sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Why inequality leads to financial crises; How to profit from inflation; 6 mln Super Bowl chicken wings; Dilberts

Monday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Why inequality leads to financial crises; How to profit from inflation; 6 mln Super Bowl chicken wings; Dilberts

Here are my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 3 pm, brought to you in association with New Zealand Mint for your reading pleasure.

I welcome your additions and comments below, or please send suggestions for tomorrow's Top 10 at 10 via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop any surplus suggestions I get into the comment stream

1. NZ$47 billion hangover - Karyn Scherer at NZHerald has a useful piece on rural debt and farm valuations.Here's the best bit.

Former banker and registered valuer Bruce Wills wrote a paper in 2006 while taking part in the Kellogg Rural Leadership Programme at Massey University that suggested prices were over-valued...

Quelle surprise.

He was rubbished at the time.

By farmers.

And bankers.

Alike.

The paper, titled The NZ Rural Property Market: Where To From Here?, concluded that the market was experiencing "irrational exuberance", and that the prices being paid for rural land could not be justified by farm incomes. It predicted prices would fall by 20 to 30 per cent.

"I did a number of presentations of that around the country and in several of them the room was full of bankers, and basically I got bollocked from pillar to post," he recalls. "They just wiped their hands and told me I was completely out of touch."  

And this bit caught my interest...

Wills insists the South Canterbury Finance receivership was no surprise to rural bankers.

In his banking days, "if someone came to us with a really stretched proposal, we used to send them down to South Canterbury Finance. They were the lender of last resort for many years." 

2. Prices are tanking in Perth - ABC reports that sales volume for houses in Perth have dropped 30% over the last year. Here it comes over the Tasman. Nice to see too that Perth's real estate agents only see buying opportunities... HT Hugh P via email.

By the end of December, Perth had experienced its ninth consecutive month of low sales turnover. Currently about 15,600 properties are listed for sale in the metropolitan area, which is 47 per cent more than at the same time last year.

REIWA president Alan Bourke, says it's a buyer's market. "In a lot of ways we believe it's the 'if only' year, in other words if only I'd bought in 2011 when there was plenty of choice because when things tighten up there will be a lot of people scrambling to get back into the market place and that stock level will go down very fast," he said  

3.Mike Pero Real Estate? - Greg Ninness at the Sunday Star Times reports the real estate industry is abuzz with rumours (but not sales) about Mike Pero potentially launching a low cost real estate agency business.

Something is up, judging from these quotes from Mike Pero Mortgages' Shaun Riley.

''At this stage we have got nothing that I would put in print,'' he said.

''There's nothing that I can confirm. We will continue to look at it.'' He said talk of an announcement next week came from an off-hand remark.

''Somebody asked me and I said that to shut them up. I don't know what may happen next week at all.''

4. A Super Bowl of greed - The Super Bowl being played today will generate over US$10 billion of spending. Ads will cost over US$2.6 million per 30 second spot. Yet this orgy of consumption around a football game just highlights the divergent path of two Americas, Al Lewis comments at WSJ.com.

As much as TVs cost, Super Bowl tickets cost more. A ticket averaged nearly $5,000 on the resale market last week. Some were priced at more than $277,000. The average food-stamp recipient receives $133 a month.

Yet some of us can blow enough loot to buy a house, a car and a big-screen TV on just one ticket. Do you know what it costs to park? A mile from Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas, $55. Across the street, more than $1,000, according to Parkwhiz.com.

The website listed one spot at a nearby Taco Bell for $330. The stadium -- just across from a Wal-Mart -- cost $1.2 billion to build. Taxpayers put up $325 million of that war chest.

5. A Super Bowl of chicken wings - Bloomberg reports that Buffalo Wild Wings expects to sell 6 million chicken wings on Super Bowl Sunday.

6. How to profit from inflation -The WSJ has a hand 'how to' guide on how to profit from inflation. Interestingly, it leaves out real estate and gold as useful investments. It actually suggests short dated term deposits. Basically, it says short term cash is king.

7. The link between inequality and crises - Michael Kumhof and Romain Ranciere write here at VoxEu.org about the links between inequality and financial crises. They find some remarkable similarities between the 1929 crisis and the 2008 crisis.

We focus on two remarkable similarities between the two pre-crisis eras. Both were characterised by a sharp increase in income inequality, and by a similarly sharp increase in household debt leverage. We also propose a theoretical explanation for the linkage between income inequality, high and growing debt leverage, financial fragility, and ultimately financial crises. Borrowing and higher debt leverage appears to have helped the poor and the middle-class to cope with the erosion of their relative income position by borrowing to maintain higher living standards.

