Google's European case may eventually influence thinking here, says Chapman Tripp

Google's European case may eventually influence thinking here, says Chapman Tripp

Content supplied by Chapman Tripp

A decision by the European Court of Justice, which allows people to request that internet information is pulled if historic or no longer relevant, has been seized upon by European criminals to have Google remove links to their criminal records.

The judgment is interesting but is unlikely to bear on the legal position in New Zealand.

The case Google Spain SL Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) Mario Costeja González was brought by a Spanish national who complained to Google Spain and Google Inc. about personal information dating back 16 years which was available through the Google search engine.

The Court found that Google had a responsibility to erase on request links and information incompatible with EU Directive 95/46/EC protecting an individual's right to privacy.

This finding changes the legal landscape in Europe, and in the week following last Tuesday's ruling Google received a number of requests to take down information.

Worth watching

New Zealand's Privacy Act does not currently recognise "data processors", as the EU directive does.

But it is worth watching developments in Europe because changes in the law or in legal interpretation there may eventually influence thinking here.

In the meantime, the Harmful Digital Communications Bill is expected to create an agency to advocate for New Zealand individuals wishing to remove digital content hosted by search engine and social media providers in cyber bullying situations.

The Bill is due to be reported back from the Justice and Electoral Committee on 3 June.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

2 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

Perhaps we should embrace this?  New Zealand's unregulated property market is already safe haven for the proceeds of crime - maybe we should add to our money laundering services for unscrupulous foreigners and allow them to start a whole new life here...
 
It can be a new industry for us!

Technically, I think they are ex-criminals, or at least ex-cons. Do people not remember the discussions around the Clean Slate bill in 2004.
This article also misses that in Europe peoples rights tend to superceed corporate rights. The information is still available in official publications, it is just that corporations have no innate right to make money from information about a person. That is the broad basis for this particular decision.