HOT TOPICS:   Election 2014  |    NZ$   |  Double shot interviews                                         RESOURCES:    Economic calendar   |  Cashback incentives

The comment stream

Reader poll

What do you view as the biggest election campaign issue?

Choices

ANZ NZ says staff requests, earthquake concerns among reasons behind lower than pledged post-National Bank branch numbers

Posted in Business

By Gareth Vaughan

ANZ says it's 31 branches short of where it said it would be when the National Bank brand was axed because it has merged more branches than initially planned, sometimes at the request of staff, and because building safety concerns were identified at some others.

This is an abridged version of this article. The full version was published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment in the box on the right or click on the "'Register" link at the bottom of the comments.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.

4 Comments

Maybe the missing 800 ANZ

Maybe the missing 800 ANZ staff (including the manager we dealt with for 11 years) and 31 closed branches could affect customer service.
 
No maybe for ourselves. Simple requests were repeatedly ignored.
 
We simply followed our old National Bank - no no no - ANZ bank manager to his new employer. Superb personal service again.
 
Finding him was simple. Googled his name and town. Thanks Google.
 
 

Standard pattern for large

Standard pattern for large company takeover.
1   Pretend no jobs will be lost or services or products cut.
2  Conduct review of company to find out what you have really bought. This takes a while, particularly if the business you have bought is large.
3  Cut jobs, services or products as you see fit.
 
It is rather depressing and it follows a very bureaucratic, central planning and control based script. Customers who enjoyed the unique characteristics of the old business have to put up with the bland alternative of the acquirer. It is a sort of Corporate Communism. where everything is dumbed down in the name of efficiency.
 
The process can only be fought by attacking the regulations that favour size over diversity. Large corporate behemoths can often only exist because more nimble competitors are denied access by well meaning but counterproductive regulations.
 
 

Agree 110% Roger.   My

Agree 110% Roger.
 
My comment relates to the effect.
 
Your comment relates to the cause.
 
I first banked ANZ in 1965. Bailed from ANZ the first time in 1997 - when their merger with Post Bank degraded their service totally. 

Yes, I was an ANZ bank

Yes, I was an ANZ bank customer then, my nickname for them was Bank of Toytown. I eventually made the move to the National because I got to deal with someone who could actually make a decision.