sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: A neat pensions trick; 'We shoot bambi'; A 'chilling fog' of competitive devaluations; Dilberts

Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: A neat pensions trick; 'We shoot bambi'; A 'chilling fog' of competitive devaluations; Dilberts
<br />

Here are my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 7 pm, brought to you in association with New Zealand Mint for your reading pleasure.

I welcome your additions and comments below, or please send suggestions for Monday's Top 10 at 10 via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop any surplus suggestions I get into the comment stream under the Top 10.

1. Gold not as high as it looks - This calculator produced by the Bank of Institutional Settlements (BIS) shows that when gold hit a peak of US$850 in 1980, this amount is actually worth US$2,248.90 in today's terms. So maybe gold hasn't risen as much as everyone thinks. It's now just under US$1,300/oz. HT Ian.

2. Here's a neat trick - US state governments are extending the retirement ages and reducing the pension entitlements of new and future employees so they can afford their future pensions obligations, the New York Times reports.

It is the ultimate in intergenerational wealth transfer, disguised in the language of actuaries.

Struggling states and cities need to save money, but they run into legal problems if they tamper with the pensions their current workers are building up year by year. So most places have opted to let current workers and retirees go unscathed. Colorado, Minnesota and South Dakota are the exceptions, dialing back cost-of-living increases for people who have already retired. All three states have reaped meaningful savings right away, and all three are being sued.

Cuts for workers not yet hired do not save much money in the present — but that’s where actuaries can work their magic. They capture the future savings for use today by assuming, in essence, that 100 percent of today’s work force is already earning tomorrow’s skimpier benefits. When used in actuarial calculations, that assumption has a powerful effect. It reduces the amount a government must put into its workers’ pension fund every year. That saves the government money. But it undermines the pension fund, which must still pay the richer benefits of today’s retirees. And because the calculations are esoteric, it is hard for anyone except a seasoned actuary to see what is going on.

3. FTAs not so good - Many people hope that a Free Trade Agreement with America will help New Zealand. The trouble is those countries with FTAs with America are actually growing their trade less than those countries without free trade agreements, HuffPo's Lori Wallach reports. They're a bad idea generally. They are an enabler for lobbyists and bullies.

The growth rate of U.S. exports to the countries with whom we do NOT have Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) has been over double that to U.S. FTA partners. That stunning finding should put an end to recent Obama administration talk about reviving three NAFTA-style FTAs leftover from the Bush era. And, it should provide impetus to finally implement President Obama's campaign commitments to renegotiate aspects of the past FTAs, and create a new American trade pact model going forward.

The core justification for FTAs like NAFTA and CAFTA is that they boost exports. Yet Public Citizen's recent study "Lies, Damn Lies and Export Statistics," analyzes the actual government trade flow data. It showed that, if exports to the 17 U.S. FTA partners had only grown as much as exports to the rest of the world, the U.S. would have had an extra $72 billion in exports over the past decade.

4. Ireland's problems worsening - The ECB bought 237 million euros worth of Irish government bonds last week in another sign of growing fear about sovereign debt in European financial markets, the FT reports.

Although the intervention is relatively small and in the millions rather than billions of euros, the fact that the ECB has had to step up its purchases highlights increasing volatility as investors fear that the eurozone debt crisis is far from over. Traders said the ECB bought Greek, Portuguese and Irish bonds last week as the extra premium these so-called peripheral eurozone markets have to pay in interest rates over Germany rose because of deteriorating sentiment.

The extra premium – or yield spread over Germany – Portugal and Ireland have had to pay in interest rates for 10-year bonds hit record levels last week. This spread widening comes as borrowing from the ECB by banks in the peripheral economies of Portugal, Spain, Ireland and Greece rises because of the refusal of investors to buy the debt of these countries and their banks.

5. It could go off on Wednesday morning - Ireland is planning to sell 1 billion euros worth of government bonds on Tuesday night. This could be a hectic week, the Irish Times points out.

THIS CANNOT go on much longer. Ever rising bond yields and a rapidly growing debt stock are like nitrates and glycerine – let them mingle and agitate together and sooner or later they explode. We are not far from that point now in the Government’s debt position. If the bond market does not stabilise, and if it does not come to believe that Ireland’s fiscal position is manageable, the country is destined, sooner or later, to activate the EU-International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout package established in May.

