sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

We could need 6 times more of the minerals used for renewables and batteries. How can we avoid a huge increase in mining impacts?

Economy / opinion
We could need 6 times more of the minerals used for renewables and batteries. How can we avoid a huge increase in mining impacts?
mining

By Rusty Langdon & Elsa Dominish*

We are seeing the biggest changes in our energy and transport systems since industrialisation. By 2026, global renewable energy generation is expected to match total fossil fuel and nuclear output. Building the wind and solar farms, batteries and electricity networks we need to run our system on renewables will use a huge array of mined minerals, known as “transition minerals”.

The numbers are staggering. The International Energy Agency estimates a sixfold increase in demand for these minerals by 2040 to meet climate targets of well below 2℃ of warming. We could need 21.5 million tonnes for electric vehicles and battery storage alone.

Transitional minerals include metals such as lithium, cobalt, copper, graphite, magnesium and nickel. They also include rare earths like neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium.

Currently, mining provides almost our entire supply. The scale of demand for these minerals could result in almost 400 new mines by 2035.

To put this in perspective, Australia has around 350 operating mines. More than 50% of the world’s lithium and much of its copper, cobalt, nickel and rare earths come from our mines.

Australia is hosting the World Mining Congress this week. A key issue for the industry is how we can ensure the minerals needed for the energy transition are sourced responsibly.

How can we manage demand?

We can design energy and transport systems to minimise mineral demand. Strategies include:

  • reducing our dependence on cars and using smaller vehicles
  • improving energy efficiency
  • moving to a circular economy that makes reuse and recycling a priority.

All these changes can reduce the need for new mines.

Recycling, for example, could reduce demand for mined materials. For lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles, estimated reductions are 25% for lithium, 35% for cobalt and nickel, and 55% for copper by 2040.

This recycled content will mainly come from waste batteries. However, large volumes of lithium-ion batteries won’t start reaching the end of their lives for at least a decade. Recycling will only have a significant impact from 2035.

Mining is unavoidable, so we must limit its impacts

If we are destined to continue mining for the minerals needed for the energy transition, how can this be done responsibly? And what exactly do we mean by responsible sourcing?

Responsible sourcing minimises the environmental, social and governance impacts and risks of mining. Key concerns include the use of child labour and forced labour, damage to the environment, impacts on Indigenous rights and cultural heritage, and corruption.

In 2011, the Australian government released guidance on sustainable mining. Historical and recent harmful impacts highlight the need for a fresh look at mining practices. In 2020, for example, Rio Tinto destroyed a 46,000-year-old Aboriginal heritage site in Juukan Gorge.

First Nations people worldwide are calling for free, prior and informed consent when mining and renewable energy developments are proposed for their land. This approach recognises the right to be consulted early in the process, informed of the impacts, and supported to take part in negotiation and making agreements. Most importantly, it includes the right to say no.

In many parts of Australia, Indigenous communities have been locked out of economic opportunities, despite mining generating enormous wealth on their Country.

What does responsible sourcing involve?

How do we do things more responsibly? We need to ensure activities comply with a range of sustainability criteria. An agreed standard will mean we have information that enables us to compare the good and bad apples.

The problem is there isn’t a common approach to measuring, managing and reporting environmental, social and governance performance. Our recent research analysed the plethora of voluntary standards and certifications available to battery materials producers. No common global or Australian standard has been adopted.

Smaller mining companies also struggle with the administrative complexities of sustainability reporting and management criteria. An agreed common language for reporting and management is needed. Only then can traceability solutions, such as the Global Battery Alliance’s blockchain-enabled “battery passport”, produce trustworthy and comparable results.

Let’s set the bar high

Our research identified the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) as one of the more rigorous standards. Its credibility is built on how it is governed. This involves six stakeholder groups: mining companies, purchasers, NGOs, affected communities, labour organisations and the finance sector.

There are still questions to be answered. How do practices in Australia measure up to the standard? And how can regulatory reform help to steer mining operations in the right direction?

