sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

After a summer of weather disasters, will Kiwis make climate an election issue?

Public Policy / opinion
After a summer of weather disasters, will Kiwis make climate an election issue?
slip
Michael Craig/New Zealand Herald via Getty Images.

By Sam Crawley*

Extreme weather-related events in early 2026 – including the fatal landslides in Mount Maunganui and Tauranga – have raised a logical question: will climate change and infrastructure resilience be big issues come the election in November?

More to the point, will climate change be pivotal enough to affect the result?

Anyone who has watched climate politics and coverage over time may have noticed a pattern: once the extreme weather passes, the news moves on to more immediate concerns and discussions about climate change fade.

News reports don’t necessarily affect election results, however. People have their own rankings of issues – separate from, but shaped by, media coverage.

It’s these rankings that influence how people vote and which could ultimately tilt an election. So it’s useful to look at the data on where people rank climate change relative to other issues, and how that might change over time.

While some may be hoping for a climate election in 2026, the data suggests it probably won’t be.

Climate and voting behaviour

Most New Zealanders accept the science of climate change, with surveys showing only around 2% of the population don’t believe it is real. More than 60% of the population would like the government to do more to address it.

But wanting action on an issue does not necessarily mean it will change how you vote. For most people, only two or three issues guide their vote.

What we’re interested in, then, is not how much people want action on climate change, but how climate change ranks against other issues.

One way of measuring this is to ask people to rank a list of issues from most to least important. This was the purpose of my 2022 survey of New Zealand and Australian voters which asked respondents to rank climate change relative to seven other issues: health, education, crime, immigration, the economy, terrorism and poverty.

At the time, climate ranked most important with 9% of respondents, and least important with 22%. Overall, 36% placed it in their top four most important issues, but 64% had it in the bottom four.

The New Zealand Election Study – a survey run after every election to understand what voters were thinking – asks an open-ended question about people’s most important issue.

After the 2023 election, 4% said climate change was their most important issue, up from 2% in 2020. In contrast, the economy was the most important issue for 16% of respondents, and the cost of living for 15%.

More recently, we can refer to data from global polling company IPSOS, which regularly publishes an issues monitor report for NZ. In February 2026, even after the deadly summer weather disasters, climate change was only the eighth most important issue.

Trends over time

Is climate change becoming more important to the public over time, and does that importance change in response to weather events? These questions are hard to answer and require frequent surveys over long periods.

We can go back a few years with New Zealand Election Study data, which shows mentions of climate change by respondents as their most important issue increasing over time, partly offset by declining mentions of the environment (see graph below).



Chart: The Conversation. Source: Sam Crawley Get the dataCreated with Datawrapper.

IPSOS also measures longer-term trends. Climate change peaked as most important issue with 27% of people after Cyclone Gabrielle in February 2023. That declined to 19% just before that year’s election in October. It has hovered around 15% ever since.

This kind of response to extreme weather – where the importance of climate change fades not long after the event – has been widely studied. There is a clear pattern showing people’s concern levels spike when weather catastrophes hit, but return to base levels within a few months.

What this means in 2026

From what we know of public opinion patterns, there’s no reason to think 2026 will be a climate election in New Zealand.

A relatively small section of the public cares very deeply about climate change, and will tend to vote for the Green Party (which partly explains its relatively consistent support over time).

And the number of people who cast their vote with climate change in mind seems to be growing – but slowly.

There is undoubtedly enough public concern about the climate that we’ll hear about it during the election campaign, in debates and in party manifestos. But as a pivotal issue it is likely to be eclipsed by the cost of living and healthcare.

Perhaps if a weather event on the scale of Cyclone Gabrielle hits a month or two out from the election, things will be different (not that anyone one wishes for that).

But the reality is, most New Zealand voters are not thinking about climate change when they enter the voting booth.


The author publishes regular data-based analysis of New Zealand public opinion, electoral behaviour and the politics of climate change at Three Long Years.The Conversation


*Sam Crawley, Teaching Fellow, School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

Is climate change, or paying for the effects of climate change, the voters' issue?

What we do as a nation makes little difference in practical terms to climate change.  

Up
2

Per head, we're one of the worst. 

But there are always those who will weasel

Up
1

Are you proposing punishing Kiwis and or economy for having such a low population...?

Up
1

Punishing? 

I'm suggesting they pay their way. (you are starting from a skewed baseline)

As for 'their economy'- it's all based on resource draw-down, like everyone else's. So temporary. Why mourn?

And where we're headed, the lower the population the better. Ex fossil energy, the best carrying-capacity achieved was 150,000. 

Up
0

No. 

Up
3

Pro extinction dude huh? 

Up
1

Hmmm, NZ's emissions are a fart in a hurricane compared to China, India and the other usual suspects. So constructively what can you do...? Don't buy land on a cliff, under a cliff, within 5m of sea level exposed to tidal surge, or within flood surge in a river valley.

Those already there... caveat emptor. Council flood maps are increasingly highlighting that risk.

 

Up
0

Emissions are only the tailpipe - it's the limited remains of the feedstock, to burn, that you need to factor it too. 

Access to energy - food being the first go-to - means that we will see an exodus from cities; a reversal of the fossil-fueled inrush. 

Be early or late...

Up
0

If this comment section reflects the right-leaning views, perhaps the focus from that side of the house could be on those which aren't related exclusively to carbon but have that as a side benefit i.e. cleaning up waterways/ reduce nitrogen leaching will reduce greenhouse emissions; promote electrification and renewable generation as a way to shore up our self-sufficiency (reducing oil imports) which also reduces our emissions etc.

Not making a case for these options, but pointing out it could be a way for the government to actually do something while placating the we're too small to bother crowd

Up
1

After seeing the Middle East of Fire who really gives a rats about emissions in little old NZ. Let’s not make ourselves poor for the sake of some gaslighting. 

Up
0