sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Monday's Top 10 at 10: Don't take rising dairy payouts for granted; Irish may default on bank debt; John Key's Youtube skit; London's Burning; Anarchy in the UK; Dilberts

Monday's Top 10 at 10: Don't take rising dairy payouts for granted; Irish may default on bank debt; John Key's Youtube skit; London's Burning; Anarchy in the UK; Dilberts

Here's my Top 10 links from around the Internet at 10 to 12 pm in association with NZ Mint.

I welcome your additions in the comments below or via email to bernard.hickey@interest.co.nz.

I'll pop the extras into the comment stream. See all previous Top 10s here.

1. Food prices are actually falling - Here's a fascinating chart  below showing US food prices over the very long term and how they have largely fallen in real terms, with the odd hiccup, including one at the moment.

Stuart Staniland writes at Peak Oil about why rising prices in the short term will generate extra production that drives prices down.

Are dairy farmers and their bankers in New Zealand ready for this?

Fonterra CEO Andrew Ferrier rightly pointed out last week that American dairy producers can pretty quickly ramp production up on their feed lots (and with some applied use of needles tho he didn't say that) to increase milk output.

Anyone assuming an NZ$8/kg payout out into infinity should be very careful before borrowing money (or lending it) on that assumption. HT Steven in Friday's Top 10.

Here's Staniland:

  1. Food crops have been getting gradually cheaper for many years.  With a couple of major excursions due to world events (price drops in the depression, and rises in the second world war and 1970s commodity price shocks), the basic trend has been for food to get cheaper and cheaper. This indicates that despite the growth in world population, improvements in agricultural productivity have tended to outpace increases in demand.
  2. In particular, any possible effect of climate change on agriculture in the future needs to be evaluated in this context: is it likely to be large enough to overcome the historical primacy of technological innovation as the control on prices?
  3. Note that the fact that prices have been low and dropping for decades means that there will be many possible investments to raise production that will not have been made, because prices were too low to justify them (for example, in the northeastern US, large amounts of perfectly usable cropland have actually fallen out of use because it was not economically competitive with better cropland elsewhere).  Therefore, there is likely to be significant scope to increase production in response to any factor that causes a sustained rise in prices.


2. Cutting funding costs - Bloomberg reports the move by the banks to start selling covered bonds from Australia could cut their funding costs by as much as 30%.

The Australian government recently relented to a bank campaign to allow them, effectively over-ruling its own regulator, APRA, which had previously banned them because they shunt depositers down the priority queue in the event of any disaster.  The government is allowing up to 8% of net assets to be issued as covered bonds.

Westpac, Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)National Australia Bank Ltd. (NAB) andAustralia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. (ANZ) had combined domestic assets of A$1.81 trillion as of January, according to data from the banking regulator. An 8 percent threshold means about A$145 billion of assets could be used to back covered securities.

The extra yield European investors demand to hold the bonds instead of similar-maturity government debt has fallen 28 basis points to 155 basis points, or 1.55 percentage points, this year, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s EMU Covered Bonds index. That’s 46 basis points less than the spread on financial debt sold in the region without collateral, another index shows.

Australian lenders have been barred from selling the securities, which are backed by assets that stay on their balance sheet and can be sold in a default, because they conflict with local laws favoring depositors over creditors.

3. Shaunie meets Johnno - Here's John Key doing his bit to promote Napier as the Art Deco capital of the world with 'Shaun Wayne.' You've got to admire the Prime Minister's ad-libbing skills... 

He's a true pro. Another reason why it will be so hard for whoever is leading Labour to dislodge him on November 26.

Key even makes fun of his decision to buy the BMWs. The chutzpah of the guy is something else. More here at Stuff. HT Alex.
 

4. 'Raise rates AND print more' - US Federal Reserve dove and former FOMC member James Bullard spoke over the weekend about how the Fed should begin raising interest rates, but should also print more (quantitatively ease). Here's the Reuters report on what Bullard said. Here's the presentation he gave on reducing Deflationary Risk in the United States.

