sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: He's Rich Ricci; Oil traders bet on Saudi 'Day of Rage'; Bond market rout 'just like in '94'; The Beijing consensus; Dilbert

Tuesday's Top 10 with NZ Mint: He's Rich Ricci; Oil traders bet on Saudi 'Day of Rage'; Bond market rout 'just like in '94'; The Beijing consensus; Dilbert

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 past 3 pm in association with NZ Mint.

I welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

1. Thanks Gail - The Australian reports Westpac CEO Gail Kelly reckons funding costs will fall next year and in 2013, which means the banks could pass on rate cuts independently of the Reserve Bank of Australia.

Hmmm.

Maybe Gail has a more positive view of the world than many.

If we get through the next two years without some sort of financial market meltdown caused by one of the following -- Greek debt crisis, Irish debt crisis, Mideast revolution crisis, North Korean crisis, US sovereign debt crisis, Chinese banking crisis -- then we will have done very well.

Here's hoping.

Here's Gail in cheery chops mode:

"I feel we've stared into all of the headwinds of what's been a very difficult environment, through the global financial crisis of much enhanced difficulty of funding costs, and all of the stresses and strains we've just spoken about," she said.

"There's no question towards the end of 2012 that situation will plateau and our average funding costs will start to plateau because marginal funding costs will be coming down, and into 2013 and '14, we can see it today the amounts of money we raised at the height of the crisis in 2009 and '10 starts to mature and hopefully we'll be able to replace that at a much cheaper level."

She says the bank intends to pass that fall in costs onto customers as soon as it can in the form of interest rate cuts. "There's no question we'll be passing that benefit onto customers when that happens," she said.  

2. I am like my name - Rich Ricci. You couldn't dream up a better name for an investment banker than Rich Ricci. Barclays has just paid out 110 million quid to its top 5 managers, including 40 million quid for Rich Ricci, pictured below in full Gekko mode.

Girls, do you think he's worth it?

He seems to think he is by the look of this picture.

Jill Treanor at the Guardian has the story.

The two top earners received more than the Barclays chief executive, Bob Diamond, who took the helm in January after more than a decade building the investment banking arm, Barclays Capital.

The American-born banker, who has called for the period of remorse for banks to end, received a potential £27m, including a £6.5m bonus for 2010, as well as a £2.25m award of shares which could pay out in the future, and share deals from the past five years that paid out £14m and one from 2007 that paid out £5m.

Lord Oakeshott, the Liberal Democrat peer who resigned as the party's Treasury spokesman in the Lords over Project Merlin, said: "The capitalist model has clearly broken down when shareholders get so little and the managers grab so much."

By the end of last year, £100 invested in Barclays shares four years earlier would have generated a loss of £47, while the FTSE 100 index of major shares gained £26 during the same period.  

4. The Austerity debate - John van Reenen writes here at VoxEu about Britain's harsh austerity plan and concludes it's the wrong way to go.

In my opinion, the accelerated austerity programme is fundamentally a mistake because it is grounded in an overly pessimistic view of the UK’s potential output. Just as there was exaggerated optimism over the improvements of the supply-side engendered by financial markets in the pre-crisis period, now there is excessive pessimism with some prophets of doom suggesting the UK has permanently lost 7%-10% of its capacity.

This ignores real improvements in relative UK performance over the past decade and a half. Unfortunately, this irrational anti-exuberance risks becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Extreme austerity leads to premature capital scrapping which in turn fulfils the expectation of lower growth. But don’t we need this extreme austerity to reassure bond markets?

We are in the realms of psychology, but I believe that the March 2010 budget contained a credible deficit reduction programme. Britain’s debt is not enormous by historical standards (79% vs. a three century average of 118%), it has a long maturity and we have never had a formal default. The UK is not Greece. The advantage of frontloading the pain is more political than economic – voters’ memories are short, so in 4 years’ time the pain will hopefully be forgotten.  

5. Watch out for Portugal - Marc Chandler at CreditWritedowns looks at how soon before Portugal will ask for a bailout. About two weeks seems to be the consensus.

The next big auction of Portugese government debt is Wednesday night.

More here.

Meanwhile, Portuguese banks continue to borrow around 25% of GDP from the ECB.

In fact, February was the third consecutive month that Portuguese bank borrowing from the ECB increased. February borrowings were 41.1 bln euros, up slightly from January. The peak was last August just above 49 bln euros. Ironically, nearly all of Portugal’s large banks have reportedly claimed to have been reducing their reliance on the ECB.

