sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

China reserves rise; Japan leading index rises; Singapore retail soft; Yen surges; EU growth picks up; German bund yields rise; copper hits record high; UST 10yr at 4.80%; gold and oil rise; NZ$1 = 58.8 USc; TWI-5 = 62

Economy / news
China reserves rise; Japan leading index rises; Singapore retail soft; Yen surges; EU growth picks up; German bund yields rise; copper hits record high; UST 10yr at 4.80%; gold and oil rise; NZ$1 = 58.8 USc; TWI-5 = 62
breakfast

Here's our summary of key economic events overnight that affect New Zealand, with news global interest rates are still moving higher. And that is particularly true for Australian benchmark bonds. Money and commodities are transitioning somewhere, but it is not clear to where just yet.

But first, it is a public holiday in the US (Labor Day) with all their financial markets closed. Given their size, this has meant all other international markets are running at lower levels and in a hesitant mode. But some key shifts are not waiting for the Americans to return.

In China, their August foreign exchange reserves were reported overnight and they rose to US$3.44 tln, the second highest level ever but not quite hitting their record May result. That puts them +3.6% higher than year-ago levels. Of note is that they added another +20 tonnes of gold to their reserves in the month, which makes the calendar year increase now almost +80 tonnes. Gold now makes up 10.2% of their overall reserves, although that is down from 11% at the start of 2026.

And China announced major funding into eight large SOE institutions to enable them to lend more. It is injecting ¥300 bln (NZ$75 bln) in 'recapitalisation' the most it has done like this in 20 years. The funds will come from Ministry of Finance 'special bonds'. It is the latest and unlikely to be the last of economic support measures to 'reinvigorate' their economy.

Japan's July leading index rose to its highest since January 2014 although the June level was revised down. The July level was also slightly below analyst's expectations despite the gain. Rising job offers and consumer sentiment were among the factors behind the rise.

Singapore reported that its July retail sales were softer than expected. They were up by +1.5% from a year ago, the softest rise since May 2025 and slowing from a +4% increase in June.

The EU reported a better rise in economic activity. The EU economy expanded +1.4% in Q2-2026 in its updated result, up from +1.0% in the previous estimate and much better than the +0.9% growth recorded in Q1-2026. The gain was driven by stronger growth in household spending and gross fixed capital formation, with exports also rebounded sharply. Euro area expansion came in slightly less than the overall EU levels.

However German industrial production recorded a sharp and unexpected -1.1% fall in July, to now be -1.6% lower than year ago levels. (The Germans, as usual, report their data on an inflation-adjusted basis unlike many other countries.) The weakness there was from energy-intensive industries, and that includes car manufacturing.

In a reaction to the Saxony state election results, the German stock exchange dipped, and the 10yr German Bund yields rose to their highest since 2010.

But they weren't the only bond yields to rise. The Australian 10 year bond yields rose to 5.22% and their highest since 2011. (Of course this has little to do with a German state election.)

And the Japanese yen surged against the US dollar overnight, up to the 154 range as growing speculation over faster-than-expected Bank of Japan rate increases combined with renewed possibility of another round of currency intervention by the Japanese authorities drove the moves.

We should also probably note that the copper price jumped to US$14,513/tonne on the LME, a record high.

The UST 10yr yield is now just on 4.80%, up +2 bps from yesterday at this time. The 30 year yield is still at 5.25%, unchanged. The key 2-10 yield curve is now at +42 bps (up +1 bp). Their 1-5 curve is now at +42 bps (unchanged) and the 3 mth-10yr curve is at +108 bps (+1 bp). The China 10 year bond rate is holding at 1.68%. The Japanese 10 year bond yield is now at 2.91%, unchanged as well. The Australian 10 year bond yield starts today at 5.22%, up +7 bps from yesterday. The NZ Government 10 year bond rate is now at 4.81%, down -1 bp.

Wall street is closed today for their Labor Day holiday. Overnight European markets were mixed between Frankfurt's -0.2% dip and Paris's +0.3% firming. Yesterday Tokyo closed up +2.1%. Hong Kong was down -0.9% while Shanghai firmed a minor +0.1%. Singapore ended down -0.2%. The ASX200 ended its Monday trade up +0.1%. The NZX50 ended down -0.2%.

The price of gold is now at US$4407/oz, and down -US$26 from yesterday at this time. Silver is little-changed at just on US$66/oz.