God help us all.

The Americans are determined to print their way out from under their debt mountain by inflating it away.

How long before the bond holders revolt? PIMCO has already abandoned US Treasuries. The Chinese are grumpy but can't find anywhere else to dump all their excess US dollars.

How long before the US bond market blows up? And what will be the trigger?

Maybe the first hike the Fed funds rate? Perhaps that is what Bullard is anticipating. To avoid a blowup the Fed will simply buy everything being issued by the government.

Here's what Bullard said.

"The conventional wisdom policy response to a negative shock is to promise a longer 'extended period'," St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard said, according to slides he was due to present in Marseille, France on Saturday.

"This may work -- but it may also encourage a liquidity trap outcome," he added in the slides, part of a presentation entitled 'Reducing Deflationary Risk in the U.S.'.

"A better policy response to a negative shock is to expand the QE program," he added, referring to the quantitative easing, which he said have been successful in the United States and Britain.

5. Here we go - Reuters reports the Irish are thinking the unthinkable and may yet impose haircuts on the holders of Irish bank bonds. This will freak that hell out of the German and French banks that hold all this Irish bank dreck. It's a sign the Irish are considering revolt.

Hold on to your hats if they actually do it. It could easily trigger round 33 in the European debt crisis, which in turn destabilises global credit markets and makes it more difficult and expensive for the New Zealand government and our banks to roll over the NZ$90 billion of debt that needs to rolled over every 90 day sor so.

The next event to watch is the release of stress test results on the Irish banks on Thursday night.

Here's the details.

Ireland's government wants to impose losses on some senior bondholders in Irish lenders to reduce the burden on taxpayers from a prolonged banking crisis, a senior minister said on Sunday.

Dublin wants to impose losses on banks' senior unsecured bonds not covered by a state guarantee, which currently amount to over 16 billion euros, as part of a new deal with the European Union, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

"A sustainable and comprehensive solution for Irish banking that involves recapitalization but also involves an element of burden-sharing ... That is certainly the outcome that the government is looking for," Simon Coveney, minister for agriculture, told state broadcaster RTE.

Under an EU-IMF bailout agreed late last year Ireland can impose losses on banks' junior debt, but the ECB is opposed to treating senior bondholders, which are ranked on a par with depositors, in the same fashion for fear of a contagion risk.

6. Monstered by supermarkets - Adele Ferguson at The Age has some more interesting background on the supermarket wars going on in Australia. It raises some interesting questions about the future of food production and how (short term management driven) capitalism works at the moment. This sort of beggar-thy-supplier slash-now-and-ask-questions later behaviour can't be sustainable for anyone.

Here's the detail.   

The brutal reality for Coles is it has an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to sales margin of 4.1 per cent, compared to more than 7 per cent for Woolworths. With Woolworths now responding to Coles' price attack on certain products, it is starting to get ugly. Woolworths can afford it; Coles, less so.

This may not be an issue for the current management of Coles, many of whom came from Britain on short-term bonus incentives and who won't be around for the longer term havoc they have wreaked on the dairy, eggs or other industries. Coles' supermarket boss Ian McLeod stands to reap a bonus of around $38 million if he hits target through to 2013.

In the case of milk, the heavy discounting is having a disastrous impact on farmers, milk distributors and smaller milk retailers.

When the Senate inquiry met earlier this month, domestic processors outlined the nuts and bolts of the milk business, with National Foods revealing that it was struggling to break even on private label contracts and that the overall branded and private label margins on white milk - before Coles started the price war - was expected to be around 2 per cent.  

7. Affordability crisis - These two words appeared in a headline for an Age article in Australia. This shows the issue is getting through into the mainstream there. Auction clearance rates are well down...

At the end of last year, only three of every 10 lots for sale in new housing estates across Australia were accessible to average-income first home buyers, a study by Monash University population expert Bob Birrell and VicUrban market research director Colin Keane has found.