Portugal, like Ireland and Greece, will deny intentions to ask for assistance until the moment they do ask. One key difference for Portugal is that it has seen the failure of the aid programs to really address the crisis and bring down interest rates, or even stabilize them. Our best guess is that Portugal will receive an aid package as part of the "comprehensive plan" to be finalized at the March 24-25 European Summit.  

6. Day of rage - Apparently protestors in Saudi Arabia are calling for a 'Day of Rage' on March 11 and another one on March 20. Oil traders are beginning to worry about US$200/bbl oil, Bloomberg points out in this chart of the day.

The CHART OF THE DAY shows open interest, or the number of outstanding contracts, for “call” options to buy New York crude for June delivery at $200 a barrel. The number has escalated, along with crude futures, to the highest since the options started trading in July 2009 amid worsening civil unrest in Libya and rare demonstrations in Saudi Arabia.

“The price of oil is going to go up, whether you like it to or don’t,” said Juerg Kiener, chief investment officer at Swiss Asia Capital Ltd. in Singapore.

“If Saudi Arabia fails, then I say you have a fire in the house. They gave out $30 billion of money so maybe they’ll buy time. But I don’t see the problems disappearing.”

7. 'Bonds get killed' - JP Morgan Chase Chief Economist Bruce Kasman is worried that emerging market central banks have kept their interest rates too low for too long.

Bloomberg reports he reckons they will have to hike at the same time as the Federal Reserve, creating a synchronised perfect storm of rising interest rates in bond markets reminiscent of the bond market rout of 1994.

This piece is well worth a read if you think about the world's biggest market -- US Treasuries.

His fear is that simultaneous shifts will lead financial markets to echo 1994, when investors first doubted the Fed’s inflation-fighting mettle, only for Treasuries to slide more than 3 percent as policy makers almost doubled the federal funds rate.

“There is a recipe for disruptive dynamics in markets if policy adjustments have to gather steam in a synchronized way,” said New York-based Kasman, a former official at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York who now oversees economic research at the second-largest U.S. bank by assets.

Such a scenario could develop in 12 to 36 months and would “take a toll on risk assets. Bonds get killed,” he said.  

8. The end of the Washington Consensus - Kevin Gallagher at The Guardian writes that the Washington Consensus may be over and is being replaced by the Beijing consensus.

A fascinating insight about global trade and economic politics.

Columbia's decision to team up with China to create a 'dry' new version of the Panama canal across central America has shocked America, which was trying to do a free trade deal with Columbia.

Before China "gets" Colombia, there is now a rallying cry that says the US must pass the US-Colombia Free Trade deal – which would make Colombia deregulate its financial services industry, scrap its ability to design innovative policies for development, and open its borders to subsidised farm products from the United States. According to a study by the UN, the agreement will actually make Colombia worse-off by up to $75m, or 0.1% of its GDP.

Ironically, the US's renegade Congress failed to renew trade preferences last week, under which the majority of Colombia's exports enter tariff-free without the conditional terms of US trade deals.

Meanwhile, the Financial Times reports that China has lent over $110bn to developing countries over the past two years, more than the World Bank has made in three years. Relative to the World Bank, these loans come with far fewer "conditionalities" and are going to massive infrastructure projects across Africa and in places like Argentina, Venezuela and, perhaps now, even Colombia.  

9. Something for us to copy? - The Australian government has signalled a fresh crackdown on the banking industry there, including plans to scrap some fees on credit cards and banning banks from offering credit limit upgrades, The Australian reports.

The proposals, which will cost the industry millions of dollars in fee income each year, will also force banks to allocate card repayments to high-interest debts first and make it mandatory for credit card applications to outline a summary of account features.

The banks will also have to provide mortgage customers a key fact sheet that can be used to compare home loans with rival banks' products.  

10. Totally relevant video on cheap flights - I'm still grumpy about AirNZ automatically adding on insurance unless you untick it on domestic flights.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

37 Comments

Grasshopper Farms, part of the Grasshopper Properties empire, has been put in the hands of receivers. It owes the Bank of Scotland an estimated $100 million.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/4744095/Big-Hamilton-developer-goes-under

Bernard

Up
0

Here's TrimTabs' Charles Biderman on how the Fed is trying to boost the US economy.

"They probably will end for a while, we think there is going to be a QE3 and 4, or until the market says: "No Mas we are not going to believe this game the Fed is playing... The Fed is printing over $100 billion a month to buy other assets and pay bills, and economic growth is picking up at a $200 billion annual rate. This is very inefficient method of boosting the economy, and then how do we repay these trillions that have been created out of thing air in the future."

