Minxin Pei says China's one-child policy has produced a shocking human toll, created an alarming gender imbalance and skewed the ratio of aging dependents in a way that will carry heavy economic consequences

Minxin Pei says China's one-child policy has produced a shocking human toll, created an alarming gender imbalance and skewed the ratio of aging dependents in a way that will carry heavy economic consequences

By Minxin Pei*

The abolition of China’s 35-year-old one-child policy closes one of the darkest chapters in the country’s history.

In the late 1970s, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), determined to boost economic growth, decided that population control was the answer. Millions of abortions, sterilisations, and infanticides later, its chickens are coming home to roost.

In raw numbers, the one-child policy’s human toll has been even greater than that of Mao’s Great Leap Forward, which caused a famine that killed around 36 million people from 1959 to 1961. And it exceeded that of the Cultural Revolution, in which large-scale political violence likely caused as many as another ten million deaths from 1966 to 1976.

As for the one-child policy, data released by China’s health ministry in 2013 indicate that from 1971 to 2012, 336 million abortions – more than the entire US population – were carried out in registered facilities alone. (Though the one-child policy was not introduced until about 1979, other family-planning policies were already in place at the time.)

The National Health and Family Planning Commission, the government agency responsible for enforcing the one-child policy, reports an even higher figure: more than 13 million surgical abortions each year – a figure that does not include abortions induced by drugs or carried out in unregistered private clinics.

Of course, it is impossible to know precisely what share of those abortions can be attributed to enforcement of the one-child policy. But in, say, India, where abortion is legal and no comparable family-planning policy exists, the figure is significantly lower – though probably not as low as the 630,000 annual figure provided by the Indian Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Indeed, it is probably closer to six million per year.

Although there is undoubtedly an economic disparity between India and China, their populations are roughly equal. So it is reasonable to estimate that as many as half of China’s abortions – some 6.5 million registered surgical abortions, plus untold numbers of drug-induced or unregistered abortions, per year – are attributable to the one-child policy. This implies that there were upwards of 200 million abortions over the policy’s 35 years.

But forced abortions are only the beginning. Indeed, these figures – however shocking – do not capture the human suffering or the harsh economic consequences brought about by the one-child policy.

Media often reported stories of unspeakable brutality by local officials against pregnant women and families who violated the policy – a unique savagery captured in Ma Jian’s novel The Dark Road. In a much-publicised 2012 case, local officials in Shaanxi province forced a woman to undergo an abortion seven months into her pregnancy.

Beyond physical and emotional trauma, violators of the one-child policy – who are most often among the country’s poorest – face serious economic penalties. Provincial sampling suggests that the Chinese government collects about CN¥20 billion ($3 billion) per year in family-planning fines. And local officials in many localities explicitly threaten violators with other harsh punishments, including destruction of their houses and confiscation of their farm animals.

The one-child policy’s long-term demographic consequences have been devastating as well. According to official data, China’s old-age dependency ratio – the ratio of those aged 65 and up to working-age people (aged 15-64) – currently stands at 13%. As the one-child generation ages – adding some ten million retirees annually – this ratio will skyrocket, with the labor surplus that supported China’s economic miracle giving way to a severe shortage that depresses growth.

Equally problematic is China’s alarming gender imbalance. Families’ preference that their one child be male led to innumerable sex-selective abortions, as well as female infanticide and abandonment. As of 2013, boys aged 0-24 outnumbered girls by 23 million, implying that more than 20 million young men will not be able to find marriage partners in the coming decades.

The most sobering lesson from this tally of the one-child policy’s toll on China lies in the simple fact that the authorities were able to enforce it for so long. In fact, China is the only country in history where a government has actually succeeded in using coercion to limit its people’s reproductive choices. The key is its unconstrained one-party regime, underpinned by a huge and powerful bureaucracy.

Outside observers often marvel at the CCP’s capacity to get things done – at least when those things are the construction of super-modern cities and a high-speed rail network. Seldom do they note the disastrous consequences when the Party applies its power in stubborn pursuit of a brutal and destructive objective.

Now is the time to recognise those consequences, particularly given that China’s leaders are not done limiting their citizens’ reproductive choices. On the contrary, they are simply moving from a one-child policy to a two-child policy. Outsiders and Chinese alike must emphasise the senseless cruelty that such measures imply and work to ensure that they are never seen again – in China or anywhere else.


Minxin Pei is Professor of Government at Claremont McKenna College and a non-resident senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2015, published here with permission.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

2 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

Unquestionably a whole lot of shocking things have been done as a result of this policy. The actions by the state were often brutal and overbearing, but then this was consistent with the way many things were done att this time under Chairman Mao. However many of the actions of individuals in respect of their own families seem far worse. For this the individuals must take responsibility for them selves. I think however we should consider the other side of the argument. What would have been the consequence of allowing the population growth to continue unchecked? Would there have also been a whole lot of suffering as a result. Which would have been worse? It is curious how we only here negative comments about China's policies and actions when it is politically acceptable to do so. What about the many shocking things that they are continuing to do.
With reference to unchecked population growth; our planet cannot support our current population sustainably as indicated by the disturbingly high rate of runaway global warming that we are witnessing.
At the end of the day nature will have the last word and may make the one child policy seem positively humane. Nature is totally ruthless, all powerful and without any scruples.

It isnt "would" its will.

We eat fossil fuels in effect, ie for every calorie of food consumed we spend 10 to 30 calories tof fossil fuels to make it to the plate. So when fossil fuels are gone by 2050 how will we make food for the projected 9billion?

The answer is pretty obvious really its a "will"