sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

First NZ Capital analysis shows that after inflation, house prices are still down on 2007, but price rises are expected to run at an annual rate of 8.5% in the near term

Property
First NZ Capital analysis shows that after inflation, house prices are still down on 2007, but price rises are expected to run at an annual rate of 8.5% in the near term
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/">Image sourced from Shutterstock.com</a>

Despite New Zealand house prices recently reaching all-time highs, values are actually still some 8% down, after inflation, on those seen during the last housing boom in 2007, according to research from First NZ Capital.

Analyst Chris Green says that in recent times, underpinning the rise in national house prices has been strong gains made in both the Auckland and Canterbury regions. In particular, the latest REINZ figures for the month of February showed annual increases in the Auckland and Canterbury regions of 11.6% year on year and 12.3% year on year, respectively.

"In real terms (deflating nominal prices by the Consumer Price Index), we estimate that annual house prices have been recording positive increases since the December 2011 quarter, and for the December 2012 quarter recorded a real increase of 5.7%.

"However, despite this recent run of annual increases, national house prices in real terms are estimated to be around 8% below their September 2007 peak levels," Green says.

First NZ believes, however, that looking forward, it expects the recent acceleration in national house prices to peak around the 8.5% level, "dominated by robust price rises in the Auckland and Canterbury regions".

"Looking further ahead over the 2014 year, we expect nominal house price growth to ease back by the end of next year to around the 5.5-6.0% year-on-year level," Green says.

"In broad terms this would represent real annual house price inflation slightly above its long-term average of 2.5% year-on-year, together with a forecast annual inflation rate of 2.0-2.5% year-on-year."

Green says that underpinning the expectation of further gains in house prices is a backdrop of a moderate NZ economic recovery, a rise in real incomes, the boost to residential investment from the Canterbury earthquake rebuild, a modest recovery in net migration flows,  together with the maintenance of "supportive" interest rate settings.

"However, somewhat offsetting these supportive factors will be the prospect of relatively subdued domestic credit growth, together with continued balance sheet consolidation by households," Green says.

"Moreover, the key policy uncertainty when attempting to forecast domestic house prices remains the potential introduction by the RBNZ of macro-prudential policy tools. While these tools are currently in the consultation phase, they could begin to be deployed as early as the second half of this year."

First NZ believes the most likely macro-prudential tool to be used by the RBNZ to dampen any additional “overheating” in the housing market would be restrictions on high loan-to-value residential mortgage lending, followed by the central bank looking to adjust sectoral capital requirements to housing lending.

"In terms of likely triggers for RBNZ to implement these new tools, the bank has noted that it is closely watching the relationship between the growth in credit and GDP. If aggregate credit growth continues to remain around its current growth rate of 4-5% then we believe the RBNZ will remain vigilant, but be unlikely to act.

"However, if credit growth accelerates to around the 8-10% region and/or national house price growth move in excess of 10% year-on-year, the likelihood of macro-prudential policy tools being deployed would significantly increase. Relative to our house price forecasts, such a scenario will likely entail a higher peak in house prices, followed a more pronounced decline, as the macro-prudential tools were employed."

Green says on the basis of the long-term trend, real house prices, which were around 35% overvalued at their peak in September quarter 2007, were now estimated to have moved back to being around 10% overvalued.

"Despite house prices remaining overvalued, our housing affordability index, which takes into account interest rates as well as incomes, has shown a significant improvement since its peak in September 2007 on the back of the sharp decline in mortgage interest rates."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Real house price growth since September 1962 has been 2.1% - however that includes 1 decade that skews the results - this past one.

 

While nominal house price growth historically has looked impressive - particularly in the 70's - that was more a function of high CPI.  Real house price growth from 62-72, 72-82, and 82-92 was 1.1%, 1.2%, and 0.8% respectively.  In the most recent comparable period, 2002-2012, real house price growth average 4.5%.  This has obviously accelerated well past that level in the last 18 months.

 

Why is this relevant?  Well - for a long period of time house prices average about 1% growth in real terms per annum.  We are now growing at 600% that level.  Forget about shortages of supply etc - the vast majority of this increase is being driven by low exchange rates fueling a speculative bubble that regulators seem inclined to ignore or at least think outside the box on.  What this also signals is that a large correction of this interest fueled bubble is more likely than not over a 5 year period.  That isn't to say prices won't increase this year - they will, but later in the year at a much slower rate than all those wizz bang bank economists predicted (the same ones who said house prices would only rise by 2% or so last year at the beginning of last year).

I was reasonably bullish about the market 2-3 years ago (not that I thought a price/volume appreciation was a good thing - it was just the likely outcome given the circumstances of the time) and that has proved true.  There is a well established housing cycle that we are near the top of - so buyer beware.

Up
0

Compare with total stock market returns (dividends reinvested) of 6% per annum after inflation since 1900. A much better home (pun intended) for your investing money.

Up
0

where are the bulls on this article. Probably trying to think up something to say in opposition to it but cannot find the answers. Being a landlord is a mugs game. The share market is killing it for returns as always. But you have to have money to get into shares and some brains of course.

Up
0

Gold mining shares are doing well, go for it ex-agent.. safe as houses..

Up
0

So you'll be buying with your ears pulled back then. Don't forget, Japanese housewives all over the world are relying on you. They think you are fantastic.

Up
0

I guess most punters would settle for nominal annual GDP growth (last 2.63%) greater than the level of mortgage rates.

Up
0

And that's a problem with CGT - there's been no capital gain, but if you sell you'd still have to pay tax on the inflation. Not really a capital gain tax - it's an inflation tax.

 

Up
0

I'm betting salary inflation has not kept up with real inflation. Houses and now harder to afford, not easier.

Up
0