Tuesday will provide the biggest test yet. The National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) has committed to putting at least €1 billion worth of Irish Government bonds up for auction. If there were to be any serious problem with take-up, or if the rate of return offered were much above already high rates in the secondary market, real consideration would have to be given to seeking help.  

6. The Mercurial McGuire - Australian stock broker Peter McGuire, the man behind CWA Global Markets, apparently likes to make a lot of money from his customers, the Sydney Morning Herald's Stuart Washington reports in this must read. HT Gareth via email.

PETER McGUIRE is, by all appearances, the super-successful stockbroker fronting CWA Global Markets, with a fondness for A$200,000-plus Mercedes cars. In contrast to McGuire's smooth media manner, former staff portray him as a mercurial figure who demands a churn-and-burn mentality of his staff.

Or, as an October 2007 CWA presentation put it: “Clients are Bambi . . . we shoot Bambi.” If the team did not meet sales targets, former staff say, McGuire called them f---wits and dumb c---s. Sensitive company documents and tapes of phone conversations obtained by the Herald paint a picture of a sales-driven business that repeatedly puts its customers last.

7. 'A chilling fog rolling over the landscape' - Jesse's Cafe American looks at whether a push for new Special Drawing Rights could end up as a hunt for a new global reserve currency to replace the US dollar. He talks about currency wars and an inexorable slide towards competitive devaluations and capital controls. HT Gertraud

China and Russia and some of the other developing nations have been proposing a reformulated SDR, with less US dollar content, a broader representation of currencies, and the inclusion of gold and silver, as a suitable replacement for the US dollar as the global reserve currency. The US and UK are opposing the SDR as replacement to the US dollar as the new global reserve currency. They prefer to delay and postpone the discussions, and to maintain the status quo for as long as is possible to support their primacy in the financial markets.

Control of the money supply is a huge hand on the levers of financial and political power. It will be most interesting to see where the European Union comes out on this issue, especially in light of the recent drubbing that their banks have taken via dodgy dollar assets and a vicious dollar short squeeze, alleviated by a rescue from the Federal Reserve.

8. An interesting week ahead - Mohamed el Irian, the CEO of PIMCO (the world's biggest bond fund) writes at FTAlphaville that this next week could prove crucial for global financial markets. Firstly Europe's sovereign debt crisis is not solved,.

Market measures of risk for peripheral European countries (Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain) are at or near danger levels… despite exceptional support from the ECB, EU and IMF, and despite the implementation of adjustment measures on the part of some. The failure to reduce risk spreads means that the public sector bailout is not working. Rather than provide assurances of better times ahead and, thus, encourage new investments, ECB/EU/IMF support funding is being used by existing investors to exit their exposures to the most vulnerable peripheral European countries.

This situation cannot be sustained forever. It undermines any chance that the most vulnerable countries (e.g., Greece) have of limiting the collapse in their GDP and maintaining social cohesion; it contaminates the balance sheet of the ECB; it exposes the revolving nature of IMF resources to considerable risk; and it raises the risk of renewed contagion.

Secondly, competitive devaluations are ratcheting up trade and political tensions.

These latest foreign exchange developments bring to the fore an inconvenient reality. While not all industrial countries wish to make it explicit, they are happy (indeed eager) to see their currencies depreciate. They see this as helping them address the extremely difficult challenges associated with a protracted period of low growth, high unemployment, and limited policy effectiveness. The list of industrial countries wishing to depreciate their currencies is not matched by a list of emerging economies happy to let their currencies appreciate significantly.

As a result, foreign exchange tensions are mounting, and the price of gold has been driven to a new record level. This week will shed light on whether policymakers can do anything to deal with these two issues. If they continue to stumble and hesitate, what has been simmering may well come to a full boil in the next few months.

9. Tougher than we thought - The new Basel III rules on bank capital may be tougher than everyone originally thought, FT.com reports. HT John Walley via email.

The full impact of the new global bank capital rules announced at the weekend is likely to be 30 per cent tougher than the headline ratio suggests, according to regulators and industry participants who have studied private banking data. The data model the impact of earlier rule changes approved by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision narrowing the definition of what banks can count towards core tier one capital ratio.

On Sunday, the committee ordered banks to raise their minimum core tier one capital from 2 per cent to 7 per cent of their risk weighted assets by 2019 or face restrictions on pay and bonuses. That more than tripled the old requirement of 2 per cent to force banks to hold more top quality capital against potential losses. But the banks will also have to subtract items such as goodwill, some tax credits and minority investments from equity and retained earnings.The data submitted to the committee suggest the real impact of the change could be equivalent to raising the minimum capital requirement from 2 per cent to 10 per cent for many banks.

