
Here are my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 past midday, brought to you in association with New Zealand Mint for your reading pleasure.
I welcome your additions and comments below, or please send suggestions for Tuesday's Top 10 at 10 via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.
I'll pop any surplus suggestions I get into the comment stream.
1. Just what we need - More shopping centres and apartments.
Tony Gapes is planning a NZ$125 million 'retail themed village' at the 5 mile hole he bought from Allied Farmers, Anne Gibson reports at NZHerald.
What is New Zealand investing more in shops and apartments when we need to be investing more in high value exports?
How do we incentivise the right type of investment and discourage the wrong type of investment?
This is why we need a land tax and a capital gains tax. We high value export producing jobs, not more bars and restaurants employing people on minimum wage serving drinks to Australians.
Gapes, of Auckland business Redwood Group, bought the site gradually from Allied Farmers after Henderson borrowed $72.4 million from Hanover to develop Five Mile at Frankton Flats on a 31ha site adjacent to Queenstown International Airport where a new township was planned.
Allied Farmers got involved after buying Hanover businesses. In August, Gapes said he wanted to produce a mixed-use concept on the land. "It will have a specialty retail-themed village anchored by a Countdown supermarket, plus national and international retailers and a residential component. It's a potent mix, designed to attract local and international brands and consumers," Gapes said.
Last week, the Otago Daily Times reported on plans for a 38,000sq m project of two and three-storey levels, a large central carpark and entertainment junction of bars, restaurants and cinemas.
2. 'Help us please' - The IMF meetings over the weekend included lots of very civilised wailing and gnashing of teeth. Many of the leaders called on the IMF to do something, anything, to stop the currency wars, Bloomberg reported.
US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner (the gall of the man!) even called on others to do the responsible thing. This from the country that is about to print money in an unprecedented fashion.
The WSJ reckons the meeting failed to resolve the conflict.
Global governments tasked the International Monetary Fund with calming the recent outbreak of tensions over currencies amid signs they are already triggering a protectionist backlash. Officials including U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Egyptian Finance Minister Youssef Boutros-Ghali said the lender should outline how countries can expand their economies without damaging those of other nations.
China is accused of keeping the yuan undervalued to boost exports, while low interest rates in the U.S. and other industrial nations are blamed for propelling capital flows into emerging markets. “The IMF has an important role to play to help ensure that progress toward rebalancing strengthens,” Geithner said in a speech at the IMF’s annual meeting yesterday in Washington. “It is ultimately the responsibility of countries to act, but the IMF must speak out effectively about challenges and marshal support for action.”
3. Robo-signer update - The Rob-signing scandal in the US housing market continues to bubble along. It's worth watching because it could prove the next trigger point in the Global Financial Crisis. See the Jon Stewart video below for the background.
Attorneys General in 40 states may announce a joint investigation, Bloomberg reports.
Officials in at least seven states have already announced investigations into claims that employees at home lenders and loan servicers signed court documents without ensuring the information was accurate. Yesterday, Miller said in a statement that he was working with state officials, banking regulators and the U.S. Justice Department to launch a coordinated review. Attorneys general in Ohio and Connecticut have said some of the practices may amount to fraud.
Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Ally Financial Inc. already froze foreclosures in 23 states where courts supervise home seizures amid allegations that employees used unverified or false data to speed the process.
4. Extend and Pretend - The IMF is now considering extending Greece's emergency loan package, Bloomberg reports.
The International Monetary Fund may transform its loan to Greece into a longer-term repayment plan, a move that would allow the country to pay its loan back later without restructuring, European Central Bank Executive Board member Lorenzo Bini Smaghi said.
“The IMF is certainly thinking of these issues,” Bini Smaghi said in a speech in Washington. “There are mechanisms in the IMF to prolong packages.”
5. Graeme Hart's timing is perfect - Investors put off by record low US Treasury yields and scared stiff of the stock market's propensity for 'flash crashes' are moving hand over fist into junk bonds, Bloomberg reports. Graeme Hart's Reynolds issued over US$3 billion of junk bonds last week to fund a big acquisition. This is the problem with very low official interest rates. Eventually they force people into riskier investments in the hunt for yield.
Sound familar? I reckon one of the reasons for the finance company debacle was relatively low interest rates from 2004 to 2008, which forced many Mums and Dads out away from banks to higher returns in finance companies. This is one of the big risks of interest rates being held artificially low by central banks.
