sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Anne-Marie Brady welcomes the NZSIS becoming more transparent about their work. NZSIS needs to build trust with the vulnerable targets of CCP foreign interference here

Anne-Marie Brady welcomes the NZSIS becoming more transparent about their work. NZSIS needs to build trust with the vulnerable targets of CCP foreign interference here

By Anne-Marie Brady

Last week NZ’s primary domestic intelligence agency, the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS), released a remarkable series of documents.

On Monday, they made public both the Arotake Report, which analysed NZSIS decision-making processes prior to the March 15 mosques attack, and their 2019 Strategic Capability and Resourcing Report.

On Wednesday, the Director-General of the NZSIS, Rebecca Kitteridge, gave a rare media stand-up, after a briefing at the annual NZ Parliament Security and Intelligence Select Committee hearing, which was open to the public and broadcast live.

Then on Friday, NZSIS shared their de-classified 2020 Annual Report. This contained the startling information that in the past year, NZSIS have discovered a New Zealander “working on behalf of a foreign state intelligence service” collecting information for that foreign government against New Zealand-based dissidents, and that another individual “closely connected to a foreign state’s interference apparatus” has been targeting New Zealand political and economic elites to form privileged relationships with them on behalf of that foreign government.

These new documents, combined with the massive 4-volume report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Attack on Christchurch Mosques on 15 March 2019, which provided a warts and all picture of NZ’s whole intelligence sector and its collection and assessment practices, has put an unprecedented level of information about the NZ intelligence community in the public domain.

NZSIS Director-General Rebecca Kitteridge has repeatedly raised the need for greater transparency on national security matters in NZ. In the 2019 NZSIS Annual Report, Kitteridge stated that “openness is the best defence against improper interference in New Zealand’s affairs”. She has advocated for greater transparency in political donations, a move that has been resisted by NZ political parties. The former Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, Cheryl Gwyn, has also repeatedly raised the need for greater transparency in the intelligence sector, towards the goal of greater accountability.

Jacinda Ardern is Minister of National Security and Intelligence, but she has made few public announcements under this portfolio. Now more significant change appears to be underway in this most secret of aspect of government, that both responds to concerns about accountability and raises public awareness of the national security threat environment.  

NZ’s intelligence community knows they have an image problem in NZ, and that this is hampering their work, as well as their ability to attract and retain staff. The report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry raised this issue, as does the Arotake Review. The Arotake Review recommends that the NZSIS engage in a structured programme to enhance government and public understanding of NZSIS’s priorities and intelligence requirements. This week’s information flow demonstrates this new approach.

Some of NZSIS’s closest international partners, ASIO, GCHQ, and CSIS, are on similar journeys of increased public engagement and greater transparency. All of these organisations now have a strong social media presence. The head of MI6, Richard Moore, even has his own Twitter account, and he likes to make 007 jokes. In recent years, ASIO has authorised histories of past intelligence operations, both successes and failures. CSIS has a strong public engagement programme. In the last two years, both the previous and the current head of ASIO have issued strong public statements about national security threats in Australia, and accepted media interviews on the work of the agency.

The NZSIS 2020 annual report says there is a need to build national security understanding across NZ’s government, business, and community. This is especially crucial when, as NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade briefed the incoming foreign minister in 2020, NZ analysis provides the grim view that “The post-World War Two global order is receding…no new order is...emerging to replace it...the future will not look like the recent past...whatever comes next, it is unlikely to align as closely with our interests...reflect our values as fully as that which we had before.” Covid-19, along with the effects of Trump, Xi, Putin - and Brexit - has upended the rules-based international order which NZ relies on for our security. Doing nothing, like a rabbit in the headlights, is not an option. The Ardern government has been working hard to re-forge allegiances and strengthen bonds with like-minded states, to maintain NZ’s independence and economic and political resilience.

One of the significant revelations of the Arotake report is the acknowledgement that since December 2018, combatting foreign interference became NZSIS’s top priority. NZSIS’s first public mention of foreign interference appeared in their 2017 annual report. NZSIS’s 2017 briefing to the incoming Ardern government - the first time such a briefing had been publicly released - highlighted “attempts to unduly influence expatriate communities” and advised the PM to “openly provide information about public security issues to the public."

In NZ, reference to “foreign interference” almost always relates to the foreign interference activities of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government. Under CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping, foreign interference activities have become an essential tool of the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) aggressive foreign policy. NZ has been very severely affected by CCP foreign interference. The Ardern government has initiated two Parliamentary inquiries on foreign interference in central and local government, with the potential of a further inquiry into foreign interference at NZ universities. The Ardern government has passed several significant pieces of legislation related to CCP foreign interference, such as legislation on foreign donations to political parties, and changes to the strategic goods list, and the Overseas Investment Act. The Serious Fraud Office is still investigating the Chaoshan Association donations to the National Party. The Ardern government’s China policy has focused on finding a way to mitigate the many strands of CCP foreign interference in our political system, without destroying economic relations. Some CCP foreign interference activities, such as efforts to dominate the editorial line of the NZ Chinese media, are not illegal under current law. Australia and other like-minded states have introduced laws on foreign interference, which are more targeted to deal with the problem. However, laws can’t fix every aspect of CCP foreign interference activities, which have many vectors. Being transparent about the issue, is an important way to curb the problem.

