sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Here's the leading indicators Bernard Hickey is watching in 2014: Chinese dairy output; Shibor; Auckland building consents; Euro-deflation and more

Here's the leading indicators Bernard Hickey is watching in 2014: Chinese dairy output; Shibor; Auckland building consents; Euro-deflation and more

Here's my Top 10 picks for leading indicators to watch in 2014, including links to useful articles about said picks. As always, we welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz

See all previous Top 10s here.

My must read today is #2 on the Chinese shadow banking situation.

1. Chinese dairy production -  China Business News has reported that in 2013 China reduced its dairy herd by 2 million cows because drought-hit farmers there were hit by high feed costs and took advantage of high beef prices to slaughter cattle.

That is forcing China to import more milk powder from the likes of New Zealand.

Remember New Zealand has less than 7 million cows and China sources more than half its imports from New Zealand. No wonder, despite record high production here and production ramping up in America, there are very high dairy prices. Prices remained elevated at last week's GlobalDairyTrade auction.

People rightly focus on our own production outlook and the prices we get fortnightly, but we should also keep an eye on Chinese production, given New Zealand (despite the botulism scare) is the major supplier of dairy imports to China.

Any continued fall in Chinese production would of course be great for dairy prices, and our economy. 

There is a downside though if our terms of trade remain as high as they've been in the last six months. 

The Reserve Bank included in its December quarter monetary policy statement a 'Box C' (page 43) scenario, which shows that a higher Terms of Trade would force the Reserve Bank to increase the Official Cash Rate by more like 2.5% than the 2.25% currently forecast. 

2. Shibor - Central bankers and professional worriers like me are very focused on China's shadow banking system and whether it might trip up the Chinese economy. 

I'm not so sure any hiccup inside China's financial system will cause much grief for us, given demand for dairy and meat is more closely connected to consumers, who have plenty of savings, rather than developers and local governments. It may hit the Australians, via iron ore and coal prices, more than us. The Chinese also have a track record of intervening to ensure the growth keeps chugging along over 7%, including by forcing 'rollovers' of loans, intervening to keep its currency low and simply cranking up investment with yet more debt.

But it is certainly something to watch.

The canary in the mine of China's internal debt problem is is the Shanghai Interbank borrowing rate (Shibor), which is a reflection of what banks have to pay each other for short term loans.

Shibor leapt in June and again in December as stress in China's banking system spilled over into higher rates. The Peoples Bank of China has tried a couple of times now to let the market deal with these stresses and both times it has blinked. 

Here's Beijing based economist Patrick Chovanec explaining via Bloomberg why it's worth watching:

To those who wrote off China’s first banking seizure in June as a fluke, this latest episode appeared to come out of nowhere. They cast about for explanations: Perhaps some seasonal surge in cash withdrawals was to blame, or the U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision to taper its bond-buying policy. Optimists assumed the PBOC was tightening credit on purpose, as a warning to banks to rein in unsafe lending practices. With inflation at manageable levels, they reasoned, the People’s Bank of China had plenty of room to loosen monetary policy again and ease the cash crunch.

In fact, loose monetary policy is the problem, not the solution. Two simple words -- bad debt -- are the key to understanding why China has too much money, yet not enough. In the years since the global financial crisis, China has racked up impressive growth in gross domestic product by engineering an investment boom, fueled by a surge in easy credit. Total debt has risen sharply, from 125 percent of GDP in 2008 to 215 percent in 2012. Credit has spiraled to $24 trillion from $9 trillion at the end of 2008. That’s an additional $15 trillion - - the size of the entire U.S. commercial banking sector -- lent out in just five years.

A lot of that money has gone into projects whose purpose was to inflate the country’s economic statistics, not to generate a return. Officially, China’s banks report a nonperforming loan ratio of less than 1 percent. In reality, they are rolling over huge amounts of bad debt, both on their own books and by repackaging it into retail investment products -- many of them extremely short-term -- that promise ever higher rates of return.

China’s banks can hide bad debt by playing this shell game, yet that doesn’t change the fact that they’re not getting their money back. With their capital locked up in existing projects, the only way they can finance the next round of big investments -- and keep China’s GDP growth rates from collapsing -- is by expanding credit. More and more of that new credit is now eaten up paying imaginary returns on the growing pile of bad debt.

