Two former Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) employees have been found guilty of corruption charges brought by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) even though their endeavours proved unsuccessful.
In the wake of Cyclone Gabrielle, SFO Director Karen Chang says the case is a reminder of the need for strong controls to be in place when public money is being used for post-disaster rebuilding.
The SFO says Gerard Gallagher was found guilty on three charges of corrupt use of official information. Simon Nikoloff was found guilty on one charge of corrupt use of official information and not guilty on one charge.
Gallagher and Nikoloff were employed as CERA investment facilitators. CERA was established to encourage the rebuild and regeneration of Christchurch after the devastating 2011 earthquake.
The two men were tasked with attracting investors to the central city, including by connecting landowners with potential purchasers and addressing any barriers to development. Later when CERA became Ōtākaro their roles included finding buyers for unused Crown land, the SFO says.
“The defendants were employed to help a damaged city recover and rebuild. Instead, they abused the power they had been entrusted with and put considerable effort into furthering their own commercial interests,” says SFO Director Karen Chang.
Gallagher and Nikoloff used information obtained in their official capacities to try and set up business deals they would personally benefit from.
"Although ultimately unsuccessful, Nikoloff and Gallagher had an unfair advantage because of their inside knowledge," Chang says.
The charges laid by the SFO related to obtaining a commercial advantage from having access to this information. Nikoloff and Gallager were both found guilty over a deal related to the Youth Hostel Association (YHA) building, while Gallagher was also found guilty on charges related to a piece of land known as Stonehurst.
“Nikoloff and Gallagher knew how much owners were willing to sell for, what investors were willing to pay and what was planned for the city,” says Chang.
“Rather than use this information to get the best outcome for Christchurch, they attempted to set up private business deals in an effort to profit by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Seeking to profit personally from information obtained in a public role is corrupt, regardless of whether they were successful."
Chang says it was a complex case highlighting the importance of organisations having robust internal controls, especially around conflicts of interest when administering public money.
"A reminder of the need for these controls is particularly relevant as New Zealand faces another post-disaster rebuild following Cyclone Gabrielle and the flooding," she says.
“The SFO will continue to investigate and prosecute cases which have the potential to undermine trust in our public service and threaten the success of projects which are intended to benefit New Zealand, including in times of disaster recovery.”
8 Comments
Unfortunately the Canterbury EQs exposed many unpleasant and scurrilous elements in our society. Not only were some of the agents of EQC and the insurers punitive and dishonest there were, like these two identities, many opportunists and scavengers in the middle and on the other side. We experienced it first hand but we were able to prevail in the end, but it was a long bitter and expensive battle. Many though were not in a position to fight and they quickly became easy victims.I am no fan of this government but they certainly were handed a nasty set of circumstances that emanated out of EQC, Sthn Cross a lead that many insurers saw fit to follow. Even now shoddy repair work is being exposed and damage recognised that was previously denied.
It was a very unethical free for all among contractors. Jobs being awarded to suppliers based on kick backs. Even Fletchers as one of the SCIRT alliance members was giving work to their subsidiary contractors and suppliers.
E.g. Fletcher awards work to Brian Perry Civil who purchases pipe from Humes who use Iplex manufactured pipe. Pile work subcontracted to Piletech. All Fletcher owned companies. Hence the "F**k Fletchers" tax that other subbies were putting on any pricing that did come their way, because either Fletchers would try screw them down on price or shop their prices.
Schadenfreud. The city was reeling and so were its people. Yet our society produced some individuals who I suggest were almost sadistic in their application of the power suddenly invested in them. The final straw for us was an assessor, an oafish failed builder type, in our house who when we caught him out lying, resorted to the old, see you in court then. So we filed. Nigh on three years later, $130k legal & expert costs, the insurers collapsed three day before the trial, and paid out in full. Many, many others had a much more unfortunate result.
So the SFO says: “The SFO will continue to investigate and prosecute cases which have the potential to undermine trust in our public service and threaten the success of projects which are intended to benefit New Zealand, including in times of disaster recovery.” ... But Cabinet Minsters are undermining trust in our public service by, for example, in Stuart Nash's case his "mate" and having a quiet chat to him about getting someone sentenced more harshly than what the Judge in the case ordered. Yeah right. I think the SFO needs to be called in regarding these Ministers
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.