sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Fed's Hoenig wants banks broken up; Should the RBNZ hike instead?; Call for 3 global currencies; Macquarie attacked; Stagflation

Thursday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: Fed's Hoenig wants banks broken up; Should the RBNZ hike instead?; Call for 3 global currencies; Macquarie attacked; Stagflation

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 past 8pm in association with NZ Mint.

Again, a shortened version tonight. No cartoons or videos.

I welcome your help below with links in the comments.

We're focused locally at the moment.

1. Hoenig's a hero - Fed Reserve Governor Thomas Hoenig has been the black sheep/lone wolf within the US Federal Reserve arguing against QE II.

Now he has said America needs to break up its Too Big To Fail banks, which he describes as a threat to "our capitalistic system."

This is extraordinary.

Someone at the centre of the system has called the US regulatory response to the GFC an emperor with no clothes. HT Andrew

Here's the full speech.

“I am convinced that the existence of too-big-to-fail financial institutions poses the greatest risk to the U.S. economy,” Hoenig said today in a speech in Washington. “They must be broken up. We must not allow organizations operating under the safety net to pursue high-risk activities and we cannot let large organizations put our financial system at risk.”

Hoenig, the lone dissenter from every Fed meeting in 2010, has argued that the most sweeping overhaul of U.S. financial regulation since the Great Depression won’t prevent the largest banks from taking excessive risks and increasing market share. Regulators, including the Fed, are implementing the law.

“In my view, it is even worse than before the crisis,” Hoenig said.

2. Should the RBNZ hike instead? - An academic paper has looked at whether the US Federal Reserve should have hiked or cut interest rates after Hurricane Katrina. It found the following:

A nominal interest rate increase following a disaster mitigates both temporary inflation effects and output distortions that are attributable to nominal rigidities.  

3. Geithner's Gamble - Simon Johnson, the co-author of 13 Bankers, has written about Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and how he is completely captured by the big banks and their plans for global domination.

In a recent interview, United States Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner laid out his view of the nature of world economic growth and the role of the US financial sector. It is a deeply disturbing vision, one that amounts to a huge, uninformed gamble with the future of the American economy – and that suggests that Geithner remains the senior public official worldwide who is most in thrall to the self-serving ideology of big banks.

Geithner argues that the world will now experience a major “financial deepening,” owing to growing demand in emerging markets for financial products and services. He is thinking, of course, of “middle-income” countries like India, China, and Brazil. And he is right to emphasize that all have made terrific progress and now offer great opportunities for the rising middle class, which wants to accumulate savings, borrow more easily (for productive investment, home purchases, education, etc), and, more generally, smooth out consumption.

But then Geithner takes a leap. He wants US banks to take the lead in these countries’ financial development.  

4. Three Global currencies - Fred Bergsten writes clearly about why the world needs three global currencies, rather than the one flawed one it has now. HT Andrew.

The share of foreign exchange reserves held in dollars has fallen in the past decade to about 60 percent. The share in euros has risen to more than 25 percent. The rise of China implies the renminbi will qualify for global currency status whenever it achieves full convertibility and sheds its protective capital controls. In short, the international monetary system is already becoming bipolar, and may soon be tripolar. The United States should accept this and even promote its acceleration.

The goal should be roughly to equate the international positions of the dollar and the euro in the next decade or so, and subsequently to bring the renminbi into the mix along with steady creation of special drawing rights (SDRs). It should encourage China and others to intervene in euros as well as in dollars.

It could intervene in euros itself if the dollar-euro rate became misaligned. It could also overtly discourage dollar build-ups by foreign monetary authorities through countervailing currency intervention and by taxing the income on their dollar holdings.

5. Ready for US$220/bbl oil? - Bloomberg reports Nomura reckons the price of oil could get to US$220/bbl if unrest halts exports from Libya and Algeria (and let's not mention Saudi Arabia).

“If Libya and Algeria were to halt oil production together, prices could peak above $220 a barrel and OPEC spare capacity will be reduced to 2.1 million barrels a day, similar to levels seen during the Gulf war and when prices hit $147 in 2008,” the Tokyo-based bank said in a note today.

Nomura said the $220 prediction may be an underestimate, as speculative investors trading crude oil who were not active in the early 1990s may amplify the price. A surge to $220 would trigger demand destruction and a correction lower, according to Stephen Schork, president of the Schork Group Inc. in Villanova, Pennsylvania.

“These are levels that effectively kill the global recovery,” Schork said in an interview. “You can never say never, but $220 is blatantly not sustainable.”

6. Rate hikes in Europe - The drums are beating for higher interest rates in Europe and Britain, Bloomberg reports.

The Bank of England's monetary policy committee is already split on the need for a hike.

The ECB is also expected to start hiking soon, Bloomberg reported.