Oil prices are up +US$1 at just over US$92.50/bbl in the US, while the international Brent price is just under US$97.50/bbl. Hormuz transits have basically stopped with just five ships exiting over the past 24 hours, and no tankers (0 dark with transponders off) and seven entering for new loads (0 dark). The Red Sea activity is marginally higher than yesterday with about 20 each way at the Yemen chokepoint.

The Kiwi dollar is little-changed from yesterday, still just on 58.8 USc . Against the Aussie we are down -20 bps at 81.4 AUc. Against the euro we are holding at 50.6 euro cents. That all means our TWI-5 starts today at just over 62, down -10 bps from yesterday.

The bitcoin price starts today at US$79,194 and down -0.7 from yesterday at this time. Volatility over the past 24 hours has been modest at just under +/-1.1%.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: RBNZ
Source: CoinDesk

The easiest place to stay up with event risk is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

26 Comments

"...massive Wall Street stock valuations are already "over-stretched", and as interest rates move up and those assets are heavily repriced down, "essentially that is the process by which all crises start, and that is the trajectory we are on".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-08/bond-markets-interest-rates-mounting-risk-global-economic-crisis/107123348

 

Up
7

1987 to 2008 = 21. 2008 to 2026 = 18. Cycle coming around a bit early then? Mind you there is something of a rather large catalyst presently in the big white house.

Up
2

Perhaps the cycle speeding up is also related to an increasingly interconnected world, automated trading etc...now with AI enhancements?

Up
5

Growth is exponential.

The planet is a static playing-field. 

Of course it would speed up. 

Up
2

All the idiots in power thought the chief idiot was untouchable, and American power in the world was sacrosanct. Well the chief idiot might be untouchable, but American power (and influence) only exists with the support and agreement of the rest of the world. So when the chief idiot and his horde runs rough shod over all their past friends, disrespects every single one of them, they're going to find all those friends will find ways to not be reliant and dependant on the US and therefore no longer having to be their friend. 

The chief idiot has already learned that friends don't have to stand by you when you've been stupid and put the world at risk. Doubling down isn't going to help. That pending collapse in the US will affect the entire world. What will the US do then?

Up
7

Another comment from the link above:

"...30 per cent of US government debt is owned by foreign financial institutions, governments, and central banks.

"They live on the kindness of strangers,"

Up
5

Nations are becoming, for want of a better euphemism, introverted and increasingly so. The regional election outcome in Germany is yet another example. It is also something of a tilt back against globalisation with some realisation of the consequences of enriching the elite at home by the exploitation of the poor abroad.

Up
5

I suggest you're conflating some things Foxy. Globalisation was an American plan (pushed by Milton Friedman as part of his Free Market theory) to enrich American corporations. Other companies around the world jumped on that bandwagon without understanding the ramifications and consequences. Trump has made them all sit up and examine what they've been doing and what it means. Social support networks need healthy economies to  support them, which requires industries to employ people and provide the indirect health benefits that active involvement in communities provides. Reality is slapping most of the world who had been in denial, full in the face.

Up
0

I think the German election, the rise of the far right, is a direct result of drinking this toxic neolib system, which has channelled the benefits increasingly to the few.   Let’s look at something that made some news last week, the pay of Xeros CEO.   There is no planet that this level of pay makes sense.  So, yes, a new wave will sweep this away, change is coming.  

Up
4

The AfD is apparently so "far right" that their leader is a European lesbian with a Sri Lankan partner. Do you also refer to the Greens, TPM & TOP as "far left"?

Up
5

Good catch by you!   Lazy language by me!

Up
1

I think you're both right. 

Growth is exponential - so globalism (extraction/consumption/discarding) was always going to be the end-game scale-wise. 

And the neolibs sought to commandeer - I've long though that was because of the Limits pressure, but seek to commandeer they did. 

 

Up
2

The evidence is that global trade is a net economic benefit for the majority of people.

"The [Elephant graph] chart became a central tool for discussing the effects of globalization. It suggests that global trade helped lift millions out of poverty in emerging nations while simultaneously making the world's richest individuals much wealthier. At the same time, it highlighted how everyday workers in wealthy Western nations felt left behind economically."

https://share.google/aimode/rpPhHKVlNPSuvEEXa

 

Up
1

FFS

Are we still away back there? 

That worked as we dug into a finite planet - all that 'lifting out of poverty'. It really meant 'being able to extract, consume and discard more, faster'. 

The workers actually got lifted - from say 1900-1970. Thereafter, left further and further behind. And more and more of them. 

