sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

ACT's Paul Henry's details plan for 'world-class,' multi-billion dollar cancer centre

Public Policy / news
ACT's Paul Henry's details plan for 'world-class,' multi-billion dollar cancer centre
Paul Henry
Paul Henry, political candidate

The ACT Party is promising to roll out new candidate Paul Henry's pledge for a dedicated cancer centre in Auckland and Christchurch.

Henry called it "New Zealand’s Starship for Cancer, the country’s first purpose-built comprehensive cancer centre" which would combine clinical care, complex surgery, radiation oncology, genomics, diagnostics, clinical trials and research.

He called it an aspirational policy, "but it is realistic and practical", with capital costs estimated at $2 bilion. Henry has left the door open for a major donor at a "transformation" level to potentially have hospital naming rights.

"Comprehensive cancer centres are the gold standard internationally because they bring researchers, clinicians, universities, private providers and philanthropists together with world-class treatment, technology and clinical trials. They also help attract and retain the best oncologists, surgeons and scientists," Henry says.

"If New Zealand cannot offer that environment, Australia and other countries will."

During his candidacy announcement, Henry said he wanted to build a world-class cancer hospital costing multiple billions of dollars.

"I think you could easily get a group of wealthy New Zealanders to stump up with about $10 billion, the rest of it we would borrow," he said. 

Under ACT's policy, it would be funded via public-private partnership financing, donations, existing Crown health investment, and other private capital.

"The indicative capital requirement is around $2b, with the final cost determined through the detailed business-case process," he said.

Henry said ACT would create a foundation "to unlock extraordinary generosity", giving major donors naming rights in parts of the centre "including, for a transformational contribution, potentially a hospital itself."

“The recently introduced $33,333 cap on the tax benefits available for charitable donations will be removed for all charitable giving. If New Zealanders want to give $1 million, $10 million or more to cancer care, medical research or other causes, the tax system should encourage that generosity, not impose an arbitrary ceiling on it."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

How can anybody take this/these clowns seriously? I can think of a better way to 'unlock' the 'generosity' of these would-be 'philanthropists' who certainly did not become wealthy by being generous. We can't even afford the health system we have now, and ACT think that they can just magic up a Peter Mac cancer center.

Up
2

It takes more than a building.

I remember went Otago built an "Innovation Centre".  Got left with bugger all innovation and a wonky looking building.

Up
0

Wanaka would be a good site.

Up
0

"The NZ Institute for Diseases of the Wealthy"?

Up
0

OK, so a celebrity candidate "famous for being famous"can suddenly become an MP, gets parachuted onto the taxpayer gravey train and then tells us he wants to spend 2 billion taxpayer dollars on a cancer centre, which is unaffordable, and impossible to implement.Another fact albeit unimportant in the scheme of things in NZ politics, the " celebrity candidate" has no relevant  experience.

Up
3

Aspirational yes, great sound bite to boot, but unaffordable and yes it will never happen, but it gives Henry the attention he craves. Another party wants to spend 1 billion dollars of our money looking for fossil fuels, when kess than 3 years ago they banned all oil and gas exploration. NZ Politics MMP style, its a game to be gamed.

Up
2

Just...why? 

Given our size this makes zero sense.

A much better use of resources would be to collaborate with an acknowledged overseas leader in the field, with the proviso NZ gets to send contributing scientists along with any cash.

Up
0

The  political parties have concluded any headline about them is better than no headline and the tragedy is that there must be something in that, that they believe works. Children with behavioural issues employ the same tactics for attention. 

Up
1

This is a sop to PH from DS. If you want my personality and  "fame" on your ticket, I want a cancer centre.

Up
0