A focus on environmental, social and governance practices in the Australian Critical Minerals Strategy, released last week, is a welcome first step.

Issues that must be front and centre include:

  • mining impacts on water supply
  • free, prior and informed consent from First Nations communities
  • integrated planning for climate change impacts such as extreme weather that may affect management of mine tailings
  • biodiversity protection
  • mine closure planning that integrates progressive rehabilitation of ecosystems
  • circular business practices to make the most of what we have.

As a leading mining nation, Australia is in a position to leverage its historical environmental leadership, show renewed responsibility and integrity, and lead by example. We can then help leave the planet in a shape that future generations will be proud to inherit.The Conversation


*Rusty Langdon, Senior Research Consultant, Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney and Elsa Dominish, Research Principal, Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

32 Comments

? Lithium and magnesium aren't transition metals...and graphite is carbon which isn't a metal at all!

Edit: Oops, looks like they meant "transitional minerals" as in transitioning to "clean energy".

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-022-00994-6 PDK you might be interested in that article.

I had just been staring at the periodic table...

 

Up
2

Australia mined 470 million tonnes of coal in 2020 , which is down from a peak of 500 million.

But lets worry about 40 million tonnes of minerals that are going to electric cars. 

And ignore the amount used in laptops , phones , toys etc , which are mostly thrown away now. increasing the amount recycled could probably provide enough for electric car batteries.

Up
2
  • "Australia Minerals Production was reported at 1,309,620,617.000 Metric Ton in Dec 2021"
  •  
Up
0

Relative yield of coal vs battery minerals is very different I would think.

Up
1

Fairly sure your basic analysis of the subject needs to be completely ignored here.

Up
2

Samm that’s the sort of cutting put down we value here, well done. 

Up
0

Thought-provoking article; timely.

solardb - two wrongs don't make a right, and a lesser wrong is still a wrong.

The reality is that all this extraction, needs fossil energy, and they've already acknowledged that what is needed, is more added mines than all the mines they have already. Which is a tacit way of saying it isn't going to happen - not in that timeframe, at least.

Their first-nation people probably have a legitimate claim to 'indigenous'; 40-50,000 years sort of counts as permanent. Our prior arrivals don't; there's five minutes between their arrival and Europeans.

Events, however, will wash this all away. Those EVs require bitumen roads - good luck with that. Bitumen roads - and EV production/distribution - require functioning financial systems. And they require growth - which the 'transition' will fall well short of.

Up
1

Just to get enough rare earth minerals out of the ground for one EV takes a D9 Caterpillar bulldozer one day moves 200 000kgs of dirt drinks 2500 litres of diesel. Is that taken into account when all these EV advocates run around telling ice vehicle owners how bad they are. By the way exposing dirt also releases carbon.

Up
2

Got a link to this amazing fact . Most lithium comes from water , by the way .

Up
2

Nickle Cobalt Magnesium all go into an EV battery granted not rare earth but still needs to be mined. 

Up
1

Yes , but wheres the link to this bulldozer taking all day to get enough metal for one battery.

Up
1

I don't operate a computer have no idea how to do a link and don't want too. You do your own research

Up
1

Don't say something in a public forum unless you're willing to defend your statements. You show the research, since you made the claim.

Up
3

True socialist then

Up
0

I tend to disregard the "facts" provided by people who can't be bothered to learn how to copy and paste a link

Up
2

Actually, none of those in my EV battery.  Lithium, Iron and Phosphate, and of course copper and aluminium for the wiring and casing.

Up
1

Rare earths are being phased out of most EV components, for pretty much this exact reason. Fuel cells e.g. the hydrogen vehicles we're being told are far superior than EVs, still require some pretty out there stuff in order to function. Are you sure you haven't got your talking points mixed up?

And yes, the emissions cycle for producing EVs must be one of the most analysed and critiqued processes on the planet. And guess what? Even discarding the improvements in LFP tech in the last few years, it's still a better deal from an emissions standpoint after about 60,000km. I'd imagine that figure would be a lot lower today.

