sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Why Russia pulled out of its grain deal with Ukraine, and what that means for the global food system

Economy / analysis
Why Russia pulled out of its grain deal with Ukraine, and what that means for the global food system
uk
The grain deal allowed Ukrainian corn and other products to reach ports in Lebanon and elsewhere. AP Photo/Hassan Ammar.

By Anna Nagurney*

The Russia-Ukraine grain deal that has been critical to keeping global food prices stable and preventing famine is currently in tatters. On July 17, 2023, Russia said it was pulling out of the year-old deal, which allowed shipments of grains and other foodstuffs to travel past the Russian naval blockade in the Black Sea. And to make matters worse, over the next two days Russia bombed the Ukrainian grain port of Odesa, destroying over 60,000 tons of grain.

As a result, food prices have surged, with the cost of wheat, corn and soybeans in Europe, the Middle East and elsewhere all skyrocketing.

So, what is the grain deal, and why is it so important to the global food supply chain?

Anna Nagurney is an expert on supply chains, including those involving perishable products like food, and is co-chair of the board of directors overseeing the Kyiv School of Economics in Ukraine. She explains how important Ukrainian grain is to feeding the world – and why the Black Sea is a vital route to getting it to people who need it.

What makes Ukraine such an important part of the global food supply chain?

Ukraine has been called the breadbasket of Europe and is a major supplier of wheat, barley, sunflower products and corn to Europe as well as to developing countries such as in the Middle East, Northern Africa and China.

More than 400 million people relied on foodstuffs from Ukraine before Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.

One key reason for that is Ukraine has approximately one-third of the world’s most fertile soil, which is known as chernozem, or black soil. And before the war, Ukraine was able to rely on its year-round access to ice-free harbors in the Black Sea to ship grains to nearby markets in the Middle East and Africa.

What happened when war broke out?

Even before the war, famine was increasing across the globe. Russia’s invasion made it a lot worse.

From 2019 to 2022, more than 122 million people were driven into hunger by a combination of the impacts of climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, the United Nations said in a recent report. Other researchers have suggested global hunger is the highest it’s been since at least the early 2000s.

From February to June 2022, at least 25 million tons of Ukrainian grain intended for global markets got trapped in Ukraine because of Russia’s naval blockade, causing food prices to jump.

How did the grain deal come about?

The U.N. and Turkey brokered what is officially known as the Black Sea Grain Deal with Ukraine and Russia on July 22, 2022.

The agreement allowed for the secure passage of agricultural products from Ukraine from three ports on the Black Sea, including its largest port, Odesa. While the original agreement was to last 120 days, it has been extended several times since.

Ukraine has exported more than 32 million tons of food products through the Black Sea since August 2022. The World Food Program, the world’s largest humanitarian agency, purchased 80% of its wheat from Ukraine. Ethiopia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Turkey have been the biggest recipients of humanitarian shipments.

The U.N. has estimated that the grain deal has reduced food prices by more than 23% since March 2022.

The amount of grain shipped per month had already been falling before the deal fell apart in July 2023, from a peak of 4.2 million metric tons in October to about 2 million tons in June. This is primarily because of slowdowns in the number of inspections Russians had been conducting before ships could exit the Black Sea.

Another problem generally is falling production. Ukraine is expected to produce 31% less wheat, barley, corn and other crops during the current season that it did before the war. And this estimate came before the destruction of a key Ukrainian dam flooded fields.

a man in military gear stands near the water and a big black ship docked
Odesa, which the Russians have attacked in recent days, is Ukraine’s largest port. AP Photo/David Goldman.

Why is the Black Sea so important for Ukrainian exports?

Colleagues at UMass Amherst and the Kyiv School of Economics and I published a study in May 2023 that showed just how vital the Black Sea ports are to ensuring Ukrainian grain gets out to the world. Before the war, 90% of Ukraine’s agricultural exports were transported on the Black Sea.

While Ukraine also ships its grain and other food over land through Europe, doing so costs a lot more and takes more time than sea exports. And transportation costs over land were rising because of the war as a result of mines, the destruction of agricultural infrastructure and other challenges.

Why did Russia say it’s pulling out of the deal?

Russia has threatened to exit the deal before, but each time it has chosen to stay in.

But on July 17, 2023, it said it’s unwilling to stay in the deal unless its demands are met to ship more of its own food and fertilizer. Over the following two days, it attacked Odesa with drones and missiles in one of the largest sustained assaults on the port. Russia also said it would deem any ship in the Black Sea bound for a Ukrainian port to be a legitimate military target.

This caused the price of critical commodities such as wheat and corn to soar and created vast uncertainty and global concern around hunger. Chicago wheat futures, a global benchmark, are up about 17% since Russia left the deal.

While Russia has extended the deal after previous threats, this time may be different. Russian strikes caused extensive damage to Odesa, which may severely limit Ukraine’s ability to export through the port in the future – deal or no deal.

I believe Russian leader Vladimir Putin is weaponizing food at a time of growing hunger. I only hope goodwill prevails and somehow Ukraine’s vital exports are allowed to continue.The Conversation


*Anna Nagurney, Professor and Eugene M. Isenberg Chair in Integrative Studies, UMass Amherst. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

33 Comments

Can you include in your article a section from the Russia perspective, ie their side of the deal wasn’t meet. Instead of getting your notes from bbc cnn propaganda dribble.

Up
6

they're writing for people who don't want to think and want to be told what to think and do

Up
6

Or they did touch on that, and you both missed  the last section.

 

Great job being loudly wrong :) 

Up
9

Yes, ‘touched’ on it is the operative word. No meaningful explanation. There’s always two sides to a dispute. Unfortunately the west always expresses their preferred narrative. 

Up
8

Did they provide a meaningful explanation of the Ukranian view? Or are you just a wee bit sensitive?

