sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Roger J Kerr takes issue with the Reserve Bank's 'bizarre execution' of a foreign exchange transaction to get funds from NZ into US dollars

Currencies / opinion
Roger J Kerr takes issue with the Reserve Bank's 'bizarre execution' of a foreign exchange transaction to get funds from NZ into US dollars
A man walks past the Reserve Bank on Wellington's The Terrace

Summary of key points: -

  • RBNZ revealed as a large NZ dollar seller
  • Financial markets await Federal Reserve interest rate decision

RBNZ revealed as a large NZ dollar seller

An innocuous entry in a table on the Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s (“RBNZ”) website in late August has provided a belated explanation as to why the Kiwi dollar reversed sharply from its appreciation to 0.6400 in mid-July.

In a transaction across the local FX market to increase their currency intervention reserves capacity, the RBNZ purchased US dollars and sold NZD4 billion. Evidence of a large, one-off FX market transaction of this nature was not detected at the time in late July as it appeared that the NZD/USD exchange rate was merely following the AUD/USD rate downwards, as it normally does. A very stable NZD/AUD cross-rate at the time indicated that there was no independent and separate NZD selling occurring. It has now transpired that the RBNZ was a massive seller of Kiwi dollars in a compressed period of time and the Aussie dollar was actually following the NZD lower!

The table below from the RBNZ’s website confirms the selling of NZD4 billion in the month of July and the resultant increase in the foreign currency intervention capacity from NZD12.9 billion to NZD16.7 billion (last two columns). The table is updated monthly, so in two weeks’ time we will be able to observe whether the RBNZ purchased any more USD’s over the month of August. (See earlier article on this issue here.)

As the chart below confirms, the Kiwi dollar was certainly hit hard by a big seller which weakened the NZD/USD rate a lot further than what general USD appreciation against all currencies at the time would have impacted on the NZD/USD rate. From mid-July to the end of July the NZD/USD exchange rate depreciated 4.70% from 0.6400 to 0.6100. Over the same two-week period, the USD appreciated only 2.50% on the USD Index.

The RBNZ’s intention to increase their USD-denominated reserves for FX market intervention purposes was disclosed to the market back in January 2023, with the RBNZ Board Chair confirming that the reserves would be increased by an undisclosed amount from the NZD12 billion amount which had been unchanged since 2007. The increase in the size of the economy and the increased volumes traded in the NZD FX market justified the increased USD reserves. Fair enough. The amount and timing of the USD purchases would not be disclosed by the RBNZ as it was considered “market sensitive” information.

It is very rare for the RBNZ to intervene directly in the FX markets to influence the value of the NZ dollar. They last intervened in 2007 and they would only do so again in “exceptional circumstances to maintain financial stability and ensure essential transactions can continue to occur”. The RBNZ’s Monetary Policy Committee has the power to “intervene in the exchange rate when the NZ dollar has moved to exceptionally low or high levels that cannot be justified by economic fundamentals”.

There is no problem with the RBNZ increasing their US dollar war chest of reserves for intervention purposes if it was ever needed.

The problem is with their bizarre execution of the FX transaction to get the funds from NZ into US dollars.

There are several pertinent questions that need to be asked as why the RBNZ made the decision to suddenly dump NZD4 billion on the FX market over a short two-week period. The NZD4 billion the RBNZ sold accounted for nearly 10% of all trades in the NZD/USD FX market over that time period. A big seller with that amount, on the margin, is always going to shift the Kiwi dollar a good few cents lower.

  • The RBNZ clearly had the authority to increase the USD reserve in January 2023, so why didn’t they start to buy, say NZD200 million per month, over a prolonged 20-month time frame so as to sift the deal into the market and not impact the value of the NZ dollar?
  • The Government increasing the RBNZ’s capital by $500 million during July appears to have been the catalyst to trigger the rather naïve buy USD/sell NZD4 billion FX transaction.
  • The RBNZ use to have FX dealers who regularly maintained a dialogue on FX market conditions and outlook with local/offshore bank participants, hedge funds and currency investors from Australia, Asia, Europe and the US. They have probably replaced those FX dealing jobs with climate change analysts, as it appears some RBNZ mandarin, unaware of the FX market impact, has pushed a button to immediately sell NZD4 billion.
  • Just why the RBNZ would allow itself to slam the NZ dollar value down by three cents, which increases imported inflation, when they are attempting to reduce inflation and a higher NZ dollar value helps to do that. It beggars belief that they would be so ill-advised on the consequences of what they were doing. A clumsy “own goal” if there ever was one!
  • Why have they left the USD intervention reserve amount unchanged for 16 years, then suddenly increase it by 33% in the space of two weeks? Why isn’t there an automatic adjustment mechanism to progressively increase the amount annually, based on the size of the economy and FX market trading volumes?

