Researchers from Treasury have looked at the possibility of a government spending cap by introducing a rolling three year target for core Crown expenses.
In a working paper released today, Tracy Mears, Gary Blick, Tim Hampton and John Janssen of Treasury said such a cap could be effective, but also complex.
The government decided this year not to implement a spending cap, although it did limit new expenditure to NZ$1.1 billion in its annual operating allowance.
Your views? Should government introduce a cap to limit its spending?
Here are the concluding remarks from the paper:
New Zealand’s existing fiscal framework – centred on the principles embedded in the Public Finance Act – contributed to New Zealand entering the economic recession of 2008-2009 with historically and internationally low levels of public debt. However, the focus on debt did not prevent Government spending increasing as a percent of GDP. This paper considered whether a spending cap would be a useful addition to the fiscal tool kit.
To be effective, a spending cap would need to have fitted into the existing Fiscal Management Approach. The proposal considered in this paper entailed a rolling threeyear nominal target for core Crown expenses, as set by the government. It was designed to have a range of exclusions, such as unemployment benefit expense – due to their cyclical nature. In addition, there would have been a margin to accommodate unexpected changes in forecast expenses.
The benefits of the proposed spending cap are that it would have reinforced the commitment to the existing limit on new initiatives under the Operating Allowance and placed an indicative limit on changes to forecast expenses that go through the Baseline Update process. However, the complexity of the proposal would have led to significant communication challenges, potentially with some confusion about how it would operate alongside the existing system.
The review of the Fiscal Management Approach, signalled in Budget 2010, could assess whether more of the changes to forecast expenses should be “counted” against the Operating Allowance. Ideally, future arrangements will also allow the fiscal pressures associated with the rising profile of some categories of demand-driven expenses (e.g. New Zealand Superannuation, some categories of welfare benefits) to be more clearly identified and compared at the same time as decisions are being made around new spending initiatives. A simple and transparent approach will ensure that the underlying trade-offs around current policy settings, and their long-term fiscal effects, are visible. This will contribute to New Zealand having a sustainable fiscal position and being well-placed to respond to long-term fiscal challenges.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.