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/charles-biderman-how-fed-continues-rig-market-and-why-there-will-be-qe-3and-4

 

Up
0

This is curious from a Bloomberg story on how Chinese spending on internal police is  now more than national defence.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-03-06/china-s-spending-on-internal-policing-outstrips-defense-budget.html

U.S. spending on the justice system in 2005 was 1.7 percent of that year’s gross domestic product. China’s announced 2010 spending on public security was 1.4 percent of 2010 GDP.

Up
0

"The IMF is worried about the emerging markets overheating...."

Is the IMF also worried about New Zealand? Why is there a delegation of the IMF expected to visit us this week? Or is this routine? Does anybody know?

Up
0

Rich(ard) is worth 40million squid? Do the girls think so? Of course the girls think he is worth it. Just ask the Heather Mills and Anna Nicole Smith's of the world...

Up
0

Former Obama supporter Matt Damon is no longer an Obama supporter

"I think he's rolled over to Wall Street completely. The economy has huge problems. We still have all these banks that are too big to fail. They're bigger and making more money than ever. Unemployment at 10 per cent? It's terrible."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/from-no-1-fan-to-criticinchief-damon-takes-aim-at-obama-2233622.htmlhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/from-no-1-fan-to-criticinchief-damon-takes-aim-at-obama-2233622.html

Up
0
Britain risks suffering another financial crisis without reform of the country’s banks, the Governor of the Bank of England warns today.

 “We allowed a [banking] system to build up which contained the seeds of its own destruction.

“We’ve not yet solved the 'too big to fail’ or, as I prefer to call it, the 'too important to fail’ problem.

“The concept of being too important to fail should have no place in a market economy.”

When asked whether there could be a repeat of the financial crisis, Mr King says: “Yes. The problem is still there. The search for yield goes on. Imbalances are beginning to grow again.”

Mr King, who rarely gives interviews, suggests that the culture of short-term profits and bonuses within the banks may ultimately be responsible for the problems.

He says that traditional manufacturing industries have a more “moral” way of operating.

“They care deeply about their workforce, about their customers and, above all, are proud of their products,” he says. “[With the banks] there isn’t that sense of longer term relationships.

“There’s a different attitude towards customers. Small and medium firms really notice this: they miss the people they know.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8362951/Britain-at-risk-of-another-financial-crisis-Bank-of-England-chief-warns.html

Up
0

Interview in the German Magazine "Der Spiegel"

Europe's Banks are in far greater danger than people realize

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,748239,00.html

Up
0

About 40 years ago I did read a book about Nicola Tesla, born in Serbia, in the then Austro-Hungarian Empire. He invented all sort of things, was later ostracized  and died very poor in New York, some reports said he died in a psychiatric institution. I was wondering back then, why some of his inventions were not followed up, some theories imply the inventions were actually suppressed. Now I found this video, 1 hour 49 minutes, yes long, worth viewing, can be forwarded more towards the end, don't miss this. May be Tesla's time has come now.

One has to consider also the unintended consequences, with free energy mankind would multiply even more and the planet would die because there would be just standing space per person.....every coin has an opposite side too.

Does anybody know more about it?

Nicola Tesla - unlimited energy forever

They don't want you to know about

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMhACdqHOCs&feature=player_embedded

Up
0

I think it's called a fridge.

It's no conspiracy theory, it's just not a 'goer'.

It's energy-needed' outweighs it's 'energy produced'.

Heat-pumps pick up all the efficiencies of heat-from-the-atmosphere via compression, that there is to be had.

Sorry.                       :)

Up
0

Apologies, correction to above link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMhAldqH0Cs

Up
0

Gertraud - just thinking - All energy, including any heat in the atmosphere, is solar-derived. Even wind and hydro are solar in origin (it evaporates the moisture which rain-fills the lakes, it creates the temperature imbalances which cause weather systems).

As all transmission incurs losses (usually as heat, it's the most common end-result) it makes sense to get it as early and on-site as possible.

There's a kilowatt per square metre in good sunlight - pick up that at 20% or so, and there you are.

The problem is that the ways we do that, thus far, take oil energy to build, in some cases more than they will return. That's still legitimate from my point of view - buying solar PV panels is like storing up fuel in a drum - but much less likely to leak or go off. That 'oil' will still be returning you energy in 20 years - well after the real is just a memory.