Oh - and 'wealthy' should include things like 40 trillion of debt... and a growing entropy bill. Are they really? 

Up
2

I was expecting your usual "gospel according to PDK" comment.

The millions who benefited, also their children had a better chance to live past infancy & all subsequently had better lives than they would have otherwise, thereby offering more opportunities to their descendants - would likely not share your opinion.

I spent over 3 decades working in multinational companies since the 1980s & have seen & heard 1st hand the multiple improvements in many peoples lives over that time thanks to those globalisation opportunities.

Up
7

But if it was based upon draw-down of finite and rate-limited resources, it was

drumroll

TEMPORARY. 

Is it so hard?

Up
3

In more simple technological times & social structures people have been here before, facing "finite & rate-limited resources" of various severity. Despite the blinkered  limitations of current world leaders I've a bit more faith in the mass of human wisdom & ingenuity to find a way through when faced with failure not being an option.

Up
3

Alright, here's the question; is "global trade" the same as the 'Globalisation' applied under the free market model? 

I suggest not. Corporations exported jobs when they shifted manufacturing offshore to cut human costs rather than improve productivity. They were just looking at more profits. That was 'globalisation'. "Global Trade" is where a country produces goods and exports them to another country. The overlap is when Apple makes stuff in Mexico or Viet Nam and brings it back into the US with a "Made in America" label on it. Which is it? 

The bigger question is what is the cost to an economy when jobs are exported? A case in point might be F&P whiteware. Purchased by Haier in China and as a consequence manufactured in China. The loss of all those jobs in East Tamaki - what did that cost the country? A lost more that the short term profit to the share holders and taxes from that I'd suggest.

Yes in some third world, and perhaps even second world nations there may have been some uplift in economic gain, but was it worth it?

Up
2

"What will the US do then?"

The chief idiot will blame the rest of the world, of course.

Up
2

No doubt he'll try. Not sure many will listen.

The cost to America as a result of Trump and his cronies (the GOP) and his family is going to be huge. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump and the GOP lose all their power in the next set of elections, that the Trump business interests and family are no longer welcome in a lot of places around the world. 

Up
1

50/50 chance he invalidates those.

And don't take them as foregone anyway, we have a wider perspective and a different media.  

Up
2

‘they're going to find all those friends will find ways to not be reliant and dependant on the US’

Isn’t that a good thing? The US has been bankrupting itself (in deficit spending) trying to provide global security for other countries unwilling to spend enough on their own defence. ‘Chief idiot’ is getting other nations to take responsibility for their own defence, instead of expecting the US taxpayer to fund the security of citizens on the opposite side of the world who have been unwilling to take responsibility for themselves. 

I don’t see this as a bad thing. Seems pretty commonsense after decades of other nations freeloading off the productivity and taxation of US citizens. Eg why should the US spend the most on NATO defence when the US is the least at risk? Those nations closest to the front should be most concerned and giving up the most in terms of % of GDP to defend themselves if they think they are most at risk of attack by a foreign enemy. Why should a farmer in Texas spend more on defending Ukrainians (or Germans or any other European nation) than the Ukrainians (or other European tax payer) themselves? 

What has been happening over previous decades, like many other things, has been completely unsustainable and always likely to fall apart Ike this. 

Up
2

Close. It was the dominant hegemony - the chief thug. As such, a lot of satellite nations decided to align. 

When you're the paramount resource-sucker, I'm not sure it's fair to suggest others aren't 'pulling their weight'. 

Up
3

Other nations should then refuse to buy US bonds if they dislike the US and their policies - then they (the US) can no longer deficit spend on military in the same capacity to protect the interests of other nations. It’s a catch-22. How many nations that want global security backed by the US refuse to buy US bonds because they dislike their foreign policy?

Note - Dalio talks about this well in the ‘Changing World Order’. As soon as other nations refuse to buy US bonds then their ability deficit spend on military (and other things) is reduced and thus their reign as global hegemony comes to an end. It could happen in the coming decades. 

It’s all about the bond market - hence why people should take a close interest what is happening right now with interest rates and some nations reducing their holding of US bonds. 

Up
3

Isn't that starting to happen now?

The US manipulated itself to the top of the hegemony, and from there built it's Military Industrial Complex which made billions exporting US arms to the world. They were the worlds largest arms exporter. Now they are complaining because the world is dependent on them for their defence? That's exactly the result they wanted to achieve.

Up
2

Mainstream political parties need to up their game...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3pHY-_jcBs

Up
1