As a foreign exchange advisor, our advice to the RBNZ on how to increase their USD reserves would be to have a pre-approved policy and strategy that authorised progressive buying of USD’s over a long period when the NZD/USD was trading nearer to the top of its cyclical range (not close to the bottom of its range as it is now in the low 0.6000’s). Adding USD reserve at the bottom of the cycle sets them up to book large “marked-to-market” FX revaluation losses on the USD assets when the NZD subsequently appreciates. Given the size of their revaluation losses already booked on the NZ Government Bonds they hold from the Covid-era money-printing, maybe the potential FX losses are not that material to them!

Importers, exporters and local fund managers with ongoing FX exposures should expect that their own central bank would handle such large FX transactions with a bit more consideration and finesse. Using a bank intermediary to discretely set up the amounts and timing each month for when Fonterra are mechanically selling USD/buying NZD to match the RBNZ on the other side transacting the opposite, would satisfy both parties’ objectives without moving the NZD/USD market price at all!

Financial markets await Federal Reserve interest rate decision

The US dollar is trading back to its six-month highs of 105 on the Dixy Index ahead of the Federal Reserve meeting this Wednesday 20th September (Thursday morning NZT). It would be a surprise if the Fed increased interest rates further, however it will be a “hawkish pause” with a message that further increases may be needed if the economic data (inflation and jobs) start to move up again. Last month’s headline inflation rate did increase due to oil/gasoline prices increasing, however the core inflation measure, which the Fed concentrate on, reduced on an annual basis from 4.70% to 4.30%. The recent rapid increase in crude oil prices from US$70/b to US$90/b (WTI) due to supply cuts may prove to be temporary as the markets re-assess global demand at the higher levels.

The markets will be looking for any subtle change in wording in the Fed’s statement and how Chair Powell handles the media questions. The Fed should be much more comfortable to signal an end to the monetary tightening cycle as the US labour market has softened over recent months and the risk of wage increases threatening inflation have certainly abated. However, they always like to keep their options open for the future, so they will not be signalling an emphatic “no more interest rate increases” that the RBNZ, the Bank of England and the ECB have now done.

It looks like the FX markets may have bought the USD in the lead up to the statement, however if the Fed are not as hawkish in their message as the markets are expecting, we should see a USD pullback that would allow the NZD/USD rate to recover above 0.6000.

The other determinant of NZD/USD rate movements is the Yuan currency value and Chinese economic data. The risk environment is improving on that front with a stabilisation in the latest Chinese economic data (retail sales and industrial production) and the Yuan has stopped depreciating above the 7.30 level to the USD. The global funds that wanted to disinvest from China have now done so, therefore some recovery in the USD/CNY rate to 7.00 seems more likely than further Yuan depreciation.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk


*Roger J Kerr is Executive Chairman of Barrington Treasury Services NZ Limited. He has written commentaries on the NZ dollar since 1981.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

22 Comments

And just like this incompetent govt the Reserve Bank gov Orr should go ASAP as he is totally incompetent as well. Along with the staff at MIBE we need a big clean out

Up
9

RBNZ has gone woke, more concerned with climate change ideology than properly managing the economy.

Up
9

good grief, 'woke' is just a smear that most people have no idea what it means. Frankly I don't know anymore. It just seems to be used as a lazy way to 'complain'. Why is climate change 'woke', even for financial stability? I would have thought it was a clear & present (and obvious) danger that needs to be faced. If insurers or banks fail because they didn't prepare for an obvious risk, then everyone including the RBNZ should be held to account. Pretending these risks aren't real is the real irresponsibility.

Up
16

As soon as you see the word 'woke' mentioned you can basically write off a comment anywhere on the internet. It makes life simpler.

Up
12

A bit like the people who throw around communism and socialism labels.  

Up
10

the origins of the word are quite diifferent to how it is used these days. 

Up
0

Yep, very different.

I would interpret it’s current usage as being along the lines of:

’virtue-signalled and often superficial prioritisation and stated concern  for minority considerations and concerns’

Up
3

I interpret as: I disagree with this statement/person for 'reasons' that I can't or don't want to say out loud because I'm either  stupid/racist/sexist/homophobic/xenophobic

Up
4

...& "neoliberal" labels

Up
2

I personally don't think RBNZ is incompetent. There is one piece which when put in its place reveals the picture and justifies all the moves which hitherto seem stupid.

I think there is big crack in the financial system which has been detected by the officials but which has been kept under wraps. It might be the banking sector, which is staring at a huge hole in their balance sheet with the bond prices falling the way they are. There is barely any new lending and the debt burden on mortgagees increasing every month. The term deposit rate of 6% is unsustainable...private lending is low and government cant afford paying big coupons with the budget blown to bits. 

