Commerce Minister Simon Power announces financial summit to crack down on loan sharks, make borrowers understand the true cost of debt

Commerce Minister Simon Power announces financial summit to crack down on loan sharks, make borrowers understand the true cost of debt

By Amanda Morrall

Consumer credit law in New Zealand could face a regulatory revamp under a new campaign to crack down on "loan sharks" and other irresponsible money lenders "preying'' on the country's most unwary and vulnerable citizens, Commerce Minister Simon Power says.

Speaking at a financial literacy event in Wellington, Power announced a summit to be held in August in Auckland that would look closely at ways to tackle New Zealanders' debt problem, particularly those who did not fully understand the true cost of, and implications of, borrowing.

Power, whose lengthy list of parliamentary duties includes a new mandate as Consumer Affairs Minister, said he planned to pay more than lip service to the problem.

But Labour Party Leader Phil Goff said legislation should be passed now, rather than holding "talk-fests" on the issue. Labour had introduced a Bill to Parliament last year for controling loan sharks, which was voted down by the National Party. Goff said Labour now planned to reintroduce the Bill.

Tackle those who prey

Power said while many lenders were "responsible, transparent and open" others deliberately preyed on a population that could least afford to borrow at exorbitant rates of interest.

"There are gaps in the system that allow the unscrupulous to take advantage of the unwary in these tough economic times. Preying on vulnerable people by loan sharks has to stop,'' said Power.

Power's move comes after the Government voted down Labour MP Carol Beaumont’s Credit Reforms (Responsible Lending) Bill last July which would have regulated loan sharks and capped the interest rates they charge.

Retirement Commissioner Diana Crossan, a key force in promoting financial literacy in New Zealand, welcomed Power's announcement.

Power said the upcoming summit, which would involve a cross-section of financial sector participants, was meant to achieve three objectives:

1)  the development of an “action plan” with initiatives to help vulnerable people trapped in a debt spiral caused by lack of financial literacy, consumer choice, and high compounding interest.

2)  to send a message to all financial sector providers “from the bigger and more mainstream ones to the small, third-tier ones" that they need to practice and commit to responsible lending and responsible consumer debt management.

3)  to determine a clear direction about how the Government can best contribute to improving the financial literacy of all New Zealanders.

Power said the Credits Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (known as the "triple C") could be directly affected as that piece of legislation is currently the main provision for disclosure surrounding the terms and conditions of borrowing money.

Banking ombudsman Deborah Battell, a participant at Tuesday's financial literacy conference, questioned Power about the Government's true "appetite" for tackling debt particularly as the Triple C legislation in its current form took such a long time to draft and implement.

Power dismissed any suggestions he was less than committed to making meaningful changes.

"Legislation on the lending side remains remarkably undercooked,'' he said.

"While the framework is reasonably solid, more work needs to be done in terms of real disclosure. The notion that funds might be available at 8% a day is a notion that will be lost unless skills are improved to the point where people can understand fully the terms of a contract they’re entering into.''

The upcoming summit is slated to be held Aug.11 in Auckland.

'We tried, but you voted against it'

Speaking to journalists in Parliament this morning, Labour Leader Phil Goff said Labour had looked to tackle the issue, but it's Credit Reforms Bill had been voted down last year.

“We don’t want summits, we don’t want talk-fests, we want a piece of legislation that sets a maximum [interest] rate so that loan sharks have to lend below that level, and legislation that says they can’t lend knowing that people can’t afford to repay," Goff said.

“We need legislation on this now. People are being ripped off, they’re losing their money – those that can least afford it – they’re losing their possessions, there should be protection under law. No more talking, let’s get some action,” he said.

Labour had its Bill before Parliament last year on the issue, which it would be seeking to reintroduce.

“It might not have been perfect, but it was a good basis for further discussion before the Select Committee. National voted against it," Goff said.

"I’d urge National to take the interests of low income people being ripped off by loan sharks into account and supporting the legislation to provide reasonable protection," he said.

(Updates with Phil Goff comments)

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

Updated with comments from Goff

"I’d urge National to take the interests of low income people being ripped off by loan sharks into account and supporting the legislation to provide reasonable protection,"

National have always cared about low income people.

While I understand the need to protect vulnerable in society (e.g. pushy rogue salespeople selling overpriced goods to the elderly).  However we should not lose sight that in order to take out a loan there is effort required (nobody is forced to take out a loan at a high interest rate, the individual has to approach the loan company).  Secondly loans fund something, something the individual wants now or has committed to in the past.

We do have to be a careful we do not put so much regulation in place that it encourages the general public to become stupid.

The general public should have the fundamental right to make a choice, some will make a good choice some will make a bad choice but everyone has the opportunity to learn.  Has anyone ever put a bet on a horse, sport team and though they’ll be better off when they win.  When they lose, they learn about risk – and that lesson they have leaned may have saved them from throwing their life savings in to say a finance company, overpriced property etc.  Society would be worse off if people are not allowed to make choices.

Also on the point of effort is required to take out a loan - libraries are free, anyone can go to a library pick up a book that help them with financial literacy.  Better still they could learn everything they need to know from ...


Yeah, if only Muldoon was still running things.

So now GE will adjust their advertising in line with new ethics: "12 months interest free - but after that we charge 27%. . Also GE will send statements to personal loan holders rather than current practice of "Let's setup the Directdebit, and then charge them for their audacity to request a statement"

How can the Government cap interest rates when the CCCFA requires lenders to cover all operating costs of their business into the Interest Rate.

A short term lender has costs, Rent, Marketing, Legal, Staff, Interest, Overheads oh and almost forgot - fraud and non payers...these costs under the CCCFA Law MUST be recovered ONLY via the Interest Rate.

It is the current law that "makes" Interest rates over a few weeks look high - when in fact the "interest rate" cost of service is high because this is the only mechanisim left to recover the operating costs of the business per the requirements of the CCCFA

To restrict the interest rate on short term lenders puts them our of business....End of story!!

It stops a perceved problem but resticts a valuable (when used correctly) service for tens of thousands of people who use the service to help them out from time to time. Trust me they will find ways of getting the cash they need - but I think we will learn it is far better to allow this in a regulated enviroment that an unregulated black market.

Why should many suffer to protect a few?

If we are going to shut this industry down because "some" people make bad decisions and borrow when they could not afford to repay then let's shut down Bars and protect the drunks and lets shut down fast food shops and protect the fatties and let's stop selling smokes and let's all earn the same wage no matter how hard we work.


The new laws also now require all lenders to be registered - there is a complaints process. The Laws require a ton of information to be provided to the consumer.


So the decision is - do you want people to have a service that allows them to get cash in an emergency or not - do you want people to buy a beer or glass of wine when they want or not - do you want people to be able to eat fast food when they want or you want a free world or a world where we are told what we earn, when and what we eat, when to get up and when to go to bed.


Grow up New Zealand.