sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Opinion: Next year is likely to be a ripper for the economy, but just how good? Here is an attempt at some specifics

Opinion: Next year is likely to be a ripper for the economy, but just how good? Here is an attempt at some specifics
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/">Image sourced from Shutterstock.com</a>

By David Hargreaves

Well, it’s that time of year when a kind of communicable madness sets in and normally sane people try to work out what will happen in the next 12 months.

Therefore in the spirit of “everybody’s doing it, so why shouldn’t I”, here are some predictions of an economic nature from me for the year ahead. I stress that the forecasts are very much my personal opinions.

For the sake of meaningful comparisons, appended to this are both the latest Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Statement, complete with official forecasts, and the NZ Institute of Economic Research's Consensus Forecasts.

I've indulged myself by putting my specific predictions in bold text, hopefully to make them easier for you to digest. As always your constructive feedback is most welcome. Enjoy.

Death to LVRs

I’ll start with the most “out there” prediction, which is that I pick the Reserve Bank will announce the ending of the hotly-debated “speed limits” on high loan-to-value lending in April.

I pick April because it’s realistically about the earliest the central bank could do it, given that the first assessment of the bank’s lending ratios will be done based on a rolling six month average, starting from October 1.

Why do I think it will be canned? Well, notwithstanding the brave face the RBNZ was trying to put on it last week, the introduction of an exemption for houses under construction was a humiliating defeat and one that will severely undermine the policy.

Worse, of course, it opens up the playing field for others to come along and skillfully lobby/pressure the way the building industry did. And with next year being an election year the Government will be listening to anybody who votes. You could end up with an LVR policy that virtually everybody is exempt from.

My pick is that the RBNZ would not want to let it get to that point. The LVR policy has to date had a sharp impact on market behaviour and the banks have fallen into line. Why wait through next year and watch the policy get more and more diluted as the Government goes into full baby-kissing mode?

If the RBNZ pulls the plug in April (or at least announces the end of LVRs at that time) then it could claim some success. Also it could then holster this particular weapon to be brought out at another time (not an election year).

OCR

Remember also, and catching on to the militaristic theme, the RBNZ will be bringing out its blunderbuss, I would pick (along with most economists) in March and start hiking interest rates. This of course is the weapon of choice when it comes to taking aim at the housing market.

So on that, my pick is for a first rise in the Official Cash Rate, yes in March, followed by a mid-year lull and then some very aggressive tightening – for reasons to be made clear through my range of predictions – in the latter months of the year. I’m picking an OCR of 3.75% by the end of the 2014 calendar year, which would be a whole 125 basis points higher than the 2.5% OCR we have now.

Mortgage rates

At the moment banks’ floating mortgage rates are on average around 5.65%. If you took my OCR pick as gospel and added a straight 125 basis points on to that rate, it would give floating mortgage rates of approaching 7% by the end of next year, which would have to sting a bit.

Realistically, I can’t see that. Competition for mortgage business is fierce and likely to remain so. The margin between the OCR and what banks charge for floating mortgages has tended historically to operate somewhere in the region of 200-300 basis points. At the moment, taking the “effective” floating mortgage rate as in the RBNZ’s statistics sets, the margin is 315 basis points.

Clearly the banks have got some room to trim that. I’ll predict, based on my 3.75% OCR pick that floating mortgage rates will be 6.25% by Christmas 2014.

House prices

Given then that I reckon mortgages are going to be costing quite a bit more, will house values be worth the trouble?

Well, yes, I believe they will. The RBNZ’s expecting house price inflation to peak at around 10% before dropping. But it’s also expecting the LVR measures to knock between 1% and 4% off house price inflation as well. And I don’t think the LVRs will achieve anything like that because in my opinion house prices are being driven more by those seeking houses as investments than they are by those looking for somewhere to live.

So, what to make of it next year? My inclination is to pick house price inflation for the full year of between 10% and 15%, but since that’s quite a large range I’ll go for the midpoint and say 12.5%, which is higher than most would be picking.

