AMP agrees to sell NZ and Aust life insurance businesses for A$3.3 billion; Plans to float its NZ wealth management (including KiwiSaver) and advice business on the share market

AMP has agreed to sell its New Zealand and Australian life insurance businesses for A$3.3 billion to a company that specialises in buying insurers undergoing restructures.

It has also announced its intention to divest from its New Zealand wealth management (including KiwiSaver) and advice businesses via an initial public offering (IPO).

AMP joins ANZ and CBA by flogging life insurance

The sale agreement will see Resolution Life acquire AMP Life by the second half of 2019, subject to regulatory approvals.

About 200,000 New Zealand life insurance policies will trade hands in the process. 

Resolution Life, which has operations in the US, UK and Bermuda, has committed nearly US$14 billion of equity to acquire 27 life insurance companies since 2003.

AMP’s acting CEO, Mike Wilkens, says the sale agreement will simplify the group’s portfolios and free up capital.

With talk of a sale having circulated for some time, it will also provide shareholders with certainty.

Wilkens expects AMP’s staff to “largely transfer with the sold businesses”.

AMP says the value of the sale equates to about 82% of the “pro forma embedded value” of the businesses as at June 2018.

The agreement sees Resolution Life assume risk and profits of the businesses going back to July 1, 2018.

Speaking to interest.co.nz, AMP New Zealand managing director, Blair Vernon, explains this means Resolution Life will take on the economic risk of the businesses until the sale goes through.

The agreement sees AMP join the likes of ANZ and CBA, which recently sold their life insurance businesses in New Zealand – OnePath Life and Sovereign – to insurance companies Cigna and AIA.

Vernon says the trend reflects the fact that "globally there is a more efficient capital pool available to back insurance obligations than necessarily having them embedded in banks and wealth management companies". 

"There is also a level of specialisation in terms of running insurance businesses that I think there's a global skill set in."

Asked about the extent to which “regulatory risk” has prompted banks and wealth management firms to ditch their life insurance businesses, Vernon says: "We don't think that the regulatory risk attached to insurance, or the advice on insurance in New Zealand, is a particular issue...

"We've been uncompromising in our approach to good conduct."

Resolution Life's chairman, Clive Cowdery, says the sale agreement is consistent with Resolution’s strategy to grow beyond its traditional markets in Europe and the US.

He sees scope for “further consolidation in the Australian life market”.

For more on the flurry of life insurance business sales in recent times, see this piece

AMP NZ boss keen to see float happen on NZX

Turning to AMP announcing its intention to float its advice and wealth management (including KiwiSaver) business on the stock exchange in 2019, the idea is for this to create a standalone New Zealand business.  

Note AMP is the country's fourth largest KiwiSaver and retail funds provider. 

While AMP is dual-listed on the New Zealand and Australian stock exchanges, it can't at this stage confirm the platform(s) on which the IPO will take place.

However Vernon says: “One could naturally assume there’s an NZX focus, but the extent to which it is beyond that will be subject to market conditions and the advisors acting for us…

“From a New Zealand point of view, I’m pretty keen to make sure that it’s a successful activity locally.”

The IPO is also subject to regulatory approvals.

AMP says its New Zealand wealth management and advice business has 2018 financial year pro forma operating earnings of about A$40 million on a standalone basis. 

Vernon assures an IPO won’t impact AMP’s KiwiSaver and other investment funds.

He says there’s no need for AMP customers to take any action or be alarmed by anything.

“Funds invested in AMP New Zealand superannuation and managed investment products are held on behalf of investors by an independent Supervisor licensed and overseen by the Financial Markets Authority, and that Supervisor provides oversight of the Manager who must act in the best interests of members,” AMP explains.

AMP customers can see this page for more information.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment or click on the "Register" link below a comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.

7 Comments

I've been with AMP Life for nearly 50 years now. Over that time I have paid them around $150,000 in today's money and in return they have fixed up my vehicles to the tune of $15-20,000 (including windscreens). Another of life's little 'sigh' moments, a bit like working out how much interest you've paid the bank manager on your mortgages over the years. The price of life!

AMP have also been the first financial provider to call a bigger crash in Australian property prices as well. 20% down by 2020. Some of the others are already stuck at 5-10% when Sydney is already down over 7% those predictions spark of lunacy which is why ANZ and Westpac 'em full of interest only' have both fallen today -2.55% and -1.05% and both sitting below 2 year lows....

https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/australian-economy/amp-downgrade...

Any financial institution would never report "worst case" forecasts related to their bread and butter. Wouldn't make any sense to do so. For the Aussie economy, housing is the primary driver.

I wondered why AMPs shareprice had taken such a kicking.

".. life insurance is pretty low risk .... it’d still be a valuable asset, not worthy of the observed (25%!) share market pummelling. That they’re selling it makes me think that they’re trying to raise liquidity for other reasons.

It’s the wealth insurance I’m more interested in. It appears to be the minor story (by $ value), but is it actually an AIG in hiding? Are they trying to offload a timebomb before anyone wises up? Buyer beware."
(comment from Australia)

BW that was the smartest comment I’ve ever read from you
Selling a time bomb buyer beware might be an omen