sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Friday's Top 10 at 10 with NZ Mint: The Fed's Voodoo economics; Dutch (anti-bank bonus) people power; Tax cut myths busted; Congress slams 'abusive' Goldman; Dilbert

Friday's Top 10 at 10 with NZ Mint: The Fed's Voodoo economics; Dutch (anti-bank bonus) people power; Tax cut myths busted; Congress slams 'abusive' Goldman; Dilbert

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 10 am in association with NZ Mint.

I'll pop the extras into the comment stream. See all previous Top 10s here.

I welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'm still full of the joys of autumn today. And I enjoy watching the Foo Fighters.

1. Our big opportunity - New Zealand does has some things going for it.

The amazing growth of China is at the top of the list.

Demand for our protein from China's rising middle class seems to have lifted the structure of commodity prices and our terms of trade. Although we have to be careful it doesn't cause our own version of the 'Dutch Disease' where it just pushes up our currency and kills off what's left of the rest of the export sector.

But there's much more we can do. More than 50 million Chinese are expected to spend US$55 billion while traveling overseas this year. How much of that will we get?

People's Daily (China's Pravda) reports on the wonders of Chinese travelers spending some of China's surplus US dollars overseas.

Read the tone of this report to get a sense of what the Chinese want to do. They are prepping the ground for consumers to say a higher yuan is a good thing. It means you can buy more stuff overseas.

And travel overseas. To places like New Zealand. 

An increasing number of Chinese tourists are expected to travel overseas and spend a record 55 billion U.S. dollars this year, boosted by an appreciating Chinese currency, the China Tourism Academy (CTA) said. In its 2011 report on China's overseas tourism, the CTA said that the number of Chinese citizens traveling overseas and their tourism consumption will climb to new highs this year, securing outbound tourism growth of 13 percent over last year.

Dai Bin, president of the CTA, said the strong growth of Chinese overseas consumption will not only help drive the economy in tourist destinations but also enable China's travel services to enjoy a high profit margin compared to the domestic tourism market.

Dai said that a sound domestic economy and the world's economic recovery, as well as a more convenient visa policy for Chinese tourists visiting foreign countries, will help increase the level of Chinese tourism consumption overseas this year. The yuan, China's currency, rose to a new high of 6.5401 per U.S. dollar on Monday. In terms of its central parity rate, the yuan has risen more than 1.2 percent against the U.S. dollar this year, making foreign goods and service cheaper overseas for Chinese tourists.

According to CTA statistics, 57.39 million Chinese tourists traveled overseas in 2010, bringing a total of 48 billion U.S. dollars to overseas destinations.

 

2. New kind of people power - Umair Haque at Harvard Business Review muses on the meaning of the revolt by Dutch banking customers at the bonuses of their bankers. The revolt led to a 100% tax on such bonuses.

This was no mere "consumer revolt." It was open rebellion by the people formerly known as consumers. Far from "voting with their wallets" or their "feet" — often impossible in an economy chock-a-block full of cushy, cozy oligopolies — people decided to take collective action of a very different kind: as citizens of a vibrant society, not merely as mute, hapless "consumers" of mass-produced junk.

Sure, as some have done, you can try to aggressively portray your giant corporation or notable investment bank as a shining beacon of humanity, progress, achievement. But who are you kidding? In a day and age where your once-secret follies and foibles leak across the globe at the speed of light, the only people who are going to take that at face value are probably all sitting around your boardroom table right now (and they're staring nervously at their shoes).

3. House prices falling faster in Britain than Spain - Ian Cowie reports at the Telegraph on the depth of pain now reverberating around the British economy as the government slashes and house prices keep falling. But there's a twist. Lower priced houses are falling, but the richer ones are rising. The perfect sign that the rich are getting richer while the poor get poorer.

Sound familiar?

House prices at the bottom end of the market are now falling faster in Britain than Spain, according to a comprehensive survey of the biggest house price indices.

But house prices continue to rise at the top end of the market, with an average increase of 3.4pc over the last year among the most expensive fifth of properties. By contrast, the cheapest fifth of properties saw prices fall by 5.1pc over the year,  compared to a 1.9pc decline over the same period in Spain.