Migration

My reasoning combines the neutering of the LVR policy I see occurring, combined with a rush of optimism about the economy and crucially a continued inflow of migrants.

New Zealand’s migration position turned from a net loss to a substantial net gain very quickly. In the year to October 2012 we had a net loss of 2300 people. That reversed to a gain of 17,500 in the year to October 2013.

People rightly point out that a big contributor is the fact that many fewer Kiwis are taking flight across the Tasman, with the Australian economy, for once, looking vulnerable.

But that’s not the whole picture at all. It’s not just about people who are or are not leaving – there’s quite a few coming in as well. In each of the four months up to and including October this year the number of inbound migrants was a record for that month of the year.

Logic suggests that with the New Zealand economy looking rosy, migrants will continue to come and fewer Kiwis will look to leave.

If the normal pattern of high numbers of inbound migrants occurs in January and February then we will be starting to look at historic high net inflows by the end of the first quarter 2014.

The all-time record net inflow of migrants was set in the 12 months to May 2003. I’m going to predict that we will beat that next year. I’ll go for a fresh record of say 44,000 in the year to September-October 2014.

If the numbers do get that high, consider that usually at least half all migrants settle in Auckland, and that gives you another 22,000 people, between them potentially looking to buy several thousand houses in our biggest city. So, I definitely think that come spring next year the pricing pressure on New Zealand’s houses will be only up.

Inflation

If house prices go up, what about other prices? I’m picking inflation of 2.1% by the end of next year. That’s not stratospheric (given the RBNZ’s target is 1% to 3% and the RBNZ Governor is now explicitly targeting the mid-point), but it is higher than the RBNZ’s currently forecasting (1.4%) and I reckon by the end of next year the pressures will be building rapidly.

I think the Christchurch rebuild will inevitably cause bigger price rises both in materials and labour costs than currently hoped, while if Auckland is successful in its efforts to crank up residential building activity in the region, this will put upward pressure on materials and labour costs there too.

And while consumer spending intentions appear very conservative, a little while longer of rising house prices and a generally buoyant economy will loosen the purse strings and that itself will fuel inflation.

GDP

I’ve mentioned a strong economy a bit without quantifying it. My pick for GDP growth for the full year 2014 is 3.8%, which would be pretty heroic. I just think that milk powder will keep working its magic, exports to China will continue to generally go very well, and the boost from construction – not just in Christchurch but Auckland also – will be considerably stronger than currently expected. Oh, and I think consumer spending will start to blip up more than currently predicted too.

Unemployment

Of course, all this economic growth has got to be good for the jobs market. I’ll pick an unemployment rate by the end of next year at 5.1%, (compared with 6.2% as at September 2013). Such a relatively low rate of unemployment will see skill shortages cropping up along with upward pressure on wages – another factor likely to fuel inflation.

The currency

And should anybody want to spend some of their newfound prosperity on an overseas trip, the all important question will be: What’s the dollar going to do? Actually of all the things to predict that’s got to be the most impossible. I’ll go for the Kiwi dollar being worth about 89c against the Australian currency and 79c against the US. But on this one, frankly, who knows?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

17 Comments

Yes , all the signals of boom times ahead are in the mix, its really exciting  

BUT

Will we use the upturn to diversify the economy away from Dairy , our single product export ?

Will we see real investment in productive assets or will we buy more passive investments such as houses for rent to the huddled masses we welcome so readily  ?

Will we exploit our under-expoited natural resources such Oil and Gas ?

Will we use the proceeds of Asset sales to start a National Oil Company for the benefit of all New Zealanders like Norway's Statoil?

Will we expand fishing operations and processing to eventually match Dairy in size and scale?

Will we remove unncessary and inefficent tarrifs on consumables and building materials (such as GIB board )  ?

OR

Will we waste the opportunity, by spending on unproductive or depreciaitng assets on the back of a strong Kiwi$.?

Will a new Government tax productive Capital as part of a rampant Tax and Spend regime, until it runs out of other peoples money to spend ?

