other failed property financiers, probably something between 10 and 25%, after its receiver revealed an initial distribution of no more 2.5 cents in the dollar. This would mean the confirmation of losses for 13,000 investors of more than NZ$300 million. 

Other failed property financiers such as Bridgecorp, Capital + Merchant, Lombard Finance, Belgrave Finance, Dominion Finance and St Laurence, have returned, or are expected to return, between zero and 34% of investors’ money. Capital + Merchant’s expected returns are the least, at 0-2%, with St Laurence the highest at 34%.

See our Deep Freeze list here, which details how over 199,000 investors have NZ$6.8 billion frozen or lost in 59 finance companies, investment trusts and mortgage trusts.

Strategic’s receiver, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) partner John Fisk, won’t comment on what the likely total recovery will be because PwC is still trying to sell Strategic's loan book.

The loan book was valued at NZ$477 million in 2008. By February this year it had a net book value of just NZ$229.1 million - in management accounts - and Fisk says the majority of updated loan valuations since February are at levels “significantly below” the ones from February.

“Valuers are having difficulty actually putting numbers on things at the moment,” Fisk said.

“When you’ve got development land, and there’s still money that needs to be extended and then a sales process to sell down sections and things, it becomes very difficult.”

The loan book consists of 87 loans with 58% of the net loan book secured through second mortgages over property. By location the lion’s share is in Auckland with 33% and 27% overseas, notably in Australia and Fiji. At 38% the biggest slice of the book by type is commercial development, with 24% in residential development and 23% in residential subdivisions.

Strategic, whose CEO was Kerry Finnigan and which counted former All Blacks captain and New Zealand Rugby Union chairman Jock Hobbs among its directors, was involved in financing Auckland's Soho Square development, the Sentinel Tower project in Takapuna and the Fiji Hilton. On the loans that are second mortgages, there was NZ$544.4 million worth of debt held against Strategic's loan book assets that ranked ahead of Strategic's claims, as of February.

Most of Strategic's loans were on a capitalised interest basis, meaning interest accruing was added to the loan balance and received on repayment of the loan, rather than being paid to Strategic on a monthly or quarterly basis. In their first letter to investors the receivers said about 25 of the 87 borrowers were either in liquidation, receivership or the property owned by the borrower was in the process of, or had been, sold by the mortgagee exercising its power of sale.

Fisk told interest.co.nz there were now “less than 10” parties remaining in the loan book sales process, with final bids expected in September. PwC had started the sales process with the idea of selling the whole loan book.

“(But) I haven’t discounted the idea that it may be a combination of outcomes in terms of loans that we recover as receivers or loans that are sold,” said Fisk.

“It’s a challenging market but we are getting on with the receivership at the same time as the sales process. I guess I should emphasis that the sales process might not result in a sale. It could be either a partial sale or it could be the counterfactual, (which is) the receivership continuing.”

The reason why a range of 1.5c and 2.5c in the dollar  (outlined in the receiver's second letter) had been provided for the interim distribution, due by September 3, was because some property transactions were expected to occur over the next couple of weeks.

Fisk said PwC could look at investing money recovered from one loan into another, but would be cautious about doing so, not taking the risks a property developer would take.

“Our role is to get the money back for investors,” said Fisk. “(So) we’d be very careful about punting money that we’ve recovered on one loan on another loan.”

“But if we can justify it on the basis that it preserves the asset or potential asset and the risk is appropriate, then we’d do something. But we’re certainly not betting all our recoveries on another loan or anything like that.”

A payout of 1c in the dollar required the freeing up of NZ$3.7 million, he noted.

Strategic froze repayments to investors in August 2008 blaming tough conditions in the property market. Investors then voted for a moratorium in December 2008 that aimed to repay them 100% of their principal investments plus interest through asset realisations over five years.

However, Perpetual Trust called in the receivers in March, with about 13,000 investors owed about NZ$417 million, after Strategic failed to generate sufficient loan recoveries for a repayment to investors' that was due in January. Fisk noted the interim distrbution would be the first money Strategic investors had received since August 2008, two years ago.