Yet for diplomatic reasons, the NZ government will only rarely directly attribute the source of foreign interference or espionage. NZ defines foreign interference as “coercive, deceptive, and clandestine activities of foreign governments, actors, and their proxies, to sow discord, manipulate public discourse, bias the development of policy, or disrupt markets for the purpose of undermining our nation and our allies.” NZSIS’s 2020 report says “foreign interference threatens the integrity of NZ’s political, media and academic sectors, and exposes some communities to undue and undesirable pressures”. They say they’ve seen “concerning relationship building and donation activity by state actors and their proxies, spanning the political spectrum at both a central and local government level”.

CCP foreign interference has targeted NZ political and economic elites, as well as our NZ Chinese diaspora community. CCP government entities have also targeted the NZ research sector to access sensitive military-related technologies.

The CCP is targeting NZ elites for intelligence purposes. It also aims to try and shape NZ government policy on issues important to the PRC, and to access NZ’s strategic infrastructure. The CCP targets the Chinese diaspora in NZ, as it fears they could help nurture and support political change in the PRC, and also to try and utilise their contacts and influence in NZ. All these issues appear - unattributed - in the NZSIS 2020 annual report.

Many of our 247,000-strong NZ Chinese population - which includes Uyghur, Tibetans, Hong Kongers, Taiwanese, Falungong adherents, and political activists - do not feel safe in NZ. This is because of the CCP’s hold over their community groups and censorship of Chinese language media in NZ, but also due to the NZ government’s perceived lack of action in addressing CCP foreign interference. The problem with the Ardern government following such a quiet strategy on dealing with CCP foreign interference is that it has been perhaps a bit too subtle, and the actions the government has taken, tend to get overlooked or under-reported. The lack of vigilance then leads - in the belief that these things are not important—to a lack of reporting to NZSIS and the police on foreign interference activities and continued complacency in the NZ community.

It is encouraging to see NZSIS becoming more transparent about their work. An informed public is a resilient public.

NZSIS needs to build trust with the vulnerable targets of CCP foreign interference, most especially the NZ Chinese community, to get their help to address the problem. They need to educate the political, media and academic sectors about foreign interference, in order to get their participation in resisting it, and to engender a more mature debate on intelligence issues.

Calling out a “foreign state” in the NZSIS 2020 annual report for intimidating diaspora communities and targeting political elites, will serve as a public warning to that country, but it also helps to reassure the victims that NZ government is concerned about this issue, and it is actually doing something about it.  


@Anne_MarieBrady is a specialist on Chinese domestic and foreign policy, NZ foreign policy, and Antarctic and Pacific politics at the University of Canterbury, NZ).

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

20 Comments

Word wide countries ruling elite mostly easily cave in with the lure of cheap $, once you got in that the next steps is land acquisition rights, method coming first as profitable business relation bilateral mutual benefit, then must allow the workers migration on behalf of 'those business', local agent settling down continuing a loyal propaganda, next to it.. the Financiers vehicular.. such as Banking (this is the formal way of massive legit backup funds transfer) then to the regular customer that has opened 'business' in the new venture area, you can observe this practices in Africa, Oceania, ASEAN, the rest of dumb head OCED countries - It's just natural isn't it? to sell the properties to the highest buyer?.. which for sure, won't come from local/cheap $ resources, cycle of support is sourced between each others 'as a business' from the same DNA heritage. Long term gamble (with below average IQ host), long term gain but it's a certainty.

Up
0

That sounds like a contribution to the govt's proposed History Curriculum - with Maori leaders welcoming English settlers for personal benefits and very quickly discovering they had lost autonomy.
https://www.education.govt.nz/news/aotearoa-new-zealands-histories-in-o…
Pusheen - your comment is written far better than the Ministry of Education's 11 page discussion document.

Up
0

Thank you Lapun, it is what it is, even the current modern Kiwis lost it.. eventually, this 'autonomy' as Kiwis & politician happily cave in for the $ numbers, for land swap & migration (not many NZ public knew that by stealth if not mistaken between two last census 2013-2018? within 5yrs Nat govt managed to 'increase' Asian ethnicity from around 300k to 700k, really impressive 'natural progression'). We knew all this is about to put head logger between the twos, second biggest ethnicity/natives vs. the third biggest ethnicity/imported. Choreograph by the first biggest ethnicity. For all? it won't happen easily if you see in comparison say to India (British tried..failed), Indonesia (Portuguese+Dutch tried for 450yrs.. failed) or other non $ driven mindset, build in strict legislation.. you can't just buy a land there, and that is the key. In NZ? you can swap it with $, with guns, with alcohol, with gambling to name a few. The CCP long already knew about this Aotearoa NZ 'quality'.