At least $13.2 billion of junk bonds have been sold this month, bringing the global total to an all-time high of $263.5 billion, 26 percent higher than the full-year record set in 2009, Bloomberg data show. Junk bond sales in the U.S. have reached $208.9 billion this year, the data show. The comment below is excellent. Holy Mackerel indeed.
“This is obviously a case of too much money chasing too few good bonds,” said Don Ross, who helps oversee $9.5 billion of assets as global strategist for Titanium Asset Management Corp. in Cleveland.
“It’s just money changing hands and corporations being the net gainer by being able to issue cheaper and have better balance sheets. In the long run that will help the economy, but holy mackerel, at what cost?”
6. Basel III to restrict exports? - This is an angle on the Basel III I haven't seen before. The regulations will make it harder for exporters to get trade finance, Dun and Bradstreet reckons, as reported by The Australian.
A report by Dun & Bradstreet, released exclusively to The Australian, argues that with new proposed capital ratio buffers to apply to traditional trade finance facilities, banks will increasingly pass on the costs to customers or even cut back their lending.
As a result, exporters could be forced to take on the funding role, and the risks associated, according to the global data agency that holds credit information on more than 165 million companies.
7. Individual regulators look to accelerate Basel III - Central bankers are looking to accelerate the very delayed timetable for tougher capital rules agreed by the Basel committee known as the Basel III rules, Bloomberg reported. All this means that funding will be harder to get globally in the next couple of years and more expensive. This is how deleveraging will inevitably work its way through the system.
Central bankers from Switzerland and Canada told bank executives to expect more global financial rules, especially for the largest institutions. Switzerland’s Philipp Hildebrand, president of the Swiss National Bank, and Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney told a panel of chief executives that included Bank of America Corp.’s Brian Moynihan that the agreement reached in Basel by international regulators represented the “minimum,” according to Carney.
“There is unfinished business that is pretty important,” Carney said yesterday at a panel discussion in Washington. Banks worldwide are grappling with the new rules approved in September by regulators, meeting as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. New minimum capital requirements take effect in less than five years. The banking industry persuaded regulators to soften rules after a lobbying campaign, pushing off implementation of some requirements for about a decade.
China, in particular, needs to confront the fact that the rest of the world will not allow it to run a huge trade surplus forever. An undervalued currency, which serves to subsidize China’s manufacturing industries, has been a key driver of the country’s economic growth for the last decade. A significant appreciation of the renminbi will reduce or even eliminate that growth subsidy. Regardless of developing countries’ growth prospects, there is a deeper question.
Will a world economy in which developing countries have substantially greater weight foster the kind of global governance that sustains a hospitable economic environment? Emerging-market economies have not yet shown the kind of global leadership that suggests an affirmative answer to this question. Countries like Brazil, China, India, and South Africa, however, have so far shown little interest in contributing to the construction of global regimes, preferring to remain free riders. Jorge Castañeda, a former foreign minister of Mexico, goes further, arguing that these countries have systematically opposed global rules, in areas ranging from climate change to international trade.
Lest we be too harsh on developing countries, however, let us also remember that political scientists have long worried that greater diffusion of economic power would produce a less stable world economy. If the world economy’s center of gravity shifts substantially toward developing countries, this will not be a smooth – and possibly not even a benign – process. We can be certain of two things: only those countries that adopt growth strategies based on stimulating domestic structural change will do well, and the conundrum of global governance – how to manage a world economy that has become unruly – will almost certainly get worse.
9. Robert Reich talks about the next economy and America's future in this video - HT Kevin via IM.
10. Very Relevant Video - Jon Stewart looks at the US Foreclosure crisis. He nails it. Must watch, in my view.
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
Foreclosure Crisis | ||||
|
29 Comments
re #1. We dont need a land or capital gains tax. I've yet to hear the effects of the depreciation changes on landlords, however I have seen plenty of listed companies reporting lower profits due to this change.
We need less taxes, not more.
A Govn steers an economy, one way is to change tax A less, B more.
Land and CGT looks better by the day.
regards
Wrong, we need MORE taxes on property investors because THAT is where the so called 'equity' & 'wealth' went and located for the past decade. It can be released simply by scaring the crap of these tax avoiding parasitic hoarders by forcing sales which will then bring house price and wages back to inflationary realities
re the Jon Stewart thing, for daily show fans there is a good interview with him on NPR Fresh Air on iTunes. It gives some insight into the daily show and his attitudes. In short, he's angrier at the crap media outlets (ie jim cramer at cnbc) than the vampire squid because a vampire squid is a vampire squid after all.......