Solar water heating is a win-win - build energy is always outdone by returns.

cheers

Up
0

Royal Bank of Scotland in the news again. Royal Bank of Scotched loans more like it.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/4744095/Big-Hamilton-developer-goes-under

Up
0

FYI via Bloomberg

China faces a 60 percent risk of a banking crisis by mid-2013 in the aftermath of record lending and surging property prices, according to a Fitch Ratings gauge.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-08/china-faces-60-risk-of-bank-crisis-by-2013-fitch-gauge-shows.html

Up
0

Bernard

You'd have to put all these threats together - Chinese crash, Euro crash, Middle east crisis etc - and say surely the chances of one of these events going mental in the next 2 years is higher than 80%????

Up
0

Also throw in,

Double dip Recession due to oil price....this now looks certain IMHO....$115USD+ is suicide....then one of the afore mentioned happens, or one of these,

One or more US states crash/default (one of a handful?)

Japanese crash/default (compared with all these that has to be the lest one, but that might be famous last words).......

US banking crisis (lets see one of 4 or 5 banks topples?)

The problem is anyone of these is a huge risk and a huge impact, but not one of these going in isolation is likely IMHO....I think if or when one goes several will......So an european PIIG default (Greece's interest rate is 12% !!!!!) means the EU goes belly up....the US banks are exposed so their chances of surviivng are I think zero....then the US states go as well....china then implodes.....

80%? that low?  ikky odds in it not happening IMHO....if things were at risk but getting better then OK, but its getting worse.....

regards

 

 

Up
0

jeez, depressing!

but probably realistic

so the great depression was averted, but still coming?

Up
0

Depressing....LOL, hows this for my expectations.....way darker....pls dont top yourself.....

Personally, I think so we are looking at the second long depression and not the second great depression. We wont come out because we wont have oil to do so. So 20 to 30 years of a downward grind while we adjust to local only...ie NZ grown and thats it....live something like Cuba or the Amish do today, few gadgets but I dont think we wil be unhappy.

There are / were some interesting articles/talks on when energy costs got to 6% of US GDP a recession resulted....$115USD is that territory so I see it as hard to avoid so yes a double dip and I think a bigger one this year is certainly very probable IMHO. Anyway its going to be this decade, Olly and his mates etc I think will be wiped out....might not happen for 2 years but very probably before 2015.....almost certian before 2018 which is the latest realistic time for dropping off our peak oil plataeu...the unknown is demand and early drop in production due to rioting....

Throw in it also depends on your defination of recession/depression, if huge jobless numbers are the main one then arguably the US never recovered from 2008.  This seems typical, these last few decades the recoveries have been jobless recoveries so bigger/improving GDP is from corporations and finance and not real jobs. So many ppl dont benefit, that for me isnt a recovery. 

Also there are some comments that it seems tha the only way to drop unemployment was to take on the same % of debt (or even double that to get it down)....ie 2% more debt per annum dropped un-employment 1%, but if debt declined so did emplyment....not good.........hence why I think Labour did nothing about our private housing ponzi scheme debt, I think they had that figured and since the Govn didnt have to do the debt were quite happy........kind of glad they got kicked out last time....and I dont want Goofy gormless Goff this time, he has no clue........but Im uneasy that JK is that much better....his blinkers are just blue....but just as big.

regards

 

Up
0

The invisible food crisis,

http://www.slate.com/id/2285530/

 

regards

Up
0

Bernard - if you want access to up to date data on the various crudes it is here:

http://www.upstreamonline.com/marketdata/markets_crude.htm;jsessionid=D…

As someone else mentioned you may as well drop WTI-  it is largely irrelevant (except to futures traders) and does not reflect what is really happening.

 

National Radio now quotes Brent in its business summaries, so progress there.

Up
0

AH    - West Texas Intermediate - is that Hugh P's old school?

Up
0

with this petrol madness one really has to ask the question - why hasn't much greater attention been given to renewable energy, hybrids, electric cars etc years ago ????? the hippies were right 

when Obama bailed the car industry out, why didn't he do it subject to the American car industry transforming to a green industry? 

everyone knew the risks years ago........

 

Up
0

who you callin' a hippie?

'Tis true, though. I've never lost sight of it, in 35 years.

Too obvious.

Which begs the question - why the continued media obfuscation?

As for addressing it, I'm there.

But oh, of course, the last one was a careless trader/ mistaken key-stroke, and this is just Libya. There's plenty more oil.........

tui ad.

Up
0

Who Killed the Electric Car

Fun documentary - left me thinking it was about loss of infrastructure/jobs rather than oil.  An economy devoted to the internal combustion engine and petrol stations (watched yonks ago so can't remember it that well)

Others said it was just too expensive to build.

Up
0

I'm not sure that cars are our problem.