Meanwhile, the rich accumulated more and more assets and in particular invested in assets backed by loans to the poor and the middle class. The consequence of having a lower increase in consumption inequality compared to income inequality has therefore been a higher wealth inequality. The increase in debt leverage of the bottom group of the distribution has implications for both the size of the US financial industry and its vulnerability to financial crises. The increase in the reliance on debt for the bottom group and the increase in wealth of the top group generated a higher demand for financial intermediation.

Between 1981 and 2008, the US financial sector grew rapidly, with the ratio of private credit to GDP more than doubling from 90% to 210%. The share of the financial industry in GDP doubled as well, from 4% to 8%. As borrowers’ debt leverage increases, the economy becomes gradually more vulnerable to the risk of financial crises. When a crisis eventually materialised in the fall of 2008, it was accompanied by a generalised wave of defaults, with 10% of mortgage loans becoming delinquent, and a sharp output contraction.  

8. 'I don't want youse Kiwis' - Peter Crane, one of the family that once controlled Aussie building supplies company Crane, has launched an internet campaign to stop Fletcher Building buying Crane.

He vaguely suggests some issues around concentration of risk and the problems of merging big companies but signally fails to convince.

No wonder the Aussie funds are more than happy to dump this dog on Fletcher Building.

Here's the video.

9. The mad rush for family trusts - Rob Stock at the Sunday Star Times picks up on the licking of the lips from the family trust industry as they gear up for the end of the gift duty.

Lawyers say the abolition of gift duty, which Labour MP David Cunliffe dubbed a National Party policy for the "plutocrats of Remuera", will have the effect of undermining other legislation. Because it will be so easy to gift assets into trusts, lawyers say, the Family Court will increasingly find itself with no assets to share out between separating couples, undermining the Property Relationships Act.

"If gift duty goes, there will be no doubt about what will happen. Certainly in the family protection context, there is not going to be anything to make a claim on," Auckland lawyer Greg Kelly said. "The effect is the 50/50 provision of the Property Relationships Act are being undermined by the establishment of trusts." Trusts are increasingly rendering prenuptial agreements pointless, say lawyers, and once gift duty is gone, prenups will fall into greater disuse.

It is far easier to put assets into a trust than present a future partner with a prenuptial agreement, said Kelly. Another piece of legislation that will be weakened, critics say, is the Family Protection Act, which gives courts power to enforce claims on an estate of people who feel they have been unfairly left out of a will.  

10. Totally relevant video - Australian property spruiker Jamie McIntyre argues here to Australian rental property investors that Pheonix Arizona is the place to be... Watch it and weep...

He says he's pretty excited...There are 10 year rental guarantees and 10 year capital guarantees.... He says it's a once in a 100 year opportunity. Sound familiar? HT Mish. He was tipped off by a Kiwi reader.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

21 Comments

Bernard, I don't know about you, but I've got a funny feeling about Fletcher's buying Crane...could it possibly be the Australian version of their failed purchase of Formica in the States??? 

With Formica they bought at the absolute pinnacle of the property boom and then it all came crashing down, and with China having an unbalanced economy there's a good chance things could come unstuck in Australia.

It makes one recall how Sir Bob Jones made millions by doing the opposite of what AMP would do in commercial property, if they were selling he would be buy and vice versa... perhaps if you do the opposite to Fletchers you can make a killing...

Up
0

R; the WSJ article on inflation avoidance - yes, there is something to be said for cash in short dated term deposits (1-6 months). As inflation ratchets up so should the rates available of said deposits - plus you have the added advantage that if things turn very nasty you can pull your money out as they mature.

A combination of short duration terms deposits, cash, PMs and useful 'hard assets' (think things like solar power systems, essential machinery/tools, booze) and you wouldnt be too badly placed methinks.

Up
0

Surely you are much better to have a highly leveraged property with a long term fixed interest rate (BNZ does 7 years)

Up
0

So: You'd lock in a mortgage on your little inflation-proofed renter , today Jimbo, at 8.3% for 7 years, 2 % above the current floating ? That's what most people can't bring themselves to do. And by the time it's 'obvious' that rates are about to fly, it's gone to 10.3%.! Do you lock in then?

Up
0

If I knew some decent inflation was coming - then yes I would buy a renter and fix at 8.3% rather than putting cash in short term deposits.

Up
0

Isn't 'decent inflation' something of an oxymoron?

 

Up
0

That really rather depends on whether you think inflation is going to let you erode the debt. I rather doubt this is going to happen as I believe we will also see stagnant/falling wages and ever growing unemployment; bit hard to service the debt in such circumstances for most folk.