Until recently, city fringe subdivisions provided first home buyers with highly prized house and land deals at prices most could afford.

Two years ago, 90 per cent of housing offered in Melbourne's new suburbs fell beneath the industry-accepted affordable land price ceiling of $200,000 per lot, Mr Keane said. At the end of last year, this figure was only 26 per cent.

But the study comes as the Melbourne property market looks set for a tough run during the lead-up to Easter, with near-record numbers of properties on the market expected to mean a lower proportion of sales - known as the clearance rate. At the weekend, the reported 827 auctions had a clearance rate of 61 per cent, which is likely to be downgraded below 60 per cent when the results of the 94 remaining auctions are reported. This time last year, the clearance rate from 1073 auctions was 85 per cent.

8. Totally Air New Zealand safety video - Air New Zealand have excelled themselves again with their latest safety video. First there was the naked hosties. Then the slightly sleazy Rico (bit of a dud that one). Then Richie and the All Blacks flying the plane.

And now the latest one is done by fluffy headed exercise maven Richard Simmons, some lycra clad hosties and a bunch of celebs, including Phil Keoghan and Paul Henry. You've got to hand it to the marketeers there at Air NZ..

Here's a big free advertising kick to them. HT Chris Keall at NBR via twitter.

9. Totally London's Burning video from the Clash. All very topical after the weekend's action on the streets there. Only lasts 2 minutes

10. Totally Anarchy in the UK from the Sex Pistols. Topical again. Johnny Rotten's laugh is the best bit. One of my favourite songs.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

39 Comments

1. Increase in production of food.....what we have really seen is the increased conversion of fossil fuels into food.....nothing else significant..

Again and again ppl get confused with money solving all things, money is a proxy for energy, ie you use money to buy energy, simple......so if fossil energy goes up in price which puts food up in price, technology will then um put more expensive fossil energy into um increase its um price...

it does not compute....

regards

Up
0

M6.5 earthquake has hit near the coast of Sendai, Honshu, Japan.

Japan Meteorological Agency announced that a tsunami of up to 1.6 feet  may wash into Miyagi Prefecture

 

Up
0

Much more lilkely the 1933 Roosevelt Gold Confiscation Act.

Up
0

@1  Typical how statistics can be abused in any way one wants. Food prices getting cheaper? BS! Look carefully at the last 20 years and you'll see that the opposite is true. Look at the last ten years, it is even more obvious. And then look at the time since we entered the abyss, since 2008!!! And then Stani-joker muses: “This indicates that despite the growth in world population, improvements in agricultural productivity have tended to outpace increases in demand.” Is he from the same planet? Then he wonders about the “historical primacy of technological innovation as the control on prices” and states “there is likely to be significant scope to increase production in response to any factor that causes a sustained rise in prices”…on a Peak Oil site?

Up
0

 

Peak oil as a site links to contraversial articles that dont necesarily agree with Peak oil or simply ignore it. i like to read such stuff either a) you can shoot it full of holes or it challenges your thoughts/conclusions ie keep an open mind.

 

regards

Up
0

I think you maybe confusing a few things...and yes the article isnt taht great....

Globally, the "cost to produce food" is/was getting cheaper, this year is especially somewhat odd.  The problem is/was one of net supply and demand, often in a specific location and we have a lot more poor ppl who cant increase their income even slightly and it seems specualtion by hedge funds etc is playing some part.....

Note he is saying there is a "trend" of its "cheaper to produce food", the fact your food bill has rising in the last year or two is a different beast. Diesel is more expensive and is in somewhat short supply....that flows onto costs in the supermarket shelf.

Example; Corn production in the US is cheaper and was getting cheaper but they are turning it into ethanol, result, its fetching a higher price.  This is only really occuring in the last few years and now the costs of fetilizer etc is feeding through into cost to farmers.

AGW or wild weather events are reducing output, for instance the 1 in 1000/2000 year event in Russia has greatly reduced output for this year.  So we have a shortage this year.....next year we could be back to as expected.