The deductions are likely to cut many banks’ equity totals by between 30 per cent and 40 per cent, according to people who have seen the data. That compares with estimates of 10-15 per cent projected by many banking analysts based on publicly available data.

10. Here's Paul Henry's acceptance speech at the Qantas Awards. Watch it until the end. It's funny and rude. HT Rob via email.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

20 Comments

some commenters on the above article   jonlivesey Today 02:05 AM Recommended by
50 people I think you could well sum the situation in Europe up in one phrase, which is that rigging the markets never works for ever.

If you think about it, the people who proclaimed a triumph when European interest rates converged sharply on Euro entry would have done better to reflect that at Euro entry, each member had the interest rate its economy deserved. Interest rates pre-Euro were arrived at by an organic and transparent market process - by a market negotiation between lender and borrower. Lenders demanded a certain rather high rate to lend to the PIIGS, and it was then up to the PIiGS to decide if they would pay that rate and for how much debt. This is, after all, what markets are for.

Euro entry destroyed that market relationship and replaced it with artificial interest rates as if the PIIGS were Germany. But what everyone ignored - apart from a few sceptics - was that it's easy to borrow like Germany, but the trouble begins when you try to repay like Greece, Portugal, Ireland and so on.

Anyone can borrow, especially at artificially low rates, but then it is *your* economy that has to generate the cash to carry and finally pay back the debt. The only way the PIIGS could borrow like Germany and later pay back like Germany, was to become Germany, which they could never do because trapped in the Euro with no possibility of devaluation, they became less, not more, competitive.

Since this is pretty elementary economics, and was widely predicted by sceptics, why did they do this to themselves? Well, in the first place most of the people who took the PIIGS into the Euro are now retired, or close to it. And in the second place, when interest rates plummet, existing Bonds rocket in price, and clever elites in the PIIGS nations who were smart enough to buy up their own sovereign and bank dept before Euro entry made huge profits.

Growth and stability for the few, and unemployment and poverty for the many.

(Edited by author 8 hours ago)

drjonathanwilson Today 03:17 AM Recommended by
29 people

Good to see Jon back again. Now all we need is David Goldsby, Bazza McKenzie and the other regulars to turn more of the floodlights on, on Ambrose's well set stage.

I must say that Ambrose does the debt analysis rather well even if he seems to be taking time out to think about where to take the liquidity (QE) argument next.

Here is a clue Ambrose (and Dominique Strauss–Clown at the IMF), think about the sustainability of any economic policy where liquidity is placed before solvency. There you have the PIIGS (and UK and USA) problem in a nutshell.

As Jon Livesey pointed out eons ago (and David Goldsby and Bazza McKenzie must surely be weary of repeating), liquidity we can fix, but solvency is a killer – insufficient future voluntary (non-tax based) transactions equates to insufficient future wealth, and with insufficient future wealth all debtors default when the liquidity runs out.

And just how much liquidity is left in the German tank for the ECB to draw down on behalf of PIIGS banks? I note that falling German export numbers are ignored by the European MSM – perhaps that German fuel gauge needle is hovering over empty.

Up
0

So in other words when it comes to FTA's, America can be guaranteed to cheat more than their trade partner.

FTA with the US?, thanks but no thanks.

Up
0

Paul Henry should learn to watch his language like these guys did (not)

another quality 3news site clip

Up
0

Without a stupid audience Paul Henry would be not more then lazy language criminal - perhaps jailed for life.

He’s to a great extent abusive, often unfair and shouldn’t be in public media, especially not when paid by taxpayers.

Up
0

Bernard,
quote:

1. Gold not as high as it looks - This calculator produced by the Bank of Institutional Settlements (BIS) shows that when gold hit a peak of US$850 in 1980, this amount is actually worth US$2,248.90 in today's terms. So maybe gold hasn't risen as much as everyone thinks. It's now just under US$1,300/oz.

unquote.

That should be B L S not B I S. If it was the BIS I would have given it a few seconds thought, as I would have been interested in which data they were using.

As it's actually the BLS (you know what the B stands for don't you?). Male cow LOL.
And that reflects the validity of their data. It is litterally B S.

