sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

A review of things you need to know before you sign off on Tuesday; no retail rate changes, interest-free car loans from Westpac, are rates really high?, swaps up, NZD holds, & more

Economy / news
A review of things you need to know before you sign off on Tuesday; no retail rate changes, interest-free car loans from Westpac, are rates really high?, swaps up, NZD holds, & more

Here are the key things you need to know before you leave work today (or if you already work from home, before you shutdown your laptop).

MORTGAGE/LOAN RATE CHANGES
No changes to report today.

TERM DEPOSIT/SAVINGS RATE CHANGES
Nothing here either. But TSB reduced its minimum deposit for its online WebSaver account from $1000 to $1. It didn't change the rate however, at 4.20%

MORE CHOICES FOR WESTPAC HOME LOAN CLIENTS
Westpac have renamed their Warm Up loan to Greater Choices, and extended its coverage to now include electric cars (and their chargers), hybrids, and rainwater tanks. These Greater Choices loans are actually interest-free (0%) for up to five years, for up to $50,000. But they are only available to Westpac customers who have a home loan with them "who meets lending and affordability criteria".

SIGNIFICANT SHORTFALL SEEN BETWEEN LEVEL OF USERS' HOLDINGS & AMOUNT OF DIGITAL ASSETS HELD BY DASSET
Digital Asset Exchange, or Dasset, had digital assets of about $600,000 versus user liabilities of about $6.9 million, according to its first liquidator's report from Grant Thornton's Malcolm Moore. The digital asset exchange offered users the ability to buy and sell over 90 different digital assets with NZ dollars. Moore estimates Dasset had more than 5,000 registered users. Moore says Grant Thornton has been in contact with the Financial Markets Authority and the Serious Fraud Office. He also notes that, as a registered financial service provider, Dasset was required to provide access to a dispute services process. However, the Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) says the company was removed from its scheme prior to liquidation because it hadn't responded to complaints raised by the IFSO.

MORE PARTY POLICY UPDATES
We have updated our policy comparison resource with new items from Top - Health on vaping, Top on Immigration, and National on Health (cancer drugs). The same link can take you to the Party Lists.

RESILIENT
Given all the challenges the country faces, within and from its northern neighbour, it is perhaps surprising that consumer sentiment is holding up very well in South Korea, better than analysts had expected. The results of their business sentiment survey will be released tomorrow.

US BANKS FEELING THE SQUEEZE FROM HIGHER RATES
In the US, S&P has followed Moody's in trimming the ratings of a set of regional banks. Many depositors have "shifted their funds into higher-interest-bearing accounts, increasing banks’ funding costs," S&P wrote in a note summarising the moves. "The decline in deposits has squeezed liquidity for many banks while the value of their securities, which make up a large part of their liquidity, has fallen." Federally insured banks were sitting on more than US$550 bln in unrealised losses on their available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities as of mid-year, S&P said.

A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE
As you will note in the next item, the benchmark UST 10yr has risen sharply to a new 'recent high'. But we should keep in mind that this is still well below the long-run average for this rate, which over the past 60 years was 5.88%. From 1963 until the end of 1979 the average was 6.31%. From 1980 for the next 20 years it was 8.62%. For the subsequent ten years until the end of 2009 it was 4.46%. And for the 13 years since, it has averaged just 2.32%. Today's 4.34% is nothing special, despite all the current angst. (In fact, economic expansion was fastest when it was highest, although inflation was also a wicked problem during some of that period.)

SWAPS COULD BE HIGHER
Wholesale swap rates were probably up again today, but the real reaction will come at the close. To be fair, this has been the situation an hour or two before the close for a few days, but things settle at the end. It may be like that again today of course, or we may see up to a +10 bps rise. Who knows. Our chart will record the final positions. The 90 day bank bill rate is unchanged yet again at 5.64% and now +14 bps above the 5.50% OCR. The Australian 10 year bond yield is up +10 bps from this time yesterday at 4.36%. The China 10 year bond rate is holding low at 2.56% and a new three year low and prior to that pandemic dip, nearing a 21 year low. And the NZ Government 10 year bond rate has risen to 5.21% and up +9 bps to a new 12 year high, and still higher than the earlier RBNZ fix which was up +6 bps to 5.09%. That is also the RBNZ's series highest since July 2011. The UST 10 year yield is at 4.34% and up +6 bps from this time yesterday but little-changed from this morning.

EQUITIES RECOVER SOME
It has been another down day on the NZX50 but this time only a -0.2% fall. The ASX200 is up +0.1% in afternoon trade after yesterday's late fall. Tokyo has opened up +0.6% in its early Tuesday trade. Hong Kong has opened up +0.6% after yesterday's -1.8% fall. And Shanghai is +0.4% higher at its market open after yesterday's -1.2%. The S&P500 ended up +0.7% in Monday trade earlier today with all that gain coming in afternoon trade.

GOLD FIRMS
In early Asian trade, gold is at US$1897/oz and up +US$5 from yesterday.

