sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Opinion: The economy has the potential to surprise everybody with how fast it grows this year - but we need rain

Opinion: The economy has the potential to surprise everybody with how fast it grows this year - but we need rain
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/">Image sourced from Shutterstock.com</a>

Perhaps those new ASB adverts mildly chastising Kiwis for understating achievements are on to something.

While everybody was quick to carp about the woes befalling the economy after the Global Financial Crisis and then subsequent setbacks, the apparent upswing in economic activity now occurring seems to be being met phlegmatically; a sort of general attitude of: “Yeah, it’s better, but about time, eh.”

True, it has been a while since things in the garden here were rosy and perhaps everybody is just being cautious.

But the fact is, good news is breaking out just about everywhere in the economy.

Yes, unemployment remains stubbornly high according to official figures – and frankly those are best consumed with a dash of salt. And yes, the Kiwi dollar remains stubbornly high – though if you are thinking of leaping off to the US or Britain for a holiday that’s a pretty good thing.

But shifting those negatives to one side for a minute, consider some of the good developments revealed just in the past month or so and in no particular order of importance:

  • ANZ’s February business confidence survey hit a 19-month high, with a net 38% of businesses surveyed expecting improved prospects for their own businesses in the next year.
  • Record numbers of people (a net 74%) in the Reserve Bank’s latest survey of household expectations believed house prices would rise in the next year.
  • ANZ’s quarterly regional survey showed for the first time in eight years that all parts of the country reported increases in economic activity.
  • Retail sales volumes showed their strongest quarterly increase in six years.
  • Real Estates Institute of New Zealand figures showed that house sales in January were up 21% compared with a year earlier. Since the 2009 low-point New Zealand’s house prices have risen 16%, with those in Auckland up 27%.
  • Building consents for homes (excluding apartments) showed a 9.6% seasonally-adjusted rise in January.
  • Real building work put in place rose 1.8% in the December quarter, following a 9.8% rise in the September quarter.
  • Commercial motor vehicle registrations in February were up 37% on the same time a year ago.
  • The annual increase in home lending hit a four-year high in January. And though that’s not necessarily a good thing, the extra NZ$952 million of mortgage lending in the month indicated the level of growing confidence about the housing market.
  • Funds held under management for Kiwis surged by 12.9% to NZ$81.6 billion in 2012, which is the biggest rise in a least recent history. KiwiSaver funds climbed nearly NZ$4 billion to NZ$15.4 billion.
  • Term deposits held by Kiwis were hovering about the NZ$110 billion level by the end of 2012, with some NZ$80 billion of that held in NZ$100,000 and above chunks.
  • Dairy prices surged 10.4% in the latest global auction, leading economists to revise upwards Fonterra’s payouts for this year and next. That of course is to some extent bad news masquerading as good news because the drought, which will cost particularly North Island farmers, is helping to push the global prices up – with New Zealand being the leading dairy exporter.
  • The ANZ Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Survey hit a 32-month high in February.

And there’s probably some other things I haven’t thought of.

It all looks like an economy seriously starting to find its feet, an economy that perhaps has the potential to surprise people this year with how fast it grows.

Official GDP figures for the December quarter are not due out till March 21. The Reserve Bank’s last official forecast for the figure was 0.4%, which looks woefully light. Economists from the commercial banks have been thinking more of 0.7-0.8%, though a few of these have started twitching in recent days, suggesting there is “upside risk”.

From where this observer is sitting there seems to be considerable “upside risk” to those quarterly figures.

But, there is always a but, isn't there? And the latest is a considerable one. If it doesn't rain soon we are in trouble. The drought is already hitting farmers and when the farmers get hit, we all get hit because the impact of less rural spending flows through the entire economy.

BNZ economist Doug Steel said yesterday that the prolonged and widespread 2007-09 drought knocked overall GDP down by around 1.5%, with about 1% coming from the direct hit to agriculture and the remainder the flow-on effects from the likes of farmers curbing discretionary spending. He reckons the impact of this year's drought could easily be 1% of GDP this time around.

Well, let us hope not. After all we've been through in the past few years it would be a kind of grim irony if the economy was really starting to tick again, only for a matter completely out of anybody's control to dash the hopes. After the recent false dawns the economy has had, we don't need another.

Perhaps the best thing everybody could do right now is their own version of a rain dance. And then later in the year when the drought’s becoming a distant memory we can all take advantage of that flying kiwi dollar with a nice overseas trip, paid for out of the profits from our Mighty River Power shares.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

25 Comments

There are some positive indicators coming out for sure, although I dispair at the reliance on debt and high house prices. A lower dollar would be good too.

Up
0

Methinks Mr Hargreaves is suffering from EXTREME ROSE TINTED SPECTACLE syndrome..,

The reality is that since at least the late 1970s this country has been going steadily backwards in virtually any area you care to look at and I for one am utterly sick of the Bull Sh..ters who infest our parliament/government /media -spreading their half truths and disinformation to a largely gullible /ignorant public.

To be fair most of those who cannot be bothered to make an effort for real and meaningful change have either been totally turned off by the way our politicians cannot ever be held accountable for their blunders or they see it as totally futile to participate in the political process as they have been lied to by so many over such a long time ! 

Up
0

Good to see you never voted for MMP Whodunnit

Up
0

The drought is a problem that could've been handled a lot better, farmers should be farming for these droughts and if they don't they only have themselves to blame......it requires diligent and radical measures such as putting in a lot more summer crops etc and not relying on grass and rain.....