3. Auckland building consents - This 2014 year is the first full year of the Housing Accord and the Government's last chance before the election to prove its efforts to boost housing supply are getting some traction. The Accord targets the issuance 9,000 consents in 2014, which would be 50% up on the number consented in 2013.

It's a huge ask, but if successful could reassure the Reserve Bank and reduce the size of interest rate hikes through 2015. It could take some of the steam out of house prices. It can't come soon enough. QV reported yesterday that Auckland values rose 15% in 2013 and were up 10% nationally.

This October speech from RBNZ Deputy Governor Grant Spencer explains the issues and the bank's outlook nicely.

4. Colin Craig's poll ratings and his electorate choice/deal - This seems a bit of a strange one to introduce into a 'year ahead' look at economics and business.

But this November's election is shaping up as a cliff hanger that will be decided by whether National can manage to help (or create) enough partners to stay in power.

Colin Craig's Conservative party is the main candidate and if National can gift him an Auckland electorate and get him elected it could stay in power.

That will then decide whether or not there is a capital gains tax and a multitude of other economic changes, including changes (perhaps) to the Reserve Bank Act.

This Matt Nippert profile of Craig, who owns a body corporate management firm, is worth a read, in particular, this exchange:

In your view, is real estate a wise investment?

I don't think our preoccupation with property is healthy, but I understand why we do it in this country. We have quite a dysfunctional market in Auckland in that property prices are not reflective of reality: we have a bubble. They look at it and think "I can get an above-average return in property" - and it's true, which is annoying. In terms of investment, to have property outperforming business investments is a negative. We would be better served if it was directed elsewhere.

5. European deflation - Economists here in New Zealand may be fretting up a storm about future inflation and calling on the Reserve Bank to act now to avoid an inflation blowout, but in Europe and America there is real fear about the dangers of entering a vicious deflationary cycle.

Europe has been teetering on the brink of Japanese-style deflation in recent months, forcing many to consider whether the European Central Bank should start printing money US-Japan-UK-style.

The Germans want this verboten, but it's still an open question. If Europe does go into deflation and the ECB doesn't print, then we could be in for all sorts of ugliness.

We will also import some of that deflation in the form of much cheaper European products and cars in particular.

Here's Ambrose Evans Pritchard with his always entertaining view:

Core inflation – stripping out food and energy – fell to 0.7pc, lower than at any time following the Lehman crisis.

“It's lower than when the European Central Bank was forced to cut rates in November,” said David Owen from Jefferies Fixed Income. “A large number of countries across the periphery are either in deflation already or very close, and this is spreading to France. The ECB will have to do quantitative easing in the end,” he said.

Almost 25pc of the items in the price basket have dropped over the last year, the clearest evidence to date that the deflation ‘virus’ is becoming lodged in the system.

Mike Amey from the bond fund Pimco said the eurozone is “sleepwalking into a decades-long deflation trap” like the Japanese in the 1990s when they mistook near zero rates for easy money. The region has no margin for error as its ageing crisis takes hold.

While gentle deflation can be benign in low-debt economies, it plays havoc with the debt dynamics of leveraged economies, an effect described by US economist Irving Fisher in his 1933 classic “Debt-deflation Theory of Great Depressions”.

6. The NZ$/A$ cross rate - Some including HSBC Economist Paul 'Rockstar' Bloxham are predicting the New Zealand dollar could hit A$1.00 later this year, triggering a parity party.

If there is a party it needs to be in Australia because everything will be relatively cheaper there. I suggest the party be held at Paul Bloxham's place...

The theory goes that Australia's economy is slowing, or at least slower than it was and slower than ours. Our interest rates will be rising this year while Australia's are flat to falling.

This in part is due to the likely switch in the structure of the Chinese economy, away from investing in infrastructure (which requires iron ore and coal) and towards more consumption (which requires meat and milk). The third plenum decisions late last year appear to reinforce that trend, which would be relatively good news for New Zealand and less-good for Australia.