Sure, there are sprawling suburbs designed round it, but the bigger problem is the rest of our infrastructure.

Don't worry about jobs - if oil gets unobtainable/expensive, there'll be a lot more manual labouring going on.

It's the one growth industry I'd bet on.           :)

Up
0

Yes the intelligence distribution in the popualtion would seem to be out of balance when you have cheap energy, when you dont....then that bulk of semi-skilled labour becomes useful....if p*ssed.

and there are going to be a lot of p*ssed ppl, well past 6billion of them/us, the ones who have seen easy street but will never atain it....

regards.

 

Up
0

Steven - I've just been reading about Edison and the Electric Chair. Seems pain was pretty much tolerated in medieval times, but as we drew out of subsistence via easily-tapped energy, that tolerance reduced. The death penalty was still advocated, but painlessly, please. I wonder if we will go back down the same ladder?

It may be happening already - I know a few people who are a pain.....

Up
0

"Back down the ladder"  regress, yes, my worst worry is that once we start to regress we no longer have the technology and energy to extract scarce and low concentrations of raw materials and energy  to maintain what we have...a nasty tail spin. What we do have is our discoveries, science and math however the likes of GOP etc seem determined to send us back into the dark ages....I mean making a miscarriage illegal for women? a one in 5 or 6 natural event? punishable by stoning to death maybe?  this I would have said was a policy from some loony fundie to the far extreme of Destiny church....but no, a senator in one of the two main political parties it seems!

"who are a pain" ppl around me think Im a in foil hat I think, they laugh....I dont bother talking about such stuff anymore....I prepare....I let ppl take on more debt, I dont suggest that might be a mistake....after all I cant prove can I.......and if Im wrong I get the blame for their loss...best to keep out of it me thinks.....

regards

 

 

Up
0

i agree pdk

 

i lived in seoul 8 years ago and they had 30 mil in an area the size of akl at the time.  they'd build apartment towns with say 10 towers between10 and 20 stories with parks and trees and playgrounds all in there in one big single project. less then half of people had cars. everything was quite central to a tube station, and the tube was cheap and punctual. Gas was about $3/litre i think.

 

more people walked and biked, which is quite an achievement considering how shite their climate is

Up
0

Look up Robert Hirsch and his report in 2005, well here it is, 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7cd_NMe9AQ 

Its known and was known by the US govn....even M. Hubbard said 2000 give or take a few years decades ago.....Robert's report is damning, we neede 10 to 20 years to move, but we didnt because of the power of big oil (and thats just one vested interest)....Another good piece on youtube I think its who killed the electric car.  Here you go,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KNX6kKQ3R

Green's right? yes mostly, or at least they are the closest we have....hence why Ive voted Green in the last 3 elections....

regards

 

Up
0

Hi Gertraud

The Youtaube link that you provided does not work, there is message on you tube that this video is not available. 

Up
0

Bernard - a good one to start the day. As I wrote a few months ago, 2011 is telling us more about the future of humanity - then any other year in history.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcZAQy-GoEY

http://www.businessinsider.com/saudi-arabia-protests-2011-3

Up
0

The commodity story started when Bernanke droped the OCR for the first time and the Dow was at it's record high shortly after he took over the FED. That is what drove OIL to 150 USD, what will drive OIL to 200 USD is the series of QE that we have and will be getting from now on... Turmoil in the Midle East is not the reason but the consecuence of the US's monetary policy.

Up
0

I wouldnt say so by a long way......Greenspan had pretty much already dropped the OCR to close to zero long before Bernanke's day. What drove oil to $147USD was lack of supply to meet demand....throw in the odd speculator keen to make some $ off a scarcity and off we go.  Oil to $200 equiv in the US, yes....if the US devalues that badly, quite possible in theory......the more expected outcome is that at where it is now we do a double dip and the recovery such that it is turns into a depression, led by the US....oil demand then drops and so will the price....

Is US MP to blame, yes without a doubt for some of it....the only reason, no, I dont believe so.

regards

Up
0

michael - ask Cantabrians which overrides the other - physics or money.

Here's the graph:

http://planetforlife.com/oilcrisis/oilsituation.html

That is not in dispute, from anyone, anywhere. It's the area in the bars, vs the area under the line. The kind of math I was doing at Intermediate School, circa '67.

Yes, quoting it in a QE'ing currency slopes the numbers, but not by double.

The limit to price will be economic implosion / demand destruction, cycling downward.

I don't think they teach ultimate scarcity in Econ 101, nor do they touch on the Laws of Thermodynamics.

Mores the pity.

Up
0