sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Why the euro's future is threatened; Australia's real problem is debt; The 'put-back timebomb; Dilbert

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Why the euro's future is threatened; Australia's real problem is debt; The 'put-back timebomb; Dilbert
<br />

Here are my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 2 pm, brought to you in association with New Zealand Mint for your reading pleasure.

I welcome your additions and comments below, or please send suggestions for Friday's Top 10 at 10 via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop any surplus suggestions I get into the comment stream.

1. 'The Euro doesn't have a future' - China expert and global macro guru Michael Pettis explains why the Euro doesn't have a future unless the powers-that-be move very fast and in a large way to rescue the situation.

The politics of Europe are turning sour quickly and the powers-that-be should move quickly to avoid being overtaken by events.

Ie. Watch out for riots and changes of government.

December 7 when the Irish parliament votes on the latest austerity budget dictated by the Europeans to save the European banks would be an obvious first port of call for politics to overtake economics.

The resolution of Europe’s crisis will inevitably involve a difficult political debate over apportioning the cost of the resolution. In one of my favorite history books (The Financial History of Western Europe), Charles Kindleberger argued that the political structure of Europe after the First World War guaranteed that different economic interests would necessarily struggle over income distribution. When it came to deciding how countries would adjust to currency and debt misalignments of the 1920s and 1930s, the main issue, according to Kindleberger, was “whether deflation and unemployment would saddle a major share of the load on the working class, as contrasted with the rentier.”

He goes on: “Keynes observed in 1922 that the choice between inflation and deflation comes down to the agonizing outcome of a struggle among interest groups.” We need to remember what Kindleberger and Keynes meant by this. As everyone knows, markets are very, very nervous about currency and sovereign debt crises in Europe. How to adjust But this nervousness will soon pass.

I have no doubt that enormous amounts of scotch tape, paper clips, and chewing gum are going to be deployed quickly to hold the whole thing together, and that perhaps in a week or two we will be all throwing sighs of relief as policymakers firmly announce that Europe was put to the ultimate test and proved itself manfully. But does that mean we can stop worrying – was this really the ultimate test? No, of course not. If previous history is any guide, this crisis will re-emerge in different places every few months until it is truly resolved, and increasingly the crisis will manifest itself in the political realm. 

2. Contagion spreads to the core - Bloomberg reports on why the ECB is preparing to push the 'nuclear' button with wholesale buying of sovereign bonds. Contagion is spreading to Belgium and Italy.

Europe’s sovereign crisis is spreading to the heart of the 16-nation bloc as investors question Belgium’s ability to cut the euro region’s third- highest debt load, overshadowing its economic performance. The extra yield investors demand to hold Belgian 10-year bonds instead of benchmark German bunds of similar maturity has more than doubled in the past four months and widened to 139 basis points yesterday, the most since at least 1993.

The Italian spread climbed to a euro-era high of 186 basis points. The European Union’s 85 billion-euro ($111 billion) rescue package for Ireland has failed to quell market turmoil as investors shift their focus from peripheral states to countries such as Belgium, whose capital of Brussels is home to the EU’s political institutions.

While the country’s economy has been among the region’s growth drivers this year, inconclusive elections have left it without a government, raising concerns on its budget outlook.  

And here's a chart showing the yield on Italy's government bonds sprinting higher. This is the one that is really scaring people. It's the seventh largest economy in the world with

3. Securities Commission 'nodded off' - Patrick Smellie at BusinessDesk reports Bell Gully Chairman Roger Partridge as telling Parliament's Commerce Select Committee that the Securities Commission had plenty of powers to deal with problem finance companies, but just didn't use them aggressively enough.

The "perceived regulatory failure" in relation to finance companies reflected existing laws not being used rather than a lack of laws, Partridge said, noting the Securities Commission had reported on its concerns about finance companies in 2005, and stated they would be keeping investment statements under review for breaches of the Securities Act, including failure to declare related party transactions.

"The Securities Commission seems then to have nodded off." While the commission had a difficult job, "from my perspective, the regulators have had all the powers they need for certainly the last decade and for longer.  

4. Here's the Taiwanese animators having a go at the Irish bailout scandal. The protestors at the end are hilarious. This is best with the sound down.

5. Australia's real banking problem is not a competition  - It is debt. That is Steve Keen's conclusion in this must read submission to the Australian senate inquiry into banking.

He says, rightly that margins have actually improved from a consumer's point of view, but all it has done is encourage more indebtedness.