We'll see. The Chinese have failed in the last five years to wean themselves off the sugar rush of debt-fueled investment spending. Every time they've tried their economy has slowed and the leadership has unleashed the beast of more concrete and steel to keep things cooking. But as the chart above shows, that simply puts off dealing with the problem of leverage.

If the NZ$ does keep strengthening against the Australian dollar then it makes us less attractive to Australian tourists and will hamper (at best) our manufacturing exporters, who are more exposed to Australia than anywhere else.

7. Road usage - I love the ANZ's truckometer measures of light and heavy vehicle usage as a proxy and leading indicator for economic growth.

But something funny is happening with our usage of roads and attitudes to cars.

This chart from the Ministry of Transport shows kilometres travelled per capita per year (VKT) has been dropping since 2005. This is a global phenomena that is puzzling people. It seems young people don't want to spend much time (or money) on cars. They prefer their electronic devices and public transport. Ageing populations are also driving this (sorry for the pun).

It begs the question: why are we spending so much money on new motorways?

Here's more on this from the Guardian on the trend also being seen in America.

New car purchases by those aged 18-34 dropped by 30% in the US between 2007 and 2012, according to the car shopping website Edmunds.com. Many American under-35s are now not even getting their licence. Given that so called "millennials" – those born between 1983 and 2000 – are now the largest generation in the US, the trend is worrying car firms.

Meanwhile the number of miles driven by Americans each year has also started to drop –they now drive fewer miles per capita than at the end of Bill Clinton's first term, according to a report released last year by US PIRG Education Fund. And the age group showing the biggest decline? Those aged 16 to 34, who drove 23% fewer miles on average in 2009 than in 2001.

There are two main, and not necessarily mutually exclusive theories, for why America's millennials are eschewing cars, said Tom Libby, lead analyst for IHS Automotive. "One theory is that millennials have lost interest in cars in general. They live more of their lives online and just don't have the same innate interest in car ownership," he said. "Secondly, the economy has held them back and they'll return once it picks up enough."

8. Readymix concrete - This is one of my favourite chart series on Interest.co.nz. It shows readymixed concrete deliveries and is a very hard (pun intended) leading indicator of construction activity.

It is really ramping up.

Readymix concrete

Select chart tabs

m3 000
annual growth
m3 000
m3 000
m3 000

9. Log exports to China - We are all conditioned to think now that the big story of trade and the economy at the moment is milk powder exports to China. It is true this shift is huge.

But we shouldn't forget the equally epic shift towards log exports to China. Not only has China appeared out of nowhere as a buyer of our log exports, but has driven a massive increase in exports of logs vs more processed wood exports.

Here's an excellent Statistics NZ graphic showing the shift since 1992. 

10. Fonterra milk production - Just to finish off with a similarly milky flavour, the last leading indicator to watch is New Zealand's milk production.

Fonterra produces a regular update of how it's 'milk curve' is tracking and how much it expects total production to be for the year. It's current forecast is for a 6.4% increase on last year, which was hit hard by the drought.

The chart says it all.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

30 Comments

If our terms of trade are improving , the Australian economy is slowing with consequent reductions in Interest rates and Europe is heading for deflation wont we have a stronger currency and acess to cheaper imports even in foreign currency terms  let alone NZD?

Wont we thus have prices falling in NZ rather than rising? Wont the reduction in tourism and struggles for exporters put a brake on our economy apart from the housing sector?

If the answer to these questions is yes why are we expecting interest rates to rise? Surely the strengthening currency will do the Reserve Banks job for it. Swap rates seem to falling.What does that tell us?

Up
0

True Waripori, but the NZD has been doing the job for the RBNZ for quite some time now, because without the deflation in the tradeable sector as a result of the high Kiwi over the past year, based upon the last numbers I saw, we'd already have the CPI well back above 2% currently. But now that non-tradable inflation is picking up so strongly the Kiwi alone isn't enough, in fact if US economic data permits the Fed to follow through on its QE tapering intentions then the NZD might well be capped in the 83-86 region as the USD likely firms - who knows on that one ?