Beyond that well yes the stats show its getting cheaper as a multi-year trend, the fact you cannot believe the trends and your "gut feeling" is it is not.....because I think he's talking past tense and multi-year samples not the odd year this year.

“This indicates that despite the growth in world population, improvements in agricultural productivity have tended to outpace increases in demand.”  This is quite true until about 2004. Peak oil is a game changer.....read the article as a past event/trend as it almost certianly no longer applies in a post peak oil world.

regards

 

 

 

 

Up
0

hey steven here's a good article that adds a bit of colour to the stories about how our food gets to our plate. It's always downward price pressure from above.

 

http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_serfs_of_arkansas

Up
0

Gotta love America....not.......and our Pollies are stupid enough to think we will get a decent deal? fat chance.

regards

PS Thanks it was an interesting read....

Up
0

The dairy farmers will attack me and say it's not so BUT contract milking in NZ is and will head further down this path as the dairy industry becomes more and more corporate.  Show me a corporate 1000 cow farm and I'll show you where its a giant ballsup (with a very few exceptions where the owner is still actively involved).  As the owners of the farms become more disassociated with the actual production (as is happening) animal welfare and staff welfare and conditions will deteriate.  Am a big fan of dairying - just show me the 400 cow farm run and owned by a couple with one or maybe two workers thanks !  Thats where is cows are happy and the farms are looked after and the owners who do the work are making the money.

Up
0

Hey simfarmer, did you catch that tv clip on life in Switzerland, where a dairy farmer made a good living, off 18 cows!.....

Up
0

Hah, Nah didn't see that one Woolly - but I used to shear with a norwegian bloke and his family farm milked about 20 cows If I remember rightly and they were bloody loaded.    By all accounts it was a bit like dairy farming in the 50's (walk through shed etc).  He just came out shearing in Nz for the summer because he loved it not that taking the money back was worth it for him.

Dairy farming in NZ on the big places is not a life for anyone.  Its sad that is what we are pinning our hopes on as a nation.  But then again I could be wrong and suddenly getting up a 3.00am having a 12-2 roster and getting paid stuff all could be the basis of a prosperous, well educated, affluent, happy nation of zombie horde dairy workers !

Up
0

That is a good analysis Steven, thank you.

Interestingly in recent years I have met two oil engineers that were quite clear on the finite supplies of it. Both were taking active measures to prepare for it.

A shame we don't have more engineers.

Up
0



Normal
0


“…read the article as a past event/trend as it almost certianly no longer applies in a post peak oil world.”

I agree.

Thank you for the time to comment. Well, if Staniford is talking past tense, so be it. I’m just a bit sensitive to some interpretation of statistics. Yes, I do have a gut feeling but it has nothing to do with my analysis.

 

Staniford’s article shows 90 year prices for three main crops (only), adjusted for inflation using government (!) CPI data. I had to force myself to read on.

 

Staniford totally ignores causality when he states cheaper food prices being the effect of improvements in agricultural productivity but misses where this productivity comes/came from (oil) and how it is financed (debt). The end consumer’s relative buying power is increasingly compromised by this debt and QE created inflation and erosion of personal wealth (incl. labor). Staniford makes light of the price increases during the last two decades. Are the last twenty years a too short time frame to look at food prices? No. And if we do, then the intention of the article is void. There is no fall. If we take the last 11 years, prices have doubled. He calls that “a blip”.

 

But back to his article. The effect of climate change on agriculture is certain, however not the only or even biggest influence on food prices. The looming global debt ‘consolidation’ tsunami will render climate change to a benign influence.

 

Also, “in the northeastern US, large amounts of perfectly usable cropland have actually fallen out of use because it was not economically competitive with better cropland elsewhere”. Well, I disagree here too because when one scrutinises this phenomenon one can find the cause in escalating desertification and cost of fertilisers/crop sprays in marginal areas, marking the limit of productivity.