This is the real reason Australians are screaming about higher interest rates. It's not bank profiteering. It's household indebtedness. Tough message for a populace that loves to hate their banks.

The major problems of the financial sector are macroeconomic and related to the level of debt, rather than microeconomic and related to the price of debt.

These are that:

1. Banks have an innate desire to issue more debt than is good for the economy as a whole, and increased competition tends to exacerbate this tendency rather than control it;

2. As a consequence of (a), debt has grown inexorably relative to incomes until the financial crisis began. This expansion of debt caused the apparent boom prior to the crisis, while the slowdown in the rate of growth of debt is the predominant cause of the crisis itself;

3. Banks are lending too much to households and too little to business; and 4. Lending has been oriented towards financing speculation rather than investment and the working capital needs of business.

Increasing competition once again, without ensuring that lending is restrained relative to incomes, and that it is directed away from households and speculation and towards business and investment, would only exacerbate problems caused by earlier introductions of unbridled competition in the 1980s and 1990s.

6. Ignoring the experts - BBC reports US President Barack Obama's deficit reduction panel is recommending massive deficit cuts and has made plenty of suggestions.

The proposal would cut defence, social security, and other spending, slashing a total of $4.1 trillion (£2.62tn) from the budget deficit by 2020.

But analysts say the panel is unlikely to ratify the plan with a vote, calling into question whether the US Congress will act on its recommendations.

"The solution will be painful," the plan reads. "There is no easy way out." Democratic Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky panned the report, claiming it disproportionately cuts social programmes, and Republican Congressmen Paul Ryan and Jeb Hensarling blasted the proposed tax increases.

7. US dollar's role in danger - US Federal Reserve hero and sometime Obama-advisor Paul Volcker worries in this Bloomberg piece that the US dollar may lose its role as the world's reserve currency. He talked about the need for leadership but didn't mention Obama.

“The growing question is whether the exceptional role of the dollar can be maintained,” Volcker told a gathering of New York civic leaders at the University Club of New York last night. The decline of the U.S. economy, political gridlock at home, U.S. involvement in two wars and “festering” geopolitical issues in the Middle East and Asia have undermined the ability of the U.S. to influence global events, Volcker said.

Volcker offered no prescriptive solutions as he spoke in broad terms of the country’s loss of stature.

“This is a troubling time for America, a troubling time for the world,” Volcker said in remarks to Common Cause, a civic group. He said the U.S. is facing its most difficult economic crisis since World War II. “If ever there were a need for clear-headed, confident leadership, nationally and internationally, that time is now.”

8. Even the Democrats are revolting - In this piece Robert Reich slams Barack Obama's refusal to tell the American public the true story of why they're in such a mess. The very rich have made themselves even richer at the expense of the poor and the middle classes through the Recession and are using their political influence to make it even worse.

I think Reich is right, apart from the stuff about not reducing the deficit. That unfortunately has to be done too, but not by making poor people poorer. It should be done by making obscenely rich people just rich.

Reich challenges Obama and the senior Democrats to tell the real story.

They’d tell the nation that income and wealth haven’t been this concentrated at the top since 1928, the year before the Great Crash. They’d be indignant about the secret money funneled into midterm campaigns. They’d demand Congress pass the Disclose Act so the public would know where the money comes from. They’d introduce legislation to curb Wall Street bonuses – exactly what European leaders are doing with their financial firms.

They’d demand that the big banks, now profitable after taxpayer bailouts, reorganize the mortgage debt of distressed homeowners. They’d call for a new WPA to put the unemployed back to work, and pay for it with a tax surcharge on incomes over $1 million.

9. The put-back time bomb - Holders of toxic US mortgage bonds are about to try to 'putback' the bonds to the banks who securitised the mortgages in the first place, costing the banks US$180 billion they don't have. Here's Euromoney with the detailed story.

10. Totally French video - The power of a good story.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

23 Comments

Eurosceptic MP Nigel Farage does his bloodcurdling thing in this King News interview.

http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/12/1_MEP_Nigel_Farage_files/Nigel%20Farage%2012:1:2010.mp3

"We are almost at that junction where unless we can persuade these politicians to give us free and fair referendums so that we can decide our future, then we are heading, I am afraid, for some very, very dark days in Europe."

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

FYI Goldman Sachs was a heavy user of the Federal Reserve facilities.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6B06KB20101201

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N), viewed as one of the stronger banks during the financial crisis, was actually one of the heavier users of emergency lending from the Federal Reserve bank, data released on Wednesday showed.

