sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Greens propose greater scrutiny of lobbyists and aims to ‘get big money and influence out of politics’

Public Policy / news
Greens propose greater scrutiny of lobbyists and aims to ‘get big money and influence out of politics’
A composite image of New Zealand money overlayed with Parliament.
Composite image: 123rf.com and Unsplash

The Green Party is proposing a package of reforms to “get big money and influence out of politics,” including capping donations at $30,000 and having a stand-down period for former ministers before they can lobby.

"Our democracy should work for everyone, not just the wealthy few. Right now, a handful of very rich and powerful people and corporations can buy access and influence the government for their benefit," Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson says.

Davidson says successive governments have changed electoral rules to suit themselves and done nothing about big corporate money in politics. Among the Greens' proposals is the establishment of a Lobbying Integrity Commission.

“We have to get big money out of politics.”

The party wants to:

  • Cap donations at $30,000 from one person to a party and its candidates over an election cycle
  • Stop companies, trusts and other organisations donating, with only individuals able to make donations
  • Publish the name and postcode of donors who give more than $1000 a year - down from $6000 now
  • Create a public register of professional lobbyists who will have to report every four months on who they lobbied and what they were lobbying for
  • Bring in a two-year stand-down period for former ministers before they can lobby while other MPs, ministerial staff and senior public servants have to wait a year
  • Establish an independent Lobbying Integrity Commission which would run the register, write the code of conduct and enforce the rules

These changes would be made through two Bills - the Electoral (Donations) Amendment Bill and the Regulation of Lobbying Bill.

Davidson says the party’s ideas are not new, with the Independent Electoral Review having called for a cap on donations in 2023 and a lower disclosure threshold. She says the Electoral (Donations) Amendment Bill “puts into law the changes experts have been calling on Parliament to pass for years.”

Meanwhile Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick says the Regulation of Lobbying Bill would put professional lobbyists on a public register.

"While lobbying is legal and a part of politics, the problem is that almost none of it is on the record."

"Other countries have been doing this for years. It's time we caught up,” Swarbrick says. "Real estate agents, lawyers and electricians all have to meet professional standards, and lobbyists should too."

“Parliament is supposed to work for New Zealanders, not just lobbyist interests,” she says.

Asked about the Opportunity Party, which also has proposals around donations, Davidson told reporters: “We feel very humbled when people copy long-standing work that we have been doing.”

The Green Party’s proposal, Davidson says, was about levelling the rules for all political parties, groups and organisations that they work with.

“We do want to capture everyone. We want to change the rules so that everyone has to play by the same ones.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

Bravo. 

Bring it on. 

Maybe tax the revolving door while they're at it. 

Up
9

I imagine this would have to have near unanimous public support??

Up
9

It won't, there are two unpopular big money groups swirling around government.  Those who want to pay less (private lobbyists) and those who want to be paid more (NGOs and consultants).  

This policy tackles only half of the problem.  

 

Up
0

Better half than none. While I feel many want substantial reform of different areas post this election, It is looking more of the start of the reforms needed, than actual assurance of reforms. Still, if the public can see that many of the rest of us want change outside the standard back and for them, red and blue, perhaps this will be enough next election in 2 years time, to sway them to vote outside of their habitual comfort zone. 

Up
1

These donations are public, right? Wonder how many supermarket owners are slipping the maximum into ACT's coffers as I type.

Up
10

100% behind this proposal.

As soon as money tips the balance democracy and good decisions are the casualty

Up
6

Popular sentiment. Probably an easy one to get across the line if they get in with Labour + Opportunity

Up
5

I wouldn't be counting on Labours support. They might lag National, but I'm sure they don't want their laundry aired either

Up
1

But with those two potential coalition partners their hand may be forced. I have heard it in the bottom line discussion for TOP..

Nats were also talking up such moves to tighten lobby rules - until they came to power

Up
0

Necessary but not a panacea

Up
1

A restraint of trade clause might be good too: where you can't go straight in to a comfy position in the areas in which you were responsible for, say, a year.

Way too much gets done here by cosy arrangements.

Up
6

In an actual democracy this would be stadard practice, but of course we've had born to rule types running the show since back when.

Up
5