sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: China extends and pretends by rolling capitalising loans to local govts; What Warren Buffett likes to invest in; 'Let them default'; Dilbert

Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: China extends and pretends by rolling capitalising loans to local govts; What Warren Buffett likes to invest in; 'Let them default'; Dilbert

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 3 pm in association with NZ Mint.

I welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop the extras into the comment stream. See all previous Top 10s here.

My favourite today is the Muppets singing a Tom Waits at #9.

1. Extend and pretend - Reuters reports the FT reporting (via paywall) that China has ordered its banks to extend loans to local authorities that are due to be repaid.

Remember, China unleashed a wave of lending through local state and council developers through late 2008 and early 2009 to build railways, apartment buildings, roads and airports to get the Chinese economy going again.

Most of these loans were capitalising interest loans (ie they didn't have to pay interest and had to be repaid in full with principal plus compounding interest when the loan was due, often within 5 years.)

These sorts of loans are a big favourite with property developers and were responsible for so many finance company blowups in New Zealand.

It meant the likes of Hanover, Strategic and Bridgecorp could truthfully (!#*?!) report they had few non-performing loans because the loans were simply rolled when they were due to be repaid...

Now China's banks are rolling the loans that are due to be repaid. Many of the loans were used to build projects that produce less returns than the interest costs. That's a definition of unproductive investment right there.

Here's Reuters:

China encouraged banks to lend to local governments for new projects during the financial crisis to buoy the economy, but its provinces and cities now face $1.7 trillion in debts. More than half those loans were scheduled to come due over the next three years, the newspaper said.

Banks had started extending maturities for local governments to avoid a wave of defaults, the paper said, citing bankers and analysts familiar with the matter. One person briefed on the plan said in some cases the maturities would be extended by as much as four years, it said.

2. 'Hollowed out economy' - Stuff's Fiona Rotheram reports expat Kiwi business titan Sir John Buchanan is surprisingly nationalisatic about ownership of NZ assets.

He argues the NZ economy has been hollowed out and restrictions should be put in place on those companies that took grants and subsidies and then sold out to foreigners. He didn't mention them, but 3D software company RightHemisphere (sold to SAP) and Navman (sold and then gutted) come to mind.

Here's Buchanan:

''To allow companies just to redomicile when they've had tax breaks, investment grants, training grants, whatever, if companies have benefited in the way then the nation states should be entitled to get those benefits back if someone wants to go elsewhere. You can't be too restrictive on one hand; on the other hand the New Zealand economy has been hollowed out at the top end.''

3. Is PIMCO too big to fail? - Reuters reports via CNBC that monster US bond fund PIMCO (who I link to often) may have become too big to fail.

U.S. regulators are now considering whether PIMCO should be deemed a "systemically important financial institution" - that is, too big to fail, and thus subject to tighter regulatory oversight. The concern: The juggernaut manages so much money for pension funds that it could hammer the economy if it ever went under. The firm has doubled in size to $1.36 trillion in assets since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008.

The firm is lobbying hard to fend off the "systemically important" designation, according to regulatory disclosures. Like other financial firms, it also objects to impending rules that could make some of its derivatives trading more costly.

3. Buffett likes stocks - Here's an excerpt (via Fortune) from Warren Buffett's forthcoming annual letter to shareholders, which many see as a must-read.

He says bond investors have missed out since 1965 and that gold investors are investing in an asset that doesn't produce anything.

He prefers to buy things that make things. Yet bonds have outperformed stocks since the mid 1980s...

However, here's Buffett's thinking:

My own preference -- and you knew this was coming -- is our third category: investment in productive assets, whether businesses, farms, or real estate. Ideally, these assets should have the ability in inflationary times to deliver output that will retain its purchasing-power value while requiring a minimum of new capital investment. Farms, real estate, and many businesses such as Coca-Cola (KO), IBM (IBM), and our own See's Candy meet that double-barreled test. Certain other companies -- think of our regulated utilities, for example -- fail it because inflation places heavy capital requirements on them. To earn more, their owners must invest more. Even so, these investments will remain superior to nonproductive or currency-based assets.

Whether the currency a century from now is based on gold, seashells, shark teeth, or a piece of paper (as today), people will be willing to exchange a couple of minutes of their daily labor for a Coca-Cola or some See's peanut brittle. In the future the U.S. population will move more goods, consume more food, and require more living space than it does now. People will forever exchange what they produce for what others produce.

4. Japan's economy shrank more than expected - Reuters reports on how Japanese GDP fell more than expected. Japan is the zombie economy that much of the west is now modeled on.

5. That's one way to do it - Reuters reports Some desperate American home owners who can't afford to pay the interest on their mortgages are painting their houses as advertising billboards...

First in first served...