4. Voodoo economics - Satyajit Das writes at Naked Capitalism about the Fed's quantitative easing (QE) policy.

He nails the problem here:

QE’s real side effects are subtle. It discourages savings, drives a rush to re-risk, encourages volatile capital flows into emerging markets and forces up commodity prices.

Low interest rates perversely discourage saving, at a time when indebted countries, like America, need to increase saving to pay down high levels of debt. Low interest rates reduce the income of retirees or others living off savings, further reducing consumption.

Low rates have driven a rush to increase risk, in search of higher returns. In January 2011, the difference between interest rates on speculative or non-investment grade corporate bonds and investment-grade debt fell to around 3.50%, the lowest level since November 2007. In 2010, companies sold a record $286.7 billion of junk bonds to investors driven by the need for higher rates. The search for yield extends to stocks and also structured products, where investors take on complex returns in return for additional returns.

The rush to re-risk has reduced general lending standards. Practices that contributed to the global financial crisis, such as “covenant lite” loans with low protection for lenders, have re-emerged. Under-pricing of risk is also evident, creating the foundations for future problems.

5. Nine things the rich don't want you to know about taxes - David Cay Johnston writes at Williamette Week  about how the supply side economics of income tax cuts simply don't work and arn't true. 

For three decades we have conducted a massive economic experiment, testing a theory known as supply-side economics. The theory goes like this: Lower tax rates will encourage more investment, which in turn will mean more jobs and greater prosperity—so much so that tax revenues will go up, despite lower rates. The late Milton Friedman, the libertarian economist who wanted to shut down public parks because he considered them socialism, promoted this strategy. Ronald Reagan embraced Friedman’s ideas and made them into policy when he was elected president in 1980.

For the past decade, we have doubled down on this theory of supply-side economics with the tax cuts sponsored by President George W. Bush in 2001 and 2003, which President Obama has agreed to continue for two years.

You would think that whether this grand experiment worked would be settled after three decades. You would think the practitioners of the dismal science of economics would look at their demand curves and the data on incomes and taxes and pronounce a verdict, the way Galileo and Copernicus did when they showed that geocentrism was a fantasy because Earth revolves around the sun (known as heliocentrism). But economics is not like that. It is not like physics with its laws and arithmetic with its absolute values. 

Tax policy is something the framers left to politics. And in politics, the facts often matter less than who has the biggest bullhorn.

 

6. Still Too To Big To Fail - Former IMF economist Simon Johnson speaks about how the To Big To Fail problem has not gone away. It is worse than ever. A fascinating and passionate view.

"Goldman Sachs is too big to fail. That's scary. From that scariness comes power."

7. Goldman slammed - Bloomberg reports a Senate panel saying Goldman Sachs misled clients and the Congress about toxic mortgage debt.

Senator Carl Levin, releasing the findings of a two-year inquiry, said he wants the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission to examine whether Goldman Sachs violated the law by misleading clients who bought the complex securities known as collateralized debt obligations without knowing the firm was betting they would fall in value.

The Michigan Democrat also said federal prosecutors should review whether to bring perjury charges against Goldman Sachs Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein and other current and former employees who testified in Congress last year. Levin said they denied under oath that the firm took a financial position against the mortgage market solely for its own profit, statements the senator said were untrue.

The panel said Goldman Sachs relied on “abusive” sales practices and was rife with conflicts of interest that encouraged putting profits ahead of clients.\

8. 'Flying pigs and unicorns' - The WSJ reports on the same Senate panel's report into the financial crisis and how it shows the depth of the cynicism and moral vacuum inside the investment banks during the mortgage boom and bust in America.

Gullible Australians get a mention.

Some call the concept of owning a home the American dream. Wall Street bankers called it something different: "Pigs." "Crap." A "white elephant, flying pig and unicorn." Those descriptions of the U.S. mortgage market were highlighted in a U.S. Senate report Wednesday that offered one view of the events leading up to the financial crisis of 2008.