The U.S. bank tapped the overnight lending facility a total of 85 times for $589 billion from September through November 2008, the data show. On one occasion in mid-October, the bank borrowed about $24 billion in overnight credit across two of its units.

Up
0

There is a book called Bailout Nation...  I'm told that it states that Goldman Sachs has borrowed $2 trillion from the fed.

In total the fed has loaned out $7 trillion to the big banks... ( at low rates).

It is kind of mind blowing.... 

AND  .... apparantly most of that money never found its way into the USA economy....  it all went to where the best return was....   speculative and emerging markets.

What  f#**ed up world we live in.

Up
0

Here we go, here we go, here we go...

Australian retail sales down 1.1% in October. Much worse than expected.

This from JP Morgan

https://mm.jpmorgan.com/stp/t/c.do?i=321EA-34C&u=a_p*d_513693.pdf*h_-2t…

While households dodged the rate hike bullet in
October, that generally was regarded as a temporary reprieve. It is well known that confidence
deteriorates substantially when mortgage rates breach long run average levels, and consumers were
standing at the edge of the Rubicon in October, crossing it one month later in November. As such,
there is a definite sense that the household sector is wading into troubled waters.

Up
0

~#10..So ~ the property market is the clip ( the chaps with the guns; the waterfall) - the vendor is the nymphette - the purchaser is the suit;  leaving the real estate agent to be...story teller! Nice analogy, Bernard....

Up
0

Here we go / Here we go / Here we go :

Whew ! ............ Finally tracked down a bit of bad news to sink your teeth into Bernard ........... It is  nearly arvo smoko , but you got there . ........ Hard yakka for you , on a day where there  is  so much awesomely good news is bursting out all around the globe .

But you found your mojo , the moment of hickeysterical gloomsterisationalysing , well done , big guy ! ......... And you seem so pleased . Nice to see you happy .

Up
0

Thrilled to bits Gummy

cheers

Bernard
 

Up
0

WA HA HA HA HA.

Up
0

On No 3. Diplock hits back - http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/4416385/Securities-Commission-did…

As an aside, Roger Partridge defended David Richwhite and his and Michael Fay's company Midavia in the Tranz Rail insider trading case against the Securities Commission where they ultimately coughed up NZ$20 million to settle without admitting liability.

Up
0

http://www.cis.org.au/media-information/opinion-pieces/article/2274-wha…

 

In China’s state-led political-economy, the CCP and state-controlled entities are the primary dispensers of capital, land and business opportunity. The CCP knows it will likely remain in power so long as it can continue to nurture the state-controlled sector; and by doing so, underwrite prosperity for the tens of millions of well-connected insiders who continue to benefit disproportionate from China’s rise. In the event of a Chinese asset bubble bursting (such as in the property market,) the paramount objective will be regime preservation. The CCP will act quickly and decisively to restrict and then reverse the damage – to the short-term benefit of commodity exporting countries like Australia and Brazil, but at greater long-term cost to countries like America looking to lower reliance its reliance on exports from Asia.

Indeed, if the onset of the global financial crisis in 2008 is any guide, we already know what Beijing will do in the event of a bursting of its bubble.

First it will immediately force its state-banks to massively increase lending so that other state-controlled entities can buy any distressed assets and prop up asset prices as long as possible. Ignoring the build-up of hidden non-performing-loans on the banks’ balance sheets, the CCP will order the huge state-controlled sector to continue investing and building within China - providing a temporary fillip for commodity exporters.

Second, China will rely increasingly on offering even more advantages to the export manufacturing sector in the form of increased currency manipulation, subsidies, tax deductions and other incentives. It cannot do otherwise since some 250 million Chinese depend directly and indirectly on this sector for a job. Beijing cannot afford to have tens of millions of unemployed workers in once-thriving coastal provinces venting their anger against the regime. Paradoxically, China’s increased reliance on exports means that it will be an even more reliable buyer of American debt since it will not convert its burgeoning surplus US dollars back into yuan in order to maintain a weak currency. But more generally, the bursting of the Chinese asset bubble will seriously set back American plans to improve its domestic export manufacturing sectors and ‘rebalance’ the global economy in the process.

Dr. John Lee is the Foreign Policy Fellow at The Center for Independent Studies in Sydney and a Visiting Fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C. He is the author of Will China Fail?

