sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Brahma Chellaney says the Communist Party of China's centenary is nothing to celebrate for neighbouring countries downriver

Brahma Chellaney says the Communist Party of China's centenary is nothing to celebrate for neighbouring countries downriver

On July 1, the Communist Party of China (CPC) will stage a patriotic extravaganza to celebrate the 100th anniversary of its founding. Among the achievements it will celebrate is the Baihetan Dam, located on the Jinsha River, on the southeastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. The dam will start operations on the same day.

The CPC loves a superlative. It is the world’s largest manufacturer and exporter, with the world’s largest foreign reserves. It boasts the world’s highest railway and the highest and longest bridges. It is also the world’s most dammed country, with more large dams than the rest of the world combined, and prides itself on having the world’s biggest water-transfer canal system.

The dams themselves are often superlative. The Three Gorges Dam is the world’s largest power station, in terms of installed capacity, and the Baihetan Dam is billed as the world’s biggest arch dam, as well as the world’s first project to use a giant one-gigawatt (GW) hydro-turbine generator. With 16 such generators, Baihetan ranks as the world’s second-largest hydroelectric dam (behind the Three Gorges Dam, at 22.5 GW).

All of this makes great fodder for CPC-fueled nationalism – essential to the party’s legitimacy. China often flaunts its hydroengineering prowess, including its execution of the most ambitious inter-river water transfers ever conceived, to highlight its military and economic might. (To be sure, there are also superlatives China will not be flaunting at its upcoming centenary – beginning with the world’s largest network of .)

But China’s dams are not merely symbols of the country’s greatness. Nor is their purpose simply to ensure China’s water security, as the CPC claims. They are also intended as a source of leverage that China can use to exert control over downstream countries.

The CPC’s 1951 annexation of the water-rich Tibetan Plateau – the starting point of Asia’s ten major river systems – gave China tremendous power over Asia’s . In the ensuing decades, the country has made the most of this riparian advantage. For example, by building on the Mekong, just before the river crosses into Southeast Asia, China has secured the ability to turn off the region’s .

But the CPC is failing to consider the high costs of its strategy, which extend far beyond political friction with neighbors. The party’s insatiable damming is wreaking environmental havoc on Asia’s major river systems, including mainland China’s dual lifelines: the Yellow and the Yangtze.

Giant dams damage ecosystems, drive freshwater species to extinction, cause deltas to retreat, and often emit more greenhouse gases than fossil-fuel power plants. More than 350 lakes in China have disappeared in recent decades, and, with few free-flowing rivers left, river fragmentation and depletion have become endemic.

The social costs are no less severe. For starters, given shoddy construction in the first three decades of communist rule, about 3,200 dams collapsed by 1981, with the 1975 Banqiao Dam failure alone killing up to 230,000 people. Of course, China has raised its dam-building prowess dramatically since then, and Baihetan was completed in just four years. But as its early dams age, and weather becomes increasingly extreme, catastrophic failures remain a serious risk.

Moreover, dam projects have displaced an enormous number of Chinese. In 2007, just as China’s mega-dam-building drive was gaining momentum, then-Prime Minister Wen Jiabao revealed that, since the CPC’s rise to power, China had relocated 22.9 million people to make way for water projects – a figure larger than more than 100 countries’ entire populations. The Three Gorges Dam alone displaced more than 1.4 million people.

This doesn’t seem to bother the CPC much. Baihetan’s inundation of vast stretches of a sparsely populated highland has forced local residents, mostly from the relatively poor Yi nationality, to farm more marginal tracts at higher elevations. As China shifts its focus from the dam-saturated rivers in its heartland to rivers in the ethnic-minority homelands the CPC annexed, China’s economically and culturally marginalized communities will suffer the most.

And there is little doubt that this will happen. The CPC has now set its sights on building the world’s first , on the Yarlung Zangbo river – better known as the Brahmaputra – near Tibet’s heavily militarized border with India.

The Brahmaputra curves around the Himalayas in a U-turn and forms the planet’s longest and deepest canyon, as it plunges from an altitude of 2,800 meters (9,200 feet) toward the Indian floodplains. Damming it means building at an elevation of more than 1,500 meters – the highest at which a mega-dam has ever been built. And because the gorge holds the world’s largest untapped concentration of river energy, the super-dam is supposed to have a hydropower generating capacity of 60 GW, nearly three times that of the Three Gorges Dam.

The fact that the gorge is one of the world’s most biodiverse regions seems to be of little concern to the CPC, which is far more interested in being able to use water as a weapon against India, its Asian rival. China has already set the stage for construction, recently completing a highway through the canyon and announcing the start of high-speed train service to a military town near the gorge. This will enable the transport of heavy equipment, materials, and workers to the remote region, which was long thought inaccessible because of its treacherous terrain.

The CPC views its centenary as cause for celebration. But the rest of the world should see the party for what it is: repressive, genocidal, and environmentally rapacious. And it should prepare for what the CPC’s second century may bring.


Brahma Chellaney, Professor of Strategic Studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research and Fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin, is the author of nine books, including Asian Juggernaut, Water: Asia’s New Battleground, and Water, Peace, and War: Confronting the Global Water Crisis. This content is © Project Syndicate, 2021, and is here with permission.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

26 Comments

Beyond words really. Thank goodness we are an island nation.

Up
0

Hmmmm. Too bad if you are a low lying Pacific island.

Up
0

No man is an island

Up
0

Quick we should strengthen our FTA with them and then totally fail to say anything about the origins of covid in case they don't like it.

And then we could run and hide under the bed and hope the CCP don't find us.

Up
0

And pollute our river with more farm effluents in the process..

Up
0

Funny how the West has nothing positive to say about China. Reality is when it comes to engineering projects they make us look like a bit of a joke. We cannot even sort out the roading in some places in 4 years or fill in pot holes. Looks like their move to renewables is going well to me.