7. Out of whack - Barry Ritholz points out the value of America's stock market has averaged 62% of US GDP since 1924, this chart below shows. It's currently at 120%.

8. Macquarie the world leader - NakedCapitalism's Yves Smith says sales of public assets almost always lead to a ripoff of the public. Here's her thinking, pointing in particular to the activities of Macquarie Bank in Australia.

Even if the owners manage to orchestrate the bidding well enough to assure that the entity fetches a decent price, the cost of doing the deal and the investors’ return requirements assure that charges to the public will rise faster than if the property was left in government hands (and this does not preclude the owner scrimping on maintenance and service levels).

Macquarie Bank has been the world leader in this business, and reader Crocodile Chuck gave some useful examples:

Ah, the Macquarie model! Clipping the ticket, at each step, and all the way through the route map from public good to ‘privatised entity’. The Sydney Airport (a Macquarie Airports asset), boasts the second highest parking rates on Earth (not inherited with the operation; they levied this themselves). About $100 for eight hours (I’ve never used it, since it was sold down the river) Highest: Budapest Ferihegy in Hungary.

Owner: Macquarie Airports. I happen to have flown out of Budapest last summer. The lavish fees most assuredly have not been reinvested in the physical plant; the airport looks dated and worn.

9. Stagflation - Mohamed El Irian from Pimco warns about stagflation in this piece published in the FT.com.

In the short run, regional developments will be stagflationary for the global economy due to three main factors: First, higher oil prices will increase production costs and act as a tax on consumers.

Second, greater precautionary stockpiling around the world will intensify pressures on commodities as a whole, aggravating the impact of demand-supply imbalances and large injections of liquidity.

Third, the region will be a smaller market for other countries’ exports. This economic reality is far from encouraging for western countries that have few options in reacting to what is an increasingly fluid situation.  

That's enough.

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

28 Comments

Oil production in Libya is shutting down as companies operating there begin to close facilities due to the ongoing violence.

Oil prices surged Wednesday, passing $100 a barrel, after a report in the Financial Times said half of Libya's production has been suspended. The report cited unnamed industry executives.

http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/23/news/international/libya_oil_production/index.htm

Up
0

So fill up your tanks and maybe buy a canister/container or two.....

regards

Up
0

I dont like posting verbatim posts made elsewhere but this one from Westexas (oil geologist Geoffrey Brown) from The Oildrum is worth reading in its entireity if you want to understand the dynamic of what is really going on in the oil markets (and Saudi Arabia in particular). Note the point he makes at the end of his comment about the Saudi Arabian share market and take a look at the graph he links to:

Regarding Saudi Arabia, it's really a story of two countries: (1) Saudi Arabia through 2005 and (2) the post-2005 Saudi Arabia. Let's look at 2002 to 2010 Saudi net oil exports versus US annual spot crude oil prices (EIA):

From 2002 to 2005, the Saudis responded to rising oil prices with sharp increases in net oil exports:

2002: 7.1 mbpd & $26
2003: 8.3 mbpd & $31
2004: 8.6 mbpd & $42
2005: 9.1 mbpd & $57

But then we have post-2005 Saudi Arabia, when the Saudis responded to generally rising oil prices with declining net oil exports:

2006: 8.4 mbpd & $66
2007: 8.0 mbpd & $72
2008: 8.4 mbpd & $100
2009: 7.3 mbpd & $62
2010: 7.4* mbpd & $79

*Estimated

Post-2005 Saudi Arabia has of course shown the same pattern as Texas after 1972, i.e., declining production, relative to a prior peak, in response to rising oil prices.

In my opinion, what passes for excess capacity worldwide, including Saudi Arabia, largely consists of what Matt Simmons called "Oil stained brine."

By increasing their output of "Oil stained brine" and by depleting inventories, I suspect that the Saudis could show some kind of short term boost in delivered oil, but I think that the time has passed when they could bring global prices down via a steady increase in net oil exports in excess of their 2005 annual rate. The Saudis to have some new production coming on line, but that was true of other post-peak regions too.

For example, Sam Foucher looked at new oil fields in the North Sea whose first full year of production was 1999 or later, and these new oil fields had a peak of about one mbpd in 2005 (versus the overall peak of six mbpd in 1999). These new fields, equivalent, at peak, to one-sixth of 1999 production only served to slow the overall decline to about 5%/year.

BTW, there were certainly have two stock markets in Saudi Arabia:  (1)  Through 2005 and (2)  Post-2005:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Economics/Stock-Market.aspx?symbol=SAR

Interesting coincidence.

 

 

Up
0

agreed, If Arabia hasn't peaked they would be opening the taps to get as much $$ as possible

Up
0

Thanks, I have been meaning to look up those numbers as when Saudi sai it was increasing its production to 8.x mbpd, I thought...."Im sure I read they were doing 9.x mbpd?" 

