sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Greens go after groceries, Helen Clark goes after Qiulae Wong and Christopher Luxon holds firm on failed leadership challenge

Public Policy / news
Greens go after groceries, Helen Clark goes after Qiulae Wong and Christopher Luxon holds firm on failed leadership challenge
groceries
Photo by nrd on Unsplash.

Parliament is back after recess and policies are coming in thick and fast. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon continues to push back on the fallout from last week's leadership challenge, ACT and the Public Service Association go toe-to-toe on the 'good employer' provision in the public service, and former PM Helen Clark gives her thoughts on the Opportunity Party.

Greens and groceries

The Green Party is targeting supermarket prices, following Australia’s recent move to ban “excessive pricing.”

Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick announced a policy to restrict supermarkets to charging prices that are not in excess relative to the cost of supplying the products, plus a fair margin. Green Party consumer affairs spokesperson Ricardo Menéndez March also lodged a member’s bill on the policy.

Supermarkets would be required to record prices so to be able to provide to the Commerce Commission when requested.

"Breaches would carry penalties of up to $10 million, three times the value of the commercial gain, or 10% of turnover,” he said.

The coup hangover

Christopher Luxon and Erica Stanford. Image source: Dan Brunskill/interest.co.nz

A sense of fatigue has hit Parliament this week. Journalists and (some) politicians alike waded into Parliament in dire need of caffeine - usually the state at the end of a particularly hectic sitting block. However, the recess week, where everyone usually takes a deep breath to catch up on work or go on holiday, was met with early starts and late nights after the will he-won’t he National leadership tangle.

National Minister Erica Stanford told media on Sunday she was not involved in any potential challenge, did not ask anyone to challenge Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and supported him “100%”.

It follows the snap departure of National MP Chris Penk, who Luxon said launched a leadership challenge against him, swiftly stripping Penk of his ministerial portfolios followed by the announcement of Penk’s retirement at November's election.

Public Service - good or bad employer?

ACT leader David Seymour announced his intention to remove the ‘good employer’ section of the Public Service Act in a bid to “end race-based hiring requirements”.

That section requires chief executives to - among other requirements such as ensuring safe working conditions - recognise the “aims and aspirations of Māori; the employment requirements of Māori; and the need for greater involvement of Māori in the public service”.

Deputy Prime Minister and ACT leader David Seymour. Image source: Mandy Te

“The public service should have the same employment rules as any other business,” Seymour said. “Health and safety, non-discrimination and and disability rights are already covered elsewhere in the law.”

The Public Service Associate said this policy indicated ACT wanted the public service to be a “bad employer”.

"The policy behind the good employer provisions is that the Government should be an exemplar employer. It's supposed to show the country what good looks like, not race to the bottom.”

ACT also wanted to legally enforce need before race in the delivery of public services and separate spiritual practices from public service work.

“ACT will prohibit public service employers from initiating or resourcing cultural or spiritual practices as part of the workplace,” Seymour said.

“Public servants will remain free to practise their own religion, culture, or traditions in their own time, with reasonable accommodation where appropriate.”

PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said removing the ability for public servants to observe cultural and spiritual practices, “on top of pushing 'need not race' into law, is part of the continued attack on Māori in the public service and the policies to improve outcomes for Māori”.

Helen Clark v Qiulae Wong

Following the Opportunity Party leader’s interview on TVNZ's Q+A over the weekend, former Prime Minister Helen Clark took to X, calling it a “trainwreck” interview.

“Simplistic responses trying to defend land tax, higher income tax, & job cuts in public sector. Fantasy posing as policy.”

Asked to elaborate on her concerns with the policies, Clark said, “lots about the land tax, the limits on UBI [universal basic income] and the consequences of that, and on public service job cuts….”

It followed Opportunity receiving 8% support in the latest 1News Verian Poll last week.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Why would HC go after ToP?  perhaps because Labour have no policy

Land tax will cause property prices to fall, every one wants cheaper houses, just not theirs....

Most do not realise how appealing a ToP vote is to young people here...

Up
3

Why would HC go after ToP?  perhaps because Labour have no policy.

Possibly because ToP is a threat to her property portfolio and those of her mates in the leafy suburbs. 

[Just joking. Kind of].  

Up
2

yes probably true

Up
0

Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick announced a policy to restrict supermarkets to charging prices that are not in excess relative to the cost of supplying the products, plus a fair margin.

Margins are added along the supply chain. Ms Smarty Pants needs to consider this. Unless of course the argument is that the supply chain is closer to perfect competition but the retail sector is not. She should at least articulate it if this is the reality. 

Up
0

Adding red tape to supermarket pricing will not help. 

I reckon Woolworths AU must be getting close to pulling the plug on NZ with all the crap that's going on. And no other supermarket chains will be remotely interested while the politicians are behaving like this. 

Up
0

Auntie Helen should stick to trying to outlaw fun in her neighborhood. The only fantasy I see on offer this election is Labour and National claiming we can change nothing and things will get better. 

Up
4

Exactly. 

Up
0

Has labour announced anything that will help the economy? It would be a good time to announce some infrastructure spending, all we seem to be getting is cancellations and handouts.

All Labours policies seem to start with the word "free". I'm not convinced this is a good time to hand lollies out! 

Up
0