Up
2

As a builder have been using cordless batteries/lithium etc for the last 15+ yrs long before they were put into cars as the only source of energy. And all manufacturers crowed about length of time and endurance Makita Dewalt Milwaukee and yeah all well and good for the first two yrs then they drop off charge quicker and don't last and after three to round yrs pretty much you have to replace them. Hence why the manufacturers only guarantee the skin not the battery. Yet every so often they will bring out the next best battery to re sell the idea. 

Up
1

Except most EVs do come with a battery warranty so I'm not sure what the point is here. 

Up
2

The point is after a certain number of years the warranty won't be valid anymore. Like the previous posters power drill scenario, the batteries will have a warranty up until what is either legal or what they determine to be a reasonable age/use.

 

Your EV's battery won't be replaced under a warranty unless there's a manufacturing defect or it doesn't hold charge with what is considered acceptable use.

Up
1

So... exactly like a warranty for a petrol-driven car then? 

Up
2

Batteries for cordless there is no warranty just brought a new framing gun the gun yep warranty but the two new batteries no warranty. But the point being even with all the tech into lithium batteries for cordless tools which has been around longer than full evs they don't hold a charge as long after a year or two. 

Up
1

Pity that EVs aren't power tools, and there are plenty of  Teslas that are on the road for 10years already with their original battery packs, on average they've only lost 12% of their capacity after 320,000kms. (https://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-model-s-x-battery-health-over-time)  Maybe because they have far superior battery management, and are sized much more appropriately for the load.  Cordless tools are designed to really push their batteries, which is why you always should go for the biggest battery option. A 5Ah battery running a skillsaw is working less than half as hard as a 2Ah battery, and it will last far longer.  Also, don't charge your batteries on a friday and leave them fully charged all weekend, chuck them on the charger monday morning then put them to use.

Up
1

60 000ks barely run in. My landcrusier had 22yrs done 950 000 ks. Mechanic just serviced it said that engine as good as the day it,was made. Pulled calves out cows cows our drains pulled trailers caravans hovercrafts firewood. So how many EVs would I have used to get that done. Also the town I am in at the moment is surrounded by ford's that streams not cars. All running at the moment high. Water over bonnet high how would an EV go thru that?

Up
2

Is someone holding a gun to your head and forcing you to buy one? Or telling you that EVs can do anything?

Up
1

Not holding a gun but pretty much every thing else had one saying the new tesla ute will out do anything else on the market and God forbide if you disagree.

Up
2

Do you want a medal or something?

Clearly all carmakers need to build cars for your cow-pulling, stream driving use case.

Up
0

Ask the guy in the coronandel with his new ev when the coromandel got hit by severe rain and he had to cross a flooded stream to get home. He won't touch another ev back to a ice vehicle. Plenty of roads flooded in North Island recently don't get stuck out in the rain. My points were to show that not all people buy 4wds to drop the kids off at the private school

Up
1

It wasn't an EV, it was a hybrid.

I could show you video of water over the bonnet of my Tesla in the Auckland anniversary weekend flooding as I drove home, no drama at all.   Wouldn't leave it parked like that, but driving through a flooded road section it was easier and safer than my ICE, which would have sucked in water  and hydrolocked most likely.

Up
1

World crude oil consumption is 100 million barrels per day.

World coal consumption is 8 billion tonnes a year.

How the F did we think we could get away with that ???

Mining 40 Million tonnes (if that's how much they end up mining), will take fossil fuels to achieve , but its like comparing jaywalking to murder..

 

 

Up
1

So please tell the green party this when miners look at NZ and its vast DOC land and want to look at the possibilities of rare earth cause the greens/forest and bird are the biggest hypocrites there is in this country

Up
2

Ah, no. Yes, the Green New Deal types are - misguided.

But they are several measures better than those who just rip, s--t and bust

while castigating them.

:)

Up
4