By Dat Tien Doan, Ali Ghaffarian Hoseini, Esther Aigwi & Franklin Nkado*
Rooftop solar has emerged as one of the more unexpected policy contests of New Zealand’s election campaign.
National has proposed low-interest, rates-based loans for solar panels, batteries and other home electrification upgrades, while Labour has floated similar finance alongside subsidies of up to $3,000 and support for renters to install plug-in solar.
The pledges follow recent government initiatives to make residential solar easier to install, as well as new electricity rules enabling more households to export surplus electricity back to local networks.
But are these measures, while important steps, enough to drive solar uptake at scale?
Our new research, which surveyed professionals across New Zealand’s building and energy sectors, suggests cost is only one piece in the puzzle.
We found households also weigh expected long-term returns, electricity market settings, whether their home is designed for solar, and whether government policy stays stable.
When support doesn’t equal uptake
We looked at rooftop solar power within the Passive House framework – an international standard for building ultra-low-energy homes and offices. Because these buildings already use so little energy, they help us clearly see what encourages or gets in the way of adding solar panels.
During our interviews, one message came through clearly: there’s now no doubt rooftop solar has a place in New Zealand’s energy future.
New Zealand’s installed rooftop solar capacity reached 573 megawatts by the end of 2024. Passive House Plus and Premium homes – which generate some or all of the energy they use through on-site renewable energy, such as solar – are also gradually becoming more common around the country.
We heard strong agreement among professionals that rooftop solar can lower household electricity costs, improve energy independence and ultimately support the country’s low-carbon transition.
So why aren’t these recognised benefits translating into widespread adoption?
Much of the discussion is focused on making solar panels more affordable. This is certainly important. Falling costs have brought rooftop solar within reach of more households.
But our research suggests affordability is only part of the equation. The professionals we surveyed saw households as making investment decisions rather than technology decisions.
They weigh upfront costs against expected long-term returns, electricity savings, export payments and future policy settings. That explains why budget constraints emerged as the biggest barrier in our survey.
Those we spoke with also ranked low payments for electricity exported back to the grid and limited financial incentives among the most important obstacles. As one interview participant put it, rooftop solar is often “the first thing cut” when construction budgets become tight.
Such findings help explain the growing political focus on green loans, subsidies and other financial incentives.
Solar starts with good design
Perhaps the most overlooked take-away from our research is that rooftop solar is not simply an energy decision, but a building design decision.
We heard that the best opportunity to support rooftop solar comes during the earliest stages of designing a home. Roof orientation, structural capacity, electrical infrastructure and future battery integration are all easier and less expensive to plan before construction begins than to retrofit later.
Our survey data underscored this message. Optimised solar design, battery integration and government incentives were ranked as the most effective strategies for increasing adoption.
As well, our findings suggest that improving finance alone will not unlock widespread uptake.
Households also need homes designed for solar from the outset, supportive electricity market settings that reward renewable generation and policy certainty that gives them confidence to invest.
Current government initiatives and policy proposals suggest New Zealand is moving in the right direction. They recognise that affordability and access are vital.
But our findings suggest the next challenge is building confidence rather than simply reducing costs.
People need confidence that rooftop solar will deliver long-term value, that they will be fairly rewarded for the electricity they generate and that their homes are designed to make the most of the investment.
New Zealand already has the technology – and abundant sunshine. Public support is growing and policymakers increasingly recognise the role rooftop solar can play in a cleaner and more resilient energy system.
The next step is ensuring finance, electricity market settings, building design and policy work together.
Only then is rooftop solar likely to become the obvious choice for more New Zealand households, rather than one of the first features to disappear when budgets become tight.![]()
*Dat Tien Doan, Senior Lecturer in Built Environment Engineering, Auckland University of Technology; Ali Ghaffarian Hoseini, Professor in Design and Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology; Esther Aigwi, Senior Lecturer in Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, and Franklin Nkado, Researcher in Engineering, Auckland University of Technology.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
3 Comments
Good follow up to the article on "the rational economic man".
Yes, the decision to install rooftop solar is complex and embodies both rational and notionally irrational considerations by the rooftop owner.
Is my rooftop solar investment a rational decision for return on capital? I doubt it.
But elements that were included in my consideration include:
Feel good - utilising sunshine to meet a big chunk of my electricity demand rather than regularly trying to figure which company will offers the best deal. And contributing generation the grid. Recharge my plugin hybrid without a transaction to a power company. Feels b****y good.
Resilience - i won't have to have buckets of water around to function when the power network goes down. Or refill those buckets by dipping them into the tank from the top of a ladder (personal safety consideration).The pumps will work, the taps will run and cistern refill. If the cell towers, still work, my router will continue to connect and I'll be able to watch Coronation Street (I don't watch it, just making a point). I'll still have to be careful as I only have 9kwh battery storage. And I won't have to burn candles (big fossil fuel saving there....🤣).
Enhancing my property. I could spend as much or mote on modernising my kitchen and bathrooms. But that wouldn't change functionality, only aesthetics. Everything works fine now. Perhaps it will enhance saleability because i will have to sell up at some point.
I've received comments that I'd be better of investing that money - probably true and rational. But I think I have enough money to see me through. And it just feels good and right for me, to do this. Who wants to be rational all the time?
Well said.
And I think the investment case stacks up anyway for many of us.
At my stage in life having some risk-free component of my portfolio is important. And given most expectations for future power prices having $X per month less on our power bill ($X after tax dollars) every month is valuable. It might be a different calculation if I was in my 30s and trying to build assets or start a business.
But as you say, it feels good and it's always interesting looking at the dashboard and understanding what we're generating and what we're using.
But I also suspect it doesn't stack up for lots of houses with the roof facing the wrong way or shaded by trees or surrounded by hills.
Or by other houses of more storeys.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.