Up
0

There’s always two sides to a dispute. Unfortunately the west always expresses their preferred narrative. 

Everyone always expresses their preferred narrative.

Your problem seems to be that you're confusing there being two sides to a story with there having to be some sort of morally equivalent middle ground.

Russia is a failing state that's hell bent on taking anyone it can with them. You can't apply standard rationality when evaluating them.

Up
8

Like the Russian public you mean?

Up
0

> Can you include in your article a section from the Russia perspective

You mean like the pbs article she linked to that included a number of quotes from the Russian spokesperson?

I trust you're also the first to complain about Russian media not providing the Ukrainian perspective, like this lovely piece on the grain deal retaliation?
https://www.rt.com/russia/579962-ukraine-odessa-missile-strikes/

Up
9

Russia has no right to control/blockade those parts of the Black Sea and in my opinion has no right to make any demands at all in regards to grain exports of another country, just like it has no right to invade another country under false pretexts in the first place. The only right and obligation Russia should have in this scenario is to go back to Russia where it belongs and stay there.  Then it can attempt to broker trade deals from there (hopefully peacefully) instead of trying to force others into agreements through bloodshed and starvation. 
Just my 2 cents worth

 

Up
21

Do some research and educate yourself on how this dispute started before throwing 2 cents away.

Up
8

The apologist for murderers and thieves again shows his ignorance. Your little man Vlad is a psychopath burying his malicious little brain in a pile of fake self entitlement. What makes you people tick?

Up
14

I've done some research. It turns out it's bad to invade another country, and it's a crime to ethnically change the make-up of an area and then claim it as your own territory! 

Who knew. Not you, apparently. 

Up
2

Just like the yanks going into Iraq to get the weapons of mass destruction....

Up
6

"Just like the yanks going into Iraq to get the weapons of mass destruction...."

People were calling US out on that when US did it.  Now people (you included) should be calling Russia out on what it's doing.

Just because someone did something wrong in the past doesn't give others permission to do those same wrong things now. Be aware when you are engaging into a "whataboutism" argument. It's a logical fallacy widely used (some claim invented!) by the Soviet and now Russian propaganda. Don't fall for that faulty logic.
Something that's wrong is still wrong even if someone else did it in the past and got away with it.

 

Up
6

Pretty sure you'll find that the locals in Iraq prefer the Yanks to Islamic State and mass murderer Saddam Hussein. 

Up
0

Ultima Ratio Regum.

Up
1

Well yeah - like if they were so evil, why did they agree to the deal in the first place and extend many times?

Merchant shipping has a long history of being used as clandestine armament avenue for belligerents, and for that reason historically has been fair game.

Up
5

"Well yeah - like if they were so evil, why did they agree to the deal in the first place and extend many times?"

"evil" is still evil regardless of its degree. Your comment is probably only relevant to the conversation about how severely Russia should be punished.

 

Up
3

What a silly statement. I wonder what you would have said if they were to block ships sending dairy up north and threaten to use missiles to blow up any that pass without their permission.

I guess you'd be busy standing by the embassy begging for citizenship of a terrorist state that is then. 

Up
3

What a ridiculous silly comparison. 

Up
5

Your argument is silly and foolish

Up
1

-

Up
0

Yes, only if your brain has been eroded by propaganda to such a degree that you can no longer grasp basic logical concepts.

Up
0

don't tease the NPC's

Up
0

I hope the Ukrainians figure out a way to turn a Russian city or two into glass. Let their nationals experience this war in first person. 

Up
2

Yep. The Russians are true heroes, firing their missiles at civilians from places Ukraine can't touch. 

Up
2

Just imagine if a couple of well placed missiles landed in St Petersberg. I’d speculate Russia would somehow ignorantly be shocked

Up
0

Utter rubbish. The price of wheat is absolutely normal (within a 1 standard deviation range) by historic standards. If anything we're slightly under the median historic price:

https://www.gurufocus.com/economic_indicators/4555/inflation-adjusted-p…

The interesting story here should be the remarkable ability of famers to meet global demand even in a difficult economic environment. Think about how difficult it is to balance so many variable (diesel, fertilizer, interest rates etc.) and yet the market has managed surprisingly well.

Up
4

> The price of wheat is absolutely normal

not according to the Russians

Wheat prices soared on Monday following the announcement of Russia discontinuing its participation in the UN-facilitated arrangement for exporting Ukrainian grain, known as the Black Sea initiative, trading data showed.

August futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange rose 4.24% to $6.89 a bushel within minutes after the news broke.

https://www.rt.com/business/579833-wheat-prices-russia-grain-deal/

Up
0

Current price looks pretty surgey to me.  You source only has the price As of 2023-05-01

Wheat futures in the US rose for a third straight day to a three-week high of $7.3 per bushel on Thursday, following an 8.5% rally the day before, which was the biggest gain since 2012, as mounting geopolitical tensions threaten grain exports from Ukraine.

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/wheat

Up
0

It's actually trading at $285/t now at spot which is lower than the May price on that chart! This is a complete non-story, it is making a mountain out of a molehill.

The price of futures lifted as on Russian announcements as people wanted to secure contracts but even the futures market was only at about the same level as this time last year.

The amazing thing is that the USD spot price of wheat now is the same as 2007. Wheat is beating inflation, this is what improving productivity looks like:

https://www.aegic.org.au/declining-real-prices-of-grains-causes-and-imp…

Spend your time worrying about things that are getting more expensive.

Up
1

Seems the price of wheat has been driving inflation since 2017. 

https://www.macrotrends.net/2534/wheat-prices-historical-chart-data

Up
0

comparing to 2007?  talk about cherry picking your data, how about July 2006, $300 vs $730 today.

Up
0