In a residential neighborhood without heavy traffic, cars passing by the house slowed and drivers gawked at the vivid colors and a giant Brainiacs From Mars billboard.

Romeo Mendoza, the company's founder and CEO, told Reuters that his ultimate goal is to turn 1,000 homes across the United States into giant advertisements for his marketing firm. And in each case struggling homeowners will get their mortgage paid, for up to a year.

6. 'Let them default' - The FT's European correspondent Wolfgang Munchau thinks Greece and Portugal should be allowed to default and then be helped out of the mire by Europe's resuce funds.
 
He thinks the Greek deal done this morning will calm things for a month or two, but ultimately, Greece will go bankrupt.

The Bundestag could still derail it, as public opinion in Germany is currently turning extremely nervous at the prospect of a futile €130bn programme. But my central expectation, however, is that the programme will happen. A period of calm will set in, but after a few months it will become clear the cuts in Greek wages and pensions will have worsened the depression. Europe’s policymakers will also find out that, in such a desolate environment, even a reduced target for privatisations is unrealistic.

This is not even the most pessimistic scenario. It still assumes that Greek politics remains broadly supportive. But with fresh strikes and ministerial resignations greeting the latest programme, do we really know whether Antonis Samaras, the leader of New Democracy and most likely winner in the April elections, will co-operate with the current strategy? I cannot see how this is going to work politically. For a new prime minister who contemplates a full term of four years, the temptation must be big to pull the plug and blame the mess on his predecessors. He will then have four years to rebuild the country from the rubble of a eurozone exit.

7. China hoarding Copper - Gordon Chang writes at Fortune that China's government is hoarding copper to ensure its trade surplus doesn't look quite so big. Eventually they'll stop buying. I hope the Australians are watching.

So what does Beijing’s politically motivated copper purchases mean for future demand?  On the one hand, they suggest that Chinese enterprises will continue buying the metal to dress up trade numbers in succeeding months.  At some point, however, Beijing will put an end to the years of stockpiling.  My guess is that will happen in the middle of this year, perhaps early fall.

Why?  First, by then the slowdown in the economy will become evident, and stockpiling will no longer be able to mask the fact that imports, a proxy for domestic consumption and growth, are tumbling.  Second, Chinese enterprises will run out of money to buy unneeded metal.  Soon, China, which accounts for about 40% of global demand for copper, will not be able to support world prices by adding to its hoard.

8. Currency wars - Bloomberg reports Chile's Finance Minister saying the central bank needs to intervene to sell the Chilean peso...

Yet our government seems relaxed about the astoundingly high level of the New Zealand dollar.

Chile’s central bank should consider renewing a dollar-buying program to curb appreciation of the peso, South America’s best performing currency in the past month, acting Finance Minister Julio Dittborn said.

“Obviously it’s a concern that the peso is strengthening so much,” he said in a telephone interview today. “The central bank should evaluate whether it is appropriate to intervene again or not like it’s done in previous years.”

9. Totally the Muppets sing Tom Waits' 'Gods Away On Business'. It made me laugh.

10. Totally Jon Stewart on the very rich and the very poor, and how Mitt Romney doesn't care about either.

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

14 Comments

I've often argued that artists (real artists, mind you) smelt all this crap coming.  Tom Wait's 'God's away on Business' is from Blood Money (originally titled Red Drum), released April 9, 2002 along with 'Alice'.  That's well before the current kerfuffle entered the run-up phase, but still doesn't compare (in terms of sniffing the wind) to Dylan's liner notes for 'World Gone Wrong' (1993). 

Up
0

The fate of $100 since 1965!

 

This is too tempting so I've calculated what $NZ100 in NZ residential real estate would be today:

 

Average house in 1965 was $7000.  Average rent for that house about $14pw.  Deducting expenses, paying tax on the rent (assuming no mortgage on $7000 initial investment). $206,000 in net rent received in nominal terms, with interest (ie put the money rent in the bank) that's $461,000.

 

Add the current value of the house at $370,000.   That's a total value of $831,000.

 

Or $11,723 for every $100 invested.

 

Better than any other way to spend $100!

Up
0

Not sure it would be an apples to apples comparison if you add interest on the net profit of the rental operation.  For example, in the S&P example was there an estimate for interest on dividends invested in a bank added to the calc? 

Even so using your figures, the rental investment returned $8,128 per $100 spent making it the top performer.

 

 

Up
0

Kate, the S&P 500 "capital" index is around 1300 this month, in 1968 it broke 100 for the first time. 

 

So $100 in 1965 in the S&P 500 would only be worth $1400 today if you didn't reinvest the dividends.

 

The person creating the chart above has used a "gross" index.  (I haven't got the data in front of me but it may or may not be not be the "net gross" numbers quoted, ie tax needs to still be deducted).