" All this means that funding will be harder to get globally in the next couple of years and more expensive. This is how deleveraging will inevitably work its way through the system."
Harder to get......more expensive.....errr ummmmm doesn't that add up to rising mortgage rates?
They're coming whether you like it or not...quick hide....but where...oh feck!
um......maybe, maybe not. Funding right now is looking for returns so they are buying junk bonds! I mean what?
Its looking likely that the demand for finance/HP will be way down and the demand for mortgages while house prices are dropping and ppl losing jobs will be down....ppl wil save knowing they can buy later cheaper...that saved money will be looking for a return.......
regards
Bernard re (5) perhaps you are beginning to understand the significance of artificially low interest rates. Study it further follow through the consequences within the different strands of the financial crises.
This could get interesting. Reuters is reporting that US state attorneys general plan to launch a probe into charges some banks used fraudulent paperwork to kick struggling borrowers out of their homes - http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6991YG20101010
Whoops, I see Bernard's got a Bloomberg story on the same topic at number 3...
#1 - Bernard like it:
"This is why we need a land tax and a capital gains tax. We [need] high value export producing jobs, not more bars and restaurants employing people on minimum wage serving drinks to Australians."
You missed a [word.]
#6 - we have an export credit office, they can step up to the plate.
#9 - at 4min'ish, note the langauge - adapt, get out of our idealogical fixations - guess what comes next? Also see similar at 4.50, "we don'te get into name calling, we just get very pragmatic ..." If only.
#10 - excellent. See:NZ told to mend fences with India - Business - NZ Herald News
Paul Henry will have cost NZ Inc. time, effort and money.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10679588
Why should he not be fired?
Cheers, Les.
Re : Paul Henry : How can you fire a guy who has already quit ?
[ The previous Labour Government enacted retrospective legislation to achieve any outcome which suited themselves . But I doubt that TVNZ will bother pushing National for legislation to pre-date Henry's quitting , in order to sack him . ]
@ #1.
This is why we need a land tax and a capital gains tax.
...
Perhaps the reason we don't is a rather large Jaws swimming beneath the surface called the New Zealand Property Council "$6B in assets 20 Corporate members"
The Glendowie junk bond salesman has sold a local business - http://www.colorpak.com.au/resources.ashx/news/23/File/2DB9926F28E02D59…
FYI an excellent piece on America's real problems. HT Darryl who comments...
"
Are we not heading down the same path of a hollowed out economy, and if not, how are we different? What's stopping us becoming low wage tenants in our own land?....if indeed we aren't already.
Relevance: Speculative capital inflows (in debased currencies) looking for real assets."
http://counterpunch.org/roberts10082010.html
"The millions of unemployed today are blamed on the popped real estate bubble and the subprime derivative financial crisis. However, the US economy has been losing jobs for a decade. As manufacturing, information technology, software engineering, research, development, and tradable professional services have been moved offshore, the American middle class has shriveled. The ladders of upward mobility that made American an “opportunity society” have been dismantled.
The wage and salary cost savings obtained by giving Americans’ jobs to Chinese and Indians have enriched corporate CEOs, shareholders, and Wall Street at the expense of the middle class and America’s consumer economy.
The loss of middle class jobs and incomes was covered up for years by the expansion of consumer debt to substitute for the lack of income growth. Americans refinanced their homes and spent the equity, and they maxed out their credit cards.
Consumer debt expansion has run its course, and there is no possibility of continuing to drive the economy with additions to consumer debt."
But, but, Roger and the Roundtable reckon the benefits of globalization, foreign ownership and outsourcing are well known, so obvious in fact that he doesn't even have to point them out.
We now have an economy based on dog grooming, lawn mowing, hair dressing and selling houses to each other. What could possibly go wrong?
What is this " hollowed out economy " nonsense you keep peddling , or quoting , Bernard ? America still has a massive manufacturing industry ( think Deere / Caterpillar / Ford ) . And huge natural resources , in oil , natural gas , coal , and productive farm land . They're at the forefront of innovation and technology advances in so many industries . And ( arguably ) , 90 % of their well educated population who want jobs , have got them .
And houses are cheap there , too ! ........... Where's the doom and gloom in that ? NZ should be so lucky , if this is a " hollowed out economy " .
GBH is right what about all that "Boom and Gloom" - I also think their cheese and women’s hats production isn’t doing too bad. BP is doing excellent - oil everywhere.
..and 90 % of their well educated population who want jobs , have got them .
..and 80% of their not so well educated population, who want jobs, ------ hmm!