 

All above is geared to paint a picture that is rosy but wrong. Too many of these pictures are painted each day and Staniford’s article is such a parade of optimism. It is unhelpful and misleading.  “…the fact that prices have been low and dropping for decades means that there will be many possible investments to raise production that will not have been made, because prices were too low to justify them.” Cute.

 

And then he says himself that the statistic of the last 11 years needs explanation to determine if the food price rises are just a blip or a more long-lasting trend reversion. I thought we had “historical primacy of technological innovation”.

 

Well, I want to be conciliatory and I agree with Staniford when he says, “Prices of crops tend to move together”. Given the rape of the US monetary system they will surely move together…UP that is and in exponential fashion.

 

Regards

Dannte

Up
0

1 and 6 are the same issue.

Staniford was right - prices were falling in real terms. They did so as the supermarkets screwed down the suppliers, who consolidated, cutting everything they could.

Then - and Staniford misses this one - the limits of supply were hit - no more land (unless it's ex-Brazillian rainforest), depleting quality of same, competition for water, and the biggie - fuel to make it happen.

Prices are indeed on the way up, relative to incomes, and that process will continue. Staniford fails to chart incomes, then use that as a base-line.

The bottom end will be out-bid first, then on upthe chain, sequentially. Own-brand, dubious quality, watered-down stuff will be the only chouch for some in this country, others will be outbid and die.

 

 

Up
0

Yes......he's missing it I think....its reversing and he is dismally failing to take heed...

Hmm not sure about on up the chain to NZ in NZ's case....we after all produce it.....we just do as other countries have done and stop exports or slap on huge export tariffs.......

Outbid and die, yep saw that in 2008, it will be an upwards trend.....for any country tahts cant make enough of its own food.

regards

Up
0

@ # 4 Key the Comedian

 

Yes having a PM who refuses to make any brave decisions yet is comfortable in front of the camera is exactly what i want.

 

As I've said before, we need to include a 'none of the above' box on the ballot paper and that vote be counted as a cast vote. All these clowns make me sick.

Up
0

Funny thing Goff isnt charasmatic....so he seems to get panned....to a degree unfairly I think....He's still stuck in the old growth mantra will fix things....cant seem to see it hasnt really for 50 years and now thats the past....

regards

Up
0

He's stuck with that but also with the idea that people are better off leaving it to Labour and the unions to run their lives for them.

Up
0

hey wolly have you ever voted labour?

Up
0

It was shameful of me but then I was young and thought I knew better...so Piggy got the heaveho...but now I am older and I think I know better..so Labour gets the heaveho....

Up
0

Had the Labour Party been formed when you were young Wal ?

Up
0

Cheeky bugger....hey Bernard I thought this crap was ruled out of order!

Up
0

As opposed to who Wolly, bankers, financial advisors, real estate agents, and lawyers? How well has that gone over the past 30 years for the majority of New Zealanders?

Up
0

Ponder this thought anarkist, you have the right to decide who you will go to for legal advice, financial advice, real estate deals and for your banking needs....quite different to being told what you may earn, who you are expected to support with transfer payments of your income and what size of shower head you may have in your house!

Socialism only survives by making sure enough envious people remain, to be suckered into voting for a regime that just loves to manage everyone from cradle to grave....do you enjoy being managed anarkist!

Up
0

"...you have the right to decide who you will go to for legal advice, financial advice, real estate deals and for your banking needs."

Really? Who do you think designs our legislation? The likes of our right honourable history professor, Michael Cullen, "political science" lecturer, Helen Clark? The Unions? Don't make me laugh!!! They're just window dressing.

Up
0

But that's the choice, Labour and the unions or national and the corporations. Wally picks the latter, but being one of the plebs with less than a million to my name I just don't see how I can win with either.

Up
0

...and if you think Labour are "socialists" Wally you really need to get out more. Might I suggest a holiday in Cuba before they go belly up?

Up
0

Who NZ Labour? or Air New Zealand?  (the latter in financial terms Im positive about they wont survive the jet fuel prices we will see in the next few years)  NZ Labour well obviously morally bankrupt if nothing else.....same cesspit as National mind.

