sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

S&P slashes SCF 5 notches to CC with negative outlook; SCF says on track for August 31 recapitalisation news

S&P slashes SCF 5 notches to CC with negative outlook; SCF says on track for August 31 recapitalisation news

Standard and Poor's has slashed South Canterbury Finance's credit rating by 5 notches to CC and has warned the Timaru-based finance company faces a default within 10 days because its cash balances have substantially diminished in recent weeks.

Loan repayment delays, a weakening of reinvestment rates and new funds inflows meant South Canterbury Finance was likely to seek additional cash.

However the troubled finance company said it remained on track to announce a recapitalisation by August 31.

South Canterbury withdrew its prospectus from its website this afternoon to amend it with the credit rating change.

While its prospectus is withdrawn it cannot raise fresh money.

(Updated with detail from S&P statement, SCF Sandy Maier's comments)

'August 31 is D-Day'

SCF Chief Executive Sandy Maier said the company was making good progress on a recapitalisation by August 31, which is necessary to meet the requirements of a waiver of a condition in its trust deed.

“This will be of far more significance for all stakeholders and we would anticipate that Standard & Poor’s will want to undertake a review of the Company’s credit rating soon after," Maier said in a statement.

“There is confidence amongst all parties involved in the recapitalisation process that a favourable outcome can be achieved and that, following the completion of that process South Canterbury Finance can continue to operate as an active supporter of small and medium business enterprises," he said.

"In the meantime, South Canterbury Finance is comfortable with its liquidity position and continues to meet all obligations as they fall due.”

SCF has a government guarantee that has been extended to the end of next year.

'Recapitalisation may not be enough'

Meanwhile, Standard and Poor's suggested even a recapitalisation may not be enough to save South Canterbury.

"The weaker-than-expected cash and liquidity position and the lack of progress in recapitalization efforts--as the Aug. 31, 2010, covenant breach waiver deadline approaches--has compromised SCF's business viability without the successful progression of recapitalization plans over the next few weeks," Standard and Poor's said.

"Even if recapitalization plans are progressed, we understand that SCF will also require trustee approval and support to progress and execute recapitalization plans after Aug. 31, 2010, while it is still in breach of trust deed covenants," it said.

"While the company is pursuing a range of recapitalization options, benefits from these initiatives would only be recognized in the company’s ratings once they were sufficiently progressed and a comprehensive assessment was done."

A CreditWatch Negative listing by Standard & Poor's implies a one-in-two likelihood that the rating may be lowered within the next three months. Standard and Poor's downgraded SCF to B minus on June 22. See article here for more detail.

'D for Default possible'

"The rating will be lowered to 'D' if SCF does not meet any of its repayment obligations in full and on time. The 'CC/C' ratings recognize that there is a strong possibility that SCF could default on its obligations within six months. The most likely scenario for default for SCF is an inability to progress recapitalization plans before the expiry of its trust deed waiver on Aug. 31, 2010," Standard and Poor's said.

"We may stabilize SCF's rating and review the CreditWatch if the company successfully executes the recapitalization of its operations and receives the necessary support from all stakeholders implicated in any such recapitalization. This would help remedy SCF's trust deed breach and help strengthen the company's current weak liquidity position."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

South Canterbury Finance is like a blog aphrodisiac to David Hillary above!

Maybe Allan Hubbard is really Darth Vader and David is really his son...who knows....but it's always fascinating how Hillary appears on cue promoting his skewed blog whenever SCF is mentioned.

David Skywalker...hmmm, has a certain resonance about it...hmmm!

Up
0

The Gov't has a lot to answer regarding accepting SCF into the extended Gov't G'tee earlier this year.  Which morons went through the SCF accounts to give them approval.  Unbelievable!

Up
0

Not to point out the bleedin obvious ROTN but hasn't David Hillary been absolutely spot on in predicting what was going to happen to SCF?

I think he has provided a wonderful service in detailing the demise of SCF and the tactics Hubbard used to try and mask the reality.

Up
0

probaly corectomundo there andyH but my comments are more based on the curious fascination of Hillary with all things SCF...i'll speak to my people and we'll get to the bottom of it...like we did on you, AndyH !

Up
0

the jackboots of the new financial reg. boys is stomping all over the world from timothy geithner to merkel to our lil adam feeley from SFO or whatever...pity they weren't more zealous over the last decade before all those older folk did their dough on the fin.companies?

but..hey..greed is good ..gordon gecko is back in wall st part 2 the movie..rock on elves!

chris lee?..amateur hour!