..and 20% of their well educated population who have jobs pay for -------hmm !
overall Ameerika is doing well.
To quote Chris Martenson from a year or two a go
"Kumbya my lord...Kumbya"
Oil, the US extracts about 6mbpd yet uses 22mbpd...
Natural gas the fracking is poisioning the water....and the flows dont last long....quite probably a poor return...
Coal, at present consumption the has less than 100 years....I think it was 80? and their production will peak..........
Their oroductive farmland needs oil and gas....see above points...and then they use all of it to turn into petrol.....somewhat silly
regards
"PM Key says NZ$ getting to high"......arrrrrrgh...to.....too.....two.....which one to use when two are needed but to many, too is meaningless..........you rotters....you cut it down....
a comment on the AEP article i posted above
drjonathanwilson
54 minutes ago
Ambrose
You correctly identify the central problem when you say;
"There is not enough demand to go around"
Do you really think that currency debasement (QE) is a solution to this problem?
Such a policy position is to assume that the global amount of demand is fixed and that the only game in town is how to gain more of this fixed pie at the expense of someone else.
The only viable approach to this problem is to find ways to increase global demand without increasing state spending.
That solution will include wholesale reductions in the size of wealth transfers through taxation to the state sector in the Western world, as well as in China, India, Brazil and Russia, in favour of productive individuals, families and business – that amounts to massive cuts to income and consumption taxes.
It will mean the reversal of bizarre schemes like cap and trade; it will mean full exploitation of US energy reserves, downscaling of pension driven liabilities, and radical application of supply side economics.
It requires the elites to swallow some humble pie in order to retain some relevance or to continue with this insane race to the bottom of the debasement bucket and end up rulers of a pile of economic rubble.
Survival is not mandatory; only optional, and US QE without limits (and focused only on pumping up asset prices) is certain global economic suicide.
Looks like the IMF meetings failed to calm down the currency wars, Bloomberg reports.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-10/global-finance-chiefs-fail-to-…
Finance ministers and central bankers pledged to improve cooperation, yet did little to show how they would alter their ways beyond agreeing to let the IMF study the matter. With the dollar down 11 percent against the yen since mid-June, compared with less than 3 percent versus the Chinese yuan, the focus turns to Group of 20 talks in South Korea in coming weeks to prove international policymaking isn’t in tatters.
“Policy makers seemed to be trying to diminish concerns about currency wars,” said Steven Englander, head of Group of 10 currency strategy at Citigroup Inc. in New York. “There did not seem any commitment to change behavior, however. There is little to suggest that the dollar’s direction is anything but down.”
cheers
Bernard
The rortybomb.....lol........
http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/foreclosure-fraud-for-dummies…
or this piece.......
http://seekingalpha.com/article/160619-the-coming-consequences-of-banki…
regards
China appears to have just tightened monetary policy.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-11/china-raises-deposit-reserve-r…
China’s central bank unexpectedly and temporarily raised reserve requirements for six large commercial banks, reining in liquidity as the economy stabilizes, according to a Reuters report.
The ratio will increase 50 basis points and for two months, Reuters reported, citing four unidentified people. The current level is 17 percent for the biggest banks and 15 percent for smaller ones. Market News cited unidentified traders to the same effect. The People’s Bank of China declined to comment.
China is looking to diversify its holdings out of the US dollar and buy into emerging market currencies.
Let's hope they don't notice all these New Zealand government bonds being sold at the moment...
I wonder if John Key would let the Chinese buy them....
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-11/china-seeks-to-add-emerging-ma…
“The Chinese authorities are some of the smartest in the world,” Kenneth Akintewe, a Singapore-based investment manager at Aberdeen Asset Management Plc that oversees $261 billion globally, said in an interview on Oct. 11. “If you look at the fundamentals of a lot of these emerging markets, they are considerably better than developed markets. Who wants to be holding U.S. dollars at this stage?”
Emerging-market currencies have rallied in the past month, with India’s rupee gaining 4.7 percent, Brazil’s real 3.3 percent, China’s yuan 1.7 percent, South Korea’s won 4.2 percent and Mexico’s peso 4.8 percent.
Of course he would - remember - there's nothing he can do about it.
Just back from Greece. Lovely country but infrastructure is degraded badly. Roads are terrible, even worse than NZ, which is saying something. The country does look 'broke'.
"Just back from Greece."
Then I'm sure you'll enjoy this remarkable essay from Michael Lewis.
http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2010/10/greeks-bearing-bonds-201010?currentPage=all
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.