Up
0

FYI San Diego's ratepayers are actively wondering if Bankruptcy is a good idea for the Californian state

http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2010/dec/01/city-light-bankruptcy-sa…

HT Troy via email.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

More here on the putback issue. Now the US banks and Freddie and Fannie are at it hammer and tongs

http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aR0qtEY01Fpg

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11890399

Fun graphic at the bottom of this trying to put the USA deficit in some perspective for those that struggle with trillions.

Up
0

Cracking link here on the battle going on in Australia between the RBA and the Government.

Houses and holes suggests the RBA wants to gently deflate Australia's housing bubble, while the government wants to fire up new lending into housing. All very familiar.

http://housesandholes.blogspot.com/2010/12/internecine.html

HT Stephen

Here's the guts of it.

The Reserve Bank is using aggressive interest rates and moral suasion to shift Australians from their debt-addled addiction to house prices and over-consumption. As was made clear by Glenn Stevens last Friday

As of today, the government is using the Budget to boost mortgage credit and house prices to fire up the addiction.

The RBA is engaged in an historic undertaking. And one that is without prior success, to this blogger's knowledge. It is attempting to backfill an enormous bubble, to grow beyond it, instead of suffering the calamitous deleveraging that is afflicting the rest of the Western world.

 

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

 Paul Krugman says Iceland may be an example of “bankrupting yourself to recovery.”

 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-02/iceland-bankrupting-self-to-recovery-reveals-policy-ireland-dared-not-take.html

This evidence may well signal a political change in all the piigs.....no wonder the bond holders are having fits.

Up
0

Haaaaaaahaha Goldman Squid got peanuts in the handouts!

 "WASHINGTON - The US Federal Reserve has revealed details of trillions of dollars in emergency aid it provided to US and foreign banks during the financial crisis.

New documents show that the most loan and other aid for US institutions over time went to Citigroup (US$2.2 trillion), followed by Merrill Lynch ($2.1 trillion), Morgan Stanley ($2 trillion), Bear Stearns ($960 billion), Bank of America ($887 billion), Goldman Sachs ($615 billion), JPMorgan Chase ($178 billion) and Wells Fargo ($154 billion)." herald

Wonder if the peasants over there will enjoy reading about this over their xmas stuffed rodents.

Up
0

Someone has popped a decimal point in the wrong place ! Divide each of those figures by a factor of 10 . The total bail-out was $US 3.3 trillion , and 21 000 transactions  ( " troubled loans " ) were made  ...

...... Just had a troll around the Federal Reserve's website , Bloomberg ,  and Yahoo Finance ...... Yahoo screwed up the figures , bunch of yahoos !

....... And the NZ Herald has merely copied the wrong figures . Anyone with an ounce of commonsense could see that those totals are wrong  ........ If GBH can get it right , the journos at the Herald oughta be feeling pretty stupid !

Up
0

Hi, where are the spreadsheets, I've had a quick look and can't find them.  If you look here http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm this shows that the total balance sheet increased from 800bn to just over 2.2 trillion.  So you could argue that the net bailout is only 1.6trn instead of 3.3trn.  However if you look at the individual organisations eg here http://www.zerohedge.com/article/observations-progress-fed-data-dump-wh… you can see totals go up to 8trn for the ECB.  The transactions go in both directions so when you look at a limited time window the sum can be higher than the total balance sheet.

Up
0

 

STIGLITZ: We Have To Throw Bankers In Jail Or The Economy Won't Recover

http://www.businessinsider.com/nobel-economist-says-we-have-to-prosecut…

Up
0

Hi Wolly

 "WASHINGTON - The US Federal Reserve has revealed details of trillions of dollars in emergency aid it provided to US and foreign banks during the financial crisis.

Would you please post the link to the above 

Thanks

Up
0

The collapse of currencies is just a matter of time.  Euro and US$ in trouble - Gold up to US$ 1’600.- by middle of January 2011 and a very high NZ$/ AU$ ???

 

----

The Federal Reserve made $9 trillion in overnight loans to major banks and Wall Street firms during the financial crisis, according to newly revealed data released Wednesday.

The loans were made through a special loan program set up by the Fed in the wake of the Bear Stearns collapse in March 2008 to keep the nation's bond markets trading normally.

http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/news/economy/fed_reserve_data_release/index.hhpt=T1

Up
0

Bankruptcy by State, County, Country, certainly unloads the taxpayer/ratepayer from underwriting the scum who floated to the surface.

What it fails to do, is acknowledge the real value of natural resources. Clean slate=didn't happen.

Perhaps they should have a 5 year stand-down period.

Includes developers, of course.

Up
0