PwC expects to issue its next report by October 29, at which point it should be able to advise on the outcome of the sales process and says the nature and timing of further distributions should be clearer.

 * This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers earlier today.See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments. Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making these comments.

8 Comments

BH - How about posting some

BH - How about posting some of Kerry Finnigan's comments about the value of Strategic from 2008 onwards.  

Andy, strategic was having

Andy, strategic was having significant problems with it's loan book back in '06.

They were pretending all was well, of course, so that they could draw in more "investors" and keep paying themselves tens of millions in "profits" - 150 million over a two year period when the real value of their loan book was deeply in the red.

Pure ponzi.

Great question Andy BH needs

Great question Andy

BH needs to do some investigative journalism. Gareth Vaughan interviewed Kerry Finnigan last week - a PR exercise before the bad news was released.

Kerry was the guy telling everyone how different and clever Strategic was when the other finance companies were falling over. He was saying how safe Strategic was and how structured they were. He was even advising the market on what investment criteria they should have when making investment decisions, including how safe Strategic Finance was.

So why now are Strategic being classified the same as the other bunch unless I suppose you are correctly inferring that they are just like the Bridgecorps or Capital & merchants of this world.

Maybe Kerry Finnigan, Jock Hobbs, Graham Jackson and Brian Fitzgerald can now sell their assets and pay the proceeds to the poor investors. They are telling everyone how honourable they are, so surely this is an honourable jesture. Without the fees and dividends derioved from Strategic these guys would not be living in their flash houses, have cash in the bank or own numerous companies that generate large revenue streams.

It is obvious that the credit crunch had a dramatic effect on the finance sector and a generous assumption would be that you could discount their book by 50% ( worse case scenario ) but not 90+% which is where it is heading. So maybe Mr Finnigan & Co can explain where the balance went.

Where are the Securities Commission and the SFO on this company?? Probably too hard as these guys are clever and will fight back - so they instead chase the minnows in the finance sector or an 82 year old

Bemused "maybe Mr Finnigan &

Bemused "maybe Mr Finnigan & Co can explain where the balance went"

Well if they pull out almost $150m in just two years (ref Brian Gaynor, NZ Herald) from unrealized profits that'd have to be a big part of it. A lot of these 'profits' were based on valuations that were in deep outer space even at peak insanity in  '06 so that has to be a huge part of it.

The other aspect that hasn't been brought out is how can they just convert (sell) these securities to second mortgage status in order to keep the ponzi alive? Was that in the prospectus in '06 etc.? What hope is there now with a loan book dominated by second mortgages.

Beyond disgraceful.

The next story in this

The next story in this bizarre episode will be when the recivers sell the loan book and it ends up that soem or all of the Strategic directors and their consultant buy the book with help from vultures like Fortress or  Bluestone.

Don't forget Bluestone has already purchased part of Kevin Podmore's outfit and Forttress are funding George Gould into SCF.

When you consider the Strategic directors/shareholders sold the first 50% to Allco for about $150M and the second half had a $12M cash component, they technically have $162M to spend - probably more because they would have used that money and invested it since 2006/7. And their new company Triumph Capital has been managing some of the Strategic loans for HBOS ( Bank of Scotland ).

 

Funnier things have happened in this saga and as usual the authorities do not act - makes you wonder?

Come on Simon Power... how

Come on Simon Power... how about statutory management of all Hanover/ Allied and Strategic directors assets. That way the investors or the crown will get 80% of their money back !!

White Collar Crime Pays in NZ.... all these guys will get off because some lawyer or accountant gave them advice that they could rely on. Just like the shameless Feltex team of 5.  

Shame on our authorities we would rather pick on an easy target like Alan Hubbard than punish the real perpetrators of zero investor confidence.  

Bemused and others I have

Bemused and others

I have edited or deleted comments that are abusive or make allegations about criminal behaviour that are not backed by facts.

Bernard

What has never been

What has never been investigated is -:

1. The profit figures were obviously being diddled as far back as 06 to show better returns than they should have. The accountancy firm or auditor that signed off on this. If it was as obvious as it now appears why no action?

2. The overstated profits and fraudulent related party lending was rewarded by management and Director bonuses. They should now be clawed back . Why no action?