It trains much of its ire on Goldman Sachs, which Sen. Levin said deceived some clients by betting against home loans in 2006 and 2007, while simultaneously selling mortgage securities. At a news conference Wednesday, Senate staffers manned large posters with headings such as "Goldman Conflicts of Interests" and "The Hudson Scam," in reference to a particular Goldman bond offering.

The report shows how on Dec. 14, 2006, executives gathered in a conference room adjoining the office of Goldman Chief Financial Officer David Viniar. They agreed the firm needed to cut its bullish bets on mortgage bonds.

The Senate report alleges that Goldman then undertook a multibillion dollar series of trades to hedge its bullish bets by selling mortgage-related trades to allegedly unsuspecting investors. The head of Goldman's mortgage unit recommended managers of Goldman's sales force issue "ginormous" sales credits to those who could find investors anywhere in the world.

A Goldman executive found one in Australia. On April 26, 2007, in an email with the subject line "utopia," the executive said, "I think I found white elephant, flying pig, and unicorn all at once."

A month later, another Goldman executive lamented his firm's reputation after a stretch of risky mortgage deals Goldman had sold. He described debt managers that worked with the firm as "street wh— managers."

"It pains me to say it but citi, ubs, db [Deutsche Bank], lehman, and ms [Morgan Stanley] have much stronger franchises—among large dealers only ML [Merrill Lynch] is more reviled than [Goldman's] business," the executive wrote.

Who used to work for Merrill Lynch?

9. Oil gone in 50 years - HSBC warns in this CNBC video that the world will run out of oil in 50 years...

10. Totally Clarke and Dawe video - I like Fridays for this reason alone. Barry Metricpressure from Queensland answers some general knowledge questions.

The answers seem strangely focused on Queensland.

11. Totally Foo Fighters video - I'm a fan. Here's a gem of a live performance video. Good value for (no) money. Nearly two hours of Foo goodness.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

15 Comments

Its not the gone in 50 years thats the worry, its the we cant get any more out of the ground today (+/- 5 years) thats going to impact us today and for the next decade or three.

Ive listened to this group before, CNBC at its usual useless self and this analyst who has no idea of the scale of this issue....whats crazy is she probably earns several times what I do!

Its simple to fix this needs a focus of the  entire global economy of the scale of ramping up to WW2...once you undertsand the commitment of your entire economy to achieve that it starts to dawn on you the mind boggling commitment of a generation and the costs involved....Lets assume ppl are prepared to make this sacrifice (and its obvious they are not) where does the money come from? Virtually everyone and every nation is up to their eyeballs in debt....they cant pay for this....ergo the only outcome is a mega depression way worse than the great depression....

regards

Up
0

"Several times" jeez steven more like 70 times!...no worries there mate...soon as the Japanese robot human look alikes comes off the line you can expect all the salary bloated heads to be replaced...That does away with more than the 'heads'...no need for the crew that write the script on the whatever screen...just feed the stuff into the plastic head.....can't wait

Up
0

FYI via email from Mark, Roubini's latest on China is interesting reading...

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/roubini37/English

...also TD Economics on the implications for commodities...

http://www.td.com/economics/special/pg0311_china.pdf

HT Mark

Up
0

That report by Roubini is very lucid and details how malinvestment is inevitable in a planned economy like China's. If his analysis is correct a bust in China is inevitable and will have serious consequences for "commodity-based" economies such as ours. It is therefore concerning  that the government and RBNZ are trumpeting the thesis that there has been a structural shift and commodities are in a secular boom. This has had not only the effect of  encouraging de-diversification of our export sector (by talking up the NZD to the detriment of non-commodity exporters), but may also be encouraging our own form of malinvestment (yet more dairy conversions?).  Dutch disease indeed; this could end up costing us dearly.

Up
0

#1 - Bernard says, "Although we have to be careful it doesn't cause our own version of the 'Dutch Disease'

So how about a stabilisation fund? Our protein industry may not be state owned, but it is state enacted/supported as a monopoly that enables sufficient presence, position and leverage that supports the dynamic we are and will continue experiencing.

How about it, Bernard? 