Up
0

The critical message: ""the rules-based international order which NZ relies on for our security"". Without which the world returns to rule of the strongest / most ferocious and returns to imperialism.

Up
0

People who say 'rules-based order' are NOT talking about an int'l law-based order, though that's what they want you to think. 'Rules' means American rules only. Rules-based order is a liberal world order. Americans use the phrase to mean "I can kill you, you can never retaliate." Link

Up
0

Its a bit rough when a commentator tells us what other people are talking about and how it contradicts what those other people are wanting us plebs to think.
I'm guessing you are saying how the rules that govern us are disproportionately set by those with power. That is true - look at our fairly typical NZ set of laws - great emphasis on property rights because it is those who are wealthy who have most influence with our politicians. But I'd rather live in NZ with its biased legal system than say Somalia where there is anarchy and the person with most guns wins.
The world does need a set of international laws and a general observance of them. China can ignore international arbitration about islands but could Nuie? Or NZ?

Up
0

Are there any developing safety issues for NZ business travellers, visiting academics, temporary residents, within China given the harder line by the CCP?

Up
0

MortgageBelt,

As Canada has found, arresting a Chinese citizen risks seeing your own country's citizens arrested in retaliation. Whether or not they had committed an offence is irrelevant. NZ has been warned.

Up
0

Perhaps Ms Kitteridge should name those involved, otherwise suspicion falls on a very few individuals, notably with National Party links. Quite unfair in my view.

Up
0

没有共产党,就没有新中国。
没有新中国,就没有恒天然。
没有恒天然,就没有新西兰。

Up
0

xing,

For the benefit of those of us who do not speak Mandarin, could you please supply an English version.

Up
0

I do believe that fonterra would be fine without the CCP. But that doesnt mean that the CCP wont try to buy it at some stage

Up
0

The short version is that NZ and fonterra wouldnt exist without the CCP.. Quite prophetic.

Up
0

My guess translation?: CCP sponsored entities to buy into: Fonterra?, Fisher & Paykel?, Water bottling plants? and soon the Westpac. Is a sure sign of future NZ, exploit the weak legislation quickly, emboss global coop, mutual benefit for NZ, in all just a temporary vehicle, soon will be increased by local 'financiers'.. - Funds transfer to NZ in the name of 'investment'? will carry one major requirements - 'the people movement'. To work as electricians, accountants, cleaners, chef, decorators, car groomers, security guards etc. - promise for local jobs, put money sleep in Banks, as per immigrations time requirement ends?, then after pass the number of years in operation(usually below 9yrs), declared insolvency, money started to flow from banks to residential purchase, those initial imported workers, already PR, will in turn sponsored plenty more agents.. in the name of prosperity for NZ, snowball actions.. slowly but surely. Once, Lab reign is off? the recent politicians that have been retracted to 'sleep' will be woken up again.. to continue the previous disruption of CCP scheme, it's just a time disruption.. it was nothing for the centuries old civilasation - meantime, inject more $, more alcohol, more ponzi/gambling, more drugs.. to NZ, so much more to dent the local IQ, sperm count for breeding, Land loss slowly legally BUT surely. NZ deserve the morphing of caterpillar into.. good? or bad?.. flying creatures.

Up
0

Well, let no-one say they weren't warned from as far back as 2010 when the Crafar farms were sold, it was just a foot in the door and don't expect it to stop there.

Up
0

It is ridiculous and scary that NZ has allowed this BS to happen in NZ. Only going to get worse with Auckland ever growing Chinese population.

Up
0

Sometimes I do not feel safe in Auckland, especially during the night. However, it is not because of CCP but deteriorated public safety. While AMB has a point, she is definitely exaggerating it a bit.

Up
0

AMB focus was fair, as subject for her study specialisation. What NZ public need to know that the CCP was just a newly modern phenomenon, doesn't happen before from that civilasation the past 2000-5000yrs. They just learned & adopted the way say the British or other West do in general, have been practicing the past 500yrs or more in term of 'expansion and land acquisition'. The difference? they have massive personnel base to execute in more rapid expansion timely wise. Just imagine.. the smallest region by authority, but yet the biggest landlords on the planet (the Vatican) - now, something similar had happened But on Steroids.

Up
0

ON TV1 last night, we got a report re Australian TV hack
Nothing re what Chinese up to here of course

Up
0

Excellent to see Int.co publishing articles like this and not running scarred like some media. Well done.

Up
0