So they should have the plant capacity to handle 9.1....if not more...so it shouldnt be a handling/refinery  problem....if there were no problems they could open the taps from 7.x to 9 ish and kill off the price and the speculators, that has not happened....the Q is, why?

Saudi have already said that $80 to $90 is a "fair" price as they recognise that we can only buy the oil at an upper limit without collapsing, at which point we wont be buying....(Iran apparantly thinks it should be $100).....so if we assume they are as good as their word on that , they should be doing something.....they are not...

Add in that in the past other OPEC countries have pretty much pumped as much as they can get away with in order to maximise revenue....no matter what the price....so what we see is, based on previous behaviour is I think it....

So 95mbpd? cant see it....90? nope, 87, maybe....

Coincidences are always possible....I wouldnt bet on it myself....just like the invasion of Iraq was about democracy and weapons of mass destruction etc etc...yeah right.........

regards

 

 

Up
0

Dont forget the numbers quoted by Westexas are net export quantities - not actual production quantities (which would be higher). He has subtracted internal consumption (which is rapidly increasing) from total national production to arrive at those figures. However to the rest of the world it is the net export quantity which is paramount.

Up
0

This in WSJ on Qaddafi's Libya

"What he created was a system of chaos, committees on top of committees reporting to committees and overseen by thugs," said Hafed al-Ghwell, a Libyan opposition activist. "My biggest fear is that you have no real institutions on a national level that can impose order, and what we are looking at is the prospect of a collapsed state on the Mediterranean Sea—with oil, no central command or institutions able to stand up and help the transition into a civilian democratic rule."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703775704576161712936171594.html?mod=WSJEurope_hpp_LEFTTopStories

Up
0

I see a chinese plane requesting permission to land..has disapeared from radar...All Ports are closed but warships a docking anyway...and Oil workers have been robbed  by gangs in the oil pumping areas and have only a days food supplies left left.The Big mans army are hired mercenaries,so it looks like its a failed State scenario..If Algeria fires up the cluster F$%#@ will have arrived.

Up
0

Lowering the OCR will be worst. Shooting Oil prices will be amplified by a lower NZD making inflation a bad aftershock.  Leave the OCR right where it is and stop the media pressure on the RBNZ.

Up
0

Brent crude was already over US$100 per barrel before the uprisings in the Middle East. Now fear in the markets and speculation will increase that upward trend. The IEA has already warned that we are close to an oil price that takes the global economy and NZ's back into recession.

Despite warnings from a New Zealand Parliamentary report, Lloyd's Of London, the International Energy Agency, the US military and a host of other credible groups,our mainstream media has failed to report this looming crisis. Likewise our politicians avoid this issue like the plague, but they need to be held to account.

In an election year hard questions need to be asked as to why these clear and urgent warnings have been ignored and not shared with the public, and what policies the main parties have to urgently lower our oil dependency, and to plan for an imminent oil-induced recession.

Up
0

#3

zerohedge reported today, Geithner also said

"Not to worry about surging oil prices. Central Banks have a lot of experience in managing these".  

(how come, can they print oil?) 

"The economic recovery is in a much stronger position to handle rising oil prices".

"The core of the American financial system is in a much stronger position than it was before the crisis. WE ARE WAY AHEAD OF ANY OTHER MAJOR ECONOMY".

 No comment needed.

Up
0

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-…

Yep, that's the base-line.

and:

“Where ideas are concerned, America can be counted on to do one of two things: take a good idea and run it completely into the ground, or take a bad idea and run it completely into the ground.” —George Carlin

 

Up
0

The bloke is a bloody lying shite GT...just ignore his BS.

Up
0

Hey Bernard,

Don't discount what you do! In the past day or so I've moved our whole family out to the folks' place, navigated the 4WD tracks that used to be called 'streets' back to what was our home so that we could retrieve more of what remains and look for the cats who may never return, tried to help clients put their businesses back together, and like everybody, mourned for the people that have lost so much more.

But it's nice that the rest of the world is still there just as it always was, and while reading about it we can forget about things here for a few minutes, like it was any other day. What you do is appreciated - keep it up :)

Cheers,

- Andrew

Up
0

Andrew S

Many thanks. We all feel for everyone struggling with the basics of daily life in Canterbury.

Many of us outside of Canterbury feel a bit useless that we can't help as much as we'd like.

Our regular routines and output all seem a bit pointless given the real struggles of people in Christchurch.

But you're right.

From today on I'll make sure the Top 10 is a good read.

With plenty of cartoons and videos for some light relief.

cheers

Bernard

 

Up
0

I am convinced Bollard must raise the rate asap.

I am also, angry that the govt and the RBNZ continue to manipulate interest rates where they can to hold savers accountable for the gambling mistakes made by the property and farm speculators. On top of that, both are hand in glove debasing the currency for the same reason.