Up
0

Boatman - yes all good points The important thing is though, having got themselves out of the mire that most countries in the world are still in, NZ has the opportunity to look at these issues and its future from a better position. I personally trust that from the way National has generally managed the economy to date (yes we'll debate some aspects) that all of these will be top of mind, but the jury's out on what will actually be done - remember much of it is related to what individual NZers and businesses choose to do, not just the Govt, although they can provide incentives.

 

And h\Hugh, if you're right about National being on the backbenchs come the end of next year, that would say alot about NZers and their fixation on housing. Home ownership is important, but a roof over your head moreso, and most have one . If they are not satisfied with the position the NZ economy is at next year, but for the moment can't afford a house, they really are away with the fairies in wanting new management. We get what we deserve though I guess   

Up
0

Those are indeed interesting and important questions, but if you're seriously interested in discussing them it's important to be clear who exactly is meant by "we".  The Government cannot decide what New Zealand is and is not going to invest in, buy, manufacture, expand, exploit, export, import.  That is the outcome of individual decisions by individuals and firms both here and overseas.   Where Government has good reason to think it knows better, it can try, through taxation, spending, regulation and the provision of information and advice, to influence and encourage and enable New Zealand individuals' and firms' decisions one way or another.  But there are many other factors in play which also influence those decisions and Government action may or may not be enough to tip the balance.

Up
0

So the Recession is over and we can go back to Moet en Chandon  and GH Mumm instead of that terrible $7.99 stuff  from Pak n Save .

Anyone see Karl Storchmanns report about how French Champagne sales are a sign of America's fortunes ?

Up
0

Hell no Boatman, when things are getting better thats the time to not get complacent, and a far easier time to be making structural reforms - I'm hoping, indeed expecting, thats what National will do if voted back in.  I'm not expressinbg an opinion on it, but the concept sometimes touted that during the tough times the public normally backs National to manage through it, and when things are better, they chuck them out as Labour is better at spreading the rewards to everyone until the bad times come back - it will be interesting to find out next year if that is actually true as it will tell a tale if there is a change - I don't believe Hugh's call that it will be a housing issue that determines it as God help us if that truly is the main focus oif Kiwis, rather than one of many.

Up
0

Hugh, you whinge too much. Every time I am in Chch for business I see the place being more positive each time. The productives I meet are positive and look at their lot now with positivity as well as working for a living. They just get on with life! You seem to want to represent all of the negatives and people who cannot be bothered to help themselves down there and live with the woe is me lot. 

About time you got off your high horse and stop blaming every organisation around for your lot and get a more positive mental attitude, you will feel a lot better for it! Something might even get done!

 

Up
0

Hear hear The best status...

Up
0

It couldn't be that you are accusing Hugh of being Malthusian in outlook could it?

Up
0

Well the way I see it is that every time someone predicts the attainment of economic Heaven, we end up arriving in Purgatory.

 

Something out there will end up pulling the plug.

 

Hallelujah.

Up
0

Purgatory being a Lab/Green government.

 

Up
0

Did anyone actually read what David wrote above?!

I for one appreciate David's articles and his ability to voice an opinion that is just that....an opinion (with some facts thrown in).

Inflation and Currency to determine the OCR. That's what i'm interested in.

I'm in an interesting position with <$200k mortgage <80%LVR and a discounted floating rate of 5.25% until July 2014 tb neg. 

I have avoided the temptation of fixing for 6 months, 1 year and even 2..as by all accounts the rates have been just that for those of us new-ish to the housing market. By the time you paid your $100 -$150 for fixing the interest saved was minimal...so I didn't bother plus we had the flexibility to jump ship if necessary and bargain hard with competitors.

So what to do.. ANZ and Westpac have bolted and perhaps more to follow? What I can't get my head around is why now? why not wait until the "inevitable" OCR hikes in 2014.

i may regret not fixing for 3 years back in September...I looked into it at 5.5% but I wasn't certain this was the way forward with our stagnant inflation and over-valued NZD. Perhaps I underestimated NZ's economic recovery or is this just a "credit fueled" recovery that will eventually go bust.