 

If those other factors you mention come to bear as strongly as you may suggest, then the RBNZ can change or stop its hiking track, but for the moment (unless your talking the past few days of normal market "noise"....e.g. US payrolls) swap rates are strongly up in anticpation (125bps plus in the last 9 months) based upon their perception of all those factors which is what markets are evaluating daily..

Up
0

"In terms of investment, to have property outperforming business investments is a negative. We would be better served if it was directed elsewhere."

Craigs

 

I love it when the "experts" suggest we invest "elsewhere" other than property.

What is "elsewhere?"

What can be leveraged to the same extent to show a good return?

What is more secure than solid real estate other than bank deposits?
What can you buy that could set you up for life for the price of a deposit on a home?

Anybody?

 

 

Up
0

I brought an insurance client base that provides a 25% return, loaned the whole amount (slightly creative financing ) return on investment paid off loan in 4 years.  Now an argument could be made that property is more certain that an insurance client.  For one client yes but for 500 no way.  The chances of all 500 clients cancelling their policy is almost nil.  

 

Thats just one example. Whether it is morally better than collecting the capital gains of our society is of course another question.

Up
0

Bigdaddy

This is exactly why capital gains profits should be taxed.

No ifs, no buts, no "intention" get out clauses.

 

If you are allowed to claim interest on the mortgage as a deduction, then in return you pay profit tax that is generated because of that same leverage.

The tax  free ride for property capital gains needs to be brought to an end.

Up
0

I agree with your views on élsewhere"

Me personally apart from my house and a few term deposits i have invested inti the forestry industry.Not expensive to get into and their are a number of companies that offerinvestments.

Up
0

Big Daddy,

Easy answer but harder to manage would be Contracts for Difference on the DJI30 or S&P500

Starting Jan 13  on the DJI at 13,500 and ending at 16,300 on a conservative committed 10% of $50000 deposited and staying long right through you would have made perhaps $200k and paid tax on that. Exact figures are hard to calculate as CFD providers offer varying terms of trade.

Better still trade two sector indices one long and one short.

Pick the right two and your fortune is made.

Up
0

PeakEverything, BB III and Ngakonui Gold,

                                 

Thank you.  Finally the type of comments we should be seeing on a financial website.  

 

PeakEverything, most insurance companies are happy to buy a adviser/clients book off them so not only do I agree it’s a safe investment it also has a easy out should you want it.  

 

Ngakonui, how long before you can cut the trees down?  Is any return paid in the short term?

 

BigDaddy, what about exporting refined food products to China?  They are happy to take our milk and trust our brand…  Cookies, cereals, crisps, etc.  Anything that can make the trip over there.  Lets start dominating other isles in their supermarkets

Up
0

No return in the short term apart from the value of the land increasing due to dairy conversions in the area.

Cutting down of the trees will commence hopefully 2021 if prices are ok,if not they will continue to grow until they are.

Up
0

BigDaddy, property is an unproductive means of allocating capital. Our output per capita and standard of living has declined as property values have risen. Property has made a major contribution to our Current Account deficit. 

Up
0

but is it smart to do it with debt?  just shove the problem into the future.

Up
0

Yes people need to be housed but the fact is property yields for investors have declined. It doesn't make any sense to borrow at 5%+ for a yield of sub 5%. That means much of todays investment is for capital gain. If investors focused predominantly on yield, property values would be much less.Property has created few jobs,contributed little to wage growth or our standard of living. This has manifested via our huge -CA.

Up
0

Yep, conveniently unsaid by those given to risking other peoples money when arguing asset classes is the seriously low likelihood that you will find out by some press release that the property you own no longer exists. That some "Suit" will get to live in his wifes' house while you scrap to recoup 5% of your capital, maybe, after the reciever "suits" have casually ammassed fees remarkably similar to the value of what was left.

Lack of credibility in the financial sector would be the primary reason that property is so popular.

We can all do the math, all profit (as asked over the cost of provision) is mirrored with loss, "suits" make a lot of profit. Some fall for the speil, many do not. Colin Craig and his ilk have cried about the lack of victims forever and dream up ways of legislating the fish into the barrel as the australians have done with compulsory super. 

Deal with "suits" at your peril.

Up
0

What ? ?