The inflationary burst we are seeing  is not just a consequence of more money being created - it is also a consequence of resource depletion (think oil first then a host of other things). Gaming the system by hoping inflation will erode your debt aint going to work this time around.

Up
0

AH - do you see cast and deposits as the same thing?

I reckon deposits are just ones and zero's in computers. Crash the system, they vanish. Prove that they can't be redeemed, and they won't be.

 

Up
0

I'm imagining you mean 'cash' and not 'cast'.

I guess it really rather depends on whether you believe the system is unstable enough yet to suddenly go boom overnight. I am not yet of that persuasion.

Up
0

Did indeed.

Well, it went mighty close, and it hasn't been fixed, see Staniford on Krugman;

http://earlywarn.blogspot.com/2011/02/why-oil-matters-more-than-rubber…

Up
0

Yes I read Stuart's missive @ the weekend - as always very impressive.

Up
0

Odd one from the UK....

Is there a lot of  'noise'  being created to distract us all? Works with me.

How forest privatisation could attract biofuel energy companies.

Up
0

Privatisation of the commons.

aka proof that there are indeed limits to growth (or they'd go elsewhere).

But the growth in question?  Long wait for a return on investment, and if they burn a mature forest, that's a carbon loss. If coppiced, I guess you can say it's carbon neutral, but it has to be a nutrient loss.

Not enough area or EROEI to take up the oil slack, though.

 

Up
0

Have you read about the use of charcoal as an advanced soil conditioner PDK?

Apparently it is what supported the Inca civilisation.

Yields apparently in the multiples of what fertiliser alone will achieve. 700% in one trial.

Being porous it provides a habitat for micro-organisms.

There is also an proposition that all civilisations eventually declined because they ran out of wood. It was the resource required for fuel, building and war machines.

Pretty hard to survive when the resources are depleted.

Up
0

#1 - it could have been different:

http://www.interest.co.nz/property/united-futures-dunne-attacks-home-affordability-says-families-should-be-able-capitalise-working-fami#comment-601247

Read the discussion between Colin Riden and I. Maybe Colin has a point about the influences of, "the powers that be."

If tomorrow the Ministry of Transport started taking the same view on road speed limits, as RBNZ did with limiting credit growth in the upswing, who would we blame for the increase in speed related road accidents?

Why ever did RBNZ not recognise earlier the problem they have lately tried to address?

http://www.interest.co.nz/news/rbnz-delays-introducing-tougher-capital-rules-rural-lending-until-end-2010

They weren't thinking the OCR alone would effectively restrain credit growth, were they?

Why weren't FF lobbying RBNZ to speed up (rather than slow down) more effective prudential lending regulations a few years ago? Surely they must have seen what was happening in their sector? 

Cheers, Les. 

www.mea.org.nz

 

Up
0

Hello Les, this is worth a read:

Cactus Kate: Repeat After Me - Farmers Are Not Special

http://asianinvasion2006.blogspot.com/2011/02/repeat-after-me-farmers-are-not-special.html#links

Thanks Les.

Your'e welcome, Les.

www.mea.org.nz

Up
0

This is the bit Les Les... "Farmers who fail are bad businesspeople. It is not the banks fault any more than it is when they lend to other businesspeople who fail. The banks are actually seizing an opportunity to reclaim some sanity in the market."......it's the reason why bankers who turn up in the paddock talking about "lazy balance sheets"...are likely to have some sanity bashed into their heads with a short lump of wood.

 

Up
0

Wolly & Wally - indeed, banks were just doing what banks are in business to do - make profit, plying their trade within the rules, regs, contraints in their environment and market.

However, I think my questions yesterday 8:34pm are valid. Any thoughts on them? Anyone?

Cheers, Less and Les.

 

Up
0

I wasn't so surprised by this though:

"I sent the New Zealand branch of Chaos & Mayhem Productions Limited to put in an OIA request in to the IRD to break down for us the amount of tax farmers actually pay. Of course Fongterra proudly state how important farmer revenue is to the New Zealand economy but conveniently forget to state how much (or little) tax they pay and whether this is proportionate once interest and expenses are morphed out. The answer we got back was that there was no answer. Despite farmers being able to claim assistance from provisional tax relief when there are "once in a lifetime" floods and droughts that seem to now happen every two years, the IRD and with it the Revenue Minister could not tell us how much tax farmers pay."

Maybe Bernard is onto something with this Norwegian, 'let it all hang out' malarkey.

Cheers, Les and Less.

Up
0

#7

I have posted before about the paralles between the 1930's and present crisis. Perhaps the outcome might be similar?

Up
0