NZD HOLDING STILL
The Kiwi dollar is still at 59.3 USc basically where it was this time yesterday. Against the Aussie we are firmish at 92.4 AUc. Against the euro we are softish at 54.3 euro cents. That means the TWI-5 is still at 68.3.

BITCOIN STILL ON HOLD
The bitcoin price is little-changed today, now at US$26,048 and down another minor -US$44 from this time yesterday. Volatility has been modest at just over +/- 1.5%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

Daily swap rates

Select chart tabs

Opening daily rate
Source: NZFMA
Opening daily rate
Source: NZFMA
Opening daily rate
Source: NZFMA
Opening daily rate
Source: NZFMA
Opening daily rate
Source: NZFMA
Opening daily rate
Source: NZFMA
Opening daily rate
Source: NZFMA

This soil moisture chart is animated here.

Keep abreast of upcoming events by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

43 Comments

Historical comparisons with the benchmark UST 10yr need to include the amount of debt.

Up
3

The actually need to be compared against the inflation rate i.e. what are real yields?

Up
8

Actually, they have to be compared to the amount of underwrite remaining.

Unfortunately, the financial world was - and clearly still is - kept in ignorance of that trajectory.

Up
1

Ominous noises coming out the U.S. as Charles Schwab to cut jobs and close and downsize some corporate offices, with expected savings of $400m-$500m.

Charles Schwab owes 130% of capital in short-term loans. If it defaults, it could spark a Lehman-esque meltdown. 

The rumor mill is suggesting another U.S. bank (Truist Bank) has over $500 billion in assets and could be on the verge of failure along with Charles Schwab & HSBC. Saying this would be huge is an understatement. 

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/charles-schwab-reduce-headcoun…

Up
4

Yes. Certainly worth watching. Non-bank institutions are where the most risk is, I agree. 

Up
4

Really, there is no evidence of any contagion in the markets today? 

Up
0

JC says whats good for JC, anything that promotes crypto 

Up
4

JC says whats good for JC, anything that promotes crypto 

What's good for JC is buying low and selling high (even though it's likely I may never sell my BTC). And I would prefer to add more to my sack at 4K than 40K or 400K. 

Up
1

What about $400 and $4 at what point are you going to realise you have been left holding the baby ?

Up
3

Relative Strength Index (RSI) of ol' ratty at levels not seen since March 2020. That means hugely "oversold."

However, it is prudent to adjust price expectations down IMO. My potential falls for ratty and the sh*tcoins have now been increased to 85%. So that means a potential price of USD4,000. However, the most DGM I have seen from influencers is USD9,000. Flash crash from 9K would explain my number.    

Buying at $4k would be the stuff of dreams for some of us.  

Up
0

So you sold all your "ratty" then JC in preparation...didn't think so.

Up
0

So you sold all your "ratty" then JC in preparation...didn't think so.

I don't sell ratty. I'm one of those people. You have to be mentally different from most people. It takes work.  

Up
0

Yep. Many people wouldve moved onto something that provided a net positive return to them by now.

Faith doesn't pay for too many trophy wives.

Up
5

You mean rental property?

Up
0

Sort of, but with even worse odds of positive returns.

Up
2

So Dasset can still be done for fraud, right? Sounds like a classic Ponzi scheme, pretending to invest the money while actually just spending it on themselves. 

Up
3

So users won't even get 10c on the dollar, if anything at all. Very disappointing.

Up
3

Dasset is more of an indictment on the weakness of / non-existence of a regulatory framework in NZ. Nobody taking responsibility. If you look at the background of the founder, I would have no idea why anyone would use the platform. Basically a dreamer. Besides that, how it operates is opaque. The fact that some punters had $40k sitting on the exchange suggests that its customers do not understand the basics of the space. 

Up
2

How bloody ironic though.  I bet you many of these Dasset "customers" were massive proponents of "decentralization", probably to the point that any talks of ideas such as taxing crypto transactions would be met with solid pushback. 

But now that they've been burnt, it's "why didn't the regulator step in sooner?".  

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/dassets-crypto-meltdown-should-regu…

 

Up
6

Are we going to bail them out like South Canterbury Finance?? $400 per each per NZ citizen from memory,. I guess they are looking at how many rich farmers and politicians mates are on Dassets books?

Up
3

 I bet you many of these Dasset "customers" were massive proponents of "decentralization"

No. If they really believe in decentralization, they would have their assets in self custody. 

Up
2

Generally if someone's into crypto, there's an assumption of a level of freedom from the "system".

Trouble is the basic assumption is an alternative system will offer the same level of security and convenience.

If you get to the level of self custody of stored value, it might as well be something of tangible use/utility.

Up
3

If you get to the level of self custody of stored value, it might as well be something of tangible use/utility.

Normie speak. Self custody is about taking responsibility. Like not leaving your keys in the ignition while you pop into the dairy. 

Up
1

The logical conclusion to that line of thinking is taking responsibility for all your core requirements. So like producing your own electricity, protein, carbs, water etc.

Not some arbitrary digital token, ironically stored offline, at the whim of a market you have no influence over.

Up
4

Not some arbitrary digital token, ironically stored offline, at the whim of a market you have no influence over.