Up
0

Regarding deflation, what happens when people start growing their own veges or otherwise bypass traditional merchants and use the black economy? What is the likely response by central banks to this continuing scenario? There is of course theories about that hyperinflationary episodes are preceded by deflation. In a printing fixes everything world this could get interesting.

Up
0

Agree Spinach.  And lets cite Forsyth Barr and 'Credit Sails'.

They don't want to talk about that, but we should keep bringing it up. And up.  And again.

Forsyth Barr behaviour and the rest of the bunch are great motivators to invest in property.

 

Up
0

hi bernard,

is that target of 9000 consents in the first year only pertaining to the Housing Accord or does it also include the normal consents (outside of the housing accord)?

Up
0

Houses overpriced

Good question. It's everything, as I read it here on page 5:

http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/SiteCollectionDocuments/aboutcouncil…

 

Up
0

Lets call a spade,  a spade. Parity with the Aussie$ would at worst be a bloody nightmare , albeit a slow lingering and continuous one .

At best it will be a game changer for Kiwi producers of everything , and be good for ordinary Kiwi consumers .

You just need to look at food prices in Melbourne and then rank them at parity to see we will all be enjoying Australian produced dairy , meat and fruit at prices lower than the the retail prices here .

 

 

 

Up
0

Can you guarantee the supermarkets will pass on those cheaper prices though, Boatman?  It would be a license for them to make money.  ;-)

Up
0

You have a good point about supermarkets and price gouging  , although I think there is enough competition in the retail food sector with the likes of fresh fruit and Veg and the butcheries for the price adjustments to filter through

Up
0

"I'm not so sure any hiccup inside China's financial system will cause much grief for us, given demand for dairy and meat is more closely connected to consumers, who have plenty of savings, rather than developers and local governments".

 

There will be grief for us as millions of construction jobs, among others, would be lost in China as a result of a credit meltdown.

Up
0

MikeM

There's hundreds of millions of consumers who save more than half their incomes. They're the ones buying the baby formula and pizzas.

Property developers and steel mills are not buying baby formula and pizza.

And the debt is owed buy Chinese local governments to Chinese state owned banks. Easily forgiven or rolled over. It may slow for a while, but no sure thing that China will collapse. I don't know how many times I've heard people warn of Chinese collapse and be wrong. It's a lot of times. 

cheers

Bernard

 

Up
0

Doubling time....the latest chinese Govn wants to grow at about 7%, that means in 10 years their economy will have doubled. Lots of Qs on just how they do that....

regards

Up
0

I do hear you Bernard but let's look back at what happened in Japan back in the late 80's. Whilst they had different dynamics as far as government and ownership/human rights were concerned, consumption declined considerably after their asset meltdown. This flowed right through to end consumption. It's never been tha same since. Yes, talk of a China demise has been around for some time but as they continue along the same economic tangent the risks are growing. 

Up
0

Zany, do you think the children that are left will be incredibly wealthy?  I would have thought that as the population shrinks the ones left would have more to go around. Think of the inheritance advantage of an only child.   Think of the clean beaches with half the number of people, half the fish needed from the ocean, half the traffic.

  Chinese woman are not breeding any faster than the Europeans did in centuries past. India and Pakistan are two countries heading for disaster.

Up
0

Here so ammo for you Bernard. Too much of Gummy Bear can give you diarrhoea :-)

 

Safety Warning: Consumption of some sugar-free candies may cause stomach discomfort and/or a laxative effect. Individual tolerance will vary. If this is the first time you’ve tried these candies, we recommend beginning with one-fourth of a serving size or less.

 

http://slightlyviral.com/beware-sugarless-gummy-bears-on-amazon-com/

Up
0

.... can you keep quiet about this Mr scarfie , long enough for the Gummster to send a complimentary bag of these wee treats to every member of the NZ parliament ... Every member !

 

So we can do to them that which they've been doing to us , for so many years ....

Up
0

Lol. I will promise if you will GBH, to do it that is :-)

Up
0

I like the Readymix index - similar to the pre-Xmas orders of gift wrapping in the USA as a reliable indicator of business confidence/retail traffic expectations

Up
0