If you're interested in some REAL real terms gold charts, look here:

http://www.neuralnetwriter.cylo42.com/node/200

Maybe it's time for you to start sourcing some credible gold articles. How about starting here:

The houses that Jack 'built'
http://www.neuralnetwriter.cylo42.com/node/3526

and for real insight, try reading some of FOFOA's articles. This will give you a taste:

Questions to FOFOA
http://www.neuralnetwriter.cylo42.com/node/3528

Steve
 

Up
0

PIMCO's man with the moustache is Mohamed El-Erian. (I'm sure just a typo Bernard).

PS. I'm looking forward to Obama's grilling on CNBC later tonight (CNBC aren't exactly Obamaphiles, so it should be interesting!)
 

Up
0

They are'nt exactly bright either.....he is.

Hope they put it on youtube!

Up
0

Bloomberg report states Aussie $ is by 27% overvalued:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-9/gillard-dollar-is-peaking-as-mi…

Up
0

Been following the interest.co.nz editorial for a few months now, trying to school myself up. Few questions for the educated -

I read a lot about the PIIGS and how they're dragging down the EU, and the seriousness of Greece's near-default for world markets. Then we have articles about Japan's impending debt crisis, and lots of countries trying to devalue their currency. My question is, what hope is there? What would be the magic fix for the fix that we've got ourselves into? Or is it inevitable that sometime in the next 2-5 years the money wheel will stop and we'll have another huge GFC, but centered on sovereign debt and central banks, instead of the commercial banks?

Secondly, which countries are in the most danger? Is it the US, the UK, Japan, or the EU states? Has the US been protected somewhat because of the US$ position as reserve currency?

Third, what other sites would you all recommend for intelligent discussion and articles?

 

Cheers

JS

Up
0

Hang on Sprite...we're all flat out digging our bomb shelters and hiding our gold....gotta stock up on ammo and baked beans mate.....

Right....oh you want to know where to hide!....not where to for Hide...hehe...try playing pinball between gold...au paper and booze....good booze will always sell.

Up
0

Hope...um....do you believe in God? start praying.....because, IMHO that's about all that might keep us from a second long depression....thats 10 to 30 years...GFC is nothing on that....

Add in Ireland and in the last few days Portugal...

:(

hence I think praying is about all that is left.

Magic fix, a time machine, either go back to Ronald Reagan and shoot him and Greenspan or go back and shoot Bush....or all three...

The far right policies of the last 10~30 years have brought us to this....you cannot undo that long a period and that much damage simply and over-night...Historicaly to fix the mess takes about 2/3rds the time that it took to make it....so if you want to start at Reagan thats 20 years of a grinding austerity....then throw in Peak Oil.

Have a look at what Obama is saying

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f59cs4RA40E&NR=1&feature=fvwp

about not keeping the tax cuts for the super-rich and you can see there is no fiscal responsibility on the right.....these days their god is moniterism just like the Labour Govn's was keynesian in the 70s....both were not bad models, but neither has worked because they have been corrupted by Pollies...you cant take the good points from a method/system and ignore the "bad" ones.........

GFC in the next 2 to 5 years....more like any time in the next 2 weeks to 2 years....

The commercial banks are not clear of this...all that has happened is some of their toxic debt has been taken on by the Public....not enough....they are still in  bad way......and they are taking on more bad debt again because their bonuses are on the line....its a grand ponzi scheme with someone else paying.....Investors are exiting Greece, Ireland and Portugal....Central Banks are holding the fort long enough for these "investor" ppl to get out and not get a haircut....

Most danger....its like walking in a mine field but all the mines are inter-connected....one I think will go off and when it does many of the others will. Looking back at today from the future I wonder if like the Great Depression we will see what happened, bear in mind the GD was mainly a US issue, this is world wide.

US protected, yes....ppl are running to it as historically it has been a safe haven....but thats like standing on the deck of the titanic, and running to the stern, everyone is going to get wet....just some a little later.

good articles,

Many of the articles and links off here are worth pursuing...generally avoid the mainstream press....featherweights in a hvy world contest...most ppl I talk to in the real world think things are just great as does the papers....head in sand comes to mind.

There are some serious kooks blogs but some very good ones, Paul Krugman is an in-depth read....Steven Keen.....especially Steve Keen, the Minsky work is fasinating for its accuracy....lol......maybe the word is frightening....

regards

 

 

 

Up
0

Jeremy - read some Heinberg while you're at learning. Powerdown comes to mind.... Stuart Stanford's blog is good too. as is The automatic earth, The energy bulletin, The oil drum.