RBNZ has been telegraphing their moves quietly. Just recently Karen Silk was talking about providing "sufficient" but not "ample" liquidity if there is a crisis. And Grant Robertson put aside $500 million at a time when he can least afford it, citing that they are needed if the interest rates need to "go negative".
 

The interest rate will need to go negative so that the bond prices rebound and the crisis is controlled. This will save the banks but blow up the NZD and hence the panicked move to shore up USD reserves. They don't know when it will happen and the move was rushed so that they can sleep a little better at night. 

Not saying that all this is true, but I am saying that this will explain the RBNZ moves better that any other rationale. 
 

Up
10

All the things you say are true.

But the potential for a crisis is because of RBNZs stupid actions over the COVID period. Its just now, its coming home to roost, they have to act even more stupidly to get it under control.

Incompetence from the past 3 years is driving more incompetence. At least National is asking for an independent review, not a report where the RBNZ does themselves and unsurprisingly tell themselves they are doing awesome.

RBNZ continue to be incompetent because the same people are making stupid decisions. Heads should have rolled a long time ago and it should be reformed.

Up
6

When you say "interest rates go negative" - Do you mean central bank rates? I.e. the OCR or Fed Funds rate?

(Like 0 degrees Kelvin, or the speed of light, negative retail rates are likewise ... Theoretical.)

Up
0

I commented on this building up of FX reserves in August I think - you could see it happening in the RBNZ D12 dataset, which is updated every weekday.

I think this build up of FX reserves is sensible risk mitigation for a scenario that is looking increasingly likely to play out - RBNZ needing to reduce interest rates because our economy is tanking while the US Fed keep rates high. This could trigger a run on the NZD, which RBNZ will need FX reserves to counter.

The challenge that RBNZ have is that high rates in NZ work much more quickly to reduce aggregate demand through mortgage rates (the effective transfer of $ from mortgagors and businesses to savers and bank shareholders). As I have said before, higher interest rates in NZ do not really effect prices, which are set at cost + margin in a low competition environment.

Up
6

Good comment. Reinforces it being a short-sell.

But why? Maybe because they know - and like we surmised - GDP is tanking, the economy is stagnating, (retail banks are squealing) and a drop in the OCR is immanent?

Up
2

So where did this $4 billion come from? It wasn't from taxation and it wasn't borrowed as that would have defeated its purpose, but it does highlight where the government obtains all of its money from and that is it is simply created by keystrokes. 

Up
5

Can someone please either confirm or deny this, with a bit of evidence?

Up
0

This is factually correct - RBNZ create money by simply crediting a settlement bank account. Whatever RBNZ buy becomes an asset on their balance sheet (e.g. ownership of $1 billion USD) and the credit they have added to a settlement account becomes their liability. You can see the $4bn being added to settlement balances for FX reserves in July here: https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/series/reserve-bank/influences-on-s….

What is often missed is that it is RBNZ policy to pay interest on settlement account balances at OCR (5.5%). So buying an extra $4 billion of FX means that RBNZ (i.e. the Crown) is now paying an extra $600,000 per day in interest (to our highly profitable banks).

Ain't life grand.

Up
8

My hot take, and happy to be torn apart here, is that this is primarily in planning for the $4b reduction in govt spending. As far as I understand this reduction in spending will appear on the RBNZ balance sheets as government deposits, something like "the government reduces its deposits at the central bank as it makes net transfers to the private sector". As this is no longer happening, to balance the books, the RBNZ must find an additional $4b in assets, or reduce its reserves. The latter would put significant upward pressure on interest rates, and downward pressure on bank lending in aggregate.

Credit to both you and treadlightly for some great resources recently!

Up
0

My currency trader neighbour says they used to ease big currency transactions into the market, and spread the work amongst various traders to help with not affecting the market too much. Then the American system came in, which involved dumping the currency into the market, taking a position against their own client, and making a fortune off everybody trading who wasn't in on the currency loss of value. Sounds like this was straight out of that book. Possibly check the trading history of RBNZ officials and people linked to them. It will show either incompetence or corruption. It can only be one or the other.

Up
3

Could be. The RBNZ has often been criticized for telegraphing future actions to the retail banks which obviously allows them to profit from it as it becomes a form of insider trading.

Up
1

Could be a massive (and desperate) short-sell.

In which case - what does the NZRB know? Or thinks it knows?

Up
2

"They have probably replaced those FX dealing jobs with climate change analysts, as it appears some RBNZ mandarin, unaware of the FX market impact"

Ahh, I see. My predictions have been well out but it's not my fault it's because the RBNZ has been infiltrated by woke lefties ... 

How is that excuse going down with your clients? 

Up
1