 

For NZ residential real estate, I quoted effectively "net gross" figures.  So my comparison is definitely legitimate, although currency effect is not included.  In 1965 NZ of course we still used pounds (so a house was 3500 pounds), the dollar was also pegged to the US so if we included the effect of about a 25% devaluation in the NZ dollar over the time the result would be a bit closer.

 

Now I've assumed that income is just invested in the bank, but you could have done even better with a modest amount of leverage and reinvesting more back into property.

 

$100 into $11k plus is proof that property should be in the portfolio.

Up
0

Property should definatly be in there, but this is part of a concerted effort to get the sheep back into stocks.

Up
0

Barclays skyscraper index - China and India at height of capital misallocation phase -

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-01-11/markets/30615195_1_burj-…

Up
0

One of the best articles I've read all week. HT zerohedge

http://www.scribd.com/doc/81329259/Whither-Gold

Fascinating detail about how a fiat currency leads to hollow economies as manufacturers are forced to become speculators (and lots, lots more besides). Written in 1996 it is rather prescient.

Up
0

The ECB is printing flat out because EZ M3 is growing at a weak 1.6%, as opposed to the US where M3 is growing at 4%.

http://www.shadowstats.com/charts/monetary-base-money-supply

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2012/01/27/euro-zone-money-supply-loan-growth-slows-in-dec/

NZ on the other hand is cranking it up at 6%.

http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/monfin/c1/data.html

 

Inflation is purely a monetary phenomenon.

Up
0

Stocks and bonds had a 7 year headstart on gold, '65-'72 gold was fixed at $32.  If you had bought gold in '72 then sold the gold and bought shares in '84, then sold the shares in '99 and bought gold, you would have PWNT any buy and hold stratagy by an order of magnitude.  Nothing moves in a straight line, and investor capital flows from different assets at different times, right now it's flowing out of stocks and housing,  into gold and farmland.

Up
0

Greece is already Bankrupt, passing austerity laws is the easy part, implementation is the hard part.  Keeping deficits below a fixed percent for the long term, is a joke when they cant even do it now.  As GDP shrinks, deficits grow, and debt/GDP soars. 

 

China is not dumb, copper is money, and selling worthless fiat for money will ensure supply for the future.  Media shills claim some kind of alterior motive, when the reality is that China wants the worlds resources.  It's selling it's fiat and bonds, and buying anything that has real value.  Why would they want to hold massive reserves, when the world is in a race to the bottom for fiat currencies?

Up
0

You nailed it Skudiv - they're a clever bunch.  There aren't many poor Chinese in NZ.  Some came here without much but generally as a race they know how to grow and protect their wealth.  Polar opposite to the yanks.

Up
0

If there was one thing the Troika needed not to hear less than 24 hours after the latest bailout demand vote passed, it is that the leader of Greek ill-named "New Democracy" party who is likely to replace Papademos as the next leader of Greece following the April elections, is that at best the new "deal" will last for two months, or until after the next local election. Needless to say, this it the only "pledge" out of Greece in the past week that is 100% certain to be kept. From The Guardian: "Samaras, the current front-runner to replace Lucas Papademos, told parliament last night: "I ask you to vote in favour of the new loan agreement today and to have the ability to negotiate and change the current policy which has been forced on us"." While hardly surprising, Guardian goes on to point out "that would rather thwart the Troika's demands that Greece's leaders all pledge to implement the current plan, as Megan Greene of Roubini Economics pointed out on Twitter: 'Samaras demands bailout be renegotiated after elections and troika insists he sign that he'll uphold 2nd bailout. We still have a problem.'" Indeed - it is called Merkel seeks guarantees that what the next Greek leader said is a joke before it agrees to send even more billions in taxpayer cash down what Schauble earlier called a "bottomless pit."

Up
0

#1

So what's so different from the ECB's  "LTRO", E489 Billion for umpteen years (or as long as the banks want), or Fed's $3trillion at 0.25%, or the BOE Bp250 billion QE ??

 

At least the Chinese goverment don't hide behind fancy accronames and give nonsense justification and financial theories to explain away their incompetence....call a spade a spade and be done away with it !!

Up
0

Re 2

BP have a very bad reputation in the oil industry which is saying something. The disasters of recent memory have their origin in cost cutting. A classic would be the Texas Oil refinary explosion.

Poor maintenance due to cost cutting culminated in the explosion and deaths of 2005. But they go all the way back to years and years of an oil company being essentially run by accountants not oil men.

The reason so many people died in that one is that they built je office complex inside the refinary.

Ask oil people, BP has never been a respected oil company, they are a product of the city of London, all manipulation of numbers.

 

 

Up
0