The more BTC held in storage, the less available to buy/sell. So indirectly it has an influence on the mkt price. 

Up
0

So if you took yours out of cold storage tonight, how much will the price move, and in which direction?

The amount of influence you have is negligible to the point of insignificant. You're just there for the ride.

Up
1

The amount of influence you have is negligible to the point of insignificant. You're just there for the ride.

Sure. Since November 2022, 404,000 BTC have been taken off exchanges. If this trend continues, it will be zero in 41 months. 

Up
0

Well, so far none of your metrics have resulted in a positive return for your investment, just reasons to hang on, just a bit longer. 

A better bit of info would be returns on bitcoin vs time of entry into the market. I think it'd show pretty clearly any newcomers have rocks in their head. 

Up
1

If they believed in decentralization, THEIR crypto would be in THEIR hard wallets.

Up
2

True, I guess I was more meaning away from the evil state/government interference or manipulation.  Until something bad happens of course, and then it's "Why didn't the Government step in sooner".  

 

Up
1

Even holding crypto locally in your hand by keeping out of an exchange as much as possible is literally the only customer protection people have with exchanges; that customers can choose not to use them.

Those who are unaware of how crypto works & inexperienced with it often use exchanges which is biggest downfall. Like signing up for high risk, high stakes game where the house gets to claim ownership of all your money as soon as you join the table.

Exchanges are not banks, they do not have even the minimum necessary financial investment protections as other investment companies & many are literally stealing customer funds to run their own side schemes. Even a paper key buried in backyard (as a case of less secure local storage) is far safer than any exchange to date.
Key lesson: always learn as much as you can about risk & security of your investment medium.

Up
0

Chalk it up to a learning experience; that we need more honesty and customer protections in marketing for investments, and actual effective sentencing for crimes so they act as a deterrent to any future cowboy operations who want to stake someone else's claim

In the world of crypto investing most exchanges (especially NZ ones) are cowboys who think customer/investor/trader protections can be ignored. Something that many of those customers would like to have words with them about now. Pity you can market and sell anything, say any level of security is used (with nothing to back it up), & NZ is a light touch in regards to responding to fraud & white collar crime.

That they were not seen as abiding by basic customer protecting regulations should have been a red flag for any tech investor... in fact that is why most experienced crypto investors did not touch the exchange with someone else's ten foot pole. When I was doing a security review of their services my main advice to others was to avoid them like the plague.

Up
0

More likely speculating than spending it. There are a lot of people out there who got lucky playing the crypto casino, and this kind of setup gives them the opportunity (and the unearned confidence) to gamble with other peoples' money. Of course they'll put it back, once their sure thing comes through..!

Up
3

 There are a lot of people out there who got lucky playing the crypto casino, and this kind of setup gives them the opportunity (and the unearned confidence) to gamble with other peoples' money.

What a load of rubbish. Speculating on crypto means stumping up your own positions. Most traders get wrecked while the real winners are the buy and hold Bitcoiners.  

Up
0

"However, the Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) says the company was removed from its scheme prior to liquidation because it hadn't responded to complaints raised by the IFSO."

Wtaf.

So it was part of the scheme and obviously made that known but just ignored the IFSO so was removed and.......

And what exactly. Is there any point to the ISFO if they just wash their hands?

I don't understand.

Up
6

The IFSO is an arbitration service - it cannot issue legally binging directives. However, membership requires agreeing to abide by directives issued - the early stages of which is simply information gathering (hearing both sides of the story). The fact Dasset wouldn't engage is a massive red flag.

Up
1

If the 16% fall in sale price of your house, and subsequent loss of $800k, is a happy ending at One Roof, what constitutes bad news?

https://www.oneroof.co.nz/news/44131

They really are the most malevolent, warped platform in the land.

 

Up
6

They didn't really "lose" 800k though. That "deal" for 5M, was it an auction or just some too good to be true offer? It's not very clear.  It looks like a happy ending to me. They lived it in for over 40 years and sold it for 4M more than they paid for it. Yes, it certainly looks like a happy ending to me.

The family declared themselves “delighted, thrilled and chuffed” at the sale.

Up
2

$4k p/sqm with a decent house in a very good Remuera Road is not a good result. They had sold for $4.9 and that fell through, how is selling for $4.1m then good news? 

Up
2

Well, that 4.9M was in Feb 2022 and prices have changed since then.

The house appears to have sold for above the 2021 CV and the current QV estimate. Nicely renovated though.

Up
0

Chinese Local Government Land Sales Revenue

January-July

2021: 4.14tn Yuan

2022: 2.83tn Yuan

2023: 2.29tn Yuan

Not looking good for Chinese local governments budgets. 

https://piqsuite.com/reuters/chinas-land-sales-revenue-down-for-19th-st…

Up
1

New PwC chief in Aussie just gone on vacation to Maldives after four weeks on the job. Employee of the month. 

https://www.afr.com/rear-window/pwc-s-kevin-burrowes-an-american-agent-…

Up
2

Gotta love those Aussies who call a spade a bloody shovel. I've been a fan of the AFR for 25 years.

Up
2