Up
0

The article is about weaponising water. Hard to argue for it.

Up
0

Except that the Baihetan Dam is on the Yangtze and the waters do not go anywhere near India
KeithW

Up
0

Yeah, too bad about the environment, too bad for the baiji, too bad anything else that relied on those rivers before they were plundered. Something to admired? My rear end.

Up
0

Maybe we can get a quote on a bridge across cook strait?

Up
0

Maybe we can get a quote on a bridge across cook strait?

Up
0

Well there you have it, commentators. Carlos has already won the award for the stupidest comment of the day.

Up
0

The article is written by an Eastern author.

Up
0

Thank goodness we never read about bridges,high rise accommodation blocks and dams collapsing .in China.

Up
0

https://twitter.com/TruthAbtChina?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eser…
Great account that gets actual news out of China

Up
0

Add world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases, arguably one of the worlds biggest polluters and repressor of human rights and you have the wonderful CCP. Unfortunately the West has a short term focus based on electoral cycles which can’t compete with a long term vision of ‘belts and roads’ initiatives. The Chinese footprint is now over Asia and entrenched in Africa, and we’re dumb enough to let the CCP scare us piecemeal. Any business which is beholden to a single customer (e.g NZ exports) needs to diversify to minimise our dependency. Collectively the West should give Beijing a big FU.

Up
0

"Slowly, Slowly catchee the Monkey" How that old saying is coming back to bite us in the arse. China has the upper hand now and the West have just been greedy and made it happen and now we are all calling foul.

Up
0

They're just as wide, and just as shallow, as we are. Hard to know who cracks first, but I wouldn't be putting money on China yet.

Up
0

I thought you would be changing the title of this article PDK from "One hundred years of devastation" to "One hundred years of growth" because thats all it boils down to really. My money is on China, pure discipline and focus, the west will implode. You cannot get a wider cultural difference. As soon as the chips go down in the USA they all reach for their guns and start shooting each other.

Up
0

Interesting perspective, Carlos.
Perhaps you should lead from the front and usher in a new culture of discipline in New Zealand. Start by never questioning any word Jacinda Ardern utters.

I wait with baited breath to see how long you can abide by your own political ideals.

'China' is anything but "pure discipline and focus". The ruling elite may fit that bill for fear of their lives and those of their family.
I very much doubt the Chinese industrialists and people all share this mindset, however.

Up
0

The Co2 emissions from dams points to tropical dams in Brazil , and even states the emissions from such dams are much higher than dams in temperate climates. I'm sure the Chinese would strip every tree and other vegetative matter from a dam's lake area , so an invalid comparison.

Up
0

Last week I commented on China's on-going belligerence and this is another example. China's actions point to it's belief that the world, specifically the west, does not have the courage to face it down. In it's conflict with India, India seems to stand alone. The Tibetan annexation got what amounts to nothing in response from the west.

And to my comments last week about them sending 24 aircraft, including four nuclear capable heavy bombers into Taiwan's ADIZ (business call me away and prevented my following the debate), those who supported China by pointing out that the outer reaches of the ADIZ lay over the Chinese mainland, missed the fact that Taiwan uses the centre of the Taiwan Strait as the outer limits they they respond to. China has largely succeeded in annexing the South China Sea despite complaints from Viet Nam, the Philippines, Indonesia, and others.

Up
0

I take issue with the much of the wording and claims made in this article, such as:

"...often emit more greenhouse gases than fossil-fuel power plants..."

The study quoted was based in Amazon tropical rain forests and cannot be compared to Tibetan terrains. Sounds like something sponsored by the big oil tbh.

Up
0

It was a political article written by someone from China's regional rival, India. Are you really surprised?

Up
0

Last week I commented on China's on-going belligerence and this is another example.

The fly-by happened on the same day the US Navy said a carrier group had entered the disputed South China Sea.

A senior official familiar with Taiwan’s security planning told Reuters that officials believed China was sending a message to the US as the carrier group sailed through the Bashi Channel, which separates Taiwan from the Philippines and leads into the South China Sea.

“It’s strategic intimidation of the US military. They wanted the US to notice their capability and for them to restrain their behaviour.”

Taiwan needs in particular to pay attention to the fact that China’s military have started conducting drills in Taiwan’s southeastern ADIZ, the source added.Link

Up
0

The potential costs of US belligerence:

In May 2020, the US government barred companies using American-made products or services from doing business with Huawei, in principle.

As a result, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), the world’s biggest contract semiconductor maker, and other companies have stopped accepting new orders from Huawei.

The action was harshly criticized by ASML Holding CEO Peter Wennink, who told Bloomberg, export controls against China will not only fail to halt its technological progress but also, and ironically, hurt the US economy.

China has been blocked from acquiring advanced lithography tools from the Dutch industry leader due to the US-China tech war.

“I believe that export controls are not the right way to manage your economic risks if you have determined that there is an economic risk,” Wennink said during an online industry event, arguing that if “you close China from access to technology, that will also cost non-Chinese economies a lot of jobs and a lot of income.”

While it will take a long time for China to build its own semiconductor equipment and technology due to a lack of access to foreign technology, eventually non-Chinese companies will be shut out of one of the largest chip markets, Wennink said.

If American business with China on semiconductors is cut off completely, it will probably cost anywhere between US$80 billion to US$100 billion in sales and 125,000 jobs in the US, Wennink added, citing Commerce Department estimates, Bloomberg reported.

ASML, which has a de facto monopoly on advanced extreme ultraviolet lithography equipment needed to make cutting-edge chips, is a crucial supplier to Samsung Electronics and TSMC, but it has plans to drive deeper into China.Link

Up
0