Up
0

S&P dropped Allied Nationwide's rating to CC on 12 August and on 20 August receivers were appointed. Today it moved SCF to CC so that should mean ...

Up
0

While I totally agree with your sentiments Jack you must realise that the majority of Labour politicians had investments in SCF and wanted to ensure their safety even if it meant that the taxpayer had to foot the bill.  All you have to do to follow the money to find out why these poor decisions were made.

Up
0

I think you mean 'leverage' not 'anchorage' in the first sentence.

I thought the Hubbard cultists would be on to this 'theory'a lot sooner than this, I have to say.

Never forget Hubbard was at the wheel while SCF was racking up the losses/debt etc in the period 2007/2009. Responsibility for the state the company finds itself in lies with him, never forget that. He was the top man, the buck stops with him; just as much as the failure of Hanover, Strategic and all the others lies with their respective top men. They all had the same model - related party loans, financial sleight of hand, capitilising loans, over-exposure to property, etc etc.  SCF did nothing differently.

Up
0

Mary - here is what could go wrong.

1. There is a very high probability that SCF will indeed fail which as you rightly say will trigger the deposit guarantee mechanism

2. If so, as you know, your principle AND the acquired interest up to the DAY OF DEFAULT will be guaranteed.

3. All good you say.

4. The problem comes in the fact that in the period between default and return of your principle/interest your money will not be earning anything. If this period is short ie 2 weeks then that wont really matter. If it is say 6 months then it will matter a hell of a lot.

Say you have $100K which has been invested for 1 year at 8% when SCF fails. Removing tax at say 30% you will be owed $105600.

If it takes them 6 months to pay out that $105600 will be sitting there earning absolutely nothing.

Six months interest at 5% in one of the big banks less tax would be over $1750.

In practice if SCF went tits up and it took 6 months to get your money back that 8% they are offering wouldnt get you much more than having the cash at 5% in an ordinary bank for the full 18 months.

If the delay was 12 months I think you would actually be out of pocket cp to just having your cash in a big 5 bank account.

 

So the question is 'How long would it take for them to get your money back'?

Well in the case of some of the smaller Finance companies to go bust it has taken months and months for folk to get their cash back (you can check just how long on the Treasury website).

SCF is much, much bigger. As a consequence I think it might take a long long time to get your money back. Maybe a year? I dont see why not.

Up
0

Here is the relevant Treasury report on payouts:

The six institutions approved for the Retail Deposit Guarantee Scheme that have triggered the Crown guarantee are:

  1. Mascot Finance, which defaulted on 2 March 2009. To date, $69.4 million of principal and interest has been repaid to eligible depositors, representing approximately 99.8 per cent of eligible depositors.
  2. Strata Finance, which defaulted on 16 April 2009. No claims are outstanding and $0.3 million of principal and interest has been repaid to eligible depositors.
  3. Vision Securities, which defaulted on 1 April 2010. To date, approximately $9.4 million of principal and interest has been repaid to eligible depositors, representing approximately one third of depositors.
  4. Rockforte Finance, which defaulted on 10 May 2010.
  5. Viaduct Capital, which defaulted on 14 May 2010.
  6. Mutual Finance, which defaulted on 14 July 2010.

“With Rockforte Finance, Viaduct Capital, and Mutual Finance, the Treasury is currently at various stages of obtaining and verifying information about depositors and the amounts deposited. We’ll contact depositors when we have the necessary information,” Mr Combes said.

Soooooo..........

Basically Vision collapsed 4 and 1/2 months ago - still only 1/3rd paid out

Rockforte, Viaduct and Mutual collapsed either 2 or 3 months ago - nothing yet paid out.

These are all tiddlers compared to SCF.

You have to imagine it will take a long time for payouts to be made dont you?

I would guess minimum 6 months, not surprised if closer to 1 year.

Up
0

Andyh,

You are a star. We really need to offer you a job. I'm sort of not kidding again.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Dear

David Hillary, Ted, Jack, Andrew, Shadbolt, Jack_Froost, Wayne, I'm not an economist, Mary Faith, Ted, muzza

and a reminder to all

We are planning to turn off unregistered "anonymous" comments from September 12.

We encourage everyone who is unregistered to register. The box on the right under the comment stream is the one.

Here's more detail

http://www.interest.co.nz/opinion/heres-why-wed-you-register-be-commente...

 

cheers

Bernard

Up
0