This is outright thieving from those who have saved. It is blatant manipulation of the economy for the benefit of a few. Those few are the banks.

How long must this farce continue where banks are encouraged to lend cheap short term money to pork this debt based activity. We get spin from Key and English about the need to save. Then we see them working with the RBNZ to play games with cheap credit.

Let there be no mistake here, the govt and the RBNZ are doing all they can to hang on to the mistakes and madness in the bubble years under Clark, while spinning BS about a tradeables sector saving the indebted economy and borrowing 50 billion a day to buy off the million Kiwi on a benefit. That is their recipe..."extend and pretend"....prevent the market from correcting the madness...cement the banks in place as farmers of the whole economy.

The outcome is seriously unaffordable housing...poor savings....a flight of capital out of NZ...higher cost of living...entrenched state lying about unemployment and inflation rates...an exodus of the skilled and positive Kiwi youth leaving behind the others !.....the old the very young and a huge group of poorly skilled with a minimum education but a working knowledge of how the WINZ system operates.

Up
0

You'd think I'd know the answer by now... Why does the OCR still dictate what the banks charge? Used to be so, but if activity and lending is what the banks want, let them drop their loan rates /  increase the savings rate independently. Fight for the business. Use Kiwibank if necessary?

Keep it simple please.

 

Up
0

It has little impact KWJ....the bank rates are determined more by the cost of the loot they borrow and most of that is offshore...so if bollard elbows down the value of the Kiwi$ on an ocr cut..the impact is a rise in the cost of the loot borrowed by the banks overseas! and a rise in the cost of all imports....leading to inflation caused by being too cheap for too long.

Consider the pleasant position of having a higher cost of money...there would be more saving and less borrowing...less fake growth...lower profits for banks....savers would build the capital base needed by industry...ie Contact wanting to fund a new geothermal plant...the loot would be local loot...the returns would stay in NZ.

Hell, people would have secure employment not dependent on a steady flow of debt financing. They would find housing was affordable. They would not need massive bloated mortgages...that would mean they would have more to save or spend.

 

 

Up
0

Our money is in our houses, yes. What we have to do is get it out; not 'borrow' more from overseas to fund the re-build. Bring in a S/D and LT and compensate householders fall in house prices with lower mortgage rates, but stop them going hollus bollus back into RE by 'levying' them. We need the money from somewhere. Let's make it our levied money, not more offshore hot money. I also note, the Japanese have .25% paid on their savings, but the yen has never been so strong. Maybe it's because they have been using their own savings to run the economy, than borrowing more at inflated rates? So a lower OCR does not have to lead to a lower NZ$.

Up
0

Ta Wally,

So if the OCR goes up - the banks DO NOT have to increase rates - they can leave everything as is?

Up
0

Some could KWJ but they would all take advantage of the signal to take more. That signal would spell an end to the property bubble madness. It would lead to more saving. It would lower import costs.

Either you want the indebted to be protected by the majority who have to deal with a higher cost of living....or you believe the opposite!

To see the future, just ask yourself what is best for the banks and you will know what govt and RBNZ policy will be.

Up
0

My debt, my problem, and increasingly a measure of my own stupidity.

People will notice the petrol price over everything else. I think you may be right - raise the OCR - blame the retail bank if it takes more.

Too late to vote this way on the website - no option.

Thanks again.

Up
0

It's hard to disagree without setting oneself up for character assassination by those who would claim one is "insensitive" and "unsympathetic" to the plight of earthquake victims, but...I disagree.

Too many over-extended Christchurch PIs see this disaster as some kind of heaven-sent opportunity for a Get Out of Jail Free card and taxpayer bailout.

Up
0

you must know the same PIs I do...I would use the same words :-)

Up
0

"A surge to $220 would trigger demand destruction and a correction lower, according to Stephen Schork, president of the Schork Group Inc. in Villanova, Pennsylvania."

Indeed.....

“These are levels that effectively kill the global recovery,” Schork said in an interview. “You can never say never, but $220 is blatantly not sustainable.”

Correct I think, problem is $147 did it last time while the underlying economy was not on life support.....this time it is...so I dont think it will get to $220....it might want to and set such a trajectory...

So $220 would like $147 be a short term spike, and we then collapse to $50? as the developed world implodes followed by the global economy and of course NZ's.

but I suspect that "peak" price could be $120USD a barrel maybe even lower......

Apart from taht I'd lay a bet Libya goes off line....

Welcome to the test tube.....how does it feel to be yeast?

regards

Up
0

Hoenig just became my hero....

regards

Up
0

" higher oil prices will increase production costs and act as a tax on consumers."

Or OCR fluctuations...

Someone who gets it.......

regards

 

Up
0

Oil is $97 for wti and $111 for brent.....

http://oil-price.net/

regards

Up
0