sign uplog in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Receivers say Springpark housing project not proceeding, buyers getting deposits back

Receivers say Springpark housing project not proceeding, buyers getting deposits back

Home buyers who purchased properties off the plans in the failed Springpark housing development in Auckland's Mt Wellington will get their deposits back before Christmas.

The company behind the 420 home development, Panama Road Developments Ltd, was put into receivership at the start of this month, leaving buyers who had paid deposits uncertain about about the future of their purchases.

Receivers Richard Simpson and David Ruscoe of Grant Thornton have written to the buyers saying their deposits will be refunded to them with interest by Christmas.

The deposits have been held in a trust account administered by a law firm.

"Following a thorough review, we have determined that it is not viable to complete the project as planned , as increased costs mean that Panama Road Developments Limited does not have sufficient funds available to it to finish the work," the receivers' letter to purchasers said.

"As the development will not be moving forward, buyers have been given the opportunity to cancel their sale and purchase agreement at an earlier date than is provided for in the contract.

"This will enable them to receive their deposit, including any interest that has accrued, straight away." 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Central Government and Council needs to step in and increase supply via incentives or what ever.
Its a dichotomy house building is sending developers bankrupt, yet theirs a huge demand?
Can only mean the housing cost is beyond what the local economy can afford, why is this so?

central governement are already allocating money to housing albeit in the wrong way and wrong areas and the Bill to the tax payer will only grow
JK this morning on ZB "Billions were being spent on working for families, accommodation supplements"

Oh, I can think of several reasons why "housing cost is beyond what the local economy can afford".

  • Materials costs being trousered by two cosy duopolists
  • Land costs inflated by dopey zoning to the tune of 10X rural land prices
  • Local TLA's extracting monopoly fees for 3 waters, development contributions, inspections and sundry Modest Fees
  • Site Safety off the scale in terms of cost incurred versus value conferred
  • Licensing of builders - yet another cosy Guild

Small wonder that discerning consumers are going Tiny House to end-run this hopeless schemozzle.

So true

Springpark's housing was too affordable. I recall their most expensive houses were just over $500k. By comparison a 3-bedroom terraced home in Hobsonville is now $800k+.

A new developer could easily step into spring park's land and offer a range of housing.

Hobsonville is laughably overpriced though. The land "shortage" that far from the city is entirely artificial.

I feel bad for the people who had their money down on Spring park. The bubble has bubbled much since they thought they were safe from the stupidity.

agree - very overpriced for what seems like tomorrow 's ghettos!

Why wouldn't you have bailed out of this if you were the developer?

Due to the delays they faced, the market leapt up in value, why would you build the place you said you'd sell to someone for 500k, when you can simply return their deposit and start up a new company that'll build the same house for today's price of 700k. Win win for everyone, except the original depositors, who have found that the housing market has left them well and truly behind.