Between the respective views of Mortgagebelt and Grant A, I stand in the middle and watch and learn. if David's predictions are correct for floating rates by years end 2014, I'll be paying 5.85% still within my current weekly repayments.

As always I look forward to continued debate (re:David's article)

ps: last evening I was sizing up Westpac to broker a deal...then the buggers bolted :-) I guess it's between the Kiwi banks...

 

 

Up
0

dobrydan - whether view proves to be corerct; Mortgage Belt's "two cuts coming" or my views, which pretty much align with David's above, and have done for a while, its a bit irrelevant as either of us could be wrong. Its really just a case of risk management and not too much pride. I think the mistake many of us make is being afraid to act anf then realising we shouldn't have. None of us can beat the market consisently so really it just comes down to what you can afford, what risk you can take.

Up
0

Agree Grant. There has to be a balance between what you would personally like to see and what is most likely to happen. I'm sure Graeme Wheeler has an ideology he would love to carry out but he has a legislated mandate to stick to. Don Brash naively tried to make his ideologies become a reality via entering politics. There are fundamental changes I'd love to see in his country but at the end of the day, there are many forces and agendas at work.  

Up
0

I think David is right about RBNZ  hare-brained scheme for 2013 (the LTVR on secondhand  houses)  being canned next year.

In the absence of a massive speculative bubble , Wheeler (or  anyone else)  is basically unable to control the market in secondhand houses, especially when the rules dont apply to new houses.

The market will do what it pleases when the normal forces of demand and supply are in play

An increase in interest rates will slow things down more than any other hare-brained scheme to control lending or house prices .

I am at a loss to understand why there are restrictions on secured lending for secondhand houses in the first place.

Up
0

Gummie's 2014 Prognostications :

 

National to narrowly beat Labour/Greens in the 2014 general election .... the Gnats had an appalling 2013 , and yet L/G made little headway against them ... whether it's the threat of CGT , higher income taxes , or we just don't like Cunliffe , L/G are doing it harder than they should be ...

 

 $NZ to peak around 95 cents Oz ... but not necessarily to end 2014 at that elevated level ....

 

.... best performing developed country stockmarket : Australia ... on the back of 1 or 2 RBA cuts to their OCR ... SME's to have a stellar year ...

 

Gold : down .... down ... down .... finally people are listening to Warren Buffett ... gold is a stupid " investment " .... it sits there and does nothing , diddly squat ... in order to profit  you have to wait for someone even stoopider than you to come along and buy it .... and what're the odds of that ....

 

... house prices to continue their upwards trajectory ... LVRs... CGT ...higher interest rates .... banning foreigners ... all BS to appease the masses ... the fact is , Oliver Hartwich is correct , we have screwed up the supply side of the equation for decades , and are now paying the price , literally ... Ollie Newland to finish 2014 with a big " I told you so " grin on his chops ...

 

Mrs Brown to file for divorce ... even if the super city can't roll Len  for his appalling behaviour and his arrogance , the good lady mayoress can .

 

... and one from left field ... a Kiwi or Aussie  rugby player when being interviewed , will spontaneously combust immediately after saying " we had to dig deep " ... and never again will players use that excretiable expression .... horticulturists dig deep ... footy stars play with their balls ... no digging ....

Up
0

You beat me to it! Always ahead of the game. (Not hard to beat me though.) You may like to repost here
http://www.interest.co.nz/news/67941/we-review-our-big-stories-2013-and…

 

Happy New Year

Up
0

Happy New Year David ! ... tie one on last night , or stuck to the gatorade ?

 

... if I knew how to repost , I would ... I'm technomiclogically illiterate .. .. happy for you to do so , if you've got some internet scissors and tape ...

 

See the Dow , S&P , Russell 2000 are all finishing the year higher than Cheech & Chong ... far out , man ...

Up
0