Not Cuba, Cuba seems to be surviving quite well and is ready for peak oil....they are self sufficient and have been isolated....

The funny thing is however there is oil off cuba's coast. Oil which Florida wont let the drillers get at....Cuba has no such limitations....now it will be really funny when Cuba looks to sell its oil abroad.....I wonder if the US can afford not to buy it.

regards

Up
0

Who NZ Labour? or Air New Zealand?  (the latter in financial terms Im positive about they wont survive the jet fuel prices we will see in the next few years)  NZ Labour well obviously morally bankrupt if nothing else.....same cesspit as National mind.

Not Cuba, Cuba seems to be surviving quite well and is ready for peak oil....they are self sufficient and have been isolated....

The funny thing is however there is oil off cuba's coast. Oil which Florida wont let the drillers get at....Cuba has no such limitations....now it will be really funny when Cuba looks to sell its oil abroad.....I wonder if the US can afford not to buy it.

regards

Up
0

i thought that might have been the case wol - you sound like someone who's either been brought up to hate Labour or someone who's been burnt by them

 

i voted for them once too.....they left me thinking my vote for Mcgillicuddy serious the election before that had been a smarter move....

Up
0

I voted for John Key but his relentless attempts to be liked by everyone are getting very tiresome. The guy is so overexposed, it's ridiculous. 

Sure it's good to have a leader who doesn't take himself too seriously, but he holds the office of Prime Minister and that IS to be taken seriously and too much of this carry on belittles that office.

Up
0

....... I voted for David Lange's government once ........... but I was told that I was a fecking idiot to do so ......... 'cos I was in a Pizza Hut at the time ...........

Up
0

Did they have voting boothes in Pizza Huts back then Gummy? My how times have changed.

Up
0

General Electric (aka Finance Company to the World)

US based profits: $5.1 billion USD

US taxes paid: $0 USD

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/economy/25tax.html?_r=1

And Obama has Immelt as an adviser.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Up
0

 "... So, during the first half of 2003, Bernanke, as a Fed Governor, started to publicly talk about the deflation threat and how the Fed can always stop that by "printing money." Thus, the Fed, under Greenspan chairmanship back then, lowered the rates to "emergency" levels when the only real emergency was the Bush re-election. Greenspan was very happy to play along because his own reappointment in 2004 was contingent upon the economy visibly recovering."
By Jas Jain , Ph.D.

 http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article27195.html

Now I am not suggesting Bollard is concerned about his job....but cutting the ocr to 2.5%....in the run up to an election.....you tell me!

All of us with savings oncall or short term..have seen returns slashed by 50 basis points....and inflation is shooting up...what sort of an incentive to save is an ocr cut...!

Up
0

Morning all.

And in other news...

Green Party MP Sue Kedgley is launching a petition today calling on the Government to immediately suspend the use of pesticides which are implicated in bee deaths around the world. These pesticides are widely used in New Zealand.

The petition launch coincides with the premier of a new film – the Queen of the Sun - which explores the decline in bee populations overseas.

The petition will be launched with New Zealand’s most famous Beehive in the background and a smaller but more realistic beehive along with actual bees.  The beehive will symbolise that, without the assistance of those in the Government ‘hive, our yellow and black friends face an uncertain future.

“We cannot take bees for granted anymore,” said Ms Kedgley.

“We need to protect them, and recognise that they are vital for our ecology, our economy and our food security.”

Note: The bees won’t be able to escape so those with bee allergies will be safe.

Link to the Queen of the Sun webpage:

http://www.queenofthesun.com/

Up
0

"Yellow and black"!!!..."Friends"...feck me...those are Wasps Alex....

Up
0

There's an old saying

"If you didn't vote labour (left) when you were young you don't have a heart. If you don't vote National (Right) when you are older you don't have a brain.

"Brain" can be interchanged with "a cent".

 

Up
0