I think one of the problems in this country is that we don't have enough people involved in productive business planning and implementation etc, this idea above if implemented with proper planning by farmers would currently be increasing NZ revenue by millions each day of drought we are now having....... instead we have hungry cows, no milk and dead pasture.....I rest my case

Up
0

The biggest problem is here.

 

http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/monfin/c5/data.html

It just goes up and up, drought or no drought.

Up
0

Another negative here: US 10yr treasury price chart

 

And the confirmation why interest rates may be headed much higher.

 

Gross, co-chief investment officer of Pimco, doubled his forecast for growth in U.S. gross domestic product to 3 percent for this year, up from the firm’s December forecast of 1.25 percent to 1.75 percent in 2013.

 

The U.S. is “moving towards a 3 percent real GDP growth rate” in 2013, in part because of housing, and a nominal growth rate of 5 percent, Gross said today in an interview with Tom Keene and Mike McKee on “Bloomberg Surveillance.”

Up
0

 

If China is indeed buying bonds to hold down its currency at a time when its trade surplus is surging, there will be serious trouble.

Once you understand that the root cause of the Long Slump in the West is excess global capacity in manufacturing and the inability/refusal of Asian powers to recycle money in the form of demand – ie that it is a trade crisis masquerading as a debt crisis – then you can see from these figures that we are no closer to escaping the trap.

The money is of course recycled as capital instead. The reserve accumulation by the rising powers over the last decade has been over €10 trillion, and it has to go somewhere. It ends up in asset markets.

 

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100023283/a…

Up
0

But inevitably it's the US creating the proceeds from US Treasury debt issuance that is circulated into the economy to allow for the purchase of Chinese goods. Furthermore, a good chunk of new inflation making debt is monetised by Federal Reserve purchases - Chinese are using the hard work of USD export sales to buy assets inflated in value with "out of air" printed money. Read article

Up
0

But in the end the Chinese will have to lose.

Up
0

Just as the Japanese did. Same US tactics, new victim. And now the YEN carry trade into the US is, once again, going gangbusters, further elevating US asset prices and elsewhere in the world, so harder working Chinese can fund their domestic masters' purchases. All the while poor US citizens don't work, but get federally funded food stamps. 

 

It now seems Mrs Watanabe's fascination with Aussie and KiWI is over as a new very liquid USD/YEN playground has opened up with domestic government backing, for now.

Up
0

Ok - if you say so.

Up
0

Not a chance, the US$ is the reserve currency. How many US treasuries does China hold?

More than the USA can pay back? Like the French trying to get gold with their US$, China is going to lose big time.

The power is not in China, its in the USA.  

>>>>>

As of the end of February, China holds US$ 1.2 trillion worth U.S. Treasury bonds, the largest in the world.

To put China's ownership of U.S. debt in perspective, its holding of $1.2 trillion is even larger than the amount owned by American households. U.S. citizens hold only about $959 billion in U.S. debt, according to the Federal Reserve.

 

http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/tic/Documents…

Up
0

History is not on your side.

Up
0

Im really sorry but the USA has a massive military advantage, how far do you want to push?

 

 I also think that Chinese investment in the west will be stopped soon. No goverment can afford to let a foreign nation buy its assets, it would be political suicide.

 Just wait, the banks will win.

Up
0

Ah, the old "5000-year China history" chestnut. That concept really needs to be thought about more critically, rather than just repeated everywhere like a verbal formula.

See here for a thoughtful discussion on that: http://www.sacu.org/historysurvey.html. It's nuanced, critical but non-judgemental, and well worth reading.

Up
0

Thanks for the link jetliner.

 Kimy,you dont control control resources the power is with those that do. The 'Gods of Money' will win again, China intellectuals could be right but dead right, is still losing. There was a resource grab at the end of WW1,by the UK and USA. Think Australia will support you over the USA? Think Saudi will stand by you? Think your agricultural policy is sustainable? Think Iran is a reliable sourse of enegy? Think you can control your currency forever?

 I suspect your economy is actually very fragile.

 Look what Germany tried to do

 

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/History/Oil_and_the_Origins_of_Wo…

Up
0

Bingo, it is all about who controls the resources. I wouldn't be surprised if Japan and China go to war simply to kill of a good percentage of the population they will struggle to feed going forward.

Up
0

Which is why the USA has kept a military presence of 40,000 troops in Japan,30,000 in Korea and 40,000 in Germany for all these years, and thats just the ones they tell us about.

Up
0

Think of this another way Andrew, if China needs to have a war then who else can they fight? Mind you the trouble is they need a land battle, or infantry battle for the desired effect.

Up
0

I read a while ago that Isreal has a higher Nuke capacity than China due to advanced delivery systems.

Perhaps corruption and wealth disparity in China will cause the people to turn inwards on themselves.

 That still leaves a problem in the middle east, but there again, it should be easy to turn the people against each other.

Up
0

A distinct possibility(probability?). Before the people turn on them.

Up
0

Spains got problems we just dont see it in the MSM

https://spanishrevolution11.wordpress.com/

Up
0

My worry is Pakistan v India....both have nukes. Pakistan doesnt look very stable, to say the least.  Thats also where Taliban tend to hang out...nice mixture.

regards

Up
0

North island in for a deluge next weekend...it'll be too much rain for sure...slips and flooding on the way....then the top of the south will cop it.

Up
0

Yes, if we get heavy rain with the cracks in the ground as wide as they are then half the North Island will slip away.

Up
0