The Limits to Growth (Club of Rome, ten-year updates) is a good primer.  An old copy of Overshoot (Will Catton) is a goodie, too.

Google: Prof Albert Bartlett,  the exponential function, and Albert Bartlett Hubbert.

Then, to stay balanced, try Peakoildebunked.  The huntinshootinfishin no limits antidote.

And weep.

Then make some tactical moves........  I suggest aiming for as much energy independence as you can, which means as much independence all up, given that energy underwrites all.

It's an interesting trip. By the end of it, you will realise that the vast majority of economists, 'pollies and media, are just plain on the wrong track. You will then try and engage, but don't hold your breath.

Someone once said it was hard to convince a man that something was so, when his income depended on it being ain't. Most of them depend on it........

So we continue to be told the Emperor (or the Duke in the paperback version) is fully clothed.

Up
0

Jeremy,
Although you will get plenty of articles on here about the debt problem, what you really need is the bigger picture, an idea of how the system works. I try to cover that angle. And IMO FOFOA is THE best writer on the internet for explaining things. But, it's not a 5 minute learning exercise. If you really want to understand, you have to put some effort in. I gave a couple of pointers above.

The key points to beware of are:

1. The US CPI numbers are calculated in a different way now to the way they used to be before 1981. All changes have resulted in lower CPI reporting than the original method. IMO the difference over the past 29 years has resulted in a roughly 3x difference in prices. Yes you read that correctly, 3x difference. So the BLS calculator above gives a 1980 price that is out by 3x. So that "gold price" should be about 3x higher.

2. The US GDP has to be calculated using the CPI numbers, what they call a deflator. By adjusting the CPI numbers down, they make the GDP numbers higher. This means that in reality the US has been in technical recession since 2005.

3. Both of the above statistical techniques favour the US government. Lower CPI increases gives the imprssion that prices are not rising so fast, which lowers wage expectations. It also makes "inflation" protected governement expenses cheaper. It's a win-win for the government, and a lose-lose for the people.

4. I believe the same techniques are used in many countries, including NZ.

5. Since 1971 the amount of "money" has increased, and the financial part of the economy has grown. Both are way out of proportion to the size of the real world. People have put their savings, their wealth, into that "money". This can be called a "credibility bubble", because people have believed this process was credible.

6. You need to understand the difference between "money" and real things, and how the credibility bubble will defllate. What effects that will have.

My "The Houses that Jack 'Built''" article mentioned above is my attempt to convey the difference between promises and real things. The difference between the credibility bubble and the real world.

Understanding this is vital for your financial wealth.

Steve

Up
0

SteveN ...who is FOFOA....??? thks

Up
0

fofoa.blogspot.com ..

An anonymous blogger on gold.  Interesting blog though..

Up
0

many thanks

Up
0

Hmm going down the batten-the-hatches and doomsday mentality, what would the effects of shifting to a one world currency be? Wouldn't that stop countries from hiding their problems through manipulating their currencies and statistics? Then everything would be valued (once again) by a real measure, right?

BTW thanks for the recommended reads, the CPI thing is interesting Steve. I don't know if I trust Obama to be an accurate and realistic un-sugared declaration of the state and future of things though.

I get the problem with credibility - real assets have been swapped for promises, but there are more promises than there are assets, and so someone will end up missing out. Like musical chairs. But hasn't money creation, even just through fractional reserve banking, encouraged growth and liquidity? Using your Houses example, its given Beth a house. She may only have 'a promise' from Jack, but taking the metaphor closer to reality, Beth can use Jack's promise to swap for real goods, because everyone else trusts Jack to build Beth's house too. If promises weren't acceptable as payment, then wouldn't Beth have to wait a few years for Jack to get around to building her house?

 

Up
0

Jeremy - I think that you would find it worthwhile to watch Chris Martenson's Crash Course, a link to it is on the home page of his website.  It's just over 3 hours of video, but you can watch it chapter by chapter, each being something like 5 -15 minutes long. 

It's a systematic and very watchable analysis of the dilemma we find ourselves in now - the warning lights flashing in a whole range of things such as debt, demographics, peak oil and energy economics in general, resource depletion, etc.  Full of facts and good analysis, and not coloured by emotion - though there's no accounting for your own emotions as you watch it.  It's from an American viewpoint but most of the issues are applicable to us - there's no hiding from this stuff. 

 

 

 

 

 

Be   

Up
0