Up
0

#3 "Until the effects of economic recovery filter further out into the country, we will continue to suffer from the effects of this stagnant, disparate market

Mortgage availability remains the sticking point to kick starting the housing market but there are now clear signs that the banks are opening back up for sensible mortgage lending

we remain optimistic that the second half of 2011 and early 2012 will mark the start of a sustained recovery in house prices"

Todays NBR mentions the increased housing activity in March - "house sales are a good indicator of activity, leading the economy by six to nine months and the housing market is showing some encouraging signs.  Mortgage approvals have also improved in recent weeks, hinting as a broadening recovery.  These developments suggest an accelerating recovery from later this year."

I don't get it.  Is this just proof that our economy so reliant on selling houses to each other that a kick start in the housing market is a good thing?  Is it really sustainable for house prices to continue increasing at this point rather than reverting back to the long term trend first?  Is this further proof that economic growth is fundamentally flawed if it relies on non productive activities?

In May 2007 the financial stability report issued by the RBNZ included data showing that house prices were 25-50 percent overvalued.  You can argue as much as you like that the fundamentals may have changed, supply/demand issues, la de da.  We know there's those of you that want prices to stay as they are or increase and there's those of us that want them to correct.  But it's time to put self interest aside and look at the bigger picture.  Why is a "stagnant" market inherently referred to as a bad thing and why is increased activity referred to as good for the economy?

Up
0

  "Is this just proof that our economy so reliant on selling houses to each other that a kick start in the housing market is a good thing?" ....that's correct meh.

Back to the future meh....a return to banks offering cheap 95% mortgage money...fully supported by the govt and the RBNZ...long live the property ponzi economy.

Meanwhile in Ireland the latest property auction on the box had property selling for just 25% of 08 values in some cases and 33% on average.....

Here in poNZi land the sale of farms has all but stopped...must be a time of the year thing...the farmers are so feeelthy rich with their wool meat and milk payouts thay are too busy splurging on new tractors and twin engine light planes to bother with buying farms..not.

Up
0

And I enjoy watching the Foo Fighters.

Still love the Foo Fighters  Bernard?

 

Up
0

Our housing market, outside of Auckland and may be one or twe hot-spots like Queenstown, is NOT all that expensive.  One can buy a house about twice the size we had in the days of Beasley Homes, with a big double garage in many places in NZ for a very reasonable price.

But if you keep repeating the expensive house mantra over and over then it becomes accepted as a fact

Trouble is that 1/3 of our population want to live in Auckland, and that's the main attraction also for many immigrants. By the way, if you want to see what expensive housing is like try New Delhi. The' middle class' place I was living in 5 years ago was worth multi-million dollars.

Up
0

Yep to all of the nominations above.

Here's a piece with more quotes from Stiglitz;

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/japans-nuclear-melt-down-economic.html 

 

Up
0

To all teachers in NZ...here is your escape route....!

 "A teacher has secured a £200,000 compensation payout after slipping on a grape and suffering injuries while in school.
.The teacher, who has not been named, aggravated an existing hernia problem when he slipped on the fruit, which had been left in a stairwell"

 http://www.metro.co.uk/news/861032-teacher-wins-200k-payout-after-slipping-on-grape

Up
0

Huffpo on Blankfein/Goldman Sachs 'could face prosecution'. 

Up
0

Matt Taibbi: "Justice department has no appetite to take ANY cases against Wall Street executives."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEK4T1Cs8c8&feature=player_embedded#at=29

Up
0

Charles Hugh Smith (oftwominds.com)

Here is the set up for the Con Of The Decade:

The con is being set up right now and the outlines are clearly visible.

In essence, the financial elites would own the revenue stream of the Federal Government and it's taxpayers.

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogapril11/setup-con-of-the-decade4-11.html

Up
0

sunday silly billy,s--our q/land govt is running a buy local initiative--they had some tee shirt,s printed up to promote this---- the minor  problem with this is that they were made and printed in bangladesh---so to remedy this slight oversight public servants armed with scissors were dispatched to remove the incriminating  shirt tags----heads should roll but won,t

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/sunday-mail/queenslands-buy-local-t-shirts-made-in-bangladesh-and-the-us/story-e6frep2f-1226040191601

Up
0